-
R\&D evaluation methodology based on group-AHP with uncertainty
Authors:
Alberto Garinei,
Emanuele Piccioni,
Massimiliano Proietti,
Andrea Marini,
Stefano Speziali,
Marcello Marconi,
Raffaella Di Sante,
Sara Casaccia,
Paolo Castellini,
Milena Martarelli,
Nicola Paone,
Gian Marco Revel,
Lorenzo Scalise,
Marco Arnesano,
Paolo Chiariotti,
Roberto Montanini,
Antonino Quattrocchi,
Sergio Silvestri,
Giorgio Ficco,
Emanuele Rizzuto,
Andrea Scorza,
Matteo Lancini,
Gianluca Rossi,
Roberto Marsili,
Emanuele Zappa
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper, we present an approach to evaluate Research \& Development (R\&D) performance based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Through a set of questionnaires submitted to a team of experts, we single out a set of indicators needed for R\&D performance evaluation. The indicators, together with the corresponding criteria, form the basic hierarchical structure of the AHP method.…
▽ More
In this paper, we present an approach to evaluate Research \& Development (R\&D) performance based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Through a set of questionnaires submitted to a team of experts, we single out a set of indicators needed for R\&D performance evaluation. The indicators, together with the corresponding criteria, form the basic hierarchical structure of the AHP method. The numerical values associated with all the indicators are then used to assign a score to a given R\&D project. In order to aggregate consistently the values taken on by the different indicators, we operate on them so that they are mapped to dimensionless quantities lying in a unit interval. This is achieved by employing the empirical Cumulative Density Function (CDF) for each of the indicators. We give a thorough discussion on how to assign a score to an R\&D project along with the corresponding uncertainty due to possible inconsistencies of the decision process. A particular example of R\&D performance is finally considered.
△ Less
Submitted 22 November, 2021; v1 submitted 5 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
PANDA Phase One
Authors:
G. Barucca,
F. Davì,
G. Lancioni,
P. Mengucci,
L. Montalto,
P. P. Natali,
N. Paone,
D. Rinaldi,
L. Scalise,
B. Krusche,
M. Steinacher,
Z. Liu,
C. Liu,
B. Liu,
X. Shen,
S. Sun,
G. Zhao,
J. Zhao,
M. Albrecht,
W. Alkakhi,
S. Bökelmann,
S. Coen,
F. Feldbauer,
M. Fink,
J. Frech
, et al. (399 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) in Darmstadt, Germany, provides unique possibilities for a new generation of hadron-, nuclear- and atomic physics experiments. The future antiProton ANnihilations at DArmstadt (PANDA or $\overline{\rm P}$ANDA) experiment at FAIR will offer a broad physics programme, covering different aspects of the strong interaction. Understanding the latter in…
▽ More
The Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) in Darmstadt, Germany, provides unique possibilities for a new generation of hadron-, nuclear- and atomic physics experiments. The future antiProton ANnihilations at DArmstadt (PANDA or $\overline{\rm P}$ANDA) experiment at FAIR will offer a broad physics programme, covering different aspects of the strong interaction. Understanding the latter in the non-perturbative regime remains one of the greatest challenges in contemporary physics. The antiproton-nucleon interaction studied with PANDA provides crucial tests in this area. Furthermore, the high-intensity, low-energy domain of PANDA allows for searches for physics beyond the Standard Model, e.g. through high precision symmetry tests. This paper takes into account a staged approach for the detector setup and for the delivered luminosity from the accelerator. The available detector setup at the time of the delivery of the first antiproton beams in the HESR storage ring is referred to as the \textit{Phase One} setup. The physics programme that is achievable during Phase One is outlined in this paper.
△ Less
Submitted 9 June, 2021; v1 submitted 28 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Characterization of a defective PbWO4 crystal cut along the a-c crystallographic plane: structural assessment and a novel photoelastic stress analysis
Authors:
L. Montalto,
P. P. Natali,
F. Davì,
P. Mengucci,
N. Paone,
D. Rinaldi
Abstract:
Among scintillators, the PWO is one of the most widely used, for instance in CMS calorimeter at CERN and PANDA project. Crystallographic structure and chemical composition as well as residual stress condition, are indicators of homogeneity and good quality of the crystal. In this paper, structural characterization of a defective PbWO4 (PWO) crystal has been performed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD), En…
▽ More
Among scintillators, the PWO is one of the most widely used, for instance in CMS calorimeter at CERN and PANDA project. Crystallographic structure and chemical composition as well as residual stress condition, are indicators of homogeneity and good quality of the crystal. In this paper, structural characterization of a defective PbWO4 (PWO) crystal has been performed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) and Photoelasticity in the unusual a-c crystallographic plane. XRD and EDS analysis have been used to investigate crystallographic orientation and chemical composition, while stress distribution, which indicates macroscopic inhomogeneities and defects, has been obtained by photoelastic approaches, in Conoscopic and Sphenoscopic configuration. Since the sample is cut along the a-c crystallographic plane, a new method is proposed for the interpretation of the fringe pattern. The structural analysis has detected odds from the nominal lattice dimension, which can be attributed to the strong presence of Pb and W. A strong inhomogeneity over the crystal sample has been revealed by the photoelastic inspection. The results give reliability to the proposed procedure which is exploitable in crystals with other structures.
△ Less
Submitted 12 December, 2017; v1 submitted 9 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
