-
Two competing populations with a common environmental resource
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
James Nelson
Abstract:
Feedback-evolving games is a framework that models the co-evolution between payoff functions and an environmental state. It serves as a useful tool to analyze many social dilemmas such as natural resource consumption, behaviors in epidemics, and the evolution of biological populations. However, it has primarily focused on the dynamics of a single population of agents. In this paper, we consider th…
▽ More
Feedback-evolving games is a framework that models the co-evolution between payoff functions and an environmental state. It serves as a useful tool to analyze many social dilemmas such as natural resource consumption, behaviors in epidemics, and the evolution of biological populations. However, it has primarily focused on the dynamics of a single population of agents. In this paper, we consider the impact of two populations of agents that share a common environmental resource. We focus on a scenario where individuals in one population are governed by an environmentally "responsible" incentive policy, and individuals in the other population are environmentally "irresponsible". An analysis on the asymptotic stability of the coupled system is provided, and conditions for which the resource collapses are identified. We then derive consumption rates for the irresponsible population that optimally exploit the environmental resource, and analyze how incentives should be allocated to the responsible population that most effectively promote the environment via a sensitivity analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 2 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
The madness of people: rational learning in feedback-evolving games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn
Abstract:
The replicator equation in evolutionary game theory describes the change in a population's behaviors over time given suitable incentives. It arises when individuals make decisions using a simple learning process - imitation. A recent emerging framework builds upon this standard model by incorporating game-environment feedback, in which the population's actions affect a shared environment, and in t…
▽ More
The replicator equation in evolutionary game theory describes the change in a population's behaviors over time given suitable incentives. It arises when individuals make decisions using a simple learning process - imitation. A recent emerging framework builds upon this standard model by incorporating game-environment feedback, in which the population's actions affect a shared environment, and in turn, the changing environment shapes incentives for future behaviors. In this paper, we investigate game-environment feedback when individuals instead use a boundedly rational learning rule known as logit learning. We characterize the resulting system's complete set of fixed points and their local stability properties, and how the level of rationality determines overall environmental outcomes in comparison to imitative learning rules. We identify a large parameter space for which logit learning exhibits a wide range of dynamics as the rationality parameter is increased from low to high. Notably, we identify a bifurcation point at which the system exhibits stable limit cycles. When the population is highly rational, the limit cycle collapses and a tragedy of the commons becomes stable.
△ Less
Submitted 5 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Reinforcement Strategies in General Lotto Games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Strategic decisions are often made over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a competitor's success in later stages. In this paper, we study these dynamics in General Lotto games, a class of models describing the competitive allocation of resources between two opposing players. We propose a two-stage formulation where one of the players has reserved resources that can be…
▽ More
Strategic decisions are often made over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a competitor's success in later stages. In this paper, we study these dynamics in General Lotto games, a class of models describing the competitive allocation of resources between two opposing players. We propose a two-stage formulation where one of the players has reserved resources that can be strategically pre-allocated across the battlefields in the first stage of the game as reinforcements. The players then simultaneously allocate their remaining real-time resources, which can be randomized, in a decisive final stage. Our main contributions provide complete characterizations of the optimal reinforcement strategies and resulting equilibrium payoffs in these multi-stage General Lotto games. Interestingly, we determine that real-time resources are at least twice as effective as reinforcement resources when considering equilibrium payoffs.
