Impacts of Social Distancing Policies on Mobility and COVID-19 Case Growth in the US
Authors:
Gregory A. Wellenius,
Swapnil Vispute,
Valeria Espinosa,
Alex Fabrikant,
Thomas C. Tsai,
Jonathan Hennessy,
Andrew Dai,
Brian Williams,
Krishna Gadepalli,
Adam Boulanger,
Adam Pearce,
Chaitanya Kamath,
Arran Schlosberg,
Catherine Bendebury,
Chinmoy Mandayam,
Charlotte Stanton,
Shailesh Bavadekar,
Christopher Pluntke,
Damien Desfontaines,
Benjamin Jacobson,
Zan Armstrong,
Bryant Gipson,
Royce Wilson,
Andrew Widdowson,
Katherine Chou
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Social distancing remains an important strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. However, the impacts of specific state-level policies on mobility and subsequent COVID-19 case trajectories have not been completely quantified. Using anonymized and aggregated mobility data from opted-in Google users, we found that state-level emergency declarations resulted in a 9.9% reduction i…
▽ More
Social distancing remains an important strategy to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States. However, the impacts of specific state-level policies on mobility and subsequent COVID-19 case trajectories have not been completely quantified. Using anonymized and aggregated mobility data from opted-in Google users, we found that state-level emergency declarations resulted in a 9.9% reduction in time spent away from places of residence. Implementation of one or more social distancing policies resulted in an additional 24.5% reduction in mobility the following week, and subsequent shelter-in-place mandates yielded an additional 29.0% reduction. Decreases in mobility were associated with substantial reductions in case growth 2 to 4 weeks later. For example, a 10% reduction in mobility was associated with a 17.5% reduction in case growth 2 weeks later. Given the continued reliance on social distancing policies to limit the spread of COVID-19, these results may be helpful to public health officials trying to balance infection control with the economic and social consequences of these policies.
△ Less
Submitted 27 May, 2021; v1 submitted 21 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports: Anonymization Process Description (version 1.1)
Authors:
Ahmet Aktay,
Shailesh Bavadekar,
Gwen Cossoul,
John Davis,
Damien Desfontaines,
Alex Fabrikant,
Evgeniy Gabrilovich,
Krishna Gadepalli,
Bryant Gipson,
Miguel Guevara,
Chaitanya Kamath,
Mansi Kansal,
Ali Lange,
Chinmoy Mandayam,
Andrew Oplinger,
Christopher Pluntke,
Thomas Roessler,
Arran Schlosberg,
Tomer Shekel,
Swapnil Vispute,
Mia Vu,
Gregory Wellenius,
Brian Williams,
Royce J Wilson
Abstract:
This document describes the aggregation and anonymization process applied to the initial version of Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports (published at http://google.com/covid19/mobility on April 2, 2020), a publicly available resource intended to help public health authorities understand what has changed in response to work-from-home, shelter-in-place, and other recommended policies aimed at…
▽ More
This document describes the aggregation and anonymization process applied to the initial version of Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports (published at http://google.com/covid19/mobility on April 2, 2020), a publicly available resource intended to help public health authorities understand what has changed in response to work-from-home, shelter-in-place, and other recommended policies aimed at flattening the curve of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our anonymization process is designed to ensure that no personal data, including an individual's location, movement, or contacts, can be derived from the resulting metrics.
The high-level description of the procedure is as follows: we first generate a set of anonymized metrics from the data of Google users who opted in to Location History. Then, we compute percentage changes of these metrics from a baseline based on the historical part of the anonymized metrics. We then discard a subset which does not meet our bar for statistical reliability, and release the rest publicly in a format that compares the result to the private baseline.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2020; v1 submitted 8 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
