-
Stochastic Earned Value Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation and Statistical Learning Techniques
Authors:
Fernando Acebes,
M Pereda,
David Poza,
Javier Pajares,
Jose M Galan
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to describe a new an integrated methodology for project control under uncertainty. This proposal is based on Earned Value Methodology and risk analysis and presents several refinements to previous methodologies. More specifically, the approach uses extensive Monte Carlo simulation to obtain information about the expected behavior of the project. This dataset is exploited i…
▽ More
The aim of this paper is to describe a new an integrated methodology for project control under uncertainty. This proposal is based on Earned Value Methodology and risk analysis and presents several refinements to previous methodologies. More specifically, the approach uses extensive Monte Carlo simulation to obtain information about the expected behavior of the project. This dataset is exploited in several ways using different statistical learning methodologies in a structured fashion. Initially, simulations are used to detect if project deviations are a consequence of the expected variability using Anomaly Detection algorithms. If the project follows this expected variability, probabilities of success in cost and time and expected cost and total duration of the project can be estimated using classification and regression approaches.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Applicability of Business Intelligence Maturity Models to SMEs
Authors:
Jose M Gonzalez-Varona,
Adolfo Lopez-Paredes,
Javier Pajares,
Fernando Acebes,
Felix Villafanez
Abstract:
Large companies are fully engaged in their digital transformation, specifically in develo** strategic Business Intelligence (BI) projects. They have a Digital Strategy and top-level executives managing the change. BI projects are also being carried out in SMEs. In this paper, we present the results of an interpretative study conducted on a sample of SMEs from different sectors carrying out BI pr…
▽ More
Large companies are fully engaged in their digital transformation, specifically in develo** strategic Business Intelligence (BI) projects. They have a Digital Strategy and top-level executives managing the change. BI projects are also being carried out in SMEs. In this paper, we present the results of an interpretative study conducted on a sample of SMEs from different sectors carrying out BI projects. We study whether BI maturity models are valid for SMEs and their usefulness for analysing the projects and evaluating the results at the end of the project.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Project Risk Management from the bottom-up: Activity Risk Index
Authors:
Fernando Acebes,
Javier Pajares,
Jose M Gonzalez-Varona,
Adolfo Lopez-Paredes
Abstract:
Project managers need to manage risks throughout the project lifecycle and, thus, need to know how changes in activity durations influence project duration and risk. We propose a new indicator (the Activity Risk Index, ARI) that measures the contribution of each activity to the total project risk while it is underway. In particular, the indicator informs us about what activities contribute the mos…
▽ More
Project managers need to manage risks throughout the project lifecycle and, thus, need to know how changes in activity durations influence project duration and risk. We propose a new indicator (the Activity Risk Index, ARI) that measures the contribution of each activity to the total project risk while it is underway. In particular, the indicator informs us about what activities contribute the most to the project's uncertainty so that project managers can pay closer attention to the performance of these activities. The main difference between our indicator and other activity sensitivity metrics in the literature (e.g. cruciality, criticality, significance, or schedule sensitivity indices) is that our indicator is based on the Schedule Risk Baseline concept instead of on cost or schedule baselines. The new metric not only provides information at the beginning of the project, but also while it is underway. Furthermore, the ARI is the only one to offer a normalized result: if we add its value for each activity, the total sum is 100%.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
On the project risk baseline: integrating aleatory uncertainty into project scheduling
Authors:
Fernando Acebes,
David Poza,
Jose M Gonzalez-Varona,
Javier Pajares,
Adolfo Lopez-Paredes
Abstract:
Obtaining a viable schedule baseline that meets all project constraints is one of the main issues for project managers. The literature on this topic focuses mainly on methods to obtain schedules that meet resource restrictions and, more recently, financial limitations. The methods provide different viable schedules for the same project, and the solutions with the shortest duration are considered t…
▽ More
Obtaining a viable schedule baseline that meets all project constraints is one of the main issues for project managers. The literature on this topic focuses mainly on methods to obtain schedules that meet resource restrictions and, more recently, financial limitations. The methods provide different viable schedules for the same project, and the solutions with the shortest duration are considered the best-known schedule for that project. However, no tools currently select which schedule best performs in project risk terms. To bridge this gap, this paper aims to propose a method for selecting the project schedule with the highest probability of meeting the deadline of several alternative schedules with the same duration. To do so, we propose integrating aleatory uncertainty into project scheduling by quantifying the risk of several execution alternatives for the same project. The proposed method, tested with a well-known repository for schedule benchmarking, can be applied to any project type to help managers to select the project schedules from several alternatives with the same duration, but the lowest risk.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
How public funding affects complexity in R&D projects. An analysis of team project perceptions
Authors:
Jose M. Gonzalez-Varona,
Natalia Martin-Cruz,
Fernando Acebes,
Javier Pajares
Abstract:
In this paper, we apply a case study approach to advance current understanding of what effects public co-funding of R&D projects have on project team members' perceived complexity. We chose an R&D project carried out by an industrial SME in northern Spain. The chosen research strategy was a qualitative approach, and sixteen employees participated in the project. We held in-depth semi-structured in…
▽ More
In this paper, we apply a case study approach to advance current understanding of what effects public co-funding of R&D projects have on project team members' perceived complexity. We chose an R&D project carried out by an industrial SME in northern Spain. The chosen research strategy was a qualitative approach, and sixteen employees participated in the project. We held in-depth semi-structured interviews at the beginning and end of the co-funded part of the project. NVivo data analysis software was used for qualitative data analysis. Results showed a substantial increase in perceived complexity. We observed that this was due to unresolved tension between the requirements of the project's co-financing entity and normal SME working procedures. New working procedures needed to be developed in order to comply with the co-financing entity's requirements. However, overall perceived complexity significantly decreased once the co-financed part of the project was completed.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Beyond probability-impact matrices in project risk management: A quantitative methodology for risk prioritisation
Authors:
Fernando Acebes,
José Manuel González-Varona,
Adolfo López-Paredes,
Javier Pajares
Abstract:
The project managers who deal with risk management are often faced with the difficult task of determining the relative importance of the various sources of risk that affect the project. This prioritisation is crucial to direct management efforts to ensure higher project profitability. Risk matrices are widely recognised tools by academics and practitioners in various sectors to assess and rank ris…
▽ More
The project managers who deal with risk management are often faced with the difficult task of determining the relative importance of the various sources of risk that affect the project. This prioritisation is crucial to direct management efforts to ensure higher project profitability. Risk matrices are widely recognised tools by academics and practitioners in various sectors to assess and rank risks according to their likelihood of occurrence and impact on project objectives. However, the existing literature highlights several limitations to use the risk matrix. In response to the weaknesses of its use, this paper proposes a novel approach for prioritising project risks. Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) is used to perform a quantitative prioritisation of risks with the simulation software MCSimulRisk. Together with the definition of project activities, the simulation includes the identified risks by modelling their probability and impact on cost and duration. With this novel methodology, a quantitative assessment of the impact of each risk is provided, as measured by the effect that it would have on project duration and its total cost. This allows the differentiation of critical risks according to their impact on project duration, which may differ if cost is taken as a priority objective. This proposal is interesting for project managers because they will, on the one hand, know the absolute impact of each risk on their project duration and cost objectives and, on the other hand, be able to discriminate the impacts of each risk independently on the duration objective and the cost objective.
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
