-
The MQT Handbook: A Summary of Design Automation Tools and Software for Quantum Computing
Authors:
Robert Wille,
Lucas Berent,
Tobias Forster,
Jagatheesan Kunasaikaran,
Kevin Mato,
Tom Peham,
Nils Quetschlich,
Damian Rovara,
Aaron Sander,
Ludwig Schmid,
Daniel Schönberger,
Yannick Stade,
Lukas Burgholzer
Abstract:
Quantum computers are becoming a reality and numerous quantum computing applications with a near-term perspective (e.g., for finance, chemistry, machine learning, and optimization) and with a long-term perspective (e.g., for cryptography or unstructured search) are currently being investigated. However, designing and realizing potential applications for these devices in a scalable fashion requires…
▽ More
Quantum computers are becoming a reality and numerous quantum computing applications with a near-term perspective (e.g., for finance, chemistry, machine learning, and optimization) and with a long-term perspective (e.g., for cryptography or unstructured search) are currently being investigated. However, designing and realizing potential applications for these devices in a scalable fashion requires automated, efficient, and user-friendly software tools that cater to the needs of end users, engineers, and physicists at every level of the entire quantum software stack. Many of the problems to be tackled in that regard are similar to design problems from the classical realm for which sophisticated design automation tools have been developed in the previous decades.
The Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT) is a collection of software tools for quantum computing developed by the Chair for Design Automation at the Technical University of Munich which explicitly utilizes this design automation expertise. Our overarching objective is to provide solutions for design tasks across the entire quantum software stack. This entails high-level support for end users in realizing their applications, efficient methods for the classical simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits, tools for quantum error correction, support for physical design, and more. These methods are supported by corresponding data structures (such as decision diagrams) and core methods (such as SAT encodings/solvers). All of the developed tools are available as open-source implementations and are hosted on https://github.com/cda-tum.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Design Tasks and Their Complexity for Hybrid Level 3 of the European Train Control System
Authors:
Stefan Engels,
Tom Peham,
Judith Przigoda,
Nils Przigoda,
Robert Wille
Abstract:
Railway networks have become increasingly important in recent times, especially to move freight and public transportation from road traffic and planes to more environmentally friendly trains. Since expanding the global railway network is time and resource consuming, maximizing the rail capacity on the existing infrastructure is desirable. However, simply running more trains is infeasible as certai…
▽ More
Railway networks have become increasingly important in recent times, especially to move freight and public transportation from road traffic and planes to more environmentally friendly trains. Since expanding the global railway network is time and resource consuming, maximizing the rail capacity on the existing infrastructure is desirable. However, simply running more trains is infeasible as certain constraints enforced by the train control system must be satisfied. The capacity of a network depends (amongst others) on the distance between trains allowed by this safety system. While most signaling systems rely on fixed blocks defined by costly hardware, new specifications provided by the ETCS Hybrid Level 3 (since recently also known as ETCS Level 2 with Hybrid Train Detection) allow the usage of virtual subsections. This additional degree of freedom allows for shorter train following times and, thus, more trains on existing railway tracks. On the other hand, new design tasks arise on which automated methods might be helpful for designers of modern railway networks. However, although first approaches exist that solve design problems arising within ETCS Hybrid Level 3, neither formal descriptions nor results on the computational complexity of the corresponding design tasks exist. In this paper, we fill this gap by providing a formal description of design tasks for the Hybrid Level 3 of the European Train Control System and proofs that these tasks are NP-complete or NP-hard, respectively. By that, we are providing a solid basis for the future development of methods to solve those tasks, which will be integrated into the Munich Train Control Toolkit available at https://github.com/cda-tum/mtct.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Depth-Optimal Synthesis of Clifford Circuits with SAT Solvers
Authors:
Tom Peham,
Nina Brandl,
Richard Kueng,
Robert Wille,
Lukas Burgholzer
Abstract:
Circuit synthesis is the task of decomposing a given logical functionality into a sequence of elementary gates. It is (depth-)optimal if it is impossible to achieve the desired functionality with even shorter circuits. Optimal synthesis is a central problem in both quantum and classical hardware design, but also plagued by complexity-theoretic obstacles. Motivated by fault-tolerant quantum computa…
▽ More
Circuit synthesis is the task of decomposing a given logical functionality into a sequence of elementary gates. It is (depth-)optimal if it is impossible to achieve the desired functionality with even shorter circuits. Optimal synthesis is a central problem in both quantum and classical hardware design, but also plagued by complexity-theoretic obstacles. Motivated by fault-tolerant quantum computation, we consider the special case of synthesizing blocks of Clifford unitaries. Leveraging entangling input stimuli and the stabilizer formalism allows us to reduce the Clifford synthesis problem to a family of poly-size satisfiability (SAT) problems -- one for each target circuit depth. On a conceptual level, our result showcases that the Clifford synthesis problem is contained in the first level of the polynomial hierarchy ($\mathsf{NP}$), while the classical synthesis problem for logical circuits is known to be complete for the second level of the polynomial hierarchy ($Σ_2^{\mathsf{P}}$). Based on this theoretical reduction, we formulate a SAT encoding for depth-optimal Clifford synthesis. We then employ SAT solvers to determine a satisfying assignment or to prove that no such assignment exists. From that, the shortest depth for which synthesis is still possible (optimality) as well as the actual circuit (synthesis) can be obtained. Empirical evaluations show that the optimal synthesis approach yields a substantial depth improvement for random Clifford circuits and Clifford+T circuits for Grover search.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2023; v1 submitted 2 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
The Basis of Design Tools for Quantum Computing: Arrays, Decision Diagrams, Tensor Networks, and ZX-Calculus
Authors:
Robert Wille,
Lukas Burgholzer,
Stefan Hillmich,
Thomas Grurl,
Alexander Ploier,
Tom Peham
Abstract:
