Showing 1–11 of 11 results for author: Padala, M

CS1-LLM: Integrating LLMs into CS1 Instruction

Authors: Annapurna Vadaparty, Daniel Zingaro, David H. Smith IV, Mounika Padala, Christine Alvarado, Jamie Gorson Benario, Leo Porter

Abstract: The recent, widespread availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot may impact introductory programming courses (CS1) both in terms of what should be taught and how to teach it. Indeed, recent research has shown that LLMs are capable of solving the majority of the assignments and exams we previously used in CS1. In addition, professional software engineers are often… ▽ More The recent, widespread availability of Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot may impact introductory programming courses (CS1) both in terms of what should be taught and how to teach it. Indeed, recent research has shown that LLMs are capable of solving the majority of the assignments and exams we previously used in CS1. In addition, professional software engineers are often using these tools, raising the question of whether we should be training our students in their use as well. This experience report describes a CS1 course at a large research-intensive university that fully embraces the use of LLMs from the beginning of the course. To incorporate the LLMs, the course was intentionally altered to reduce emphasis on syntax and writing code from scratch. Instead, the course now emphasizes skills needed to successfully produce software with an LLM. This includes explaining code, testing code, and decomposing large problems into small functions that are solvable by an LLM. In addition to frequent, formative assessments of these skills, students were given three large, open-ended projects in three separate domains (data science, image processing, and game design) that allowed them to showcase their creativity in topics of their choosing. In an end-of-term survey, students reported that they appreciated learning with the assistance of the LLM and that they interacted with the LLM in a variety of ways when writing code. We provide lessons learned for instructors who may wish to incorporate LLMs into their course. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: to be published in Proceedings of the 29th ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (ITiCSE)

Designing Redistribution Mechanisms for Reducing Transaction Fees in Blockchains

Authors: Sankarshan Damle, Manisha Padala, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Blockchains deploy Transaction Fee Mechanisms (TFMs) to determine which user transactions to include in blocks and determine their payments (i.e., transaction fees). Increasing demand and scarce block resources have led to high user transaction fees. As these blockchains are a public resource, it may be preferable to reduce these transaction fees. To this end, we introduce Transaction Fee Redistri… ▽ More Blockchains deploy Transaction Fee Mechanisms (TFMs) to determine which user transactions to include in blocks and determine their payments (i.e., transaction fees). Increasing demand and scarce block resources have led to high user transaction fees. As these blockchains are a public resource, it may be preferable to reduce these transaction fees. To this end, we introduce Transaction Fee Redistribution Mechanisms (TFRMs) -- redistributing VCG payments collected from such TFM as rebates to minimize transaction fees. Classic redistribution mechanisms (RMs) achieve this while ensuring Allocative Efficiency (AE) and User Incentive Compatibility (UIC). Our first result shows the non-triviality of applying RM in TFMs. More concretely, we prove that it is impossible to reduce transaction fees when (i) transactions that are not confirmed do not receive rebates and (ii) the miner can strategically manipulate the mechanism. Driven by this, we propose \emph{Robust} TFRM (\textsf{R-TFRM}): a mechanism that compromises on an honest miner's individual rationality to guarantee strictly positive rebates to the users. We then introduce \emph{robust} and \emph{rational} TFRM (\textsf{R}$^2$\textsf{-TFRM}) that uses trusted on-chain randomness that additionally guarantees miner's individual rationality (in expectation) and strictly positive rebates. Our results show that TFRMs provide a promising new direction for reducing transaction fees in public blockchains. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: Full Paper (AAMAS '24)

