Showing 1–37 of 37 results for author: Olivetti, D

Shared Randomness Helps with Local Distributed Problems

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn, Augusto Modanese, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: By prior work, we have many results related to distributed graph algorithms for problems that can be defined with local constraints; the formal framework used in prior work is locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer in the 1990s. It is known, for example, that if we have a deterministic algorithm that solves an LCL in $o(\log n)$ rounds, we can speed it up to… ▽ More By prior work, we have many results related to distributed graph algorithms for problems that can be defined with local constraints; the formal framework used in prior work is locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer in the 1990s. It is known, for example, that if we have a deterministic algorithm that solves an LCL in $o(\log n)$ rounds, we can speed it up to $O(\log^*n)$ rounds, and if we have a randomized $O(\log^*n)$ rounds algorithm, we can derandomize it for free. It is also known that randomness helps with some LCL problems: there are LCL problems with randomized complexity $Θ(\log\log n)$ and deterministic complexity $Θ(\log n)$. However, so far there have not been any LCL problems in which the use of shared randomness has been necessary; in all prior algorithms it has been enough that the nodes have access to their own private sources of randomness. Could it be the case that shared randomness never helps with LCLs? Could we have a general technique that takes any distributed graph algorithm for any LCL that uses shared randomness, and turns it into an equally fast algorithm where private randomness is enough? In this work we show that the answer is no. We present an LCL problem $Π$ such that the round complexity of $Π$ is $Ω(\sqrt n)$ in the usual randomized \local model with private randomness, but if the nodes have access to a source of shared randomness, then the complexity drops to $O(\log n)$. As corollaries, we also resolve several other open questions related to the landscape of distributed computing in the context of LCL problems. In particular, problem $Π$ demonstrates that distributed quantum algorithms for LCL problems strictly benefit from a shared quantum state. Problem $Π$ also gives a separation between finitely dependent distributions and non-signaling distributions. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Local Advice and Local Decompression

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Krzysztof Nowicki, Dennis Olivetti, Eva Rotenberg, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Algorithms with advice have received ample attention in the distributed and online settings, and they have recently proven useful also in dynamic settings. In this work we study local computation with advice: the goal is to solve a graph problem $Π$ with a distributed algorithm in $f(Δ)$ communication rounds, for some function $f$ that only depends on the maximum degree $Δ$ of the graph, and the k… ▽ More Algorithms with advice have received ample attention in the distributed and online settings, and they have recently proven useful also in dynamic settings. In this work we study local computation with advice: the goal is to solve a graph problem $Π$ with a distributed algorithm in $f(Δ)$ communication rounds, for some function $f$ that only depends on the maximum degree $Δ$ of the graph, and the key question is how many bits of advice per node are needed. Our main results are: - Any locally checkable labeling problem can be solved in graphs with sub-exponential growth with only $1$ bit of advice per node. Moreover, we can make the set of nodes that carry advice bits arbitrarily sparse, that is, we can make arbitrarily small the ratio between nodes carrying a 1 and the nodes carrying a 0. - The assumption of sub-exponential growth is necessary: assuming the Exponential-Time Hypothesis, there are LCLs that cannot be solved in general with any constant number of bits per node. - In any graph we can find an almost-balanced orientation (indegrees and outdegrees differ by at most one) with $1$ bit of advice per node, and again we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. - As a corollary, we can also compress an arbitrary subset of edges so that a node of degree $d$ stores only $d/2 + 2$ bits, and we can decompress it locally, in $f(Δ)$ rounds. - In any graph of maximum degree $Δ$, we can find a $Δ$-coloring (if it exists) with $1$ bit of advice per node, and again, we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. - In any $3$-colorable graph, we can find a $3$-coloring with $1$ bit of advice per node. Here, it remains open whether we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. Our work shows that for many problems the key threshold is not whether we can achieve, say, $1$ bit of advice per node, but whether we can make the advice arbitrarily sparse. △ Less

Submitted 7 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Completing the Node-Averaged Complexity Landscape of LCLs on Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti, Gustav Schmid

Abstract: The node-averaged complexity of a problem captures the number of rounds nodes of a graph have to spend on average to solve the problem in the LOCAL model. A challenging line of research with regards to this new complexity measure is to understand the complexity landscape of locally checkable labelings (LCLs) on families of bounded-degree graphs. Particularly interesting in this context is the fami… ▽ More The node-averaged complexity of a problem captures the number of rounds nodes of a graph have to spend on average to solve the problem in the LOCAL model. A challenging line of research with regards to this new complexity measure is to understand the complexity landscape of locally checkable labelings (LCLs) on families of bounded-degree graphs. Particularly interesting in this context is the family of bounded-degree trees as there, for the worst-case complexity, we know a complete characterization of the possible complexities and structures of LCL problems. A first step for the node-averaged complexity case has been achieved recently [DISC '23], where the authors in particular showed that in bounded-degree trees, there is a large complexity gap: There are no LCL problems with a deterministic node-averaged complexity between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $n^{o(1)}$. For randomized algorithms, they even showed that the node-averaged complexity is either $O(1)$ or $n^{Ω(1)}$. In this work we fill in the remaining gaps and give a complete description of the node-averaged complexity landscape of LCLs on bounded-degree trees. Our contributions are threefold. - On bounded-degree trees, there is no LCL with a node-averaged complexity between $ω(1)$ and $(\log^*n)^{o(1)}$. - For any constants $0<r_1 < r_2 \leq 1$ and $\varepsilon>0$, there exists a constant $c$ and an LCL problem with node-averaged complexity between $Ω((\log^* n)^c)$ and $O((\log^* n)^{c+\varepsilon})$. - For any constants $0<α\leq 1/2$ and $\varepsilon>0$, there exists an LCL problem with node-averaged complexity $Θ(n^x)$ for some $x\in [α, α+\varepsilon]$. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Tight Lower Bounds in the Supported LOCAL Model

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Thomas Boudier, Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: We study the complexity of fundamental distributed graph problems in the recently popular setting where information about the input graph is available to the nodes before the start of the computation. We focus on the most common such setting, known as the Supported LOCAL model, where the input graph (on which the studied graph problem has to be solved) is guaranteed to be a subgraph of the underly… ▽ More We study the complexity of fundamental distributed graph problems in the recently popular setting where information about the input graph is available to the nodes before the start of the computation. We focus on the most common such setting, known as the Supported LOCAL model, where the input graph (on which the studied graph problem has to be solved) is guaranteed to be a subgraph of the underlying communication network. Building on a successful lower bound technique for the LOCAL model called round elimination, we develop a framework for proving complexity lower bounds in the stronger Supported LOCAL model. Our framework reduces the task of proving a (deterministic or randomized) lower bound for a given problem $Π$ to the graph-theoretic task of proving non-existence of a solution to another problem $Π'$ (on a suitable graph) that can be derived from $Π$ in a mechanical manner. We use the developed framework to obtain substantial (and, in the majority of cases, asymptotically tight) Supported LOCAL lower bounds for a variety of fundamental graph problems, including maximal matching, maximal independent set, ruling sets, arbdefective colorings, and generalizations thereof. In a nutshell, for essentially any major lower bound proved in the LOCAL model in recent years, we prove a similar lower bound in the Supported LOCAL model. Our framework also gives rise to a new deterministic version of round elimination in the LOCAL model: while, previous to our work, the general round elimination technique required the use of randomness (even for obtaining deterministic lower bounds), our framework allows to obtain deterministic (and therefore via known lifting techniques also randomized) lower bounds in a purely deterministic manner. Previously, such a purely deterministic application of round elimination was only known for the specific problem of sinkless orientation [SOSA'23]. △ Less

