-
Deep operator learning-based surrogate models for aerothermodynamic analysis of AEDC hypersonic waverider
Authors:
Khemraj Shukla,
Jasmine Ratchford,
Luis Bravo,
Vivek Oommen,
Nicholas Plewacki,
Anindya Ghoshal,
George Karniadakis
Abstract:
Neural networks are universal approximators that traditionally have been used to learn a map between function inputs and outputs. However, recent research has demonstrated that deep neural networks can be used to approximate operators, learning function-to-function map**s. Creating surrogate models to supplement computationally expensive hypersonic aerothermodynamic models in characterizing the…
▽ More
Neural networks are universal approximators that traditionally have been used to learn a map between function inputs and outputs. However, recent research has demonstrated that deep neural networks can be used to approximate operators, learning function-to-function map**s. Creating surrogate models to supplement computationally expensive hypersonic aerothermodynamic models in characterizing the response of flow fields at different angles of attack (AoA) is an ideal application of neural operators. We investigate the use of neural operators to infer flow fields (volume and surface quantities) around a geometry based on a 3D waverider model based on experimental data measured at the Arnold Engineering Development Center (AEDC) Hypervelocity Wind Tunnel Number 9. We use a DeepONet neural operator which consists of two neural networks, commonly called a branch and a trunk network. The final output is the inner product of the output of the branch network and the output of the trunk net. Because the flow field contains shocks across the entire volume, we conduct a two-step training approach of the DeepONet that facilitates accurate approximation of solutions even in the presence of discontinuities. We train various DeepONet models to understand and predict pressure $(p)$, density $(ρ)$, velocity $(u)$, heat flux $(Q_w)$, and total shear stress $(τ_{w})$ for the AEDC waverider geometry at Ma=7.36 across AoA that range from $-10^{\circ}$ to $10^{\circ}$ for surface quantities and from $-14^{\circ}$ to $14^{\circ}$ for volume quantities.
△ Less
Submitted 21 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
RiemannONets: Interpretable Neural Operators for Riemann Problems
Authors:
Ahmad Peyvan,
Vivek Oommen,
Ameya D. Jagtap,
George Em Karniadakis
Abstract:
Develo** the proper representations for simulating high-speed flows with strong shock waves, rarefactions, and contact discontinuities has been a long-standing question in numerical analysis. Herein, we employ neural operators to solve Riemann problems encountered in compressible flows for extreme pressure jumps (up to $10^{10}$ pressure ratio). In particular, we first consider the DeepONet that…
▽ More
Develo** the proper representations for simulating high-speed flows with strong shock waves, rarefactions, and contact discontinuities has been a long-standing question in numerical analysis. Herein, we employ neural operators to solve Riemann problems encountered in compressible flows for extreme pressure jumps (up to $10^{10}$ pressure ratio). In particular, we first consider the DeepONet that we train in a two-stage process, following the recent work of \cite{lee2023training}, wherein the first stage, a basis is extracted from the trunk net, which is orthonormalized and subsequently is used in the second stage in training the branch net. This simple modification of DeepONet has a profound effect on its accuracy, efficiency, and robustness and leads to very accurate solutions to Riemann problems compared to the vanilla version. It also enables us to interpret the results physically as the hierarchical data-driven produced basis reflects all the flow features that would otherwise be introduced using ad hoc feature expansion layers. We also compare the results with another neural operator based on the U-Net for low, intermediate, and very high-pressure ratios that are very accurate for Riemann problems, especially for large pressure ratios, due to their multiscale nature but computationally more expensive. Overall, our study demonstrates that simple neural network architectures, if properly pre-trained, can achieve very accurate solutions of Riemann problems for real-time forecasting. The source code, along with its corresponding data, can be found at the following URL: https://github.com/apey236/RiemannONet/tree/main
