-
Constructing a control-ready model of EEG signal during general anesthesia in humans
Authors:
John H. Abel,
Marcus A. Badgeley,
Taylor E. Baum,
Sourish Chakravarty,
Patrick L. Purdon,
Emery N. Brown
Abstract:
Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship b…
▽ More
Significant effort toward the automation of general anesthesia has been made in the past decade. One open challenge is in the development of control-ready patient models for closed-loop anesthesia delivery. Standard depth-of-anesthesia tracking does not readily capture inter-individual differences in response to anesthetics, especially those due to age, and does not aim to predict a relationship between a control input (infused anesthetic dose) and system state (commonly, a function of electroencephalography (EEG) signal). In this work, we developed a control-ready patient model for closed-loop propofol-induced anesthesia using data recorded during a clinical study of EEG during general anesthesia in ten healthy volunteers. We used principal component analysis to identify the low-dimensional state-space in which EEG signal evolves during anesthesia delivery. We parameterized the response of the EEG signal to changes in propofol target-site concentration using logistic models. We note that inter-individual differences in anesthetic sensitivity may be captured by varying a constant cofactor of the predicted effect-site concentration. We linked the EEG dose-response with the control input using a pharmacokinetic model. Finally, we present a simple nonlinear model predictive control in silico demonstration of how such a closed-loop system would work.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
In reply to Faes et al. and Barnett et al. regarding "A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective"
Authors:
Patrick A. Stokes,
Patrick L. Purdon
Abstract:
This reply is in response to commentaries by Barnett, Barrett, and Seth (arXiv:1708.08001) and Faes, Stramaglia, and Marinazzo (arXiv:1708.06990) on our paper entitled "A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective." (PNAS 114(34):7063-7072. 2017). In our paper, we analyzed several properties of Granger-Geweke causality (GGC) and discussed potential…
▽ More
This reply is in response to commentaries by Barnett, Barrett, and Seth (arXiv:1708.08001) and Faes, Stramaglia, and Marinazzo (arXiv:1708.06990) on our paper entitled "A study of problems encountered in Granger causality analysis from a neuroscience perspective." (PNAS 114(34):7063-7072. 2017). In our paper, we analyzed several properties of Granger-Geweke causality (GGC) and discussed potential problems in neuroscience applications. We demonstrated: (i) that GGC, estimated using separate model fits, is either severely biased, particularly when the true model is known, or a high variance is introduced to overcome the bias; and (ii) that GGC does not reflect some component dynamics of the system. The commentaries by both Faes et al. and Barnett et al. point out that the computational problems of (i) are resolved by using recent computational methods. We acknowledge that these problems are indeed resolved by these methods. However, the traditional computation using separate model fits continues to be presented and applied. More fundamentally, the interpretational problems stemming from (ii) are not in anyway addressed by the improved methods because they are inherent to the definition of GGC. These properties are indeed acknowledged by both commentaries. We have no misconception of the GGC measure and do not claim that these properties are facially wrong. But we do discuss at length how these properties make it inappropriate and misleading for common types of scientific questions, how presentation of GGC results without model estimates are not decipherable, and how the absence of clear statements of questions of interest present further opportunities for misinterpretation.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2017;
originally announced September 2017.
-
Sparsity Enables Estimation of both Subcortical and Cortical Activity from MEG and EEG
Authors:
Pavitra Krishnaswamy,
Gabriel Obregon-Henao,
Jyrki Ahveninen,
Sheraz Khan,
Behtash Babadi,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias,
Matti S. Hamalainen,
Patrick L. Purdon
Abstract:
Subcortical structures play a critical role in brain function. However, options for assessing electrophysiological activity in these structures are limited. Electromagnetic fields generated by neuronal activity in subcortical structures can be recorded non-invasively using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). However, these subcortical signals are much weaker than those d…
▽ More
Subcortical structures play a critical role in brain function. However, options for assessing electrophysiological activity in these structures are limited. Electromagnetic fields generated by neuronal activity in subcortical structures can be recorded non-invasively using magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG). However, these subcortical signals are much weaker than those due to cortical activity. In addition, we show here that it is difficult to resolve subcortical sources, because distributed cortical activity can explain the MEG and EEG patterns due to deep sources. We then demonstrate that if the cortical activity can be assumed to be spatially sparse, both cortical and subcortical sources can be resolved with M/EEG. Building on this insight, we develop a novel hierarchical sparse inverse solution for M/EEG. We assess the performance of this algorithm on realistic simulations and auditory evoked response data and show that thalamic and brainstem sources can be correctly estimated in the presence of cortical activity. Our analysis and method suggest new opportunities and offer practical tools for characterizing electrophysiological activity in the subcortical structures of the human brain.
△ Less
Submitted 25 June, 2017;
originally announced June 2017.