△ Less
Submitted 28 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
The Defense of Networked Targets in General Lotto games
Authors:
Adel Aghajan,
Keith Paarporn,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Ensuring the security of networked systems is a significant problem, considering the susceptibility of modern infrastructures and technologies to adversarial interference. A central component of this problem is how defensive resources should be allocated to mitigate the severity of potential attacks on the system. In this paper, we consider this in the context of a General Lotto game, where a defe…
▽ More
Ensuring the security of networked systems is a significant problem, considering the susceptibility of modern infrastructures and technologies to adversarial interference. A central component of this problem is how defensive resources should be allocated to mitigate the severity of potential attacks on the system. In this paper, we consider this in the context of a General Lotto game, where a defender and attacker deploys resources on the nodes of a network, and the objective is to secure as many links as possible. The defender secures a link only if it out-competes the attacker on both of its associated nodes. For bipartite networks, we completely characterize equilibrium payoffs and strategies for both the defender and attacker. Surprisingly, the resulting payoffs are the same for any bipartite graph. On arbitrary network structures, we provide lower and upper bounds on the defender's max-min value. Notably, the equilibrium payoff from bipartite networks serves as the lower bound. These results suggest that more connected networks are easier to defend against attacks. We confirm these findings with simulations that compute deterministic allocation strategies on large random networks. This also highlights the importance of randomization in the equilibrium strategies.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Analysis of Contagion Dynamics with Active Cyber Defenders
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Shouhuai Xu
Abstract:
In this paper, we analyze the infection spreading dynamics of malware in a population of cyber nodes (i.e., computers or devices). Unlike most prior studies where nodes are reactive to infections, in our setting some nodes are active defenders meaning that they are able to clean up malware infections of their neighboring nodes, much like how spreading malware exploits the network connectivity prop…
▽ More
In this paper, we analyze the infection spreading dynamics of malware in a population of cyber nodes (i.e., computers or devices). Unlike most prior studies where nodes are reactive to infections, in our setting some nodes are active defenders meaning that they are able to clean up malware infections of their neighboring nodes, much like how spreading malware exploits the network connectivity properties in order to propagate. We formulate these dynamics as an Active Susceptible-Infected-Susceptible (A-SIS) compartmental model of contagion. We completely characterize the system's asymptotic behavior by establishing conditions for the global asymptotic stability of the infection-free equilibrium and for an endemic equilibrium state. We show that the presence of active defenders counter-acts infectious spreading, effectively increasing the epidemic threshold on parameters for which an endemic state prevails. Leveraging this characterization, we investigate a general class of problems for finding optimal investments in active cyber defense capabilities given limited resources. We show that this class of problems has unique solutions under mild assumptions. We then analyze an Active Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (A-SIR) compartmental model, where the peak infection level of any trajectory is explicitly derived.
△ Less
Submitted 23 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Strategically revealing capabilities in General Lotto games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Philip N. Brown
Abstract:
Can revealing one's competitive capabilities to an opponent offer strategic benefits? In this paper, we address this question in the context of General Lotto games, a class of two-player competitive resource allocation models. We consider an asymmetric information setting where the opponent is uncertain about the resource budget of the other player, and holds a prior belief on its value. We assume…
▽ More
Can revealing one's competitive capabilities to an opponent offer strategic benefits? In this paper, we address this question in the context of General Lotto games, a class of two-player competitive resource allocation models. We consider an asymmetric information setting where the opponent is uncertain about the resource budget of the other player, and holds a prior belief on its value. We assume the other player, called the signaler, is able to send a noisy signal about its budget to the opponent. With its updated belief, the opponent then must decide to invest in costly resources that it will deploy against the signaler's resource budget in a General Lotto game. We derive the subgame perfect equilibrium to this extensive-form game. In particular, we identify necessary and sufficient conditions for which a signaling policy improves the signaler's resulting performance in comparison to the scenario where it does not send any signal. Moreover, we provide the optimal signaling policy when these conditions are met. Notably we find that for some scenarios, the signaler can effectively double its performance.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2023; v1 submitted 27 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Strategic investments in multi-stage General Lotto games
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Keith Paarporn,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In adversarial interactions, one is often required to make strategic decisions over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a player's competitive standing as well as how choices are made in later stages. In this paper, we study such scenarios in the context of General Lotto games, which models the competitive allocation of resources over multiple battlefields between two p…
▽ More
