Galaxy Zoo DESI: large-scale bars as a secular mechanism for triggering AGN
Authors:
Izzy L. Garland,
Mike Walmsley,
Maddie S. Silcock,
Leah M. Potts,
Josh Smith,
Brooke D. Simmons,
Chris J. Lintott,
Rebecca J. Smethurst,
James M. Dawson,
William C. Keel,
Sandor Kruk,
Kameswara Bharadwaj Mantha,
Karen L. Masters,
David O'Ryan,
Jürgen J. Popp,
Matthew R. Thorne
Abstract:
Despite the evidence that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) co-evolve with their host galaxy, and that most of the growth of these SMBHs occurs via merger-free processes, the underlying mechanisms which drive this secular co-evolution are poorly understood. We investigate the role that both strong and weak large-scale galactic bars play in mediating this relationship. Using 72,940 disc galaxies in…
▽ More
Despite the evidence that supermassive black holes (SMBHs) co-evolve with their host galaxy, and that most of the growth of these SMBHs occurs via merger-free processes, the underlying mechanisms which drive this secular co-evolution are poorly understood. We investigate the role that both strong and weak large-scale galactic bars play in mediating this relationship. Using 72,940 disc galaxies in a volume-limited sample from Galaxy Zoo DESI, we analyse the active galactic nucleus (AGN) fraction in strongly barred, weakly barred, and unbarred galaxies up to z = 0.1 over a range of stellar masses and colours. After controlling for stellar mass and colour, we find that the optically selected AGN fraction is 31.6 +/- 0.9 per cent in strongly barred galaxies, 23.3 +/- 0.8 per cent in weakly barred galaxies, and 14.2 +/- 0.6 per cent in unbarred disc galaxies. These are highly statistically robust results, strengthening the tantalising results in earlier works. Strongly barred galaxies have a higher fraction of AGNs than weakly barred galaxies, which in turn have a higher fraction than unbarred galaxies. Thus, while bars are not required in order to grow a SMBH in a disc galaxy, large-scale galactic bars appear to facilitate AGN fuelling, and the presence of a strong bar makes a disc galaxy more than twice as likely to host an AGN than an unbarred galaxy at all galaxy stellar masses and colours.
△ Less
Submitted 28 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Scaling Laws for Galaxy Images
Authors:
Mike Walmsley,
Micah Bowles,
Anna M. M. Scaife,
Jason Shingirai Makechemu,
Alexander J. Gordon,
Annette M. N. Ferguson,
Robert G. Mann,
James Pearson,
Jürgen J. Popp,
Jo Bovy,
Josh Speagle,
Hugh Dickinson,
Lucy Fortson,
Tobias Géron,
Sandor Kruk,
Chris J. Lintott,
Kameswara Mantha,
Devina Mohan,
David O'Ryan,
Inigo V. Slijepevic
Abstract:
We present the first systematic investigation of supervised scaling laws outside of an ImageNet-like context - on images of galaxies. We use 840k galaxy images and over 100M annotations by Galaxy Zoo volunteers, comparable in scale to Imagenet-1K. We find that adding annotated galaxy images provides a power law improvement in performance across all architectures and all tasks, while adding trainab…
▽ More
We present the first systematic investigation of supervised scaling laws outside of an ImageNet-like context - on images of galaxies. We use 840k galaxy images and over 100M annotations by Galaxy Zoo volunteers, comparable in scale to Imagenet-1K. We find that adding annotated galaxy images provides a power law improvement in performance across all architectures and all tasks, while adding trainable parameters is effective only for some (typically more subjectively challenging) tasks. We then compare the downstream performance of finetuned models pretrained on either ImageNet-12k alone vs. additionally pretrained on our galaxy images. We achieve an average relative error rate reduction of 31% across 5 downstream tasks of scientific interest. Our finetuned models are more label-efficient and, unlike their ImageNet-12k-pretrained equivalents, often achieve linear transfer performance equal to that of end-to-end finetuning. We find relatively modest additional downstream benefits from scaling model size, implying that scaling alone is not sufficient to address our domain gap, and suggest that practitioners with qualitatively different images might benefit more from in-domain adaption followed by targeted downstream labelling.
△ Less
Submitted 3 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.