Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Oufkir, A

Hamiltonian Property Testing

Authors: Andreas Bluhm, Matthias C. Caro, Aadil Oufkir

Abstract: Locality is a fundamental feature of many physical time evolutions. Assumptions on locality and related structural properties also underlie recently proposed procedures for learning an unknown Hamiltonian from access to the induced time evolution. However, no protocols to rigorously test whether an unknown Hamiltonian is local were known. We investigate Hamiltonian locality testing as a property t… ▽ More Locality is a fundamental feature of many physical time evolutions. Assumptions on locality and related structural properties also underlie recently proposed procedures for learning an unknown Hamiltonian from access to the induced time evolution. However, no protocols to rigorously test whether an unknown Hamiltonian is local were known. We investigate Hamiltonian locality testing as a property testing problem, where the task is to determine whether an unknown $n$-qubit Hamiltonian $H$ is $k$-local or $\varepsilon$-far from all $k$-local Hamiltonians, given access to the time evolution along $H$. First, we emphasize the importance of the chosen distance measure: With respect to the operator norm, a worst-case distance measure, incoherent quantum locality testers require $\tildeΩ(2^n)$ many time evolution queries and an expected total evolution time of $\tildeΩ(2^n / \varepsilon)$, and even coherent testers need $Ω(2^{n/2})$ many queries and $Ω(2^{n/2}/\varepsilon)$ total evolution time. In contrast, when distances are measured according to the normalized Frobenius norm, corresponding to an average-case distance, we give a sample-, time-, and computationally efficient incoherent Hamiltonian locality testing algorithm based on randomized measurements. In fact, our procedure can be used to simultaneously test a wide class of Hamiltonian properties beyond locality. Finally, we prove that learning a general Hamiltonian remains exponentially hard with this average-case distance, thereby establishing an exponential separation between Hamiltonian testing and learning. Our work initiates the study of property testing for quantum Hamiltonians, demonstrating that a broad class of Hamiltonian properties is efficiently testable even with limited quantum capabilities, and positioning Hamiltonian testing as an independent area of research alongside Hamiltonian learning. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2024; v1 submitted 5 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Comments: 39+21 pages, 3 figures; improved upper bounds, added tolerant tester, corrected some typos

Learning Properties of Quantum States Without the I.I.D. Assumption

Authors: Omar Fawzi, Richard Kueng, Damian Markham, Aadil Oufkir

Abstract: We develop a framework for learning properties of quantum states beyond the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) input states. We prove that, given any learning problem (under reasonable assumptions), an algorithm designed for i.i.d. input states can be adapted to handle input states of any nature, albeit at the expense of a polynomial increase in copy complexity. Further… ▽ More We develop a framework for learning properties of quantum states beyond the assumption of independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) input states. We prove that, given any learning problem (under reasonable assumptions), an algorithm designed for i.i.d. input states can be adapted to handle input states of any nature, albeit at the expense of a polynomial increase in copy complexity. Furthermore, we establish that algorithms which perform non-adaptive incoherent measurements can be extended to encompass non-i.i.d. input states while maintaining comparable error probabilities. This allows us, among others applications, to generalize the classical shadows of Huang, Kueng, and Preskill to the non-i.i.d. setting at the cost of a small loss in efficiency. Additionally, we can efficiently verify any pure state using Clifford measurements, in a way that is independent of the ideal state. Our main techniques are based on de Finetti-style theorems supported by tools from information theory. In particular, we prove a new randomized local de Finetti theorem that can be of independent interest. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Quantum Channel Certification with Incoherent Strategies

Authors: Omar Fawzi, Nicolas Flammarion, Aurélien Garivier, Aadil Oufkir

Abstract: In the problem of quantum channel certification, we have black box access to a quantum process and would like to decide if this process matches some predefined specification or is $\varepsilon$-far from this specification. The objective is to achieve this task while minimizing the number of times the black box is used. Here, we focus on optimal incoherent strategies for two relevant extreme case… ▽ More In the problem of quantum channel certification, we have black box access to a quantum process and would like to decide if this process matches some predefined specification or is $\varepsilon$-far from this specification. The objective is to achieve this task while minimizing the number of times the black box is used. Here, we focus on optimal incoherent strategies for two relevant extreme cases of channel certification. The first one is when the predefined specification is a unitary channel, e.g., a gate in a quantum circuit. In this case, we show that testing whether the black box is described by a fixed unitary operator in dimension $d$ or $\varepsilon$-far from it in the trace norm requires $Θ(d/\varepsilon^2)$ uses of the black box. The second setting we consider is when the predefined specification is a completely depolarizing channel with input dimension $d_{\text{in}}$ and output dimension $d_{\text{out}}$. In this case, we prove that, in the non-adaptive setting, $\tildeΘ(d_{\text{in}}^2d_{\text{out}}^{1.5}/\varepsilon^2)$ uses of the channel are necessary and sufficient to verify whether it is equal to the depolarizing channel or $\varepsilon$-far from it in the diamond norm. Finally, we prove a lower bound of $Ω(d_{\text{in}}^2d_{\text{out}}/\varepsilon^2)$ for this problem in the adaptive setting. Note that the special case $d_{\text{in}} = 1$ corresponds to the well-studied quantum state certification problem. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2023; v1 submitted 2 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: The lower bounds are generalized to ancilla assisted strategies