△ Less
Submitted 16 April, 2024; v1 submitted 16 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Rethinking materials simulations: Blending direct numerical simulations with neural operators
Authors:
Vivek Oommen,
Khemraj Shukla,
Saaketh Desai,
Remi Dingreville,
George Em Karniadakis
Abstract:
Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are accurate but computationally expensive for predicting materials evolution across timescales, due to the complexity of the underlying evolution equations, the nature of multiscale spatio-temporal interactions, and the need to reach long-time integration. We develop a new method that blends numerical solvers with neural operators to accelerate such simulations.…
▽ More
Direct numerical simulations (DNS) are accurate but computationally expensive for predicting materials evolution across timescales, due to the complexity of the underlying evolution equations, the nature of multiscale spatio-temporal interactions, and the need to reach long-time integration. We develop a new method that blends numerical solvers with neural operators to accelerate such simulations. This methodology is based on the integration of a community numerical solver with a U-Net neural operator, enhanced by a temporal-conditioning mechanism that enables accurate extrapolation and efficient time-to-solution predictions of the dynamics. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this framework on simulations of microstructure evolution during physical vapor deposition modeled via the phase-field method. Such simulations exhibit high spatial gradients due to the co-evolution of different material phases with simultaneous slow and fast materials dynamics. We establish accurate extrapolation of the coupled solver with up to 16.5$\times$ speed-up compared to DNS. This methodology is generalizable to a broad range of evolutionary models, from solid mechanics, to fluid dynamics, geophysics, climate, and more.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
GPT vs Human for Scientific Reviews: A Dual Source Review on Applications of ChatGPT in Science
Authors:
Chenxi Wu,
Alan John Varghese,
Vivek Oommen,
George Em Karniadakis
Abstract:
The new polymath Large Language Models (LLMs) can speed-up greatly scientific reviews, possibly using more unbiased quantitative metrics, facilitating cross-disciplinary connections, and identifying emerging trends and research gaps by analyzing large volumes of data. However, at the present time, they lack the required deep understanding of complex methodologies, they have difficulty in evaluatin…
▽ More
The new polymath Large Language Models (LLMs) can speed-up greatly scientific reviews, possibly using more unbiased quantitative metrics, facilitating cross-disciplinary connections, and identifying emerging trends and research gaps by analyzing large volumes of data. However, at the present time, they lack the required deep understanding of complex methodologies, they have difficulty in evaluating innovative claims, and they are unable to assess ethical issues and conflicts of interest. Herein, we consider 13 GPT-related papers across different scientific domains, reviewed by a human reviewer and SciSpace, a large language model, with the reviews evaluated by three distinct types of evaluators, namely GPT-3.5, a crowd panel, and GPT-4. We found that 50% of SciSpace's responses to objective questions align with those of a human reviewer, with GPT-4 (informed evaluator) often rating the human reviewer higher in accuracy, and SciSpace higher in structure, clarity, and completeness. In subjective questions, the uninformed evaluators (GPT-3.5 and crowd panel) showed varying preferences between SciSpace and human responses, with the crowd panel showing a preference for the human responses. However, GPT-4 rated them equally in accuracy and structure but favored SciSpace for completeness.