Submitted 1 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

On the Node-Averaged Complexity of Locally Checkable Problems on Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti, Gustav Schmid

Abstract: Over the past decade, a long line of research has investigated the distributed complexity landscape of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems on bounded-degree graphs, culminating in an almost-complete classification on general graphs and a complete classification on trees. The latter states that, on bounded-degree trees, any LCL problem has deterministic worst-case time complexity $O(1)$,… ▽ More Over the past decade, a long line of research has investigated the distributed complexity landscape of locally checkable labeling (LCL) problems on bounded-degree graphs, culminating in an almost-complete classification on general graphs and a complete classification on trees. The latter states that, on bounded-degree trees, any LCL problem has deterministic worst-case time complexity $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for some positive integer $k$, and all of those complexity classes are nonempty. Moreover, randomness helps only for (some) problems with deterministic worst-case complexity $Θ(\log n)$, and if randomness helps (asymptotically), then it helps exponentially. In this work, we study how many distributed rounds are needed on average per node in order to solve an LCL problem on trees. We obtain a partial classification of the deterministic node-averaged complexity landscape for LCL problems. As our main result, we show that every problem with worst-case round complexity $O(\log n)$ has deterministic node-averaged complexity $O(\log^* n)$. Then we show how using randomization we can speed this up and show that every problem with worst case round complexity $O(\log n)$ has randomized node-averaged complexity $O(1)$. We further establish bounds on the node-averaged complexity of problems with worst-case complexity $Θ(n^{1/k})$: we show that all these problems have node-averaged complexity $\widetildeΩ(n^{1 / (2^k - 1)})$, and that this lower bound is tight for some problems. The lower bound holds even for the randomized case and the upper bound is a deterministic algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2024; v1 submitted 8 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: 68 pages, 10 figures, conference version in 37th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2023)

ACM Class: F.2.2; G.2.2

A Note on the Complexity of Maximizing Temporal Reachability via Edge Temporalisation of Directed Graphs

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Filippo Brunelli, Pierluigi Crescenzi, Dennis Olivetti, Laurent Viennot

Abstract: A temporal graph is a graph in which edges are assigned a time label. Two nodes u and v of a temporal graph are connected one to the other if there exists a path from u to v with increasing edge time labels. We consider the problem of assigning time labels to the edges of a digraph in order to maximize the total reachability of the resulting temporal graph (that is, the number of pairs of nodes wh… ▽ More A temporal graph is a graph in which edges are assigned a time label. Two nodes u and v of a temporal graph are connected one to the other if there exists a path from u to v with increasing edge time labels. We consider the problem of assigning time labels to the edges of a digraph in order to maximize the total reachability of the resulting temporal graph (that is, the number of pairs of nodes which are connected one to the other). In particular, we prove that this problem is NP-hard. We then conjecture that the problem is approximable within a constant approximation ratio. This conjecture is a consequence of the following graph theoretic conjecture: any strongly connected directed graph with n nodes admits an out-arborescence and an in-arborescence that are edge-disjoint, have the same root, and each spans $Ω$(n) nodes. △ Less

Submitted 3 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Optimal Deterministic Massively Parallel Connectivity on Forests

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Rustam Latypov, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jara Uitto

Abstract: We show fast deterministic algorithms for fundamental problems on forests in the challenging low-space regime of the well-known Massive Parallel Computation (MPC) model. A recent breakthrough result by Coy and Czumaj [STOC'22] shows that, in this setting, it is possible to deterministically identify connected components on graphs in $O(\log D + \log\log n)$ rounds, where $D$ is the diameter of the… ▽ More We show fast deterministic algorithms for fundamental problems on forests in the challenging low-space regime of the well-known Massive Parallel Computation (MPC) model. A recent breakthrough result by Coy and Czumaj [STOC'22] shows that, in this setting, it is possible to deterministically identify connected components on graphs in $O(\log D + \log\log n)$ rounds, where $D$ is the diameter of the graph and $n$ the number of nodes. The authors left open a major question: is it possible to get rid of the additive $\log\log n$ factor and deterministically identify connected components in a runtime that is completely independent of $n$? We answer the above question in the affirmative in the case of forests. We give an algorithm that identifies connected components in $O(\log D)$ deterministic rounds. The total memory required is $O(n+m)$ words, where $m$ is the number of edges in the input graph, which is optimal as it is only enough to store the input graph. We complement our upper bound results by showing that $Ω(\log D)$ time is necessary even for component-unstable algorithms, conditioned on the widely believed 1 vs. 2 cycles conjecture. Our techniques also yield a deterministic forest-rooting algorithm with the same runtime and memory bounds. Furthermore, we consider Locally Checkable Labeling problems (LCLs), whose solution can be verified by checking the $O(1)$-radius neighborhood of each node. We show that any LCL problem on forests can be solved in $O(\log D)$ rounds with a canonical deterministic algorithm, improving over the $O(\log n)$ runtime of Brandt, Latypov and Uitto [DISC'21]. We also show that there is no algorithm that solves all LCL problems on trees asymptotically faster. △ Less

Submitted 7 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) 2023

Distributed Maximal Matching and Maximal Independent Set on Hypergraphs

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: We investigate the distributed complexity of maximal matching and maximal independent set (MIS) in hypergraphs in the LOCAL model. A maximal matching of a hypergraph $H=(V_H,E_H)$ is a maximal disjoint set $M\subseteq E_H$ of hyperedges and an MIS $S\subseteq V_H$ is a maximal set of nodes such that no hyperedge is fully contained in $S$. Both problems can be solved by a simple sequential greedy a… ▽ More We investigate the distributed complexity of maximal matching and maximal independent set (MIS) in hypergraphs in the LOCAL model. A maximal matching of a hypergraph $H=(V_H,E_H)$ is a maximal disjoint set $M\subseteq E_H$ of hyperedges and an MIS $S\subseteq V_H$ is a maximal set of nodes such that no hyperedge is fully contained in $S$. Both problems can be solved by a simple sequential greedy algorithm, which can be implemented naively in $O(Δr + \log^* n)$ rounds, where $Δ$ is the maximum degree, $r$ is the rank, and $n$ is the number of nodes. We show that for maximal matching, this naive algorithm is optimal in the following sense. Any deterministic algorithm for solving the problem requires $Ω(\min\{Δr, \log_{Δr} n\})$ rounds, and any randomized one requires $Ω(\min\{Δr, \log_{Δr} \log n\})$ rounds. Hence, for any algorithm with a complexity of the form $O(f(Δ, r) + g(n))$, we have $f(Δ, r) \in Ω(Δr)$ if $g(n)$ is not too large, and in particular if $g(n) = \log^* n$ (which is the optimal asymptotic dependency on $n$ due to Linial's lower bound [FOCS'87]). Our lower bound proof is based on the round elimination framework, and its structure is inspired by a new round elimination fixed point that we give for the $Δ$-vertex coloring problem in hypergraphs. For the MIS problem on hypergraphs, we show that for $Δ\ll r$, there are significant improvements over the naive $O(Δr + \log^* n)$-round algorithm. We give two deterministic algorithms for the problem. We show that a hypergraph MIS can be computed in $O(Δ^2\cdot\log r + Δ\cdot\log r\cdot \log^* r + \log^* n)$ rounds. We further show that at the cost of a worse dependency on $Δ$, the dependency on $r$ can be removed almost entirely, by giving an algorithm with complexity $Δ^{O(Δ)}\cdot\log^* r + O(\log^* n)$. △ Less