Quantum computers promise to efficiently solve important problems classical computers never will. However, in order to capitalize on these prospects, a fully automated quantum software stack needs to be developed. This involves a multitude of complex tasks from the classical simulation of quantum circuits, over their compilation to specific devices, to the verification of the circuits to be execut…
▽ More
Quantum computers promise to efficiently solve important problems classical computers never will. However, in order to capitalize on these prospects, a fully automated quantum software stack needs to be developed. This involves a multitude of complex tasks from the classical simulation of quantum circuits, over their compilation to specific devices, to the verification of the circuits to be executed as well as the obtained results. All of these tasks are highly non-trivial and necessitate efficient data structures to tackle the inherent complexity. Starting from rather straight-forward arrays over decision diagrams (inspired by the design automation community) to tensor networks and the ZX-calculus, various complementary approaches have been proposed. This work provides a look "under the hood" of today's tools and showcases how these means are utilized in them, e.g., for simulation, compilation, and verification of quantum circuits.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Equivalence Checking of Parameterized Quantum Circuits: Verifying the Compilation of Variational Quantum Algorithms
Authors:
Tom Peham,
Lukas Burgholzer,
Robert Wille
Abstract:
Variational quantum algorithms have been introduced as a promising class of quantum-classical hybrid algorithms that can already be used with the noisy quantum computing hardware available today by employing parameterized quantum circuits. Considering the non-trivial nature of quantum circuit compilation and the subtleties of quantum computing, it is essential to verify that these parameterized ci…
▽ More
Variational quantum algorithms have been introduced as a promising class of quantum-classical hybrid algorithms that can already be used with the noisy quantum computing hardware available today by employing parameterized quantum circuits. Considering the non-trivial nature of quantum circuit compilation and the subtleties of quantum computing, it is essential to verify that these parameterized circuits have been compiled correctly. Established equivalence checking procedures that handle parameter-free circuits already exist. However, no methodology capable of handling circuits with parameters has been proposed yet. This work fills this gap by showing that verifying the equivalence of parameterized circuits can be achieved in a purely symbolic fashion using an equivalence checking approach based on the ZX-calculus. At the same time, proofs of inequality can be efficiently obtained with conventional methods by taking advantage of the degrees of freedom inherent to parameterized circuits. We implemented the corresponding methods and proved that the resulting methodology is complete. Experimental evaluations (using the entire parametric ansatz circuit library provided by Qiskit as benchmarks) demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach. The implementation is open source and publicly available as part of the equivalence checking tool QCEC (https://github.com/cda-tum/qcec) which is part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
On Optimal Subarchitectures for Quantum Circuit Map**
Authors:
Tom Peham,
Lukas Burgholzer,
Robert Wille
Abstract:
Compiling a high-level quantum circuit down to a low-level description that can be executed on state-of-the-art quantum computers is a crucial part of the software stack for quantum computing. One step in compiling a quantum circuit to some device is quantum circuit map**, where the circuit is transformed such that it complies with the architecture's limited qubit connectivity. Because the searc…
▽ More
Compiling a high-level quantum circuit down to a low-level description that can be executed on state-of-the-art quantum computers is a crucial part of the software stack for quantum computing. One step in compiling a quantum circuit to some device is quantum circuit map**, where the circuit is transformed such that it complies with the architecture's limited qubit connectivity. Because the search space in quantum circuit map** grows exponentially in the number of qubits, it is desirable to consider as few of the device's physical qubits as possible in the process. Previous work conjectured that it suffices to consider only subarchitectures of a quantum computer composed of as many qubits as used in the circuit. In this work, we refute this conjecture and establish criteria for judging whether considering larger parts of the architecture might yield better solutions to the map** problem. We show that determining subarchitectures that are of minimal size, i.e., of which no physical qubit can be removed without losing the optimal map** solution for some quantum circuit, is a very hard problem. Based on a relaxation of the criteria for optimality, we introduce a relaxed consideration that still maintains optimality for practically relevant quantum circuits. Eventually, this results in two methods for computing near-optimal sets of subarchitectures$\unicode{x2014}$providing the basis for efficient quantum circuit map** solutions. We demonstrate the benefits of this novel method for state-of-the-art quantum computers by IBM, Google and Rigetti.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2023; v1 submitted 17 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
Equivalence Checking of Quantum Circuits with the ZX-Calculus
Authors:
Tom Peham,
Lukas Burgholzer,
Robert Wille
Abstract:
As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different per…
▽ More
As state-of-the-art quantum computers are capable of running increasingly complex algorithms, the need for automated methods to design and test potential applications rises. Equivalence checking of quantum circuits is an important, yet hardly automated, task in the development of the quantum software stack. Recently, new methods have been proposed that tackle this problem from widely different perspectives. One of them is based on the ZX-calculus, a graphical rewriting system for quantum computing. However, the power and capability of this equivalence checking method has barely been explored. The aim of this work is to evaluate the ZX-calculus as a tool for equivalence checking of quantum circuits. To this end, it is demonstrated how the ZX-calculus based approach for equivalence checking can be expanded in order to verify the results of compilation flows and optimizations on quantum circuits. It is also shown that the ZX-calculus based method is not complete$\unicode{x2014}$especially for quantum circuits with ancillary qubits. In order to properly evaluate the proposed method, we conduct a detailed case study by comparing it to two other state-of-the-art methods for equivalence checking: one based on path-sums and another based on decision diagrams. The proposed methods have been integrated into the publicly available QCEC tool (https://github.com/cda-tum/qcec) which is part of the Munich Quantum Toolkit (MQT).
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