Fair Allocation of goods and chores -- Tutorial and Survey of Recent Results

Authors: Shaily Mishra, Manisha Padala, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Fair resource allocation is an important problem in many real-world scenarios, where resources such as goods and chores must be allocated among agents. In this survey, we delve into the intricacies of fair allocation, focusing specifically on the challenges associated with indivisible resources. We define fairness and efficiency within this context and thoroughly survey existential results, algori… ▽ More Fair resource allocation is an important problem in many real-world scenarios, where resources such as goods and chores must be allocated among agents. In this survey, we delve into the intricacies of fair allocation, focusing specifically on the challenges associated with indivisible resources. We define fairness and efficiency within this context and thoroughly survey existential results, algorithms, and approximations that satisfy various fairness criteria, including envyfreeness, proportionality, MMS, and their relaxations. Additionally, we discuss algorithms that achieve fairness and efficiency, such as Pareto Optimality and Utilitarian Welfare. We also study the computational complexity of these algorithms, the likelihood of finding fair allocations, and the price of fairness for each fairness notion. We also cover mixed instances of indivisible and divisible items and investigate different valuation and allocation settings. By summarizing the state-of-the-art research, this survey provides valuable insights into fair resource allocation of indivisible goods and chores, highlighting computational complexities, fairness guarantees, and trade-offs between fairness and efficiency. It serves as a foundation for future advancements in this vital field. △ Less

Submitted 21 July, 2023; v1 submitted 20 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Combinatorial Civic Crowdfunding with Budgeted Agents: Welfare Optimality at Equilibrium and Optimal Deviation

Authors: Sankarshan Damle, Manisha Padala, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Civic Crowdfunding (CC) uses the ``power of the crowd'' to garner contributions towards public projects. As these projects are non-excludable, agents may prefer to ``free-ride,'' resulting in the project not being funded. For single project CC, researchers propose to provide refunds to incentivize agents to contribute, thereby guaranteeing the project's funding. These funding guarantees are applic… ▽ More Civic Crowdfunding (CC) uses the ``power of the crowd'' to garner contributions towards public projects. As these projects are non-excludable, agents may prefer to ``free-ride,'' resulting in the project not being funded. For single project CC, researchers propose to provide refunds to incentivize agents to contribute, thereby guaranteeing the project's funding. These funding guarantees are applicable only when agents have an unlimited budget. This work focuses on a combinatorial setting, where multiple projects are available for CC and agents have a limited budget. We study certain specific conditions where funding can be guaranteed. Further, funding the optimal social welfare subset of projects is desirable when every available project cannot be funded due to budget restrictions. We prove the impossibility of achieving optimal welfare at equilibrium for any monotone refund scheme. We then study different heuristics that the agents can use to contribute to the projects in practice. Through simulations, we demonstrate the heuristics' performance as the average-case trade-off between welfare obtained and agent utility. △ Less

Submitted 25 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: To appear in the Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI '23). A preliminary version of this paper titled "Welfare Optimal Combinatorial Civic Crowdfunding with Budgeted Agents" also appeared at GAIW@AAMAS '22

Coordinating Monetary Contributions in Participatory Budgeting

Authors: Haris Aziz, Sujit Gujar, Manisha Padala, Mashbat Suzuki, Jeremy Vollen

Abstract: We formalize a framework for coordinating funding and selecting projects, the costs of which are shared among agents with quasi-linear utility functions and individual budgets. Our model contains the classical discrete participatory budgeting model as a special case, while capturing other useful scenarios. We propose several important axioms and objectives and study how well they can be simultaneo… ▽ More We formalize a framework for coordinating funding and selecting projects, the costs of which are shared among agents with quasi-linear utility functions and individual budgets. Our model contains the classical discrete participatory budgeting model as a special case, while capturing other useful scenarios. We propose several important axioms and objectives and study how well they can be simultaneously satisfied. We show that whereas welfare maximization admits an FPTAS, welfare maximization subject to a natural and very weak participation requirement leads to a strong inapproximability. This result is bypassed if we consider some natural restricted valuations, namely laminar single-minded valuations and symmetric valuations. Our analysis for the former restriction leads to the discovery of a new class of tractable instances for the Set Union Knapsack problem, a classical problem in combinatorial optimization. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Comments: In this version, we include results regarding single minded valuations. We have also corrected a bug in the proof of Lemma 1

