Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Peleg, H

AmiGo: Computational Design of Amigurumi Crochet Patterns

Authors: Michal Edelstein, Hila Peleg, Shachar Itzhaky, Mirela Ben-Chen

Abstract: We propose an approach for generating crochet instructions (patterns) from an input 3D model. We focus on Amigurumi, which are knitted stuffed toys. Given a closed triangle mesh, and a single point specified by the user, we generate crochet instructions, which when knitted and stuffed result in a toy similar to the input geometry. Our approach relies on constructing the geometry and connectivity o… ▽ More We propose an approach for generating crochet instructions (patterns) from an input 3D model. We focus on Amigurumi, which are knitted stuffed toys. Given a closed triangle mesh, and a single point specified by the user, we generate crochet instructions, which when knitted and stuffed result in a toy similar to the input geometry. Our approach relies on constructing the geometry and connectivity of a Crochet Graph, which is then translated into a crochet pattern. We segment the shape automatically into chrochetable components, which are connected using the join-as-you-go method, requiring no additional sewing. We demonstrate that our method is applicable to a large variety of shapes and geometries, and yields easily crochetable patterns. △ Less

Submitted 2 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: 11 pages, 10 figures, SCF 2022

Just-in-Time Learning for Bottom-Up Enumerative Synthesis

Authors: Shraddha Barke, Hila Peleg, Nadia Polikarpova

Abstract: A key challenge in program synthesis is the astronomical size of the search space the synthesizer has to explore. In response to this challenge, recent work proposed to guide synthesis using learned probabilistic models. Obtaining such a model, however, might be infeasible for a problem domain where no high-quality training data is available. In this work we introduce an alternative approach to gu… ▽ More A key challenge in program synthesis is the astronomical size of the search space the synthesizer has to explore. In response to this challenge, recent work proposed to guide synthesis using learned probabilistic models. Obtaining such a model, however, might be infeasible for a problem domain where no high-quality training data is available. In this work we introduce an alternative approach to guided program synthesis: instead of training a model ahead of time we show how to bootstrap one just in time, during synthesis, by learning from partial solutions encountered along the way. To make the best use of the model, we also propose a new program enumeration algorithm we dub guided bottom-up search, which extends the efficient bottom-up search with guidance from probabilistic models. We implement this approach in a tool called Probe, which targets problems in the popular syntax-guided synthesis (SyGuS) format. We evaluate Probe on benchmarks from the literature and show that it achieves significant performance gains both over unguided bottom-up search and over a state-of-the-art probability-guided synthesizer, which had been trained on a corpus of existing solutions. Moreover, we show that these performance gains do not come at the cost of solution quality: programs generated by Probe are only slightly more verbose than the shortest solutions and perform no unnecessary case-splitting. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: Accepted at OOPSLA 2020

Targeted Synthesis for Programming with Data Invariants

Authors: John Sarracino, Shraddha Barke, Hila Peleg, Sorin Lerner, Nadia Polikarpova

Abstract: Programmers frequently maintain implicit data invariants, which are relations between different data structures in a program. Traditionally, such invariants are manually enforced and checked by programmers. This ad-hoc practice is difficult because the programmer must manually account for all the locations and configurations that break an invariant. Moreover, implicit invariants are brittle under… ▽ More Programmers frequently maintain implicit data invariants, which are relations between different data structures in a program. Traditionally, such invariants are manually enforced and checked by programmers. This ad-hoc practice is difficult because the programmer must manually account for all the locations and configurations that break an invariant. Moreover, implicit invariants are brittle under code-evolution: when the invariants and data structures change, the programmer must repeat the process of manually repairing all of the code locations where invariants are violated. A much better approach is to introduce data invariants as a language feature and rely on language support to maintain invariants. To handle this challenge, we introduce Targeted Synthesis, a technique for integrating data invariants with invariant-agnostic imperative code at compile-time. This technique is nontrivial due to the complex structure of both invariant specifications, as well as general imperative code. The key insight is to take a language co-design approach involving both the language of data invariants, as well as the imperative language. We leverage this insight to produce two high-level results: first, we support a language with iterators without requiring general quantified reasoning, and second, we infer complicated invariant-preserving patches. We evaluate these claims through a language termed Spyder, a core calculus of data invariants over imperative iterator programs. We evaluate the expressiveness and performance of Spyder on a variety of programs inspired by web applications, and we find that Spyder efficiently compiles and maintains data invariants. △ Less

Submitted 25 October, 2019; v1 submitted 30 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Programming Not Only by Example

Authors: Hila Peleg, Sharon Shoham, Eran Yahav

Abstract: In recent years, there has been tremendous progress in automated synthesis techniques that are able to automatically generate code based on some intent expressed by the programmer. A major challenge for the adoption of synthesis remains in having the programmer communicate their intent. When the expressed intent is coarse-grained (for example, restriction on the expected type of an expression), th… ▽ More In recent years, there has been tremendous progress in automated synthesis techniques that are able to automatically generate code based on some intent expressed by the programmer. A major challenge for the adoption of synthesis remains in having the programmer communicate their intent. When the expressed intent is coarse-grained (for example, restriction on the expected type of an expression), the synthesizer often produces a long list of results for the programmer to choose from, shifting the heavy-lifting to the user. An alternative approach, successfully used in end-user synthesis is programming by example (PBE), where the user leverages examples to interactively and iteratively refine the intent. However, using only examples is not expressive enough for programmers, who can observe the generated program and refine the intent by directly relating to parts of the generated program. We present a novel approach to interacting with a synthesizer using a granular interaction model. Our approach employs a rich interaction model where (i) the synthesizer decorates a candidate program with debug information that assists in understanding the program and identifying good or bad parts, and (ii) the user is allowed to provide feedback not only on the expected output of a program, but also on the underlying program itself. That is, when the user identifies a program as (partially) correct or incorrect, they can also explicitly indicate the good or bad parts, to allow the synthesizer to accept or discard parts of the program instead of discarding the program as a whole. We show the value of our approach in a controlled user study. Our study shows that participants have strong preference to using granular feedback instead of examples, and are able to provide granular feedback much faster. △ Less

Submitted 3 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Learn&Fuzz: Machine Learning for Input Fuzzing

Authors: Patrice Godefroid, Hila Peleg, Rishabh Singh

Abstract: Fuzzing consists of repeatedly testing an application with modified, or fuzzed, inputs with the goal of finding security vulnerabilities in input-parsing code. In this paper, we show how to automate the generation of an input grammar suitable for input fuzzing using sample inputs and neural-network-based statistical machine-learning techniques. We present a detailed case study with a complex input… ▽ More Fuzzing consists of repeatedly testing an application with modified, or fuzzed, inputs with the goal of finding security vulnerabilities in input-parsing code. In this paper, we show how to automate the generation of an input grammar suitable for input fuzzing using sample inputs and neural-network-based statistical machine-learning techniques. We present a detailed case study with a complex input format, namely PDF, and a large complex security-critical parser for this format, namely, the PDF parser embedded in Microsoft's new Edge browser. We discuss (and measure) the tension between conflicting learning and fuzzing goals: learning wants to capture the structure of well-formed inputs, while fuzzing wants to break that structure in order to cover unexpected code paths and find bugs. We also present a new algorithm for this learn&fuzz challenge which uses a learnt input probability distribution to intelligently guide where to fuzz inputs. △ Less

Submitted 25 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.