-
The Point Process Framework for Integrated Modelling of Biodiversity Data
Authors:
Kwaku Peprah Adjei,
Philip Mostert,
Jorge Sicacha Parada,
Emma Skarstein,
Robert B. O'Hara
Abstract:
The quantity and types of biodiversity data being collected have increased in recent years. If we are to model and monitor biodiversity effectively, we need to respect how different data sets were collected, and effectively integrate these data types together. The framework that has emerged to do this is based on a point process formulation, with individuals as points and their distribution as a r…
▽ More
The quantity and types of biodiversity data being collected have increased in recent years. If we are to model and monitor biodiversity effectively, we need to respect how different data sets were collected, and effectively integrate these data types together. The framework that has emerged to do this is based on a point process formulation, with individuals as points and their distribution as a realisation of a random field. We describe this formulation and how the process model for the actual distribution is linked to the data that is collected through observation models. The observation models describe the data collection process and its uncertainties and biases. We provide an example of using these methods to model species of Norwegian freshwater fish, which shows how integrated models can be adapted to the data we can collect. We summarise the modelling issues that arise and the approaches that could be taken to solve them.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Carbon stars as standard candles -- III. Un-binned maximum likelihood fitting and comparison with TRGB estimations
Authors:
Javiera Parada,
Jeremy Heyl,
Harvey Richer,
Paul Ripoche,
Laurie Rousseau-Nepton
Abstract:
In the second paper of this series, we developed a new distance determination method using the median $J$ magnitude of carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch stars (CS) as standard candles and the Magellanic Clouds as the fundamental calibrators. The $J$-band CS luminosity function was modeled using a modified Lorentzian distribution whose parameters were used to determined whether the LMC or SMC was…
▽ More
In the second paper of this series, we developed a new distance determination method using the median $J$ magnitude of carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch stars (CS) as standard candles and the Magellanic Clouds as the fundamental calibrators. The $J$-band CS luminosity function was modeled using a modified Lorentzian distribution whose parameters were used to determined whether the LMC or SMC was the most suitable calibrator. In this third paper of the series, we expand our sample of galaxies and introduce a more robust method to determine the parameters of the Lorentzian model. The new fitting method uses an un-binned maximum likelihood estimator to determine the parameters of the Lorentzian model resulting in parameter errors that are significantly smaller compared to the second paper. We test our method in NGC 6822, IC 1613, NGC 3109 and WLM. We also estimate the distances to the same sample of galaxies via the tip of the red giant branch (TRGB) detection method. Our results from the CS measurements agree well with those obtained from the TRGB.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
How is model-related uncertainty quantified and reported in different disciplines?
Authors:
Emily G. Simmonds,
Kwaku Peprah Adjei,
Christoffer Wold Andersen,
Janne Cathrin Hetle Aspheim,
Claudia Battistin,
Nicola Bulso,
Hannah Christensen,
Benjamin Cretois,
Ryan Cubero,
Ivan A. Davidovich,
Lisa Dickel,
Benjamin Dunn,
Etienne Dunn-Sigouin,
Karin Dyrstad,
Sigurd Einum,
Donata Giglio,
Haakon Gjerlow,
Amelie Godefroidt,
Ricardo Gonzalez-Gil,
Soledad Gonzalo Cogno,
Fabian Grosse,
Paul Halloran,
Mari F. Jensen,
John James Kennedy,
Peter Egge Langsaether
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
How do we know how much we know? Quantifying uncertainty associated with our modelling work is the only way we can answer how much we know about any phenomenon. With quantitative science now highly influential in the public sphere and the results from models translating into action, we must support our conclusions with sufficient rigour to produce useful, reproducible results. Incomplete considera…
▽ More
How do we know how much we know? Quantifying uncertainty associated with our modelling work is the only way we can answer how much we know about any phenomenon. With quantitative science now highly influential in the public sphere and the results from models translating into action, we must support our conclusions with sufficient rigour to produce useful, reproducible results. Incomplete consideration of model-based uncertainties can lead to false conclusions with real world impacts. Despite these potentially damaging consequences, uncertainty consideration is incomplete both within and across scientific fields. We take a unique interdisciplinary approach and conduct a systematic audit of model-related uncertainty quantification from seven scientific fields, spanning the biological, physical, and social sciences. Our results show no single field is achieving complete consideration of model uncertainties, but together we can fill the gaps. We propose opportunities to improve the quantification of uncertainty through use of a source framework for uncertainty consideration, model type specific guidelines, improved presentation, and shared best practice. We also identify shared outstanding challenges (uncertainty in input data, balancing trade-offs, error propagation, and defining how much uncertainty is required). Finally, we make nine concrete recommendations for current practice (following good practice guidelines and an uncertainty checklist, presenting uncertainty numerically, and propagating model-related uncertainty into conclusions), future research priorities (uncertainty in input data, quantifying uncertainty in complex models, and the importance of missing uncertainty in different contexts), and general research standards across the sciences (transparency about study limitations and dedicated uncertainty sections of manuscripts).
