-
QAOA Performance in Noisy Devices: The Effect of Classical Optimizers and Ansatz Depth
Authors:
Aidan Pellow-Jarman,
Shane McFarthing,
Ilya Sinayskiy,
Daniel K. Park,
Anban Pillay,
Francesco Petruccione
Abstract:
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a variational quantum algorithm for Near-term Intermediate-Scale Quantum computers (NISQ) providing approximate solutions for combinatorial optimiz\-ation problems. The QAOA utilizes a quantum-classical loop, consisting of a quantum ansatz and a classical optimizer, to minimize some cost function, computed on the quantum device. This paper p…
▽ More
The Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a variational quantum algorithm for Near-term Intermediate-Scale Quantum computers (NISQ) providing approximate solutions for combinatorial optimiz\-ation problems. The QAOA utilizes a quantum-classical loop, consisting of a quantum ansatz and a classical optimizer, to minimize some cost function, computed on the quantum device. This paper presents an investigation into the impact of realistic noise on the classical optimizer and the determination of optimal circuit depth for the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) in the presence of noise. We find that, while there is no significant difference in the performance of classical optimizers in a state vector simulation, the Adam and AMSGrad optimizers perform best in the presence of shot noise. Under the conditions of real noise, the SPSA optimizer, along with ADAM and AMSGrad, emerge as the top performers. The study also reveals that the quality of solutions to some 5 qubit minimum vertex cover problems increases for up to around six layers in the QAOA circuit, after which it begins to decline. This analysis shows that increasing the number of layers in the QAOA in an attempt to increase accuracy may not work well in a noisy device.
△ Less
Submitted 11 July, 2024; v1 submitted 19 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Near Term Algorithms for Linear Systems of Equations
Authors:
Aidan Pellow-Jarman,
Ilya Sinayskiy,
Anban Pillay,
Francesco Petruccione
Abstract:
Finding solutions to systems of linear equations is a common prob\-lem in many areas of science and engineering, with much potential for a speedup on quantum devices. While the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) quantum algorithm yields up to an exponential speed-up over classical algorithms in some cases, it requires a fault-tolerant quantum computer, which is unlikely to be available in the near term.…
▽ More
Finding solutions to systems of linear equations is a common prob\-lem in many areas of science and engineering, with much potential for a speedup on quantum devices. While the Harrow-Hassidim-Lloyd (HHL) quantum algorithm yields up to an exponential speed-up over classical algorithms in some cases, it requires a fault-tolerant quantum computer, which is unlikely to be available in the near term. Thus, attention has turned to the investigation of quantum algorithms for noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices where several near-term approaches to solving systems of linear equations have been proposed. This paper focuses on the Variational Quantum Linear Solvers (VQLS), and other closely related methods. This paper makes several contributions that include: the first application of the Evolutionary Ansatz to the VQLS (EAVQLS), the first implementation of the Logical Ansatz VQLS (LAVQLS), based on the Classical Combination of Quantum States (CQS) method, the first proof of principle demonstration of the CQS method on real quantum hardware and a method for the implementation of the Adiabatic Ansatz (AAVQLS). These approaches are implemented and contrasted.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2021; v1 submitted 25 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
A Comparison of Various Classical Optimizers for a Variational Quantum Linear Solver
Authors:
Aidan Pellow-Jarman,
Ilya Sinayskiy,
Anban Pillay,
Francesco Petruccione
Abstract:
Variational Hybrid Quantum Classical Algorithms (VHQCAs) are a class of quantum algorithms intended to run on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. These algorithms employ a parameterized quantum circuit (ansatz) and a quantum-classical feedback loop. A classical device is used to optimize the parameters in order to minimize a cost function that can be computed far more efficiently on a…
▽ More
Variational Hybrid Quantum Classical Algorithms (VHQCAs) are a class of quantum algorithms intended to run on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. These algorithms employ a parameterized quantum circuit (ansatz) and a quantum-classical feedback loop. A classical device is used to optimize the parameters in order to minimize a cost function that can be computed far more efficiently on a quantum device. The cost function is constructed such that finding the ansatz parameters that minimize its value, solves some problem of interest. We focus specifically on the Variational Quantum Linear Solver (VQLS), and examine the effect of several gradient-free and gradient-based classical optimizers on performance. We focus on both the average rate of convergence of the classical optimizers studied, as well as the distribution of their average termination cost values, and how these are affected by noise. Our work demonstrates that realistic noise levels on NISQ devices present a challenge to the optimization process. All classical optimizers appear to be very negatively affected by the presence of realistic noise. If noise levels are significantly improved, there may be a good reason for preferring gradient-based methods in the future, which performed better than the gradient-free methods with the only shot-noise present. The gradient-free optimizers, Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) and Powell's method, and the gradient-based optimizers, AMSGrad and BFGS performed the best in the noisy simulation, and appear to be less affected by noise than the rest of the methods. SPSA appears to be the best performing method. COBYLA, Nelder-Mead and Conjugate-Gradient methods appear to be the most heavily affected by noise, with even slight noise levels significantly impacting their performance.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
