Waveform accuracy and systematic uncertainties in current gravitational wave observations
Authors:
Caroline B. Owen,
Carl-Johan Haster,
Scott Perkins,
Neil J. Cornish,
Nicolás Yunes
Abstract:
The post-Newtonian formalism plays an integral role in the models used to extract information from gravitational wave data, but models that incorporate this formalism are inherently approximations. Disagreement between an approximate model and nature will produce mismodeling biases in the parameters inferred from data, introducing systematic error. We here carry out a proof-of-principle study of s…
▽ More
The post-Newtonian formalism plays an integral role in the models used to extract information from gravitational wave data, but models that incorporate this formalism are inherently approximations. Disagreement between an approximate model and nature will produce mismodeling biases in the parameters inferred from data, introducing systematic error. We here carry out a proof-of-principle study of such systematic error by considering signals produced by quasi-circular, inspiraling black hole binaries through an injection and recovery campaign. In particular, we study how unknown, but calibrated, higher-order post-Newtonian corrections to the gravitational wave phase impact systematic error in recovered parameters. As a first study, we produce injected data of non-spinning binaries as detected by a current, second-generation network of ground-based observatories and recover them with models of varying PN order in the phase. We find that the truncation of higher order (>3.5) post-Newtonian corrections to the phase can produce significant systematic error even at signal-to-noise ratios of current detector networks. We propose a method to mitigate systematic error by marginalizing over our ignorance in the waveform through the inclusion of higher-order post-Newtonian coefficients as new model parameters. We show that this method can reduce systematic error greatly at the cost of increasing statistical error.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2023; v1 submitted 27 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
Petrov Type, Principal Null Directions, and Killing Tensors of Slowly-Rotating Black Holes in Quadratic Gravity
Authors:
Caroline B. Owen,
Nicolás Yunes,
Helvi Witek
Abstract:
The ability to test general relativity in extreme gravity regimes using gravitational wave observations from current ground-based or future space-based detectors motivates the mathematical study of the symmetries of black holes in modified theories of gravity. In this paper we focus on spinning black hole solutions in two quadratic gravity theories: dynamical Chern-Simons and scalar Gauss-Bonnet g…
▽ More
The ability to test general relativity in extreme gravity regimes using gravitational wave observations from current ground-based or future space-based detectors motivates the mathematical study of the symmetries of black holes in modified theories of gravity. In this paper we focus on spinning black hole solutions in two quadratic gravity theories: dynamical Chern-Simons and scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity. We compute the principal null directions, Weyl scalars, and complex null tetrad in the small-coupling, slow rotation approximation for both theories, confirming that both spacetimes are Petrov type I. Additionally, we solve the Killing equation through rank 6 in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity and rank 2 in scalar Gauss-Bonnet gravity, showing that there is no nontrivial Killing tensor through those ranks for each theory. We therefore conjecture that the still-unknown, exact, quadratic-gravity, black-hole solutions do not possess a fourth constant of motion.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2024; v1 submitted 29 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