Submitted 3 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Exponential Speedup Over Locality in MPC with Optimal Memory

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Manuela Fischer, Rustam Latypov, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jara Uitto

Abstract: Locally Checkable Labeling (LCL) problems are graph problems in which a solution is correct if it satisfies some given constraints in the local neighborhood of each node. Example problems in this class include maximal matching, maximal independent set, and coloring problems. A successful line of research has been studying the complexities of LCL problems on paths/cycles, trees, and general graphs,… ▽ More Locally Checkable Labeling (LCL) problems are graph problems in which a solution is correct if it satisfies some given constraints in the local neighborhood of each node. Example problems in this class include maximal matching, maximal independent set, and coloring problems. A successful line of research has been studying the complexities of LCL problems on paths/cycles, trees, and general graphs, providing many interesting results for the LOCAL model of distributed computing. In this work, we initiate the study of LCL problems in the low-space Massively Parallel Computation (MPC) model. In particular, on forests, we provide a method that, given the complexity of an LCL problem in the LOCAL model, automatically provides an exponentially faster algorithm for the low-space MPC setting that uses optimal global memory, that is, truly linear. While restricting to forests may seem to weaken the result, we emphasize that all known (conditional) lower bounds for the MPC setting are obtained by lifting lower bounds obtained in the distributed setting in tree-like networks (either forests or high girth graphs), and hence the problems that we study are challenging already on forests. Moreover, the most important technical feature of our algorithms is that they use optimal global memory, that is, memory linear in the number of edges of the graph. In contrast, most of the state-of-the-art algorithms use more than linear global memory. Further, they typically start with a dense graph, sparsify it, and then solve the problem on the residual graph, exploiting the relative increase in global memory. On forests, this is not possible, because the given graph is already as sparse as it can be, and using optimal memory requires new solutions. △ Less

Submitted 19 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Comments: 36th International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2022). arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2112.09479

Node and Edge Averaged Complexities of Local Graph Problems

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Mohsen Ghaffari, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: The node-averaged complexity of a distributed algorithm running on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the average over the times at which the nodes $V$ of $G$ finish their computation and commit to their outputs. We study the node-averaged complexity for some distributed symmetry breaking problems and provide the following results (among others): - The randomized node-averaged complexity of computing a maxima… ▽ More The node-averaged complexity of a distributed algorithm running on a graph $G=(V,E)$ is the average over the times at which the nodes $V$ of $G$ finish their computation and commit to their outputs. We study the node-averaged complexity for some distributed symmetry breaking problems and provide the following results (among others): - The randomized node-averaged complexity of computing a maximal independent set (MIS) in $n$-node graphs of maximum degree $Δ$ is at least $Ω\big(\min\big\{\frac{\logΔ}{\log\logΔ},\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\big\}\big)$. This bound is obtained by a novel adaptation of the well-known KMW lower bound [JACM'16]. As a side result, we obtain the same lower bound for the worst-case randomized round complexity for computing an MIS in trees -- this essentially answers open problem 11.15 in the book of Barenboim and Elkin and resolves the complexity of MIS on trees up to an $O(\sqrt{\log\log n})$ factor. We also show that, $(2,2)$-ruling sets, which are a minimal relaxation of MIS, have $O(1)$ randomized node-averaged complexity. - For maximal matching, we show that while the randomized node-averaged complexity is $Ω\big(\min\big\{\frac{\logΔ}{\log\logΔ},\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}}\big\}\big)$, the randomized edge-averaged complexity is $O(1)$. Further, we show that the deterministic edge-averaged complexity of maximal matching is $O(\log^2Δ+ \log^* n)$ and the deterministic node-averaged complexity of maximal matching is $O(\log^3Δ+ \log^* n)$. - Finally, we consider the problem of computing a sinkless orientation of a graph. The deterministic worst-case complexity of the problem is known to be $Θ(\log n)$, even on bounded-degree graphs. We show that the problem can be solved deterministically with node-averaged complexity $O(\log^* n)$, while kee** the worst-case complexity in $O(\log n)$. △ Less

Submitted 17 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Distributed Edge Coloring in Time Polylogarithmic in $Δ$

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: We provide new deterministic algorithms for the edge coloring problem, which is one of the classic and highly studied distributed local symmetry breaking problems. As our main result, we show that a $(2Δ-1)$-edge coloring can be computed in time $\mathrm{poly}\logΔ+ O(\log^* n)$ in the LOCAL model. This improves a result of Balliu, Kuhn, and Olivetti [PODC '20], who gave an algorithm with a quasi-… ▽ More We provide new deterministic algorithms for the edge coloring problem, which is one of the classic and highly studied distributed local symmetry breaking problems. As our main result, we show that a $(2Δ-1)$-edge coloring can be computed in time $\mathrm{poly}\logΔ+ O(\log^* n)$ in the LOCAL model. This improves a result of Balliu, Kuhn, and Olivetti [PODC '20], who gave an algorithm with a quasi-polylogarithmic dependency on $Δ$. We further show that in the CONGEST model, an $(8+\varepsilon)Δ$-edge coloring can be computed in $\mathrm{poly}\logΔ+ O(\log^* n)$ rounds. The best previous $O(Δ)$-edge coloring algorithm that can be implemented in the CONGEST model is by Barenboim and Elkin [PODC '11] and it computes a $2^{O(1/\varepsilon)}Δ$-edge coloring in time $O(Δ^\varepsilon + \log^* n)$ for any $\varepsilon\in(0,1]$. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2022; originally announced June 2022.

Efficient Classification of Locally Checkable Problems in Regular Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yi-Jun Chang, Dennis Olivetti, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We give practical, efficient algorithms that automatically determine the asymptotic distributed round complexity of a given locally checkable graph problem in the $[Θ(\log n), Θ(n)]$ region, in two settings. We present one algorithm for unrooted regular trees and another algorithm for rooted regular trees. The algorithms take the description of a locally checkable labeling problem as input, and th… ▽ More We give practical, efficient algorithms that automatically determine the asymptotic distributed round complexity of a given locally checkable graph problem in the $[Θ(\log n), Θ(n)]$ region, in two settings. We present one algorithm for unrooted regular trees and another algorithm for rooted regular trees. The algorithms take the description of a locally checkable labeling problem as input, and the running time is polynomial in the size of the problem description. The algorithms decide if the problem is solvable in $O(\log n)$ rounds. If not, it is known that the complexity has to be $Θ(n^{1/k})$ for some $k = 1, 2, \dotsc$, and in this case the algorithms also output the right value of the exponent $k$. In rooted trees in the $O(\log n)$ case we can then further determine the exact complexity class by using algorithms from prior work; for unrooted trees the more fine-grained classification in the $O(\log n)$ region remains an open question. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 17 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Improved Distributed Fractional Coloring Algorithms

