Machine Learning on Difference Image Analysis: A comparison of methods for transient detection
Authors:
B. Sánchez,
M. J. Domínguez R.,
M. Lares,
M. Beroiz,
J. B. Cabral,
S. Gurovich,
C. Quiñones,
R. Artola,
C. Colazo,
M. Schneiter,
C. Girardini,
M. Tornatore,
J. L. Nilo Castellón,
D. García Lambas,
M. C. Díaz
Abstract:
We present a comparison of several Difference Image Analysis (DIA) techniques, in combination with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, applied to the identification of optical transients associated with gravitational wave events. Each technique is assessed based on the scoring metrics of Precision, Recall, and their harmonic mean F1, measured on the DIA results as standalone techniques, and also in…
▽ More
We present a comparison of several Difference Image Analysis (DIA) techniques, in combination with Machine Learning (ML) algorithms, applied to the identification of optical transients associated with gravitational wave events. Each technique is assessed based on the scoring metrics of Precision, Recall, and their harmonic mean F1, measured on the DIA results as standalone techniques, and also in the results after the application of ML algorithms, on transient source injections over simulated and real data. This simulations cover a wide range of instrumental configurations, as well as a variety of scenarios of observation conditions, by exploring a multi dimensional set of relevant parameters, allowing us to extract general conclusions related to the identification of transient astrophysical events. The newest subtraction techniques, and particularly the methodology published in Zackay et al. (2016) are implemented in an Open Source Python package, named properimage, suitable for many other astronomical image analyses. This together with the ML libraries we describe, provides an effective transient detection software pipeline. Here we study the effects of the different ML techniques, and the relative feature importances for classification of transient candidates, and propose an optimal combined strategy. This constitutes the basic elements of pipelines that could be applied in searches of electromagnetic counterparts to GW sources.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2019; v1 submitted 26 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
The MeSsI (Merging Systems Identification) Algorithm & Catalogue
Authors:
Martín de los Rios,
Mariano J. Domínguez R.,
Dante Paz,
Manuel Merchán
Abstract:
Merging galaxy systems provides observational evidence of the existence of dark matter and constraints on its properties. Therefore, statistical uniform samples of merging systems would be a powerful tool for several studies. In this work we presents a new methodology for merging systems identification and the results of its application to galaxy redshift surveys. We use as starting point a mock c…
▽ More
Merging galaxy systems provides observational evidence of the existence of dark matter and constraints on its properties. Therefore, statistical uniform samples of merging systems would be a powerful tool for several studies. In this work we presents a new methodology for merging systems identification and the results of its application to galaxy redshift surveys. We use as starting point a mock catalogue of galaxy systems, identified using traditional FoF algorithms, which experienced a major merger as indicated by its merger tree. Applying machine learning techniques in this training sample, and using several features computed from the observable properties of galaxy members, it is possible to select galaxy groups with a high probability of have been experienced a major merger. Next we apply clustering techniques on galaxy members in order to reconstruct the properties of the haloes involved in such merger. This methodology provides a highly reliable sample of merging systems with low contamination and precise recovered properties. We apply our techniques in samples of galaxy systems obtained from SDSS-DR7, WINGS and HeCS. Our results recover previously known merging systems and provide several new candidates. We present its measured properties and discuss future analysis on current and forthcoming samples.
△ Less
Submitted 31 December, 2015; v1 submitted 8 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
