-
TunaOil: A Tuning Algorithm Strategy for Reservoir Simulation Workloads
Authors:
Felipe Albuquerque Portella,
David Buchaca Prats,
José Roberto Pereira Rodrigues,
Josep Lluís Berral
Abstract:
Reservoir simulations for petroleum fields and seismic imaging are known as the most demanding workloads for high-performance computing (HPC) in the oil and gas (O&G) industry. The optimization of the simulator numerical parameters plays a vital role as it could save considerable computational efforts. State-of-the-art optimization techniques are based on running numerous simulations, specific for…
▽ More
Reservoir simulations for petroleum fields and seismic imaging are known as the most demanding workloads for high-performance computing (HPC) in the oil and gas (O&G) industry. The optimization of the simulator numerical parameters plays a vital role as it could save considerable computational efforts. State-of-the-art optimization techniques are based on running numerous simulations, specific for that purpose, to find good parameter candidates. However, using such an approach is highly costly in terms of time and computing resources. This work presents TunaOil, a new methodology to enhance the search for optimal numerical parameters of reservoir flow simulations using a performance model. In the O&G industry, it is common to use ensembles of models in different workflows to reduce the uncertainty associated with forecasting O&G production. We leverage the runs of those ensembles in such workflows to extract information from each simulation and optimize the numerical parameters in their subsequent runs.
To validate the methodology, we implemented it in a history matching (HM) process that uses a Kalman filter algorithm to adjust an ensemble of reservoir models to match the observed data from the real field. We mine past execution logs from many simulations with different numerical configurations and build a machine learning model based on extracted features from the data. These features include properties of the reservoir models themselves, such as the number of active cells, to statistics of the simulation's behavior, such as the number of iterations of the linear solver. A sampling technique is used to query the oracle to find the numerical parameters that can reduce the elapsed time without significantly impacting the quality of the results. Our experiments show that the predictions can improve the overall HM workflow runtime on average by 31%.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Sequence-to-sequence models for workload interference
Authors:
David Buchaca Prats,
Joan Marcual,
Josep Lluís Berral,
David Carrera
Abstract:
Co-scheduling of jobs in data-centers is a challenging scenario, where jobs can compete for resources yielding to severe slowdowns or failed executions. Efficient job placement on environments where resources are shared requires awareness on how jobs interfere during execution, to go far beyond ineffective resource overbooking techniques. Current techniques, most of them already involving machine…
▽ More
Co-scheduling of jobs in data-centers is a challenging scenario, where jobs can compete for resources yielding to severe slowdowns or failed executions. Efficient job placement on environments where resources are shared requires awareness on how jobs interfere during execution, to go far beyond ineffective resource overbooking techniques. Current techniques, most of them already involving machine learning and job modeling, are based on workload behavior summarization across time, instead of focusing on effective job requirements at each instant of the execution. In this work we propose a methodology for modeling co-scheduling of jobs on data-centers, based on their behavior towards resources and execution time, using sequence-to-sequence models based on recurrent neural networks. The goal is to forecast co-executed jobs footprint on resources along their execution time, from the profile shown by the individual jobs, to enhance resource managers and schedulers placement decisions. The methods here presented are validated using High Performance Computing benchmarks based on different frameworks (like Hadoop and Spark) and applications (CPU bound, IO bound, machine learning, SQL queries...). Experiments show that the model can correctly identify the resource usage trends from previously seen and even unseen co-scheduled jobs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 July, 2020; v1 submitted 25 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Weighted Contrastive Divergence
Authors:
Enrique Romero Merino,
Ferran Mazzanti Castrillejo,
Jordi Delgado Pin,
David Buchaca Prats
Abstract:
Learning algorithms for energy based Boltzmann architectures that rely on gradient descent are in general computationally prohibitive, typically due to the exponential number of terms involved in computing the partition function. In this way one has to resort to approximation schemes for the evaluation of the gradient. This is the case of Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM) and its learning algori…
▽ More
Learning algorithms for energy based Boltzmann architectures that rely on gradient descent are in general computationally prohibitive, typically due to the exponential number of terms involved in computing the partition function. In this way one has to resort to approximation schemes for the evaluation of the gradient. This is the case of Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM) and its learning algorithm Contrastive Divergence (CD). It is well-known that CD has a number of shortcomings, and its approximation to the gradient has several drawbacks. Overcoming these defects has been the basis of much research and new algorithms have been devised, such as persistent CD. In this manuscript we propose a new algorithm that we call Weighted CD (WCD), built from small modifications of the negative phase in standard CD. However small these modifications may be, experimental work reported in this paper suggest that WCD provides a significant improvement over standard CD and persistent CD at a small additional computational cost.
△ Less
Submitted 12 July, 2018; v1 submitted 8 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