In adversarial interactions, one is often required to make strategic decisions over multiple periods of time, wherein decisions made earlier impact a player's competitive standing as well as how choices are made in later stages. In this paper, we study such scenarios in the context of General Lotto games, which models the competitive allocation of resources over multiple battlefields between two players. We propose a two-stage formulation where one of the players has reserved resources that can be strategically pre-allocated across the battlefields in the first stage. The pre-allocation then becomes binding and is revealed to the other player. In the second stage, the players engage by simultaneously allocating their real-time resources against each other. The main contribution in this paper provides complete characterizations of equilibrium payoffs in the two-stage game, revealing the interplay between performance and the amount of resources expended in each stage of the game. We find that real-time resources are at least twice as effective as pre-allocated resources. We then determine the player's optimal investment when there are linear costs associated with purchasing each type of resource before play begins, and there is a limited monetary budget.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Strategically revealing intentions in General Lotto games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Dan Kovenock,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Strategic decision-making in uncertain and adversarial environments is crucial for the security of modern systems and infrastructures. A salient feature of many optimal decision-making policies is a level of unpredictability, or randomness, which helps to keep an adversary uncertain about the system's behavior. This paper seeks to explore decision-making policies on the other end of the spectrum -…
▽ More
Strategic decision-making in uncertain and adversarial environments is crucial for the security of modern systems and infrastructures. A salient feature of many optimal decision-making policies is a level of unpredictability, or randomness, which helps to keep an adversary uncertain about the system's behavior. This paper seeks to explore decision-making policies on the other end of the spectrum -- namely, whether there are benefits in revealing one's strategic intentions to an opponent before engaging in competition. We study these scenarios in a well-studied model of competitive resource allocation problem known as General Lotto games. In the classic formulation, two competing players simultaneously allocate their assets to a set of battlefields, and the resulting payoffs are derived in a zero-sum fashion. Here, we consider a multi-step extension where one of the players has the option to publicly pre-commit assets in a binding fashion to battlefields before play begins. In response, the opponent decides which of these battlefields to secure (or abandon) by matching the pre-commitment with its own assets. They then engage in a General Lotto game over the remaining set of battlefields. Interestingly, this paper highlights many scenarios where strategically revealing intentions can actually significantly improve one's payoff. This runs contrary to the conventional wisdom that randomness should be a central component of decision-making in adversarial environments.
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2021; v1 submitted 22 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
A General Lotto game with asymmetric budget uncertainty
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
The General Lotto game is a popular variant of the famous Colonel Blotto game, in which two opposing players allocate limited resources over many battlefields. In this paper, we consider incomplete and asymmetric information formulations regarding the resource budgets of the players. In particular, one of the player's resource budget is common knowledge while the other player's is private. We prov…
▽ More
The General Lotto game is a popular variant of the famous Colonel Blotto game, in which two opposing players allocate limited resources over many battlefields. In this paper, we consider incomplete and asymmetric information formulations regarding the resource budgets of the players. In particular, one of the player's resource budget is common knowledge while the other player's is private. We provide complete equilibrium characterizations in the scenario where the private resource budget is drawn from an arbitrary Bernoulli distribution. We then show that these characterizations can be used to analyze a multi-stage resource assignment problem where a commander must decide how to assign resources to sub-colonels that compete against opponents in separate General Lotto games. While optimal deterministic assignments have been characterized in the literature, we broaden the context by deriving optimal (Bernoulli) randomized assignments, which induce asymmetric information General Lotto games to be played. We demonstrate that randomizing can offer a four-fold improvement in the commander's performance over deterministic assignments.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2022; v1 submitted 22 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
The Division of Assets in Multiagent Systems: A Case Study in Team Blotto Games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
Multi-agent systems are designed to concurrently accomplish a diverse set of tasks at unprecedented scale. Here, the central problems faced by a system operator are to decide (i) how to divide available resources amongst the agents assigned to tasks and (ii) how to coordinate the behavior of the agents to optimize the efficiency of the resulting collective behavior. The focus of this paper is on p…
▽ More
Multi-agent systems are designed to concurrently accomplish a diverse set of tasks at unprecedented scale. Here, the central problems faced by a system operator are to decide (i) how to divide available resources amongst the agents assigned to tasks and (ii) how to coordinate the behavior of the agents to optimize the efficiency of the resulting collective behavior. The focus of this paper is on problem (i), where we seek to characterize the impact of the division of resources on the best-case efficiency of the resulting collective behavior. Specifically, we focus on a team Colonel Blotto game where there are two sub-colonels competing against a common adversary in a two battlefield environment. Here, each sub-colonel is assigned a given resource budget and is required to allocate these resources independent of the other sub-colonel. However, their success is dependent on the allocation strategy of both sub-colonels. The central focus of this manuscript is on how to divide a common pool of resources among the two sub-colonels to optimize the resulting best-case efficiency guarantees. Intuitively, one would imagine that the more balanced the division of resources, the worse the performance, as such divisions restrict the sub-colonels' ability to employ joint randomized strategies that tend to be necessary for optimizing performance guarantees. However, the main result of this paper demonstrates that this intuition is actually incorrect. A more balanced division of resources can offer better performance guarantees than a more centralized division. Hence, this paper demonstrates that the resource division problem is highly non-trivial in such enmeshed environments and worthy of significant future research efforts.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