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: We prove new bounds on the distributed fractional coloring problem in the LOCAL model. Fractional $c$-colorings can be understood as multicolorings as follows. For some natural numbers $p$ and $q$ such that $p/q\leq c$, each node $v$ is assigned a set of at least $q$ colors from $\{1,\dots,p\}$ such that adjacent nodes are assigned disjoint sets of colors. The minimum $c$ for which a fractional… ▽ More We prove new bounds on the distributed fractional coloring problem in the LOCAL model. Fractional $c$-colorings can be understood as multicolorings as follows. For some natural numbers $p$ and $q$ such that $p/q\leq c$, each node $v$ is assigned a set of at least $q$ colors from $\{1,\dots,p\}$ such that adjacent nodes are assigned disjoint sets of colors. The minimum $c$ for which a fractional $c$-coloring of a graph $G$ exists is called the fractional chromatic number $χ_f(G)$ of $G$. Recently, [Bousquet, Esperet, and Pirot; SIROCCO '21] showed that for any constant $ε>0$, a fractional $(Δ+ε)$-coloring can be computed in $Δ^{O(Δ)} + O(Δ\cdot\log^* n)$ rounds. We show that such a coloring can be computed in only $O(\log^2 Δ)$ rounds, without any dependency on $n$. We further show that in $O\big(\frac{\log n}ε\big)$ rounds, it is possible to compute a fractional $(1+ε)χ_f(G)$-coloring, even if the fractional chromatic number $χ_f(G)$ is not known. That is, this problem can be approximated arbitrarily well by an efficient algorithm in the LOCAL model. For the standard coloring problem, it is only known that an $O\big(\frac{\log n}{\log\log n}\big)$-approximation can be computed in polylogarithmic time in the LOCAL model. We also show that our distributed fractional coloring approximation algorithm is best possible. We show that in trees, which have fractional chromatic number $2$, computing a fractional $(2+ε)$-coloring requires at least $Ω\big(\frac{\log n}ε\big)$ rounds. We finally study fractional colorings of regular grids. In [Bousquet, Esperet, and Pirot; SIROCCO '21], it is shown that in regular grids of bounded dimension, a fractional $(2+ε)$-coloring can be computed in time $O(\log^* n)$. We show that such a coloring can even be computed in $O(1)$ rounds in the LOCAL model. △ Less

Submitted 9 December, 2021; v1 submitted 8 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Distributed $Δ$-Coloring Plays Hide-and-Seek

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: We prove several new tight distributed lower bounds for classic symmetry breaking graph problems. As a basic tool, we first provide a new insightful proof that any deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a $Δ$-coloring on $Δ$-regular trees requires $Ω(\log_Δn)$ rounds and any randomized algorithm requires $Ω(\log_Δ\log n)$ rounds. We prove this result by showing that a natural relaxation… ▽ More We prove several new tight distributed lower bounds for classic symmetry breaking graph problems. As a basic tool, we first provide a new insightful proof that any deterministic distributed algorithm that computes a $Δ$-coloring on $Δ$-regular trees requires $Ω(\log_Δn)$ rounds and any randomized algorithm requires $Ω(\log_Δ\log n)$ rounds. We prove this result by showing that a natural relaxation of the $Δ$-coloring problem is a fixed point in the round elimination framework. As a first application, we show that our $Δ$-coloring lower bound proof directly extends to arbdefective colorings. We exactly characterize which variants of the arbdefective coloring problem are "easy", and which of them instead are "hard". As a second application, which we see as our main contribution, we use the structure of the fixed point as a building block to prove lower bounds as a function of $Δ$ for a large class of distributed symmetry breaking problems. For example, we obtain a tight lower bound for the fundamental problem of computing a $(2,β)$-ruling set. This is an exponential improvement over the best existing lower bound for the problem, which was proven in [FOCS '20]. Our lower bound even applies to a much more general family of problems that allows for almost arbitrary combinations of natural constraints from coloring problems, orientation problems, and independent set problems, and provides a single unified proof for known and new lower bound results for these types of problems. Our lower bounds as a function of $Δ$ also imply lower bounds as a function of $n$. We obtain, for example, that maximal independent set, on trees, requires $Ω(\log n / \log \log n)$ rounds for deterministic algorithms, which is tight. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2022; v1 submitted 1 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Sinkless Orientation Made Simple

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Janne H. Korhonen, Fabian Kuhn, Henrik Lievonen, Dennis Olivetti, Shreyas Pai, Ami Paz, Joel Rybicki, Stefan Schmid, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Jara Uitto

Abstract: The sinkless orientation problem plays a key role in understanding the foundations of distributed computing. The problem can be used to separate two fundamental models of distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL and SLOCAL: the locality of sinkless orientation is $Ω(\log n)$ in the deterministic LOCAL model and $O(\log \log n)$ in the deterministic SLOCAL model. Both of these results are known by prior… ▽ More The sinkless orientation problem plays a key role in understanding the foundations of distributed computing. The problem can be used to separate two fundamental models of distributed graph algorithms, LOCAL and SLOCAL: the locality of sinkless orientation is $Ω(\log n)$ in the deterministic LOCAL model and $O(\log \log n)$ in the deterministic SLOCAL model. Both of these results are known by prior work, but here we give new simple, self-contained proofs for them. △ Less

Submitted 10 June, 2022; v1 submitted 5 August, 2021; originally announced August 2021.

Comments: Parts of this work appeared in DISC 2021 as a brief announcement, under the title "Sinkless orientation is hard also in the supported LOCAL model"

Improved Distributed Lower Bounds for MIS and Bounded (Out-)Degree Dominating Sets in Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: Recently, Balliu, Brandt, and Olivetti [FOCS '20] showed the first $ω(\log^* n)$ lower bound for the maximal independent set (MIS) problem in trees. In this work we prove lower bounds for a much more relaxed family of distributed symmetry breaking problems. As a by-product, we obtain improved lower bounds for the distributed MIS problem in trees. For a parameter $k$ and an orientation of the edg… ▽ More Recently, Balliu, Brandt, and Olivetti [FOCS '20] showed the first $ω(\log^* n)$ lower bound for the maximal independent set (MIS) problem in trees. In this work we prove lower bounds for a much more relaxed family of distributed symmetry breaking problems. As a by-product, we obtain improved lower bounds for the distributed MIS problem in trees. For a parameter $k$ and an orientation of the edges of a graph $G$, we say that a subset $S$ of the nodes of $G$ is a $k$-outdegree dominating set if $S$ is a dominating set of $G$ and if in the induced subgraph $G[S]$, every node in $S$ has outdegree at most $k$. Note that for $k=0$, this definition coincides with the definition of an MIS. For a given $k$, we consider the problem of computing a $k$-outdegree dominating set. We show that, even in regular trees of degree at most $Δ$, in the standard \LOCAL model, there exists a constant $ε>0$ such that for $k\leq Δ^ε$, for the problem of computing a $k$-outdegree dominating set, any randomized algorithm requires at least $Ω(\min\{\logΔ,\sqrt{\log\log n}\})$ rounds and any deterministic algorithm requires at least $Ω(\min\{\logΔ,\sqrt{\log n}\})$ rounds. The proof of our lower bounds is based on the recently highly successful round elimination technique. We provide a novel way to do simplifications for round elimination, which we expect to be of independent interest. Our new proof is considerably simpler than the lower bound proof in [FOCS '20]. In particular, our round elimination proof uses a family of problems that can be described by only a constant number of labels. The existence of such a proof for the MIS problem was believed impossible by the authors of [FOCS '20]. △ Less

