-
PIntMF: Penalized Integrative Matrix Factorization Method for Multi-Omics Data
Authors:
Morgane Pierre-Jean,
Florence Mauger,
Jean-François Deleuze,
Edith Le Floch
Abstract:
It is more and more common to explore the genome at diverse levels and not only at a single omic level. Through integrative statistical methods, omics data have the power to reveal new biological processes, potential biomarkers, and subgroups of a cohort. The matrix factorization (MF) is a unsupervised statistical method that allows giving a clustering of individuals, but also revealing relevant o…
▽ More
It is more and more common to explore the genome at diverse levels and not only at a single omic level. Through integrative statistical methods, omics data have the power to reveal new biological processes, potential biomarkers, and subgroups of a cohort. The matrix factorization (MF) is a unsupervised statistical method that allows giving a clustering of individuals, but also revealing relevant omic variables from the various blocks. Here, we present PIntMF (Penalized Integrative Matrix Factorization), a model of MF with sparsity, positivity and equality constraints.To induce sparsity in the model, we use a classical Lasso penalization on variable and individual matrices. For the matrix of samples, sparsity helps for the clustering, and normalization (matching an equality constraint) of inferred coefficients is added for a better interpretation. Besides, we add an automatic tuning of the sparsity parameters using the famous glmnet package. We also proposed three criteria to help the user to choose the number of latent variables. PIntMF was compared to other state-of-the-art integrative methods including feature selection techniques in both synthetic and real data. PIntMF succeeds in finding relevant clusters as well as variables in two types of simulated data (correlated and uncorrelated). Then, PIntMF was applied to two real datasets (Diet and cancer), and it reveals interpretable clusters linked to available clinical data. Our method outperforms the existing ones on two criteria (clustering and variable selection). We show that PIntMF is an easy, fast, and powerful tool to extract patterns and cluster samples from multi-omics data.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
High heritability does not imply accurate prediction under the small additive effects hypothesis
Authors:
Arthur Frouin,
Claire Dandine-Roulland,
Morgane Pierre-Jean,
Jean-François Deleuze,
Christophe Ambroise,
Edith Le Floch
Abstract:
Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) explain only a small fraction of heritability for most complex human phenotypes. Genomic heritability estimates the variance explained by the SNPs on the whole genome using mixed models and accounts for the many small contributions of SNPs in the explanation of a phenotype.
This paper approaches heritability from a machine learning perspective, and examines…
▽ More
Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) explain only a small fraction of heritability for most complex human phenotypes. Genomic heritability estimates the variance explained by the SNPs on the whole genome using mixed models and accounts for the many small contributions of SNPs in the explanation of a phenotype.
This paper approaches heritability from a machine learning perspective, and examines the close link between mixed models and ridge regression. Our contribution is twofold. First, we propose estimating genomic heritability using a predictive approach via ridge regression and Generalized Cross Validation (GCV). We show that this is consistent with classical mixed model based estimation. Second, we derive simple formulae that express prediction accuracy as a function of the ratio n/p, where n is the population size and p the total number of SNPs. These formulae clearly show that a high heritability does not imply an accurate prediction when p>n.
Both the estimation of heritability via GCV and the prediction accuracy formulae are validated using simulated data and real data from UK Biobank.
△ Less
Submitted 13 July, 2020; v1 submitted 10 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
New efficient algorithms for multiple change-point detection with kernels
Authors:
Alain Celisse,
Guillemette Marot,
Morgane Pierre-Jean,
Guillem Rigaill
Abstract:
Several statistical approaches based on reproducing kernels have been proposed to detect abrupt changes arising in the full distribution of the observations and not only in the mean or variance. Some of these approaches enjoy good statistical properties (oracle inequality, \ldots). Nonetheless, they have a high computational cost both in terms of time and memory. This makes their application diff…
▽ More
Several statistical approaches based on reproducing kernels have been proposed to detect abrupt changes arising in the full distribution of the observations and not only in the mean or variance. Some of these approaches enjoy good statistical properties (oracle inequality, \ldots). Nonetheless, they have a high computational cost both in terms of time and memory. This makes their application difficult even for small and medium sample sizes ($n< 10^4$). This computational issue is addressed by first describing a new efficient and exact algorithm for kernel multiple change-point detection with an improved worst-case complexity that is quadratic in time and linear in space. It allows dealing with medium size signals (up to $n \approx 10^5$). Second, a faster but approximation algorithm is described. It is based on a low-rank approximation to the Gram matrix. It is linear in time and space. This approximation algorithm can be applied to large-scale signals ($n \geq 10^6$). These exact and approximation algorithms have been implemented in \texttt{R} and \texttt{C} for various kernels. The computational and statistical performances of these new algorithms have been assessed through empirical experiments. The runtime of the new algorithms is observed to be faster than that of other considered procedures. Finally, simulations confirmed the higher statistical accuracy of kernel-based approaches to detect changes that are not only in the mean. These simulations also illustrate the flexibility of kernel-based approaches to analyze complex biological profiles made of DNA copy number and allele B frequencies. An R package implementing the approach will be made available on github.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Performance evaluation of DNA copy number segmentation methods
Authors:
Morgane Pierre-Jean,
Guillem Rigaill,
Pierre Neuvial
Abstract:
A number of bioinformatic or biostatistical methods are available for analyzing DNA copy number profiles measured from microarray or sequencing technologies. In the absence of rich enough gold standard data sets, the performance of these methods is generally assessed using unrealistic simulation studies, or based on small real data analyses. We have designed and implemented a framework to generate…
▽ More
A number of bioinformatic or biostatistical methods are available for analyzing DNA copy number profiles measured from microarray or sequencing technologies. In the absence of rich enough gold standard data sets, the performance of these methods is generally assessed using unrealistic simulation studies, or based on small real data analyses. We have designed and implemented a framework to generate realistic DNA copy number profiles of cancer samples with known truth. These profiles are generated by resampling real SNP microarray data from genomic regions with known copy-number state. The original real data have been extracted from dilutions series of tumor cell lines with matched blood samples at several concentrations. Therefore, the signal-to-noise ratio of the generated profiles can be controlled through the (known) percentage of tumor cells in the sample. In this paper, we describe this framework and illustrate some of the benefits of the proposed data generation approach on a practical use case: a comparison study between methods for segmenting DNA copy number profiles from SNP microarrays. This study indicates that no single method is uniformly better than all others. It also helps identifying pros and cons for the compared methods as a function of biologically informative parameters, such as the fraction of tumor cells in the sample and the proportion of heterozygous markers. Availability: R package jointSeg: http://r-forge.r-project.org/R/?group\_id=1562
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2015; v1 submitted 28 February, 2014;
originally announced February 2014.