Mechanism Design without Money for Fair Allocations

Authors: Manisha Padala, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Fairness is well studied in the context of resource allocation. Researchers have proposed various fairness notions like envy-freeness (EF), and its relaxations, proportionality and max-min share (MMS). There is vast literature on the existential and computational aspects of such notions. While computing fair allocations, any algorithm assumes agents' truthful reporting of their valuations towards… ▽ More Fairness is well studied in the context of resource allocation. Researchers have proposed various fairness notions like envy-freeness (EF), and its relaxations, proportionality and max-min share (MMS). There is vast literature on the existential and computational aspects of such notions. While computing fair allocations, any algorithm assumes agents' truthful reporting of their valuations towards the resources. Whereas in real-world web-based applications for fair division, the agents involved are strategic and may manipulate for individual utility gain. In this paper, we study strategy-proof mechanisms without monetary transfer, which satisfies the various fairness criteria. We know that for additive valuations, designing truthful mechanisms for EF, MMS and proportionality is impossible. Here we show that there cannot be a truthful mechanism for EFX and the existing algorithms for EF1 are manipulable. We then study the particular case of single-minded agents. For this case, we provide a Serial Dictatorship Mechanism that is strategy-proof and satisfies all the fairness criteria except EF. △ Less

Submitted 14 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

EEF1-NN: Efficient and EF1 allocations through Neural Networks

Authors: Shaily Mishra, Manisha Padala, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Neural networks have shown state-of-the-art performance in designing auctions, where the network learns the optimal allocations and payment rule to ensure desirable properties. Motivated by the same, we focus on learning fair division of resources, with no payments involved. Our goal is to allocate the items, goods and/or chores efficiently among the fair allocations. By fair, we mean an allocatio… ▽ More Neural networks have shown state-of-the-art performance in designing auctions, where the network learns the optimal allocations and payment rule to ensure desirable properties. Motivated by the same, we focus on learning fair division of resources, with no payments involved. Our goal is to allocate the items, goods and/or chores efficiently among the fair allocations. By fair, we mean an allocation that is Envy-free (EF). However, such an allocation may not always exist for indivisible resources. Therefore, we consider the relaxed notion, Envy-freeness up to one item (EF1) that is guaranteed to exist. However, it is not enough to guarantee EF1 since the allocation of empty bundles is also EF1. Hence, we add the further constraint of efficiency, maximum utilitarian social welfare (USW). In general finding, USW allocations among EF1 is an NP-Hard problem even when valuations are additive. In this work, we design a network for this task which we refer to as EEF1-NN. We propose an UNet inspired architecture, Lagrangian loss function, and training procedure to obtain desired results. We show that EEF1-NN finds allocation close to optimal USW allocation and ensures EF1 with a high probability for different distributions over input valuations. Compared to existing approaches EEF1-NN empirically guarantees higher USW. Moreover, EEF1-NN is scalable and determines the allocations much faster than solving it as a constrained optimization problem. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

F3: Fair and Federated Face Attribute Classification with Heterogeneous Data

Authors: Samhita Kanaparthy, Manisha Padala, Sankarshan Damle, Ravi Kiran Sarvadevabhatla, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Fairness across different demographic groups is an essential criterion for face-related tasks, Face Attribute Classification (FAC) being a prominent example. Apart from this trend, Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly gaining traction as a scalable paradigm for distributed training. Existing FL approaches require data homogeneity to ensure fairness. However, this assumption is too restrictive i… ▽ More Fairness across different demographic groups is an essential criterion for face-related tasks, Face Attribute Classification (FAC) being a prominent example. Apart from this trend, Federated Learning (FL) is increasingly gaining traction as a scalable paradigm for distributed training. Existing FL approaches require data homogeneity to ensure fairness. However, this assumption is too restrictive in real-world settings. We propose F3, a novel FL framework for fair FAC under data heterogeneity. F3 adopts multiple heuristics to improve fairness across different demographic groups without requiring data homogeneity assumption. We demonstrate the efficacy of F3 by reporting empirically observed fairness measures and accuracy guarantees on popular face datasets. Our results suggest that F3 strikes a practical balance between accuracy and fairness for FAC. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2022; v1 submitted 6 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: This paper is accepted as 2-page extended abstract at CODS-COMAD 2022 with title "Fair Federated Learning for Heterogeneous Face Data"