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022; v1 submitted 24 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Carbon stars as standard candles: II. The median J magnitude as a distance indicator
Authors:
Javiera Parada,
Jeremy Heyl,
Harvey Richer,
Paul Ripoche,
Laurie Rousseau-Nepton
Abstract:
We introduce a new distance determination method using carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch stars (CS) as standard candles and the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) as the fundamental calibrators. We select the samples of CS from the ($(J-K_{s})_0$, $J_0$) colour-magnitude diagrams, as, in this combination of filters, CS are bright and easy to identify. We fit the CS $J$-band luminosi…
▽ More
We introduce a new distance determination method using carbon-rich asymptotic giant branch stars (CS) as standard candles and the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC) as the fundamental calibrators. We select the samples of CS from the ($(J-K_{s})_0$, $J_0$) colour-magnitude diagrams, as, in this combination of filters, CS are bright and easy to identify. We fit the CS $J$-band luminosity functions using a Lorentzian distribution modified to allow the distribution to be asymmetric. We use the parameters of the best-fit distribution to determine if the CS luminosity function of a given galaxy resembles that of the LMC or SMC. Based on this resemblance, we use either the LMC or SMC as the calibrator and estimate the distance to the given galaxy using the median $J$ magnitude ($\overline{J}$) of the CS samples. We apply this new method to the two Local Group galaxies NGC 6822 and IC 1613. We find that NGC 6822 has an "LMC-like" CS luminosity function while IC 1613 is more "SMC-like". Using the values for the median absolute $J$ magnitude for the LMC and SMC found in Paper I we find a distance modulus of $μ_{0}=23.54\pm0.03$ (stat) for NGC 6822 and $μ_{0}=24.34\pm0.05$ (stat) for IC 1613.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2020; v1 submitted 23 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Carbon stars as standard candles: I. The luminosity function of carbon stars in the Magellanic Clouds
Authors:
Paul Ripoche,
Jeremy Heyl,
Javiera Parada,
Harvey Richer
Abstract:
Our goal in this paper is to derive a carbon-star luminosity function that will eventually be used to determine distances to galaxies at $50$-$60$ Mpc and hence yield a value of the Hubble constant. Cool N-type carbon stars exhibit redder near-infrared colours than oxygen-rich stars. Using Two Micron All Sky Survey near-infrared photometry and the Gaia Data Release 2, we identify carbon stars in t…
▽ More
Our goal in this paper is to derive a carbon-star luminosity function that will eventually be used to determine distances to galaxies at $50$-$60$ Mpc and hence yield a value of the Hubble constant. Cool N-type carbon stars exhibit redder near-infrared colours than oxygen-rich stars. Using Two Micron All Sky Survey near-infrared photometry and the Gaia Data Release 2, we identify carbon stars in the Magellanic Clouds (MC) and the Milky Way (MW). Carbon stars in the MC appear as a distinct horizontal feature in the near-infrared ($(J-K_s)_0$, $M_J$) colour-magnitude diagram. We build a colour selection ($1.4 < (J-K_s)_0 < 2$) and derive the luminosity function of the colour-selected carbon stars. We find the median absolute magnitude and the dispersion, in the J band, for the Large Magellanic Cloud and the Small Magellanic Cloud to be, respectively, ($\bar{M_J} = -6.284 \pm 0.004$, $σ= 0.352 \pm 0.005$) and ($\bar{M_J} = -6.160 \pm 0.015$, $σ= 0.365 \pm 0.014$). The difference between the MC may be explained by the lower metallicity of the Small Magellanic Cloud, but in any case it provides limits on the type of galaxy whose distance can be determined with this technique. To account for metallicity effects, we developed a composite magnitude, named C, for which the error-weighted mean C magnitude of both the MC are equal. Thanks to the next generation of telescopes (JWST, ELT, TMT), carbon stars could be detected in MC-type galaxies at distances out to $50$-$60$ Mpc. The final goal is to eventually try and improve the measurement of the Hubble constant while exploring the current tensions related to its value.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2020; v1 submitted 12 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Deep HST Imaging in 47 Tucanae: A Global Dynamical Model
Authors:
J. Heyl,
I. Caiazzo,
H. Richer,
J. Anderson,
J. Kalirai,