Submitted 4 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: Accepted at PODC 2021

Locally Checkable Labelings with Small Messages

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Keren Censor-Hillel, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: A rich line of work has been addressing the computational complexity of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), illustrating the landscape of possible complexities. In this paper, we study the landscape of LCL complexities under bandwidth restrictions. Our main results are twofold. First, we show that on trees, the CONGEST complexity of an LCL problem is asymptotically equal to its complexity in the L… ▽ More A rich line of work has been addressing the computational complexity of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), illustrating the landscape of possible complexities. In this paper, we study the landscape of LCL complexities under bandwidth restrictions. Our main results are twofold. First, we show that on trees, the CONGEST complexity of an LCL problem is asymptotically equal to its complexity in the LOCAL model. An analog statement for general (non-LCL) problems is known to be false. Second, we show that for general graphs this equivalence does not hold, by providing an LCL problem for which we show that it can be solved in $O(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, but requires $\tildeΩ(n^{1/2})$ rounds in the CONGEST model. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2021; v1 submitted 12 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.

Comments: fixed typos

Locally Checkable Problems in Rooted Trees

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yi-Jun Chang, Dennis Olivetti, Jan Studený, Jukka Suomela, Aleksandr Tereshchenko

Abstract: Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex co… ▽ More Consider any locally checkable labeling problem $Π$ in rooted regular trees: there is a finite set of labels $Σ$, and for each label $x \in Σ$ we specify what are permitted label combinations of the children for an internal node of label $x$ (the leaf nodes are unconstrained). This formalism is expressive enough to capture many classic problems studied in distributed computing, including vertex coloring, edge coloring, and maximal independent set. We show that the distributed computational complexity of any such problem $Π$ falls in one of the following classes: it is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds in trees with $n$ nodes (and all of these classes are nonempty). We show that the complexity of any given problem is the same in all four standard models of distributed graph algorithms: deterministic $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, randomized $\mathsf{LOCAL}$, deterministic $\mathsf{CONGEST}$, and randomized $\mathsf{CONGEST}$ model. In particular, we show that randomness does not help in this setting, and the complexity class $Θ(\log \log n)$ does not exist (while it does exist in the broader setting of general trees). We also show how to systematically determine the complexity class of any such problem $Π$, i.e., whether $Π$ takes $O(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $n^{Θ(1)}$ rounds. While the algorithm may take exponential time in the size of the description of $Π$, it is nevertheless practical: we provide a freely available implementation of the classifier algorithm, and it is fast enough to classify many problems of interest. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 18 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Local Mending

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Darya Melnyk, Dennis Olivetti, Joel Rybicki, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: In this work we introduce the graph-theoretic notion of mendability: for each locally checkable graph problem we can define its mending radius, which captures the idea of how far one needs to modify a partial solution in order to "patch a hole." We explore how mendability is connected to the existence of efficient algorithms, especially in distributed, parallel, and fault-tolerant settings. It i… ▽ More In this work we introduce the graph-theoretic notion of mendability: for each locally checkable graph problem we can define its mending radius, which captures the idea of how far one needs to modify a partial solution in order to "patch a hole." We explore how mendability is connected to the existence of efficient algorithms, especially in distributed, parallel, and fault-tolerant settings. It is easy to see that $O(1)$-mendable problems are also solvable in $O(\log^* n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. One of the surprises is that in paths and cycles, a converse also holds in the following sense: if a problem $Π$ can be solved in $O(\log^* n)$, there is always a restriction $Π' \subseteq Π$ that is still efficiently solvable but that is also $O(1)$-mendable. We also explore the structure of the landscape of mendability. For example, we show that in trees, the mending radius of any locally checkable problem is $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, or $Θ(n)$, while in general graphs the structure is much more diverse. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2021; v1 submitted 17 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Distributed Lower Bounds for Ruling Sets

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: Given a graph $G = (V,E)$, an $(α, β)$-ruling set is a subset $S \subseteq V$ such that the distance between any two vertices in $S$ is at least $α$, and the distance between any vertex in $V$ and the closest vertex in $S$ is at most $β$. We present lower bounds for distributedly computing ruling sets. More precisely, for the problem of computing a $(2, β)$-ruling set in the LOCAL model, we show… ▽ More Given a graph $G = (V,E)$, an $(α, β)$-ruling set is a subset $S \subseteq V$ such that the distance between any two vertices in $S$ is at least $α$, and the distance between any vertex in $V$ and the closest vertex in $S$ is at most $β$. We present lower bounds for distributedly computing ruling sets. More precisely, for the problem of computing a $(2, β)$-ruling set in the LOCAL model, we show the following, where $n$ denotes the number of vertices, $Δ$ the maximum degree, and $c$ is some universal constant independent of $n$ and $Δ$. $\bullet$ Any deterministic algorithm requires $Ω\left(\min \left\{ \frac{\log Δ}{β\log \log Δ} , \log_Δn \right\} \right)$ rounds, for all $β\le c \cdot \min\left\{ \sqrt{\frac{\log Δ}{\log \log Δ}} , \log_Δn \right\}$. By optimizing $Δ$, this implies a deterministic lower bound of $Ω\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log n}{β\log \log n}}\right)$ for all $β\le c \sqrt[3]{\frac{\log n}{\log \log n}}$. $\bullet$ Any randomized algorithm requires $Ω\left(\min \left\{ \frac{\log Δ}{β\log \log Δ} , \log_Δ\log n \right\} \right)$ rounds, for all $β\le c \cdot \min\left\{ \sqrt{\frac{\log Δ}{\log \log Δ}} , \log_Δ\log n \right\}$. By optimizing $Δ$, this implies a randomized lower bound of $Ω\left(\sqrt{\frac{\log \log n}{β\log \log \log n}}\right)$ for all $β\le c \sqrt[3]{\frac{\log \log n}{\log \log \log n}}$. For $β> 1$, this improves on the previously best lower bound of $Ω(\log^* n)$ rounds that follows from the 30-year-old bounds of Linial [FOCS'87] and Naor [J.Disc.Math.'91]. For $β= 1$, i.e., for the problem of computing a maximal independent set, our results improve on the previously best lower bound of $Ω(\log^* n)$ on trees, as our bounds already hold on trees. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2022; v1 submitted 17 April, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Distributed Edge Coloring in Time Quasi-Polylogarithmic in Delta

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Fabian Kuhn, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: The problem of coloring the edges of an $n$-node graph of maximum degree $Δ$ with $2Δ- 1$ colors is one of the key symmetry breaking problems in the area of distributed graph algorithms. While there has been a lot of progress towards the understanding of this problem, the dependency of the running time on $Δ$ has been a long-standing open question. Very recently, Kuhn [SODA '20] showed that the pr… ▽ More The problem of coloring the edges of an $n$-node graph of maximum degree $Δ$ with $2Δ- 1$ colors is one of the key symmetry breaking problems in the area of distributed graph algorithms. While there has been a lot of progress towards the understanding of this problem, the dependency of the running time on $Δ$ has been a long-standing open question. Very recently, Kuhn [SODA '20] showed that the problem can be solved in time $2^{O(\sqrt{\logΔ})}+O(\log^* n)$. In this paper, we study the edge coloring problem in the distributed LOCAL model. We show that the $(\mathit{degree}+1)$-list edge coloring problem, and thus also the $(2Δ-1)$-edge coloring problem, can be solved deterministically in time $\log^{O(\log\logΔ)}Δ+ O(\log^* n)$. This is a significant improvement over the result of Kuhn [SODA '20]. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Truly Tight-in-$Δ$ Bounds for Bipartite Maximal Matching and Variants

