The Case for Controls: Identifying outbreak risk factors through case-control comparisons
Authors:
Nina H. Fefferman,
Michael J. Blum,
Lydia Bourouiba,
Nathaniel L. Gibson,
Qiang He,
Debra L. Miller,
Monica Papes,
Dana K. Pasquale,
Connor Verheyen,
Sadie J. Ryan
Abstract:
Investigations of infectious disease outbreaks often focus on identifying place- and context-dependent factors responsible for emergence and spread, resulting in phenomenological narratives ill-suited to develo** generalizable predictive and preventive measures. We contend that case-control hypothesis testing is a more powerful framework for epidemiological investigation. The approach, widely us…
▽ More
Investigations of infectious disease outbreaks often focus on identifying place- and context-dependent factors responsible for emergence and spread, resulting in phenomenological narratives ill-suited to develo** generalizable predictive and preventive measures. We contend that case-control hypothesis testing is a more powerful framework for epidemiological investigation. The approach, widely used in medical research, involves identifying counterfactuals, with case-control comparisons drawn to test hypotheses about the conditions that manifest outbreaks. Here we outline the merits of applying a case-control framework as epidemiological study design. We first describe a framework for iterative multidisciplinary interrogation to discover minimally sufficient sets of factors that can lead to disease outbreaks. We then lay out how case-control comparisons can respectively center on pathogen(s), factor(s), or landscape(s) with vignettes focusing on pathogen transmission. Finally, we consider how adopting case-control approaches can promote evidence-based decision making for responding to and preventing outbreaks.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
