-
Single Flux Quantum-Based Digital Control of Superconducting Qubits in a Multi-Chip Module
Authors:
Chuan-Hong Liu,
Andrew Ballard,
David Olaya,
Daniel R. Schmidt,
John Biesecker,
Tammy Lucas,
Joel Ullom,
Shravan Patel,
Owen Rafferty,
Alexander Opremcak,
Kenneth Dodge,
Vito Iaia,
Tianna McBroom,
Jonathan L. Dubois,
Pete F. Hopkins,
Samuel P. Benz,
Britton L. T. Plourde,
Robert McDermott
Abstract:
The single flux quantum (SFQ) digital superconducting logic family has been proposed for the scalable control of next-generation superconducting qubit arrays. In the initial implementation, SFQ-based gate fidelity was limited by quasiparticle (QP) poisoning induced by the dissipative on-chip SFQ driver circuit. In this work, we introduce a multi-chip module architecture to suppress phonon-mediated…
▽ More
The single flux quantum (SFQ) digital superconducting logic family has been proposed for the scalable control of next-generation superconducting qubit arrays. In the initial implementation, SFQ-based gate fidelity was limited by quasiparticle (QP) poisoning induced by the dissipative on-chip SFQ driver circuit. In this work, we introduce a multi-chip module architecture to suppress phonon-mediated QP poisoning. Here, the SFQ elements and qubits are fabricated on separate chips that are joined with In bump bonds. We use interleaved randomized benchmarking to characterize the fidelity of SFQ-based gates, and we demonstrate an error per Clifford gate of 1.2(1)%, an order-of-magnitude reduction over the gate error achieved in the initial realization of SFQ-based qubit control. We use purity benchmarking to quantify the contribution of incoherent error at 0.96(2)%; we attribute this error to photon-mediated QP poisoning mediated by the resonant mm-wave antenna modes of the qubit and SFQ-qubit coupler. We anticipate that a straightforward redesign of the SFQ driver circuit to limit the bandwidth of the SFQ pulses will eliminate this source of infidelity, allowing SFQ-based gates with fidelity approaching theoretical limits, namely 99.9% for resonant sequences and 99.99% for more complex pulse sequences involving variable pulse-to-pulse separation.
△ Less
Submitted 13 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Quasiparticle Poisoning of Superconducting Qubits from Resonant Absorption of Pair-breaking Photons
Authors:
Chuan-Hong Liu,
David C. Harrison,
Shravan Patel,
Christopher D. Wilen,
Owen Rafferty,
Abigail Shearrow,
Andrew Ballard,
Vito Iaia,
Jaseung Ku,
Britton L. T. Plourde,
Robert McDermott
Abstract:
The ideal superconductor provides a pristine environment for the delicate states of a quantum computer: because there is an energy gap to excitations, there are no spurious modes with which the qubits can interact, causing irreversible decay of the quantum state. As a practical matter, however, there exists a high density of excitations out of the superconducting ground state even at ultralow temp…
▽ More
The ideal superconductor provides a pristine environment for the delicate states of a quantum computer: because there is an energy gap to excitations, there are no spurious modes with which the qubits can interact, causing irreversible decay of the quantum state. As a practical matter, however, there exists a high density of excitations out of the superconducting ground state even at ultralow temperature; these are known as quasiparticles. Observed quasiparticle densities are of order 1~$μ$m$^{-3}$, tens of orders of magnitude larger than the equilibrium density expected from theory. Nonequilibrium quasiparticles extract energy from the qubit mode and induce discrete changes in qubit offset charge, a potential source of dephasing. Here we show that a dominant mechanism for quasiparticle poisoning in superconducting qubits is direct absorption of high-energy photons at the qubit junction. We use a Josephson junction-based photon source to controllably dose qubit circuits with millimeter-wave radiation, and we use an interferometric quantum gate sequence to reconstruct the charge parity on the qubit island. We find that the structure of the qubit itself acts as a resonant antenna for millimeter-wave radiation, providing an efficient path for photons to generate quasiparticle excitations. A deep understanding of this physics will pave the way to realization of next-generation superconducting qubits that are robust against quasiparticle poisoning and could enable a new class of quantum sensors for dark matter detection.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Spurious Antenna Modes of the Transmon Qubit
Authors:
O. Rafferty,
S. Patel,
C. H. Liu,
S. Abdullah,
C. D. Wilen,
D. C. Harrison,
R. McDermott
Abstract:
Superconducting qubits are resonant absorbers of pair-breaking radiation. The metal pads that form the qubit capacitance support standing wave modes at frequencies of order 100~GHz; these modes are strongly coupled to free-space impedance through their electric dipole moment. While the antenna mode of the 3D transmon qubit is easily seen to be a resonant dipole, other 2D qubit types can be underst…
▽ More
Superconducting qubits are resonant absorbers of pair-breaking radiation. The metal pads that form the qubit capacitance support standing wave modes at frequencies of order 100~GHz; these modes are strongly coupled to free-space impedance through their electric dipole moment. While the antenna mode of the 3D transmon qubit is easily seen to be a resonant dipole, other 2D qubit types can be understood as the aperture duals of wire loop antennas or folded dipoles. For typical Josephson junction parameters, the junction provides a reasonable conjugate match to the fundamental antenna mode. We calculate the contribution to quasiparticle poisoning from resonant absorption of blackbody radiation. We extend our analysis to dissipation at the qubit frequency, where radiative losses provide an ultimate limit to qubit energy relaxation time. A clear understanding of the spurious antenna modes of qubits will allow designs that are insensitive to pair-breaking radiation and that display reduced radiative losses at the qubit frequency.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2021; v1 submitted 11 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