Authors: Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: In a recent breakthrough result, Balliu et al. [FOCS'19] proved a deterministic $Ω(\min(Δ,\log n /\log \log n))$-round and a randomized $Ω(\min(Δ,\log \log n/\log \log \log n))$-round lower bound for the complexity of the bipartite maximal matching problem on $n$-node graphs in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. Both lower bounds are asymptotically tight as a function of the maximum degre… ▽ More In a recent breakthrough result, Balliu et al. [FOCS'19] proved a deterministic $Ω(\min(Δ,\log n /\log \log n))$-round and a randomized $Ω(\min(Δ,\log \log n/\log \log \log n))$-round lower bound for the complexity of the bipartite maximal matching problem on $n$-node graphs in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. Both lower bounds are asymptotically tight as a function of the maximum degree $Δ$. We provide truly tight bounds in $Δ$ for the complexity of bipartite maximal matching and many natural variants, up to and including the additive constant. As a by-product, our results yield a considerably simplified version of the proof by Balliu et al. We show that our results can be obtained via bounded automatic round elimination, a version of the recent automatic round elimination technique by Brandt [PODC'19] that is particularly suited for automatization from a practical perspective. In this context, our work can be seen as another step towards the automatization of lower bounds in the LOCAL model. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Classification of distributed binary labeling problems

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yuval Efron, Juho Hirvonen, Yannic Maus, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfec… ▽ More We present a complete classification of the deterministic distributed time complexity for a family of graph problems: binary labeling problems in trees. These are locally checkable problems that can be encoded with an alphabet of size two in the edge labeling formalism. Examples of binary labeling problems include sinkless orientation, sinkless and sourceless orientation, 2-vertex coloring, perfect matching, and the task of coloring edges red and blue such that all nodes are incident to at least one red and at least one blue edge. More generally, we can encode e.g. any cardinality constraints on indegrees and outdegrees. We study the deterministic time complexity of solving a given binary labeling problem in trees, in the usual LOCAL model of distributed computing. We show that the complexity of any such problem is in one of the following classes: $O(1)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n)$, or unsolvable. In particular, a problem that can be represented in the binary labeling formalism cannot have time complexity $Θ(\log^* n)$, and hence we know that e.g. any encoding of maximal matchings has to use at least three labels (which is tight). Furthermore, given the description of any binary labeling problem, we can easily determine in which of the four classes it is and what is an asymptotically optimal algorithm for solving it. Hence the distributed time complexity of binary labeling problems is decidable, not only in principle, but also in practice: there is a simple and efficient algorithm that takes the description of a binary labeling problem and outputs its distributed time complexity. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2020; v1 submitted 29 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Locality of not-so-weak coloring

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Christoph Lenzen, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Many graph problems are locally checkable: a solution is globally feasible if it looks valid in all constant-radius neighborhoods. This idea is formalized in the concept of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer (1995). Recently, Chang et al. (2016) showed that in bounded-degree graphs, every LCL problem belongs to one of the following classes: - "Easy": solvable i… ▽ More Many graph problems are locally checkable: a solution is globally feasible if it looks valid in all constant-radius neighborhoods. This idea is formalized in the concept of locally checkable labelings (LCLs), introduced by Naor and Stockmeyer (1995). Recently, Chang et al. (2016) showed that in bounded-degree graphs, every LCL problem belongs to one of the following classes: - "Easy": solvable in $O(\log^* n)$ rounds with both deterministic and randomized distributed algorithms. - "Hard": requires at least $Ω(\log n)$ rounds with deterministic and $Ω(\log \log n)$ rounds with randomized distributed algorithms. Hence for any parameterized LCL problem, when we move from local problems towards global problems, there is some point at which complexity suddenly jumps from easy to hard. For example, for vertex coloring in $d$-regular graphs it is now known that this jump is at precisely $d$ colors: coloring with $d+1$ colors is easy, while coloring with $d$ colors is hard. However, it is currently poorly understood where this jump takes place when one looks at defective colorings. To study this question, we define $k$-partial $c$-coloring as follows: nodes are labeled with numbers between $1$ and $c$, and every node is incident to at least $k$ properly colored edges. It is known that $1$-partial $2$-coloring (a.k.a. weak $2$-coloring) is easy for any $d \ge 1$. As our main result, we show that $k$-partial $2$-coloring becomes hard as soon as $k \ge 2$, no matter how large a $d$ we have. We also show that this is fundamentally different from $k$-partial $3$-coloring: no matter which $k \ge 3$ we choose, the problem is always hard for $d = k$ but it becomes easy when $d \gg k$. The same was known previously for partial $c$-coloring with $c \ge 4$, but the case of $c < 4$ was open. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

How much does randomness help with locally checkable problems?

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) are distributed graph problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it is locally feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Vertex colorings, maximal independent sets, and maximal matchings are examples of LCLs. On the one hand, it is known that some LCLs benefit exponentially from randomness---for example, any deterministic distributed algo… ▽ More Locally checkable labeling problems (LCLs) are distributed graph problems in which a solution is globally feasible if it is locally feasible in all constant-radius neighborhoods. Vertex colorings, maximal independent sets, and maximal matchings are examples of LCLs. On the one hand, it is known that some LCLs benefit exponentially from randomness---for example, any deterministic distributed algorithm that finds a sinkless orientation requires $Θ(\log n)$ rounds in the LOCAL model, while the randomized complexity of the problem is $Θ(\log \log n)$ rounds. On the other hand, there are also many LCLs in which randomness is useless. Previously, it was not known if there are any LCLs that benefit from randomness, but only subexponentially. We show that such problems exist: for example, there is an LCL with deterministic complexity $Θ(\log^2 n)$ rounds and randomized complexity $Θ(\log n \log \log n)$ rounds. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2020; v1 submitted 18 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

Lower bounds for maximal matchings and maximal independent sets

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Juho Hirvonen, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: There are distributed graph algorithms for finding maximal matchings and maximal independent sets in $O(Δ+ \log^* n)$ communication rounds; here $n$ is the number of nodes and $Δ$ is the maximum degree. The lower bound by Linial (1987, 1992) shows that the dependency on $n$ is optimal: these problems cannot be solved in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds even if $Δ= 2$. However, the dependency on $Δ$ is a long-… ▽ More There are distributed graph algorithms for finding maximal matchings and maximal independent sets in $O(Δ+ \log^* n)$ communication rounds; here $n$ is the number of nodes and $Δ$ is the maximum degree. The lower bound by Linial (1987, 1992) shows that the dependency on $n$ is optimal: these problems cannot be solved in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds even if $Δ= 2$. However, the dependency on $Δ$ is a long-standing open question, and there is currently an exponential gap between the upper and lower bounds. We prove that the upper bounds are tight. We show that any algorithm that finds a maximal matching or maximal independent set with probability at least $1-1/n$ requires $Ω(\min\{Δ,\log \log n / \log \log \log n\})$ rounds in the LOCAL model of distributed computing. As a corollary, it follows that any deterministic algorithm that finds a maximal matching or maximal independent set requires $Ω(\min\{Δ, \log n / \log \log n\})$ rounds; this is an improvement over prior lower bounds also as a function of $n$. △ Less