When showing your hand pays off: Announcing strategic intentions in Colonel Blotto games
Authors:
Rahul Chandan,
Keith Paarporn,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In competitive adversarial environments, it is often advantageous to obfuscate one's strategies or capabilities. However, revealing one's strategic intentions may shift the dynamics of the competition in complex ways. Can it ever be advantageous to reveal strategic intentions to an opponent? In this paper, we consider three-stage Colonel Blotto games in which one player can choose whether or not t…
▽ More
In competitive adversarial environments, it is often advantageous to obfuscate one's strategies or capabilities. However, revealing one's strategic intentions may shift the dynamics of the competition in complex ways. Can it ever be advantageous to reveal strategic intentions to an opponent? In this paper, we consider three-stage Colonel Blotto games in which one player can choose whether or not to pre-commit resources to a single battlefield before play begins. This pre-commitment is public knowledge. In response, the opponent can either secure the battlefield by matching the pre-commitment with its own forces, or withdraw. In a two-player setting, we show that a weaker player never has an incentive to pre-commit any amount of resources to a battlefield regardless of how valuable it is. We then consider a three-player setting in which two players fight against a common adversary on separate fronts. Only one of the two players facing the adversary has the option of pre-committing. We find there are instances where this player benefits from pre-committing. The analysis indicates that under non-cooperative team settings and no possibility of forming alliances, there can be incentives to publicly announce one's strategic intentions to an adversary.
△ Less
Submitted 13 March, 2020; v1 submitted 26 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Characterizing the interplay between information and strength in Blotto games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Rahul Chandan,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
In this paper, we investigate informational asymmetries in the Colonel Blotto game, a game-theoretic model of competitive resource allocation between two players over a set of battlefields. The battlefield valuations are subject to randomness. One of the two players knows the valuations with certainty. The other knows only a distribution on the battlefield realizations. However, the informed playe…
▽ More
In this paper, we investigate informational asymmetries in the Colonel Blotto game, a game-theoretic model of competitive resource allocation between two players over a set of battlefields. The battlefield valuations are subject to randomness. One of the two players knows the valuations with certainty. The other knows only a distribution on the battlefield realizations. However, the informed player has fewer resources to allocate. We characterize unique equilibrium payoffs in a two battlefield setup of the Colonel Blotto game. We then focus on a three battlefield setup in the General Lotto game, a popular variant of the Colonel Blotto game. We characterize the unique equilibrium payoffs and mixed equilibrium strategies. We quantify the value of information - the difference in equilibrium payoff between the asymmetric information game and complete information game. We find information strictly improves the informed player's performance guarantee. However, the magnitude of improvement varies with the informed player's strength as well as the game parameters. Our analysis highlights the interplay between strength and information in adversarial environments.
△ Less
Submitted 13 September, 2019; v1 submitted 8 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
The Impact of Complex and Informed Adversarial Behavior in Graphical Coordination Games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Brian Canty,
Philip N. Brown,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
How does system-level information impact the ability of an adversary to degrade performance in a networked control system? How does the complexity of an adversary's strategy affect its ability to degrade performance? This paper focuses on these questions in the context of graphical coordination games where an adversary can influence a given fraction of the agents in the system, and the agents foll…
▽ More
How does system-level information impact the ability of an adversary to degrade performance in a networked control system? How does the complexity of an adversary's strategy affect its ability to degrade performance? This paper focuses on these questions in the context of graphical coordination games where an adversary can influence a given fraction of the agents in the system, and the agents follow log-linear learning, a well-known distributed learning algorithm. Focusing on a class of homogeneous ring graphs of various connectivity, we begin by demonstrating that minimally connected ring graphs are the most susceptible to adversarial influence. We then proceed to characterize how both (i) the sophistication of the attack strategies (static vs dynamic) and (ii) the informational awareness about the network structure can be leveraged by an adversary to degrade system performance. Focusing on the set of adversarial policies that induce stochastically stable states, our findings demonstrate that the relative importance between sophistication and information changes depending on the the influencing power of the adversary. In particular, sophistication far outweighs informational awareness with regards to degrading system-level damage when the adversary's influence power is relatively weak. However, the opposite is true when an adversary's influence power is more substantial.