Sample-Optimal Quantum Process Tomography with Non-Adaptive Incoherent Measurements

Authors: Aadil Oufkir

Abstract: How many copies of a quantum process are necessary and sufficient to construct an approximate classical description of it? We extend the result of Surawy-Stepney, Kahn, Kueng, and Guta (2022) to show that $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d_{\text{in}}^3d_{\text{out}}^3/\varepsilon^2)$ copies are sufficient to learn any quantum channel… ▽ More How many copies of a quantum process are necessary and sufficient to construct an approximate classical description of it? We extend the result of Surawy-Stepney, Kahn, Kueng, and Guta (2022) to show that $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(d_{\text{in}}^3d_{\text{out}}^3/\varepsilon^2)$ copies are sufficient to learn any quantum channel $C^{d_{\text{in}}\times d_{\text{in}}} \rightarrow C^{d_{\text{out}}\times d_{\text{out}}}$ to within $\varepsilon$ in diamond norm. Moreover, we show that $Ω(d_{\text{in}}^3 d_{\text{out}}^3/\varepsilon^2)$ copies are necessary for any strategy using incoherent non-adaptive measurements. This lower bound applies even for ancilla-assisted strategies. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Journal ref: 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

Lower Bounds on Learning Pauli Channels

Authors: Omar Fawzi, Aadil Oufkir, Daniel Stilck França

Abstract: Understanding the noise affecting a quantum device is of fundamental importance for scaling quantum technologies. A particularly important class of noise models is that of Pauli channels, as randomized compiling techniques can effectively bring any quantum channel to this form and are significantly more structured than general quantum channels. In this paper, we show fundamental lower bounds on th… ▽ More Understanding the noise affecting a quantum device is of fundamental importance for scaling quantum technologies. A particularly important class of noise models is that of Pauli channels, as randomized compiling techniques can effectively bring any quantum channel to this form and are significantly more structured than general quantum channels. In this paper, we show fundamental lower bounds on the sample complexity for learning Pauli channels in diamond norm with unentangled measurements. We consider both adaptive and non-adaptive strategies. In the non-adaptive setting, we show a lower bound of $Ω(2^{3n}ε^{-2})$ to learn an $n$-qubit Pauli channel. In particular, this shows that the recently introduced learning procedure by Flammia and Wallman is essentially optimal. In the adaptive setting, we show a lower bound of $Ω(2^{2.5n}ε^{-2})$ for $ε=\mathcal{O}(2^{-n})$, and a lower bound of $Ω(2^{2n}ε^{-2} )$ for any $ε> 0$. This last lower bound even applies for arbitrarily many sequential uses of the channel, as long as they are only interspersed with other unital operations. △ Less

Submitted 22 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Sequential algorithms for testing identity and closeness of distributions

Authors: Omar Fawzi, Nicolas Flammarion, Aurélien Garivier, Aadil Oufkir

Abstract: What advantage do \emph{sequential} procedures provide over batch algorithms for testing properties of unknown distributions? Focusing on the problem of testing whether two distributions $\mathcal{D}_1$ and $\mathcal{D}_2$ on $\{1,\dots, n\}$ are equal or $ε$-far, we give several answers to this question. We show that for a small alphabet size $n$, there is a sequential algorithm that outperforms… ▽ More What advantage do \emph{sequential} procedures provide over batch algorithms for testing properties of unknown distributions? Focusing on the problem of testing whether two distributions $\mathcal{D}_1$ and $\mathcal{D}_2$ on $\{1,\dots, n\}$ are equal or $ε$-far, we give several answers to this question. We show that for a small alphabet size $n$, there is a sequential algorithm that outperforms any batch algorithm by a factor of at least $4$ in terms sample complexity. For a general alphabet size $n$, we give a sequential algorithm that uses no more samples than its batch counterpart, and possibly fewer if the actual distance $TV(\mathcal{D}_1, \mathcal{D}_2)$ between $\mathcal{D}_1$ and $\mathcal{D}_2$ is larger than $ε$. As a corollary, letting $ε$ go to $0$, we obtain a sequential algorithm for testing closeness when no a priori bound on $TV(\mathcal{D}_1, \mathcal{D}_2)$ is given that has a sample complexity $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{n^{2/3}}{TV(\mathcal{D}_1, \mathcal{D}_2)^{4/3}})$: this improves over the $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(\frac{n/\log n}{TV(\mathcal{D}_1, \mathcal{D}_2)^{2} })$ tester of \cite{daskalakis2017optimal} and is optimal up to multiplicative constants. We also establish limitations of sequential algorithms for the problem of testing identity and closeness: they can improve the worst case number of samples by at most a constant factor. △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.