Submitted 10 December, 2021; v1 submitted 8 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

The distributed complexity of locally checkable problems on paths is decidable

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Yi-Jun Chang, Dennis Olivetti, Mikaël Rabie, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: Consider a computer network that consists of a path with $n$ nodes. The nodes are labeled with inputs from a constant-sized set, and the task is to find output labels from a constant-sized set subject to some local constraints---more formally, we have an LCL (locally checkable labeling) problem. How many communication rounds are needed (in the standard LOCAL model of computing) to solve this probl… ▽ More Consider a computer network that consists of a path with $n$ nodes. The nodes are labeled with inputs from a constant-sized set, and the task is to find output labels from a constant-sized set subject to some local constraints---more formally, we have an LCL (locally checkable labeling) problem. How many communication rounds are needed (in the standard LOCAL model of computing) to solve this problem? It is well known that the answer is always either $O(1)$ rounds, or $Θ(\log^* n)$ rounds, or $Θ(n)$ rounds. In this work we show that this question is decidable (albeit PSPACE-hard): we present an algorithm that, given any LCL problem defined on a path, outputs the distributed computational complexity of this problem and the corresponding asymptotically optimal algorithm. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Hardness of minimal symmetry breaking in distributed computing

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: A graph is weakly $2$-colored if the nodes are labeled with colors black and white such that each black node is adjacent to at least one white node and vice versa. In this work we study the distributed computational complexity of weak $2$-coloring in the standard LOCAL model of distributed computing, and how it is related to the distributed computational complexity of other graph problems. First,… ▽ More A graph is weakly $2$-colored if the nodes are labeled with colors black and white such that each black node is adjacent to at least one white node and vice versa. In this work we study the distributed computational complexity of weak $2$-coloring in the standard LOCAL model of distributed computing, and how it is related to the distributed computational complexity of other graph problems. First, we show that weak $2$-coloring is a minimal distributed symmetry-breaking problem for regular even-degree trees and high-girth graphs: if there is any non-trivial locally checkable labeling problem that is solvable in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds with a distributed graph algorithm in the middle of a regular even-degree tree, then weak $2$-coloring is also solvable in $o(\log^* n)$ rounds there. Second, we prove a tight lower bound of $Ω(\log^* n)$ for the distributed computational complexity of weak $2$-coloring in regular trees; previously only a lower bound of $Ω(\log \log^* n)$ was known. By minimality, the same lower bound holds for any non-trivial locally checkable problem inside regular even-degree trees. △ Less

Submitted 18 February, 2019; v1 submitted 5 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Almost Global Problems in the LOCAL Model

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Sebastian Brandt, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems (LCLs) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: - There are lots of problems with time complexities of $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(\log n)$. - It is not possible to have a problem with com… ▽ More The landscape of the distributed time complexity is nowadays well-understood for subpolynomial complexities. When we look at deterministic algorithms in the LOCAL model and locally checkable problems (LCLs) in bounded-degree graphs, the following picture emerges: - There are lots of problems with time complexities of $Θ(\log^* n)$ or $Θ(\log n)$. - It is not possible to have a problem with complexity between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\log n)$ and $n^{o(1)}$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. However, the high end of the complexity spectrum was left open by prior work. In general graphs there are LCL problems with complexities of the form $Θ(n^α)$ for any rational $0 < α\le 1/2$, while for trees only complexities of the form $Θ(n^{1/k})$ are known. No LCL problem with complexity between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$ is known, and neither are there results that would show that such problems do not exist. We show that: - In general graphs, we can construct LCL problems with infinitely many complexities between $ω(\sqrt{n})$ and $o(n)$. - In trees, problems with such complexities do not exist. Put otherwise, we show that any LCL with a complexity $o(n)$ can be solved in time $O(\sqrt{n})$ in trees, while the same is not true in general graphs. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2020; v1 submitted 12 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

New Classes of Distributed Time Complexity

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Juho Hirvonen, Janne H. Korhonen, Tuomo Lempiäinen, Dennis Olivetti, Jukka Suomela

Abstract: A number of recent papers -- e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) -- have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph proble… ▽ More A number of recent papers -- e.g. Brandt et al. (STOC 2016), Chang et al. (FOCS 2016), Ghaffari & Su (SODA 2017), Brandt et al. (PODC 2017), and Chang & Pettie (FOCS 2017) -- have advanced our understanding of one of the most fundamental questions in theory of distributed computing: what are the possible time complexity classes of LCL problems in the LOCAL model? In essence, we have a graph problem $Π$ in which a solution can be verified by checking all radius-$O(1)$ neighbourhoods, and the question is what is the smallest $T$ such that a solution can be computed so that each node chooses its own output based on its radius-$T$ neighbourhood. Here $T$ is the distributed time complexity of $Π$. The time complexity classes for deterministic algorithms in bounded-degree graphs that are known to exist by prior work are $Θ(1)$, $Θ(\log^* n)$, $Θ(\log n)$, $Θ(n^{1/k})$, and $Θ(n)$. It is also known that there are two gaps: one between $ω(1)$ and $o(\log \log^* n)$, and another between $ω(\log^* n)$ and $o(\log n)$. It has been conjectured that many more gaps exist, and that the overall time hierarchy is relatively simple -- indeed, this is known to be the case in restricted graph families such as cycles and grids. We show that the picture is much more diverse than previously expected. We present a general technique for engineering LCL problems with numerous different deterministic time complexities, including $Θ(\log^αn)$ for any $α\ge1$, $2^{Θ(\log^αn)}$ for any $α\le 1$, and $Θ(n^α)$ for any $α<1/2$ in the high end of the complexity spectrum, and $Θ(\log^α\log^* n)$ for any $α\ge 1$, $\smash{2^{Θ(\log^α\log^* n)}}$ for any $α\le 1$, and $Θ((\log^* n)^α)$ for any $α\le 1$ in the low end; here $α$ is a positive rational number. △ Less

Submitted 5 April, 2018; v1 submitted 6 November, 2017; originally announced November 2017.

Distributed Subgraph Detection

Authors: Pierre Fraigniaud, Pedro Montealegre, Dennis Olivetti, Ivan Rapaport, Ioan Todinca

Abstract: In the standard CONGEST model for distributed network computing, it is known that "global" tasks such as minimum spanning tree, diameter, and all-pairs shortest paths, consume large bandwidth, for their running-time is $Ω(\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in $n$-node networks with constant diameter. Surprisingly, "local" tasks such as detecting the presence of a 4-cycle as a subgraph also requires… ▽ More In the standard CONGEST model for distributed network computing, it is known that "global" tasks such as minimum spanning tree, diameter, and all-pairs shortest paths, consume large bandwidth, for their running-time is $Ω(\mbox{poly}(n))$ rounds in $n$-node networks with constant diameter. Surprisingly, "local" tasks such as detecting the presence of a 4-cycle as a subgraph also requires $\widetildeΩ(\sqrt{n})$ rounds, even using randomized algorithms, and the best known upper bound for detecting the presence of a 3-cycle is $\widetilde{O}(n^{\frac{2}{3}})$ rounds. The objective of this paper is to better understand the landscape of such subgraph detection tasks. We show that, in contrast to \emph{cycles}, which are hard to detect in the CONGEST model, there exists a deterministic algorithm for detecting the presence of a subgraph isomorphic to $T$ running in a \emph{constant} number of rounds, for every tree $T$. Our algorithm provides a distributed implementation of a combinatorial technique due to Erdős et al. for sparsening the set of partial solutions kept by the nodes at each round. Our result has important consequences to \emph{distributed property-testing}, i.e., to randomized algorithms whose aim is to distinguish between graphs satisfying a property, and graphs far from satisfying that property. In particular, we get that, for every graph pattern $H$ composed of an edge and a tree connected in an arbitrary manner, there exists a distributed testing algorithm for $H$-freeness, performing in a constant number of rounds. Although the class of graph patterns $H$ formed by a tree and an edge connected arbitrarily may look artificial, all previous results of the literature concerning testing $H$-freeness for classical patterns such as cycles and cliques can be viewed as direct consequences of our result, while our algorithm enables testing more complex patterns. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Distributed Detection of Cycles