△ Less
Submitted 3 October, 2020; v1 submitted 5 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
A risk-security tradeoff in graphical coordination games
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Mahnoosh Alizadeh,
Jason R. Marden
Abstract:
A system relying on the collective behavior of decision-makers can be vulnerable to a variety of adversarial attacks. How well can a system operator protect performance in the face of these risks? We frame this question in the context of graphical coordination games, where the agents in a network choose among two conventions and derive benefits from coordinating neighbors, and system performance i…
▽ More
A system relying on the collective behavior of decision-makers can be vulnerable to a variety of adversarial attacks. How well can a system operator protect performance in the face of these risks? We frame this question in the context of graphical coordination games, where the agents in a network choose among two conventions and derive benefits from coordinating neighbors, and system performance is measured in terms of the agents' welfare. In this paper, we assess an operator's ability to mitigate two types of adversarial attacks - 1) broad attacks, where the adversary incentivizes all agents in the network and 2) focused attacks, where the adversary can force a selected subset of the agents to commit to a prescribed convention. As a mitigation strategy, the system operator can implement a class of distributed algorithms that govern the agents' decision-making process. Our main contribution characterizes the operator's fundamental trade-off between security against worst-case broad attacks and vulnerability from focused attacks. We show that this tradeoff significantly improves when the operator selects a decision-making process at random. Our work highlights the design challenges a system operator faces in maintaining resilience of networked distributed systems.
△ Less
Submitted 6 June, 2019; v1 submitted 3 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
Control of learning in anti-coordination network games
Authors:
Ceyhun Eksin,
Keith Paarporn
Abstract:
We consider control of heterogeneous players repeatedly playing an anti-coordination network game. In an anti-coordination game, each player has an incentive to differentiate its action from its neighbors. At each round of play, players take actions according to a learning algorithm that mimics the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies. We show that the learning dynamics may fail t…
▽ More
We consider control of heterogeneous players repeatedly playing an anti-coordination network game. In an anti-coordination game, each player has an incentive to differentiate its action from its neighbors. At each round of play, players take actions according to a learning algorithm that mimics the iterated elimination of strictly dominated strategies. We show that the learning dynamics may fail to reach anti-coordination in certain scenarios. We formulate an optimization problem with the objective to reach maximum anti-coordination while minimizing the number of players to control. We consider both static and dynamic control policy formulations. Relating the problem to a minimum vertex cover problem on bipartite networks, we develop a feasible dynamic policy that is efficient to compute. Solving for optimal policies on benchmark networks show that the vertex cover based policy can be a loose upper bound when there is a potential to make use of cascades caused by the learning dynamics of uncontrolled players. We propose an algorithm that finds feasible, though possibly suboptimal, policies by sequentially adding players to control considering their cascade potential. Numerical experiments on random networks show the cascade-based algorithm can lower the control effort significantly compared to simpler control schemes.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2018; v1 submitted 8 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Going Viral: Stability of Consensus-Driven Adoptive Spread
Authors:
Sebastian F. Ruf,
Keith Paarporn,
Philip E. Paré
Abstract:
The spread of new products in a networked population is often modeled as an epidemic. However, in the case of `complex' contagion, these models {do not capture nuanced, dynamic social reinforcement effects in adoption behavior}. In this paper, we investigate a model of complex contagion which allows a coevolutionary interplay between adoption, modeled as an SIS epidemic spreading process, and soci…
▽ More
The spread of new products in a networked population is often modeled as an epidemic. However, in the case of `complex' contagion, these models {do not capture nuanced, dynamic social reinforcement effects in adoption behavior}. In this paper, we investigate a model of complex contagion which allows a coevolutionary interplay between adoption, modeled as an SIS epidemic spreading process, and social reinforcement effects, modeled as consensus opinion dynamics. Asymptotic stability analysis of the all-adopt as well as the none-adopt equilibria of the combined opinion-adoption model is provided through the use of Lyapunov arguments. In doing so, sufficient conditions are provided which determine the stability of the `flop' state, where no one adopts the product and everyone's opinion of the product is least favorable, and the `hit' state, where everyone adopts and their opinions are most favorable. These conditions are shown to extend to the bounded confidence opinion dynamic under a stronger assumption on the model parameters. To conclude, numerical simulations demonstrate behavior of the model which reflect findings from the sociology literature on adoption behavior.
