-
A Survey on Design Methodologies for Accelerating Deep Learning on Heterogeneous Architectures
Authors:
Fabrizio Ferrandi,
Serena Curzel,
Leandro Fiorin,
Daniele Ielmini,
Cristina Silvano,
Francesco Conti,
Alessio Burrello,
Francesco Barchi,
Luca Benini,
Luciano Lavagno,
Teodoro Urso,
Enrico Calore,
Sebastiano Fabio Schifano,
Cristian Zambelli,
Maurizio Palesi,
Giuseppe Ascia,
Enrico Russo,
Nicola Petra,
Davide De Caro,
Gennaro Di Meo,
Valeria Cardellini,
Salvatore Filippone,
Francesco Lo Presti,
Francesco Silvestri,
Paolo Palazzari
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In recent years, the field of Deep Learning has seen many disruptive and impactful advancements. Given the increasing complexity of deep neural networks, the need for efficient hardware accelerators has become more and more pressing to design heterogeneous HPC platforms. The design of Deep Learning accelerators requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining expertise from several areas, spanning…
▽ More
In recent years, the field of Deep Learning has seen many disruptive and impactful advancements. Given the increasing complexity of deep neural networks, the need for efficient hardware accelerators has become more and more pressing to design heterogeneous HPC platforms. The design of Deep Learning accelerators requires a multidisciplinary approach, combining expertise from several areas, spanning from computer architecture to approximate computing, computational models, and machine learning algorithms. Several methodologies and tools have been proposed to design accelerators for Deep Learning, including hardware-software co-design approaches, high-level synthesis methods, specific customized compilers, and methodologies for design space exploration, modeling, and simulation. These methodologies aim to maximize the exploitable parallelism and minimize data movement to achieve high performance and energy efficiency. This survey provides a holistic review of the most influential design methodologies and EDA tools proposed in recent years to implement Deep Learning accelerators, offering the reader a wide perspective in this rapidly evolving field. In particular, this work complements the previous survey proposed by the same authors in [203], which focuses on Deep Learning hardware accelerators for heterogeneous HPC platforms.
△ Less
Submitted 29 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Accurate and Efficient Measurements of IP level Performance to Drive Interface Selection in Heterogeneous Wireless Networks
Authors:
Stefano Salsano,
Fabio Patriarca,
Francesco Lo Presti,
Pier Luigi Ventre,
Valerio Gentile
Abstract:
Optimal interface selection is a key mobility management issue in heterogeneous wireless networks. Measuring the physical or link level performance on a given wireless access networks does not provide a reliable indication of the IP connectivity, delay and loss on the (bidirectional) paths from the Mobile Host to the node that is handling the mobility, over different heterogeneous networks. In thi…
▽ More
Optimal interface selection is a key mobility management issue in heterogeneous wireless networks. Measuring the physical or link level performance on a given wireless access networks does not provide a reliable indication of the IP connectivity, delay and loss on the (bidirectional) paths from the Mobile Host to the node that is handling the mobility, over different heterogeneous networks. In this paper, we propose, implement and analyze mechanisms for connectivity check and performance (network delay and packet loss) monitoring over IP access networks. We evaluate the accuracy and timeliness of the performance estimates and provide guidelines for tuning up the parameters. From the implementation perspective, we show that using application level measurements is highly CPU intensive, while a kernel based implementation has comparably a very low CPU usage. The Linux kernel implementation results in an efficient use of batteries in Mobile Hosts and intermediate Mobility Management Nodes can scale up to monitoring thousands of flows. The proposed solutions have been implemented in the context of a specific mobility management solution, but the results are of general applicability. The Linux implementation is available as Open Source.
△ Less
Submitted 19 January, 2018; v1 submitted 12 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
-
Generalized Virtual Networking: an enabler for Service Centric Networking and Network Function Virtualization
Authors:
Stefano Salsano,
Nicola Blefari-Melazzi,
Francesco Lo Presti,
Giuseppe Siracusano,
Pier Luigi Ventre
Abstract:
In this paper we introduce the Generalized Virtual Networking (GVN) concept. GVN provides a framework to influence the routing of packets based on service level information that is carried in the packets. It is based on a protocol header inserted between the Network and Transport layers, therefore it can be seen as a layer 3.5 solution. Technically, GVN is proposed as a new transport layer protoco…
▽ More
In this paper we introduce the Generalized Virtual Networking (GVN) concept. GVN provides a framework to influence the routing of packets based on service level information that is carried in the packets. It is based on a protocol header inserted between the Network and Transport layers, therefore it can be seen as a layer 3.5 solution. Technically, GVN is proposed as a new transport layer protocol in the TCP/IP protocol suite. An IP router that is not GVN capable will simply process the IP destination address as usual. Similar concepts have been proposed in other works, and referred to as Service Oriented Networking, Service Centric Networking, Application Delivery Networking, but they are now generalized in the proposed GVN framework. In this respect, the GVN header is a generic container that can be adapted to serve the needs of arbitrary service level routing solutions. The GVN header can be managed by GVN capable end-hosts and applications or can be pushed/popped at the edge of a GVN capable network (like a VLAN tag). In this position paper, we show that Generalized Virtual Networking is a powerful enabler for SCN (Service Centric Networking) and NFV (Network Function Virtualization) and how it couples with the SDN (Software Defined Networking) paradigm.
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
