-
Risk-Free Bidding in Complement-Free Combinatorial Auctions
Authors:
Vishnu V. Narayan,
Gautam Rayaprolu,
Adrian Vetta
Abstract:
We study risk-free bidding strategies in combinatorial auctions with incomplete information. Specifically, what is the maximum profit that a complement-free (subadditive) bidder can guarantee in a multi-item combinatorial auction? Suppose there are $n$ bidders and $B_i$ is the value that bidder $i$ has for the entire set of items. We study the above problem from the perspective of the first bidder…
▽ More
We study risk-free bidding strategies in combinatorial auctions with incomplete information. Specifically, what is the maximum profit that a complement-free (subadditive) bidder can guarantee in a multi-item combinatorial auction? Suppose there are $n$ bidders and $B_i$ is the value that bidder $i$ has for the entire set of items. We study the above problem from the perspective of the first bidder, Bidder~1. In this setting, the worst case profit guarantees arise in a duopsony, that is when $n=2$, so this problem then corresponds to playing an auction against a budgeted adversary with budget $B_2$. We present worst-case guarantees for two simple and widely-studied combinatorial auctions, namely, the sequential and simultaneous auctions, for both the first-price and second-price case. In the general case of distinct items, our main results are for the class of {\em fractionally subadditive} (XOS) bidders, where we show that for both first-price and second-price sequential auctions Bidder~$1$ has a strategy that guarantees a profit of at least $(\sqrt{B_1}-\sqrt{B_2})^2$ when $B_2 \leq B_1$, and this bound is tight. More profitable guarantees can be obtained for simultaneous auctions, where in the first-price case, Bidder~$1$ has a strategy that guarantees a profit of at least $\frac{(B_1-B_2)^2}{2B_1}$, and in the second-price case, a bound of $B_1-B_2$ is achievable. We also consider the special case of sequential auctions with identical items, for which we provide tight guarantees for bidders with subadditive valuations.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Improving performance of logical qubits by parameter tuning and topology compensation
Authors:
Jack Raymond,
Ndiamé Ndiaye,
Gautam Rayaprolu,
Andrew King
Abstract:
Optimization or sampling of arbitrary pairwise Ising models, in a quantum annealing protocol of constrained interaction topology, can be enabled by a minor-embedding procedure. The logical problem of interest is transformed to a physical (device programmable) problem, where one binary variable is represented by a logical qubit consisting of multiple physical qubits. In this paper we discuss tuning…
▽ More
Optimization or sampling of arbitrary pairwise Ising models, in a quantum annealing protocol of constrained interaction topology, can be enabled by a minor-embedding procedure. The logical problem of interest is transformed to a physical (device programmable) problem, where one binary variable is represented by a logical qubit consisting of multiple physical qubits. In this paper we discuss tuning of this transformation for the cases of clique, biclique, and cubic lattice problems on the D-Wave 2000Q quantum computer. We demonstrate parameter tuning protocols in spin glasses and channel communication problems, focusing on anneal duration, chain strength, and map** from the result on physical qubits back to the logical space. Inhomogeneities in effective coupling strength arising from minor-embedding are shown to be mitigated by an efficient reweighting of programmed couplings, accounting for logical qubit topology.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2020; v1 submitted 8 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Pricing Policies for Selling Indivisible Storable Goods to Strategic Consumers
Authors:
Gerardo Berbeglia,
Gautam Rayaprolu,
Adrian Vetta
Abstract:
We study the dynamic pricing problem faced by a monopolistic retailer who sells a storable product to forward-looking consumers. In this framework, the two major pricing policies (or mechanisms) studied in the literature are the preannounced (commitment) pricing policy and the contingent (threat or history dependent) pricing policy. We analyse and compare these pricing policies in the setting wher…
▽ More
We study the dynamic pricing problem faced by a monopolistic retailer who sells a storable product to forward-looking consumers. In this framework, the two major pricing policies (or mechanisms) studied in the literature are the preannounced (commitment) pricing policy and the contingent (threat or history dependent) pricing policy. We analyse and compare these pricing policies in the setting where the good can be purchased along a finite time horizon in indivisible atomic quantities. First, we show that, given linear storage costs, the retailer can compute an optimal preannounced pricing policy in polynomial time by solving a dynamic program. Moreover, under such a policy, we show that consumers do not need to store units in order to anticipate price rises. Second, under the contingent pricing policy rather than the preannounced pricing mechanism, (i) prices could be lower, (ii) retailer revenues could be higher, and (iii) consumer surplus could be higher. This result is surprising, in that these three facts are in complete contrast to the case of a retailer selling divisible storable goods Dudine et al. (2006). Third, we quantify exactly how much more profitable a contingent policy could be with respect to a preannounced policy. Specifically, for a market with $N$ consumers, a contingent policy can produce a multiplicative factor of $Ω(\log N)$ more revenues than a preannounced policy, and this bound is tight.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2018; v1 submitted 24 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
