The Vienna Architecture Description Language
Authors:
Simon Himmelbauer,
Christoph Hochrainer,
Benedikt Huber,
Niklas Mischkulnig,
Philipp Paulweber,
Tobias Schwarzinger,
Andreas Krall
Abstract:
The Vienna Architecture Description Language (VADL) is a powerful processor description language (PDL) that enables the concise formal specification of processor architectures. By utilizing a single VADL processor specification, the VADL system exhibits the capability to automatically generate a range of artifacts necessary for rapid design space exploration. These include assemblers, compilers, l…
▽ More
The Vienna Architecture Description Language (VADL) is a powerful processor description language (PDL) that enables the concise formal specification of processor architectures. By utilizing a single VADL processor specification, the VADL system exhibits the capability to automatically generate a range of artifacts necessary for rapid design space exploration. These include assemblers, compilers, linkers, functional instruction set simulators, cycle-accurate instruction set simulators, synthesizable specifications in a hardware description language, as well as test cases and documentation. One distinctive feature of VADL lies in its separation of the instruction set architecture (ISA) specification and the microarchitecture (MiA) specification. This segregation allows users the flexibility to combine various ISAs with different MiAs, providing a versatile approach to processor design. In contrast to existing PDLs, VADL's MiA specification operates at a higher level of abstraction, enhancing the clarity and simplicity of the design process. Notably, with a single ISA specification, VADL streamlines compiler generation and maintenance by eliminating the need for intricate compiler-specific knowledge. This article introduces VADL, describes the generator techniques in detail and demonstrates the power of the language and the performance of the generators in an empirical evaluation. The evaluation shows the expressiveness and conciseness of VADL and the efficiency of the generated artifacts.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
Tutorial on the Executable ASM Specification of the AB Protocol and Comparison with TLA$^+$
Authors:
Paolo Dini,
Manuel Bravo,
Philipp Paulweber,
Alexander Raschke,
Gabriela Moreira
Abstract:
The main aim of this report is to provide an introductory tutorial on the Abstract State Machines (ASM) specification method for software engineering to an audience already familiar with the Temporal Logic of Actions (TLA$^+$) method. The report asks to what extent the ASM and TLA$^+$ methods are complementary in checking specifications against stated requirements and proposes some answers. A seco…
▽ More
The main aim of this report is to provide an introductory tutorial on the Abstract State Machines (ASM) specification method for software engineering to an audience already familiar with the Temporal Logic of Actions (TLA$^+$) method. The report asks to what extent the ASM and TLA$^+$ methods are complementary in checking specifications against stated requirements and proposes some answers. A second aim is to provide a comparison between different executable frameworks that have been developed for the same specification languages. Thus, the ASM discussion is complemented by executable Corinthian ASM (CASM) and CoreASM models. Similarly, the two TLA$^+$ specifications presented, which rely on the TLC and Apalache model checkers, respectively, are complemented by a Quint specification, a new language developed by Informal Systems to serve as a user-friendly syntax layer for TLA$^+$. For the basis of comparison we use the specification of the Alternating Bit (AB) protocol because it is a simple and well-understood protocol already extensively analysed in the literature. While the models reported here and developed with the two methods are semantically equivalent, ASMs and Quint are better suited for top-down specification from abstract requirements by iterative refinement. TLA$^+$ seems to be more easily used bottom-up, to build abstractions on top of verified components in spite of the fact that it, too, emphasizes iterative refinement. In the final section, the report begins to scope out the possibility of a homomorphism between the specification of the AB protocol and its finite-state machine (FSM) through state space visualizations, motivated by a search for a formal decomposition method.
△ Less
Submitted 31 January, 2023; v1 submitted 25 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