J. Parada
Abstract:
Multi-epoch observations with ACS and WFC3 on HST provide a unique and comprehensive probe of stellar dynamics within 47 Tucanae. We confront analytic models of the globular cluster with the observed stellar proper motions that probe along the main sequence from just above 0.8 to 0.1M$_\odot$ as well as white dwarfs younger than one gigayear. One field lies just beyond the half-light radius where…
▽ More
Multi-epoch observations with ACS and WFC3 on HST provide a unique and comprehensive probe of stellar dynamics within 47 Tucanae. We confront analytic models of the globular cluster with the observed stellar proper motions that probe along the main sequence from just above 0.8 to 0.1M$_\odot$ as well as white dwarfs younger than one gigayear. One field lies just beyond the half-light radius where dynamical models (\eg lowered Maxwellian distributions) make robust predictions for the stellar proper motions. The observed proper motions in this outer field show evidence for anisotropy in the velocity distribution as well as skewness; the latter is evidence of rotation. The measured velocity dispersions and surface brightness distributions agree in detail with a rotating, anisotropic model of the stellar distribution function with mild dependence of the proper-motion dispersion on mass. However, the best fitting models under-predict the rotation and skewness of the stellar velocities. In the second field, centered on the core of the cluster, the mass segregation in proper motion is much stronger. Nevertheless the model developed in the outer field can be extended inward by taking this mass segregation into account in a heuristic fashion. The proper motions of the main-sequence stars yield a mass estimate of the cluster of $1.31 \pm 0.02 \times 10^6 \mathrm{M}_\odot$ at a distance of 4.7 kpc. By comparing the proper motions of a sample of giant and sub-giant stars with the observed radial velocities we estimate the distance to the cluster kinematically to be $4.29 \pm 0.47$ kpc.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Formation and Evolution of Blue Stragglers in 47 Tucanae
Authors:
Javiera Parada,
Harvey Richer,
Jeremy Heyl,
Jason Kalirai,
Ryan Goldsbury
Abstract:
Blue stragglers (BSS) are stars whose position in the Color-Magnitude Diagram (CMD) places them above the main sequence turn-off (TO) point of a star cluster. Using data from the core of 47 Tuc in the ultraviolet (UV), we have identified various stellar populations in the CMD, and used their radial distributions to study the evolution and origin of BSS, and obtain a dynamical estimate of the mass…
▽ More
Blue stragglers (BSS) are stars whose position in the Color-Magnitude Diagram (CMD) places them above the main sequence turn-off (TO) point of a star cluster. Using data from the core of 47 Tuc in the ultraviolet (UV), we have identified various stellar populations in the CMD, and used their radial distributions to study the evolution and origin of BSS, and obtain a dynamical estimate of the mass of BSS systems. When we separate the BSS into two samples by their magnitude, we find that the bright BSS show a much more centrally concentrated radial distribution and thus higher mass estimate (over twice the TO mass for these BSS systems), suggesting an origin involving triple or multiple stellar systems. In contrast, the faint BSS are less concentrated, with a radial distribution similar to the main sequence (MS) binaries, pointing to the MS binaries as the likely progenitors of these BSS. Putting our data together with available photometric data in the visible and using MESA evolutionary models, we calculate the expected number of stars in each evolutionary stage for the normal evolution of stars and the number of stars coming from the evolution of BSS. The results indicate that BSS have a post-MS evolution comparable to that of a normal star of the same mass and a MS BSS lifetime of about 200-300 Myr. We also find that the excess population of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars in 47 Tuc is due to evolved BSS.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
Dynamical estimate of post main sequence stellar masses in 47 Tucanae
Authors:
Javiera Parada,
Harvey Richer,
Jeremy Heyl,
Jason Kalirai,
Ryan Goldsbury
Abstract:
We use the effects of mass segregation on the radial distribution of different stellar populations in the core of 47 Tucanae to find estimates for the masses of stars at different post main sequence evolutionary stages. We take samples of main sequence (MS) stars from the core of 47 Tucanae, at different magnitudes (i.e. different masses), and use the effects of this dynamical process to develop a…