-
A Spatiotemporal Dynamic Solution to the MEG Inverse Problem: An Empirical Bayes Approach
Authors:
Camilo Lamus,
Matti S. Hämäläinen,
Simona Temereanca,
Emery N. Brown,
Patrick L. Purdon
Abstract:
MEG/EEG are non-invasive imaging techniques that record brain activity with high temporal resolution. However, estimation of brain source currents from surface recordings requires solving an ill-posed inverse problem. Converging lines of evidence in neuroscience, from neuronal network models to resting-state imaging and neurophysiology, suggest that cortical activation is a distributed spatiotempo…
▽ More
MEG/EEG are non-invasive imaging techniques that record brain activity with high temporal resolution. However, estimation of brain source currents from surface recordings requires solving an ill-posed inverse problem. Converging lines of evidence in neuroscience, from neuronal network models to resting-state imaging and neurophysiology, suggest that cortical activation is a distributed spatiotemporal dynamic process, supported by both local and long-distance neuroanatomic connections. Because spatiotemporal dynamics of this kind are central to brain physiology, inverse solutions could be improved by incorporating models of these dynamics. In this article, we present a model for cortical activity based on nearest-neighbor autoregression that incorporates local spatiotemporal interactions between distributed sources in a manner consistent with neurophysiology and neuroanatomy. We develop a dynamic Maximum a Posteriori Expectation-Maximization (dMAP-EM) source localization algorithm for estimation of cortical sources and model parameters based on the Kalman Filter, the Fixed Interval Smoother, and the EM algorithms. We apply the dMAP-EM algorithm to simulated experiments as well as to human experimental data. Furthermore, we derive expressions to relate our dynamic estimation formulas to those of standard static models, and show how dynamic methods optimally assimilate past and future data. Our results establish the feasibility of spatiotemporal dynamic estimation in large-scale distributed source spaces with several thousand source locations and hundreds of sensors, with resulting inverse solutions that provide substantial performance improvements over static methods.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2016; v1 submitted 16 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
An Analysis of How Spatiotemporal Dynamic Models of Brain Activity Could Improve MEG/EEG Inverse Solutions
Authors:
Camilo Lamus,
Matti S. Hamalainen,
Emery N. Brown,
Patrick L. Purdon
Abstract:
MEG and EEG are noninvasive functional neuroimaging techniques that provide recordings of brain activity with high temporal resolution, and thus provide a unique window to study fast time-scale neural dynamics in humans. However, the accuracy of brain activity estimates resulting from these data is limited mainly because 1) the number of sensors is much smaller than the number of sources, and 2) t…
▽ More
MEG and EEG are noninvasive functional neuroimaging techniques that provide recordings of brain activity with high temporal resolution, and thus provide a unique window to study fast time-scale neural dynamics in humans. However, the accuracy of brain activity estimates resulting from these data is limited mainly because 1) the number of sensors is much smaller than the number of sources, and 2) the low sensitivity of the recording device to deep or radially oriented sources. These factors limit the number of sources that can be recovered and bias estimates to superficial cortical areas, resulting in the need to include a priori information about the source activity. The question of how to specify this information and how it might lead to improved solutions remains a critical open problem. In this paper we show that the incorporation of knowledge about the brain's underlying connectivity and spatiotemporal dynamics could dramatically improve inverse solutions. To do this, we develop the concept of the \textit{dynamic lead field map**}, which expresses how information about source activity at a given time is mapped not only to the immediate measurement, but to a time series of measurements. With this map** we show that the number of source parameters that can be recovered could increase by up to a factor of ${\sim20}$, and that such improvement is primarily represented by deep cortical areas. Our result implies that future developments in MEG/EEG analysis that model spatialtemporal dynamics have the potential to dramatically increase source resolution.
△ Less
Submitted 11 November, 2015;
originally announced November 2015.
-
State-space solutions to the dynamic magnetoencephalography inverse problem using high performance computing
Authors:
Christopher J. Long,
Patrick L. Purdon,
Simona Temereanca,
Neil U. Desai,
Matti S. Hämäläinen,
Emery N. Brown
Abstract:
Determining the magnitude and location of neural sources within the brain that are responsible for generating magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals measured on the surface of the head is a challenging problem in functional neuroimaging. The number of potential sources within the brain exceeds by an order of magnitude the number of recording sites. As a consequence, the estimates for the magnitude a…
▽ More
Determining the magnitude and location of neural sources within the brain that are responsible for generating magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals measured on the surface of the head is a challenging problem in functional neuroimaging. The number of potential sources within the brain exceeds by an order of magnitude the number of recording sites. As a consequence, the estimates for the magnitude and location of the neural sources will be ill-conditioned because of the underdetermined nature of the problem. One well-known technique designed to address this imbalance is the minimum norm estimator (MNE). This approach imposes an $L^2$ regularization constraint that serves to stabilize and condition the source parameter estimates. However, these classes of regularizer are static in time and do not consider the temporal constraints inherent to the biophysics of the MEG experiment. In this paper we propose a dynamic state-space model that accounts for both spatial and temporal correlations within and across candidate intracortical sources. In our model, the observation model is derived from the steady-state solution to Maxwell's equations while the latent model representing neural dynamics is given by a random walk process.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2011;
originally announced July 2011.
