Smart Contract Languages: a comparative analysis
Authors:
Massimo Bartoletti,
Lorenzo Benetollo,
Michele Bugliesi,
Silvia Crafa,
Giacomo Dal Sasso,
Roberto Pettinau,
Andrea Pinna,
Mattia Piras,
Sabina Rossi,
Stefano Salis,
Alvise Spanò,
Viacheslav Tkachenko,
Roberto Tonelli,
Roberto Zunino
Abstract:
Decentralized blockchain platforms support the secure exchange of assets among users without relying on trusted third parties. These exchanges are programmed with smart contracts, computer programs directly executed by blockchain nodes. Multiple smart contract languages are available nowadays to developers, each with its own distinctive features, strengths, and weaknesses. In this paper, we examin…
▽ More
Decentralized blockchain platforms support the secure exchange of assets among users without relying on trusted third parties. These exchanges are programmed with smart contracts, computer programs directly executed by blockchain nodes. Multiple smart contract languages are available nowadays to developers, each with its own distinctive features, strengths, and weaknesses. In this paper, we examine the smart contract languages used in six major blockchain platforms: Ethereum, Solana, Cardano, Algorand, Aptos, and Tezos. Starting with a high-level overview of their design choices, we provide a comprehensive assessment that focuses on programming style, security, code readability, and usability, drawing on an original benchmark that encompasses a common set of use cases across all the smart contract languages under examination.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
Towards benchmarking of Solidity verification tools
Authors:
Massimo Bartoletti,
Fabio Fioravanti,
Giulia Matricardi,
Roberto Pettinau,
Franco Sainas
Abstract:
Formal verification of smart contracts has become a hot topic in academic and industrial research, given the growing value of assets managed by decentralized applications and the consequent incentive for adversaries to tamper with them. Most of the current research on the verification of contracts revolves around Solidity, the main high-level language supported by Ethereum and other leading blockc…
▽ More
Formal verification of smart contracts has become a hot topic in academic and industrial research, given the growing value of assets managed by decentralized applications and the consequent incentive for adversaries to tamper with them. Most of the current research on the verification of contracts revolves around Solidity, the main high-level language supported by Ethereum and other leading blockchains. Although bug detection tools for Solidity have been proliferating almost since the inception of Ethereum, only in the last few years we have seen verification tools capable of proving that a contract respects some desirable properties. An open issue is how to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of these tools: indeed, the existing benchmarks for general-purpose programming languages cannot be adapted to Solidity, given substantial differences in the programming model and in the desirable properties. We address this problem by proposing an open benchmark for Solidity verification tools. By exploiting our benchmark, we compare two leading tools, SolCMC and Certora, discussing their completeness, soundness and expressiveness limitations.
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