▽ More
We use the effects of mass segregation on the radial distribution of different stellar populations in the core of 47 Tucanae to find estimates for the masses of stars at different post main sequence evolutionary stages. We take samples of main sequence (MS) stars from the core of 47 Tucanae, at different magnitudes (i.e. different masses), and use the effects of this dynamical process to develop a relation between the radial distance (RD) at which the cumulative distribution reaches the 20th and 50th percentile, and stellar mass. From these relations we estimate the masses of different post MS populations. We find that mass remains constant for stars going through the evolutionary stages between the upper MS up to the horizontal branch (HB). By comparing RDs of the HB stars with stars of lower masses, we can exclude a mass loss greater than 0.09M during the red giant branch (RGB) stage at nearly the 3σ level. The slightly higher mass estimates for the asymptotic giant branch (AGB) are consistent with the AGB having evolved from somewhat more massive stars. The AGB also exhibits evidence of contamination by more massive stars, possibly blue stragglers (BSS), going through the RGB phase. We do not include the BSS in this paper due to the complexity of these objects, instead, the complete analysis of this population is left for a companion paper. The process to estimate the masses described in this paper are exclusive to the core of 47 Tuc.
△ Less
Submitted 18 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
-
When do stars in 47 Tucanae lose their mass?
Authors:
Jeremy Heyl,
Jason Kalirai,
Harvey B. Richer,
Paola Marigo,
Elisa Antolini,
Ryan Goldsbury,
Javiera Parada
Abstract:
By examining the diffusion of young white dwarfs through the core of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae, we estimate the time when the progenitor star lost the bulk of its mass to become a white dwarf. According to stellar evolution models of the white-dwarf progenitors in 47 Tucanae, we find this epoch to coincide approximately with the star ascending the asymptotic giant branch ($3.0 \pm 8.1$ Myr b…
▽ More
By examining the diffusion of young white dwarfs through the core of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae, we estimate the time when the progenitor star lost the bulk of its mass to become a white dwarf. According to stellar evolution models of the white-dwarf progenitors in 47 Tucanae, we find this epoch to coincide approximately with the star ascending the asymptotic giant branch ($3.0 \pm 8.1$ Myr before the tip of the AGB) and more than ninety million years after the helium flash (with ninety-percent confidence). From the diffusion of the young white dwarfs we can exclude the hypothesis that the bulk of the mass loss occurs on the red-giant branch at the four-sigma level. Furthermore, we find that the radial distribution of horizontal branch stars is consistent with that of the red-giant stars and upper-main-sequence stars and inconsistent with the loss of more than 0.2 solar masses on the red-giant branch at the six-sigma level.
△ Less
Submitted 5 August, 2015; v1 submitted 25 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.
-
A Measurement of Diffusion in 47 Tucanae
Authors:
Jeremy Heyl,
Harvey B. Richer,
Elisa Antolini,
Ryan Goldsbury,
Jason Kalirai,
Javiera Parada,
Pier-Emmanuel Tremblay
Abstract:
Using images from the Hubble Space Telescope Wide-Field Camera 3, we measure the rate of diffusion of stars through the core of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae using a sample of young white dwarfs identified in these observations. This is the first direct measurement of diffusion due to gravitational relaxation. We find that the diffusion rate $κ\approx 10-13$ arcsecond$^2$ Myr$^{-1}$ is consisten…
▽ More
Using images from the Hubble Space Telescope Wide-Field Camera 3, we measure the rate of diffusion of stars through the core of the globular cluster 47 Tucanae using a sample of young white dwarfs identified in these observations. This is the first direct measurement of diffusion due to gravitational relaxation. We find that the diffusion rate $κ\approx 10-13$ arcsecond$^2$ Myr$^{-1}$ is consistent with theoretical estimates of the relaxation time in the core of 47 Tucanae of about 70 Myr.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2015; v1 submitted 6 February, 2015;
originally announced February 2015.