A Foundation Model for Cell Segmentation
Authors:
Uriah Israel,
Markus Marks,
Rohit Dilip,
Qilin Li,
Morgan Schwartz,
Elora Pradhan,
Edward Pao,
Shenyi Li,
Alexander Pearson-Goulart,
Pietro Perona,
Georgia Gkioxari,
Ross Barnowski,
Yisong Yue,
David Van Valen
Abstract:
Cells are the fundamental unit of biological organization, and identifying them in imaging data - cell segmentation - is a critical task for various cellular imaging experiments. While deep learning methods have led to substantial progress on this problem, models that have seen wide use are specialist models that work well for specific domains. Methods that have learned the general notion of "what…
▽ More
Cells are the fundamental unit of biological organization, and identifying them in imaging data - cell segmentation - is a critical task for various cellular imaging experiments. While deep learning methods have led to substantial progress on this problem, models that have seen wide use are specialist models that work well for specific domains. Methods that have learned the general notion of "what is a cell" and can identify them across different domains of cellular imaging data have proven elusive. In this work, we present CellSAM, a foundation model for cell segmentation that generalizes across diverse cellular imaging data. CellSAM builds on top of the Segment Anything Model (SAM) by develo** a prompt engineering approach to mask generation. We train an object detector, CellFinder, to automatically detect cells and prompt SAM to generate segmentations. We show that this approach allows a single model to achieve state-of-the-art performance for segmenting images of mammalian cells (in tissues and cell culture), yeast, and bacteria collected with various imaging modalities. To enable accessibility, we integrate CellSAM into DeepCell Label to further accelerate human-in-the-loop labeling strategies for cellular imaging data. A deployed version of CellSAM is available at https://label-dev.deepcell.org/.
△ Less
Submitted 18 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
Measurement of the atmospheric $ν_e$ and $ν_μ$ energy spectra with the ANTARES neutrino telescope
Authors:
A. Albert,
S. Alves,
M. André,
M. Anghinolfi,
G. Anton,
M. Ardid,
J. -J. Aubert,
J. Aublin,
B. Baret,
S. Basa,
B. Belhorma,
M. Bendahman,
V. Bertin,
S. Biagi,
M. Bissinger,
J. Boumaaza,
M. Bouta,
M. C. Bouwhuis,
H. Brânzaş,
R. Bruijn,
J. Brunner,
J. Busto,
A. Capone,
L. Caramete,
J. Carr
, et al. (117 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This letter presents a combined measurement of the energy spectra of atmospheric $ν_e$ and $ν_μ$ in the energy range between $\sim$100 GeV and $\sim$50 TeV with the ANTARES neutrino telescope. The analysis uses 3012 days of detector livetime in the period 2007--2017, and selects 1016 neutrinos interacting in (or close to) the instrumented volume of the detector, yielding shower-like events (mainly…
▽ More
This letter presents a combined measurement of the energy spectra of atmospheric $ν_e$ and $ν_μ$ in the energy range between $\sim$100 GeV and $\sim$50 TeV with the ANTARES neutrino telescope. The analysis uses 3012 days of detector livetime in the period 2007--2017, and selects 1016 neutrinos interacting in (or close to) the instrumented volume of the detector, yielding shower-like events (mainly from $ν_e+\overline ν_e$ charged current plus all neutrino neutral current interactions) and starting track events (mainly from $ν_μ+ \overline ν_μ$ charged current interactions). The contamination by atmospheric muons in the final sample is suppressed at the level of a few per mill by different steps in the selection analysis, including a Boosted Decision Tree classifier. The distribution of reconstructed events is unfolded in terms of electron and muon neutrino fluxes. The derived energy spectra are compared with previous measurements that, above 100 GeV, are limited to experiments in polar ice and, for $ν_μ$, to Super-Kamiokande.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2021; v1 submitted 28 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