△ Less
Submitted 14 February, 2019; v1 submitted 12 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Optimal control policies for evolutionary dynamics with environmental feedback
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Ceyhun Eksin,
Joshua S. Weitz,
Yorai Wardi
Abstract:
We study a dynamical model of a population of cooperators and defectors whose actions have long-term consequences on environmental "commons" - what we term the "resource". Cooperators contribute to restoring the resource whereas defectors degrade it. The population dynamics evolve according to a replicator equation coupled with an environmental state. Our goal is to identify methods of influencing…
▽ More
We study a dynamical model of a population of cooperators and defectors whose actions have long-term consequences on environmental "commons" - what we term the "resource". Cooperators contribute to restoring the resource whereas defectors degrade it. The population dynamics evolve according to a replicator equation coupled with an environmental state. Our goal is to identify methods of influencing the population with the objective to maximize accumulation of the resource. In particular, we consider strategies that modify individual-level incentives. We then extend the model to incorporate a public opinion state that imperfectly tracks the true environmental state, and study strategies that influence opinion. We formulate optimal control problems and solve them using numerical techniques to characterize locally optimal control policies for three problem formulations: 1) control of incentives, and control of opinions through 2) propaganda-like strategies and 3) awareness campaigns. We show numerically that the resulting controllers in all formulations achieve the objective, albeit with an unintended consequence. The resulting dynamics include cycles between low and high resource states - a dynamical regime termed an "oscillating tragedy of the commons". This outcome may have desirable average properties, but includes risks to resource depletion. Our findings suggest the need for new approaches to controlling coupled population-environment dynamics.
△ Less
Submitted 18 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Networked SIS Epidemics with Awareness
Authors:
Keith Paarporn,
Ceyhun Eksin,
Joshua S. Weitz,
Jeff S. Shamma
Abstract:
We study an SIS epidemic process over a static contact network where the nodes have partial information about the epidemic state. They react by limiting their interactions with their neighbors when they believe the epidemic is currently prevalent. A node's awareness is weighted by the fraction of infected neighbors in their social network, and a global broadcast of the fraction of infected nodes i…
▽ More
We study an SIS epidemic process over a static contact network where the nodes have partial information about the epidemic state. They react by limiting their interactions with their neighbors when they believe the epidemic is currently prevalent. A node's awareness is weighted by the fraction of infected neighbors in their social network, and a global broadcast of the fraction of infected nodes in the entire network. The dynamics of the benchmark (no awareness) and awareness models are described by discrete-time Markov chains, from which mean-field approximations (MFA) are derived. The states of the MFA are interpreted as the nodes' probabilities of being infected. We show a sufficient condition for existence of a "metastable", or endemic, state of the awareness model coincides with that of the benchmark model. Furthermore, we use a coupling technique to give a full stochastic comparison analysis between the two chains, which serves as a probabilistic analogue to the MFA analysis. In particular, we show that adding awareness reduces the expectation of any epidemic metric on the space of sample paths, e.g. eradication time or total infections. We characterize the reduction in expectations in terms of the coupling distribution. In simulations, we evaluate the effect social distancing has on contact networks from different random graph families (geometric, Erdős-Renyi, and scale-free random networks).
△ Less
Submitted 12 July, 2016; v1 submitted 8 July, 2016;
originally announced July 2016.