△ Less
Submitted 5 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Real-time Inference and Extrapolation via a Diffusion-inspired Temporal Transformer Operator (DiTTO)
Authors:
Oded Ovadia,
Vivek Oommen,
Adar Kahana,
Ahmad Peyvan,
Eli Turkel,
George Em Karniadakis
Abstract:
Extrapolation remains a grand challenge in deep neural networks across all application domains. We propose an operator learning method to solve time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) continuously and with extrapolation in time without any temporal discretization. The proposed method, named Diffusion-inspired Temporal Transformer Operator (DiTTO), is inspired by latent diffusion model…
▽ More
Extrapolation remains a grand challenge in deep neural networks across all application domains. We propose an operator learning method to solve time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs) continuously and with extrapolation in time without any temporal discretization. The proposed method, named Diffusion-inspired Temporal Transformer Operator (DiTTO), is inspired by latent diffusion models and their conditioning mechanism, which we use to incorporate the temporal evolution of the PDE, in combination with elements from the transformer architecture to improve its capabilities. Upon training, DiTTO can make inferences in real-time. We demonstrate its extrapolation capability on a climate problem by estimating the temperature around the globe for several years, and also in modeling hypersonic flows around a double-cone. We propose different training strategies involving temporal-bundling and sub-sampling and demonstrate performance improvements for several benchmarks, performing extrapolation for long time intervals as well as zero-shot super-resolution in time.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2023; v1 submitted 18 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Deep neural operators can serve as accurate surrogates for shape optimization: A case study for airfoils
Authors:
Khemraj Shukla,
Vivek Oommen,
Ahmad Peyvan,
Michael Penwarden,
Luis Bravo,
Anindya Ghoshal,
Robert M. Kirby,
George Em Karniadakis
Abstract:
Deep neural operators, such as DeepONets, have changed the paradigm in high-dimensional nonlinear regression from function regression to (differential) operator regression, paving the way for significant changes in computational engineering applications. Here, we investigate the use of DeepONets to infer flow fields around unseen airfoils with the aim of shape optimization, an important design pro…
▽ More
Deep neural operators, such as DeepONets, have changed the paradigm in high-dimensional nonlinear regression from function regression to (differential) operator regression, paving the way for significant changes in computational engineering applications. Here, we investigate the use of DeepONets to infer flow fields around unseen airfoils with the aim of shape optimization, an important design problem in aerodynamics that typically taxes computational resources heavily. We present results which display little to no degradation in prediction accuracy, while reducing the online optimization cost by orders of magnitude. We consider NACA airfoils as a test case for our proposed approach, as their shape can be easily defined by the four-digit parametrization. We successfully optimize the constrained NACA four-digit problem with respect to maximizing the lift-to-drag ratio and validate all results by comparing them to a high-order CFD solver. We find that DeepONets have low generalization error, making them ideal for generating solutions of unseen shapes. Specifically, pressure, density, and velocity fields are accurately inferred at a fraction of a second, hence enabling the use of general objective functions beyond the maximization of the lift-to-drag ratio considered in the current work.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Learning two-phase microstructure evolution using neural operators and autoencoder architectures
Authors:
Vivek Oommen,
Khemraj Shukla,
Somdatta Goswami,
Remi Dingreville,
George Em Karniadakis
Abstract:
Phase-field modeling is an effective but computationally expensive method for capturing the mesoscale morphological and microstructure evolution in materials. Hence, fast and generalizable surrogate models are needed to alleviate the cost of computationally taxing processes such as in optimization and design of materials. The intrinsic discontinuous nature of the physical phenomena incurred by the…
▽ More
Phase-field modeling is an effective but computationally expensive method for capturing the mesoscale morphological and microstructure evolution in materials. Hence, fast and generalizable surrogate models are needed to alleviate the cost of computationally taxing processes such as in optimization and design of materials. The intrinsic discontinuous nature of the physical phenomena incurred by the presence of sharp phase boundaries makes the training of the surrogate model cumbersome. We develop a framework that integrates a convolutional autoencoder architecture with a deep neural operator (DeepONet) to learn the dynamic evolution of a two-phase mixture and accelerate time-to-solution in predicting the microstructure evolution. We utilize the convolutional autoencoder to provide a compact representation of the microstructure data in a low-dimensional latent space. DeepONet, which consists of two sub-networks, one for encoding the input function at a fixed number of sensors locations (branch net) and another for encoding the locations for the output functions (trunk net), learns the mesoscale dynamics of the microstructure evolution from the autoencoder latent space. The decoder part of the convolutional autoencoder then reconstructs the time-evolved microstructure from the DeepONet predictions. The trained DeepONet architecture can then be used to replace the high-fidelity phase-field numerical solver in interpolation tasks or to accelerate the numerical solver in extrapolation tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2022; v1 submitted 11 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