Fair Allocation with Special Externalities

Authors: Shaily Mishra, Manisha Padala, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Most of the existing algorithms for fair division do not consider externalities. Under externalities, the utility an agent obtains depends not only on its allocation but also on the allocation of other agents. An agent has a positive (negative) value for the assigned goods (chores). This work focuses on a special case of externality, i.e., an agent receives positive or negative value for unassigne… ▽ More Most of the existing algorithms for fair division do not consider externalities. Under externalities, the utility an agent obtains depends not only on its allocation but also on the allocation of other agents. An agent has a positive (negative) value for the assigned goods (chores). This work focuses on a special case of externality, i.e., an agent receives positive or negative value for unassigned items independent of which other agent gets it. We show that it is possible to adapt existing algorithms using a transformation to ensure certain fairness and efficiency notions in this setting. Despite the positive results, fairness notions like proportionality need to be re-defined. Further, we prove that maximin share (MMS) may not have any multiplicative approximation in this setting. Studying this domain is a step** stone towards full externalities where ensuring fairness is much more challenging. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2022; v1 submitted 29 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Federated Learning Meets Fairness and Differential Privacy

Authors: Manisha Padala, Sankarshan Damle, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Deep learning's unprecedented success raises several ethical concerns ranging from biased predictions to data privacy. Researchers tackle these issues by introducing fairness metrics, or federated learning, or differential privacy. A first, this work presents an ethical federated learning model, incorporating all three measures simultaneously. Experiments on the Adult, Bank and Dutch datasets high… ▽ More Deep learning's unprecedented success raises several ethical concerns ranging from biased predictions to data privacy. Researchers tackle these issues by introducing fairness metrics, or federated learning, or differential privacy. A first, this work presents an ethical federated learning model, incorporating all three measures simultaneously. Experiments on the Adult, Bank and Dutch datasets highlight the resulting ``empirical interplay" between accuracy, fairness, and privacy. △ Less

Submitted 23 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Effect of Input Noise Dimension in GANs

Authors: Manisha Padala, Debojit Das, Sujit Gujar

Abstract: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are by far the most successful generative models. Learning the transformation which maps a low dimensional input noise to the data distribution forms the foundation for GANs. Although they have been applied in various domains, they are prone to certain challenges like mode collapse and unstable training. To overcome the challenges, researchers have proposed n… ▽ More Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are by far the most successful generative models. Learning the transformation which maps a low dimensional input noise to the data distribution forms the foundation for GANs. Although they have been applied in various domains, they are prone to certain challenges like mode collapse and unstable training. To overcome the challenges, researchers have proposed novel loss functions, architectures, and optimization methods. In our work here, unlike the previous approaches, we focus on the input noise and its role in the generation. We aim to quantitatively and qualitatively study the effect of the dimension of the input noise on the performance of GANs. For quantitative measures, typically \emph{Fréchet Inception Distance (FID)} and \emph{Inception Score (IS)} are used as performance measure on image data-sets. We compare the FID and IS values for DCGAN and WGAN-GP. We use three different image data-sets -- each consisting of different levels of complexity. Through our experiments, we show that the right dimension of input noise for optimal results depends on the data-set and architecture used. We also observe that the state of the art performance measures does not provide enough useful insights. Hence we conclude that we need further theoretical analysis for understanding the relationship between the low dimensional distribution and the generated images. We also require better performance measures. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.