Dosimetric characterization of single- and dual-port temporary tissue expanders for postmastectomy radiotherapy using Monte Carlo methods
Authors:
Jose Ramos-Méndez,
Catherine Park,
Manju Sharma
Abstract:
Purpose: The aim of this work was, a) to assess two treatment planning strategies for accounting CT-artifacts introduced by temporary tissue-expanders(TTEs); b) to evaluate the dosimetric impact of two commercially available and one novel TTE. MethodsThe CT artifacts were managed using two strategies. 1) Identifying the metal in the RayStation treatment planning software (TPS) using image window l…
▽ More
Purpose: The aim of this work was, a) to assess two treatment planning strategies for accounting CT-artifacts introduced by temporary tissue-expanders(TTEs); b) to evaluate the dosimetric impact of two commercially available and one novel TTE. MethodsThe CT artifacts were managed using two strategies. 1) Identifying the metal in the RayStation treatment planning software (TPS) using image window level adjustments, delineate a contour enclosing the artifact, and setting the density of the surrounding voxels to unity (RS1). 2) Registering a geometry template with dimensions and materials from the TTEs (RS2). Both strategies were compared for DermaSpan, AlloX2, and AlloX2-Pro TTEs using Collapsed-Cone-Convolution (CCC) in RayStation TPS, Monte Carlo simulations (MC) using TOPAS, and films. Wax slab phantoms with TTEs and breast phantoms with TTEs balloons were made and irradiated with a 6 MV AP beam and partial arc, respectively. Results: For the wax slab phantoms, the dose differences between RS1 and RS2 were 0.5% for DermaSpan and AlloX2 but 3% for AlloX2-Pro. From TOPAS simulations of RS2, the impact in dose distributions caused by the magnet attenuation was (6.4+-0.4)%, (4.9+-0.7)%, and (2.0+-0.9)% for DermaSpan, AlloX2, and AlloX2-Pro. With breast phantoms, maximum differences in DVH parameters between RS1 and RS2 were as follows. For AlloX2 at the posterior region: (2.1+-1.0)%, (1.9+-1.0)% and (1.4+-1.0)% for D1, D10, and average dose, respectively. For AlloX2-Pro at the anterior region (-1.0+-1.0)%, (-0.6+-1.0)% and (-0.6+-1.0)% for D1, D10 and average dose, respectively. The impact in D10 caused by the magnet was at most (5.5+-1.0)% and (-0.8+-1.0)% for AlloX2 and AlloX2-Pro, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that the highest differences with respect to measurements occurred with RS1 and can be mitigated if a template with the actual port geometry and materials is used.
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
A new Standard DNA damage (SDD) data format
Authors:
J. Schuemann,
A. McNamara,
J. W. Warmenhoven,
N. T. Henthorn,
K. Kirkby,
M. J. Merchant,
S. Ingram,
H. Paganetti,
KD. Held,
J. Ramos-Mendez,
B. Faddegon,
J. Perl,
D. Goodhead,
I. Plante,
H. Rabus,
H. Nettelbeck,
W. Friedland,
P. Kundrat,
A. Ottolenghi,
G. Baiocco,
S. Barbieri,
M. Dingfelder,
S. Incerti,
C. Villagrasa,
M. Bueno
, et al. (26 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Our understanding of radiation induced cellular damage has greatly improved over the past decades. Despite this progress, there are still many obstacles to fully understanding how radiation interacts with biologically relevant cellular components to form observable endpoints. One hurdle is the difficulty faced by members of different research groups in directly comparing results. Multiple Monte Ca…
▽ More
Our understanding of radiation induced cellular damage has greatly improved over the past decades. Despite this progress, there are still many obstacles to fully understanding how radiation interacts with biologically relevant cellular components to form observable endpoints. One hurdle is the difficulty faced by members of different research groups in directly comparing results. Multiple Monte Carlo codes have been developed to simulate damage induction at the DNA scale, while at the same time various groups have developed models that describe DNA repair processes with varying levels of detail. These repair models are intrinsically linked to the damage model employed in their development, making it difficult to disentangle systematic effects in either part of the modelling chain. The modelling chain typically consists of track structure Monte Carlo simulations of the physics interactions creating direct damages to the DNA; followed by simulations of the production and initial reactions of chemical species causing indirect damages. After the DNA damage induction, DNA repair models combine the simulated damage patterns with biological models to determine the biological consequences of the damage. We propose a new Standard data format for DNA Damage to unify the interface between the simulation of damage induction and the biological modelling of cell repair processes. Such a standard greatly facilitates inter model comparisons, providing an ideal environment to tease out model assumptions and identify persistent, underlying mechanisms. Through inter model comparisons, this unified standard has the potential to greatly advance our understanding of the underlying mechanisms of radiation induced DNA damage and the resulting observable biological effects.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
