-
Experimental investigation of Popper's proposed ghost-diffraction experiment
Authors:
Eliot Bolduc,
Ebrahim Karimi,
Kevin Piché,
Jonathan Leach,
Robert W. Boyd
Abstract:
In an effort to challenge the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, Karl Popper proposed an experiment involving spatially separated entangled particles. In this experiment, one of the particles passes through a very narrow slit, and thereby its position becomes well-defined. This particle therefore diffracts into a large divergence angle; this effect can be understood as a consequence o…
▽ More
In an effort to challenge the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, Karl Popper proposed an experiment involving spatially separated entangled particles. In this experiment, one of the particles passes through a very narrow slit, and thereby its position becomes well-defined. This particle therefore diffracts into a large divergence angle; this effect can be understood as a consequence of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Popper further argued that its entangled partner would become comparably localized in position, and that, according to his understanding of the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, the \qo{mere knowledge} of the position of this particle would cause it also to diffract into a large divergence angle. Popper recognized that such behaviour could violate the principle of causality in that the slit could be removed and the partner particle would be expected to respond instantaneously. Popper thus concluded that it was most likely the case that in an actual experiment the partner photon would not undergo increased diffractive spreading and thus that the Copenhagen interpretation is incorrect. Here, we report and analyze the results of an implementation of Popper's proposal. We find that the partner beam does not undergo increased diffractive spreading. Our work resolves many of the open questions involving Popper's proposal, and it provides further insight into the nature of entanglement and its relation to the uncertainty principle of correlated particles.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Sub-fidelity as a measure of irreversibility of decoherence
Authors:
Filippo M. Miatto,
Kevin Piche,
Thomas Brougham,
Robert W. Boyd
Abstract:
Quantum correlations between two systems can be impaired by the presence of an environment, as it can make systems decohere. We wish to evaluate how much coherence has been irreversibly lost. To do so, we study two qubits which leak correlations into an arbitrarily large environment and we find that our ability to steer one of them to the most coherent set of states possible by acting on the other…
▽ More
Quantum correlations between two systems can be impaired by the presence of an environment, as it can make systems decohere. We wish to evaluate how much coherence has been irreversibly lost. To do so, we study two qubits which leak correlations into an arbitrarily large environment and we find that our ability to steer one of them to the most coherent set of states possible by acting on the other is given by the sub-fidelity of two conditional states of the environment. Sub-fidelity is a quantity that was already known, but that until now lacked an operational interpretation. Furthermore, we conjecture the existence of a family of measures, of which fidelity and sub-fidelity are the first two, which measure the irreversibility of decoherence as we gain access to more and more degrees of freedom of the enviroment.
△ Less
Submitted 21 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
Recovering full coherence in a qubit by measuring half of its environment
Authors:
Filippo M. Miatto,
Kevin Piché,
Thomas Brougham,
Robert W. Boyd
Abstract:
When quantum systems interact with the environment they lose their quantum properties, such as coherence. Quantum erasure makes it possible to restore coherence in a system by measuring its environment, but accessing the whole of it may be prohibitive: realistically one might have to concentrate only on an accessible subspace and neglect the rest. If that is the case, how good is quantum erasure?…
▽ More
When quantum systems interact with the environment they lose their quantum properties, such as coherence. Quantum erasure makes it possible to restore coherence in a system by measuring its environment, but accessing the whole of it may be prohibitive: realistically one might have to concentrate only on an accessible subspace and neglect the rest. If that is the case, how good is quantum erasure? In this work we compute the largest coherence $\langle \mathcal C\rangle$ that we can expect to recover in a qubit, as a function of the dimension of the accessible and of the inaccessible subspaces of its environment. We then imagine the following game: we are given a uniformly random pure state of $n+1$ qubits and we are asked to compute the largest coherence that we can retrieve on one of them by optimally measuring a certain number $0\leq a\leq n$ of the others. We find a surprising effect around the value $a\approx n/2$: the recoverable coherence sharply transitions between 0 and 1, indicating that in order to restore full coherence on a qubit we need access to only half of its physical environment (or in terms of degrees of freedom to just the square root of them). Moreover, we find that the recoverable coherence becomes a typical property of the whole ensemble as $n$ grows.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2015; v1 submitted 24 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
The optimal bound of quantum erasure with limited means
Authors:
Filippo M. Miatto,
Kevin Piché,
Thomas Brougham,
Robert W. Boyd
Abstract:
In practical applications of quantum information science, quantum systems can have non-negligible interactions with the environment, and this generally degrades the power of quantum protocols as it introduces noise. Counteracting this by appropriately measuring the environment (and therefore projecting its state) would require access all the necessary degrees of freedom, which in practice can be f…
▽ More
In practical applications of quantum information science, quantum systems can have non-negligible interactions with the environment, and this generally degrades the power of quantum protocols as it introduces noise. Counteracting this by appropriately measuring the environment (and therefore projecting its state) would require access all the necessary degrees of freedom, which in practice can be far too hard to achieve. To better understand one's limitations, we calculate the upper bound of optimal quantum erasure (i.e. the highest recoverable visibility, or "coherence"), when erasure is realistically limited to an accessible subspace of the whole environment. In the particular case of a two-dimensional accessible environment, the bound is given by the sub-fidelity of two particular states of the \emph{inaccessible} environment, which opens a new window into understanding the connection between correlated systems. We also provide an analytical solution for a three-dimensional accessible environment. This result provides also an interesting operational interpretation of sub-fidelity. We end with a statistical analysis of the expected visibility of an optimally erased random state and we find that 1) if one picks a random pure state of 2 qubits, there is an optimal measurement that allows one to distill a 1-qubit state with almost 90\% visibility and 2) if one picks a random pure state of 2 qubits in an inaccessible environment, there is an optimal measurement that allows one to distill a 1-qubit state with almost twice its initial visibility.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2014;
originally announced October 2014.
-
The duality principle in the presence of postselection
Authors:
Jonathan Leach,
Eliot Bolduc,
Filippo. M. Miatto,
Kevin Piche,
Gerd Leuchs,
Robert W. Boyd
Abstract:
The duality principle, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, limits the coexistence of wave and particle behaviours of quantum systems. This limitation takes a quantitative form when applied to the visibility $\mathcal V$ and predictability $\mathcal P$ within a two-alternative system, which are bound by the inequality $\mathcal V^2+ \mathcal P^2 \leq 1$. However, if such a system is coupled to its…
▽ More
The duality principle, a cornerstone of quantum mechanics, limits the coexistence of wave and particle behaviours of quantum systems. This limitation takes a quantitative form when applied to the visibility $\mathcal V$ and predictability $\mathcal P$ within a two-alternative system, which are bound by the inequality $\mathcal V^2+ \mathcal P^2 \leq 1$. However, if such a system is coupled to its environment, it becomes possible to obtain conditional measures of visibility and predictability, i.e.~measures that are conditional on the state of the environment. We show that in this case, the predictability and visibility values can lead to an apparent violation of the duality principle. We experimentally realize this apparent violation in a controlled manner by enforcing a fair-sampling-like loophole via postselection. Given the ability to simultaneously obtain high predictability information and high visibility interference fringes for a wide range of coupling strengths and postselected states, this work highlights the role of fair-sampling in tests of the duality principle.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2014; v1 submitted 17 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
