Comparison of open-source software for producing directed acyclic graphs
Authors:
Amy J. Pitts,
Charlotte R. Fowler
Abstract:
Many software packages have been developed to assist researchers in drawing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), each with unique functionality and usability. We examine five of the most common software to generate DAGs: TikZ, DAGitty, ggdag, dagR, and igraph. For each package, we provide a general description of the its background, analysis and visualization capabilities, and user-friendliness. Additi…
▽ More
Many software packages have been developed to assist researchers in drawing directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), each with unique functionality and usability. We examine five of the most common software to generate DAGs: TikZ, DAGitty, ggdag, dagR, and igraph. For each package, we provide a general description of the its background, analysis and visualization capabilities, and user-friendliness. Additionally in order to compare packages, we produce two DAGs in each software, the first featuring a simple confounding structure, while the second includes a more complex structure with three confounders and a mediator. We provide recommendations for when to use each software depending on the user's needs.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2023; v1 submitted 19 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
Sensitivity analysis for transportability in multi-study, multi-outcome settings
Authors:
Ngoc Q. Duong,
Amy J. Pitts,
Soohyun Kim,
Caleb H. Miles
Abstract:
Existing work in data fusion has covered identification of causal estimands when integrating data from heterogeneous sources. These results typically require additional assumptions to make valid estimation and inference. However, there is little literature on transporting and generalizing causal effects in multiple-outcome setting, where the primary outcome is systematically missing on the study l…
▽ More
Existing work in data fusion has covered identification of causal estimands when integrating data from heterogeneous sources. These results typically require additional assumptions to make valid estimation and inference. However, there is little literature on transporting and generalizing causal effects in multiple-outcome setting, where the primary outcome is systematically missing on the study level but for which other outcome variables may serve as proxies. We review an identification result developed in ongoing work that utilizes information from these proxies to obtain more efficient estimators and the corresponding key identification assumption. We then introduce methods for assessing the sensitivity of this approach to the identification assumption.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