Authors: Pierre Fraigniaud, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: Distributed property testing in networks has been introduced by Brakerski and Patt-Shamir (2011), with the objective of detecting the presence of large dense sub-networks in a distributed manner. Recently, Censor-Hillel et al. (2016) have shown how to detect 3-cycles in a constant number of rounds by a distributed algorithm. In a follow up work, Fraigniaud et al. (2016) have shown how to detect 4-… ▽ More Distributed property testing in networks has been introduced by Brakerski and Patt-Shamir (2011), with the objective of detecting the presence of large dense sub-networks in a distributed manner. Recently, Censor-Hillel et al. (2016) have shown how to detect 3-cycles in a constant number of rounds by a distributed algorithm. In a follow up work, Fraigniaud et al. (2016) have shown how to detect 4-cycles in a constant number of rounds as well. However, the techniques in these latter works were shown not to generalize to larger cycles $C_k$ with $k\geq 5$. In this paper, we completely settle the problem of cycle detection, by establishing the following result. For every $k\geq 3$, there exists a distributed property testing algorithm for $C_k$-freeness, performing in a constant number of rounds. All these results hold in the classical CONGEST model for distributed network computing. Our algorithm is 1-sided error. Its round-complexity is $O(1/ε)$ where $ε\in(0,1)$ is the property testing parameter measuring the gap between legal and illegal instances. △ Less

Submitted 13 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

How Bandwidth Affects the $CONGEST$ Model

Authors: Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: The $CONGEST$ model for distributed network computing is well suited for analyzing the impact of limiting the throughput of a network on its capacity to solve tasks efficiently. For many "global" problems there exists a lower bound of $Ω(D + \sqrt{n/B})$, where $B$ is the amount of bits that can be exchanged between two nodes in one round of communication, $n$ is the number of nodes and $D$ is the… ▽ More The $CONGEST$ model for distributed network computing is well suited for analyzing the impact of limiting the throughput of a network on its capacity to solve tasks efficiently. For many "global" problems there exists a lower bound of $Ω(D + \sqrt{n/B})$, where $B$ is the amount of bits that can be exchanged between two nodes in one round of communication, $n$ is the number of nodes and $D$ is the diameter of the graph. Typically, upper bounds are given only for the case $B=O(\log n)$, or for the case $B = +\infty$. For $B=O(\log n)$, the Minimum Spanning Tree (MST) construction problem can be solved in $O(D + \sqrt{n}\log^* n)$ rounds, and the Single Source Shortest Path (SSSP) problem can be $(1+ε)$-approximated in $\widetilde{O}(ε^{-O(1)} (D+\sqrt{n}) )$ rounds. We extend these results by providing algorithms with a complexity parametric on $B$. We show that, for any $B=Ω(\log n)$, there exists an algorithm that constructs a MST in $\widetilde{O}(D + \sqrt{n/B})$ rounds, and an algorithm that $(1+ε)$-approximate the SSSP problem in $\widetilde{O}(ε^{-O(1)} (D+\sqrt{n/B}) )$ rounds. We also show that there exist problems that are bandwidth insensitive. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Name Independent Fault Tolerant Routing Scheme

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: We consider the problem of routing in presence of faults in undirected weighted graphs. More specifically, we focus on the design of compact name-independent fault-tolerant routing schemes, where the designer of the scheme is not allowed to assign names to nodes, i.e., the name of a node is just its identifier. Given a set $F$ of faulty (or forbidden) edges, the goal is to route from a source node… ▽ More We consider the problem of routing in presence of faults in undirected weighted graphs. More specifically, we focus on the design of compact name-independent fault-tolerant routing schemes, where the designer of the scheme is not allowed to assign names to nodes, i.e., the name of a node is just its identifier. Given a set $F$ of faulty (or forbidden) edges, the goal is to route from a source node $s$ to a target $t$ avoiding the forbidden edges in $F$. Given any name-dependent fault-tolerant routing scheme and any name-independent routing scheme, we show how to use them as a black box to construct a name-independent fault-tolerant routing scheme. In particular, we present a name-independent routing scheme able to handle any set $F$ of forbidden edges in $|F|+1$ connected graphs. This has stretch $O(k^2\,|F|^3(|F|+\log^2 n)\log D)$, where $D$ is the diameter of the graph. It uses tables of size $ \widetilde{O}(k\, n^{1/k}(k + deg(v)))$ bits at every node $v$, where $deg(v)$ is the degree of node $v$. In the context of networks that suffer only from occasional failures, we present a name-independent routing scheme that handles only $1$ fault at a time, and another routing scheme that handles at most $2$ faults at a time. The former uses $\widetilde{O}(k^2\, n^{1/k} + k\,deg(v))$ bits of memory per node, with stretch $O(k^3\log D)$. The latter consumes in average $ \widetilde{O}(k^2 \,n^{1/k} + deg(v))$ bits of memory per node, with stretch $O(k^2\log D)$. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2017; v1 submitted 20 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

Comments: The stretch analysis is faulty, so the whole idea does not work

Local Distributed Verification

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Gianlorenzo D'Angelo, Pierre Fraigniaud, Dennis Olivetti

Abstract: In the framework of distributed network computing, it is known that, for every network predicate, each network configuration that satisfies this predicate can be proved using distributed certificates which can be verified locally. However, this requires to leak information about the identities of the nodes in the certificates, which might not be applicable in a context in which privacy is desirabl… ▽ More In the framework of distributed network computing, it is known that, for every network predicate, each network configuration that satisfies this predicate can be proved using distributed certificates which can be verified locally. However, this requires to leak information about the identities of the nodes in the certificates, which might not be applicable in a context in which privacy is desirable. Unfortunately, it is known that if one insists on certificates independent of the node identities, then not all network predicates can be proved using distributed certificates that can be verified locally. In this paper, we prove that, for every network predicate, there is a distributed protocol satisfying the following two properties: (1) for every network configuration that is legal w.r.t. the predicate, and for any attempt by an adversary to prove the illegality of that configuration using distributed certificates, there is a locally verifiable proof that the adversary is wrong, also using distributed certificates; (2) for every network configuration that is illegal w.r.t. the predicate, there is a proof of that illegality, using distributed certificates, such that no matter the way an adversary assigns its own set of distributed certificates in an attempt to prove the legality of the configuration, the actual illegality of the configuration will be locally detected. In both cases, the certificates are independent of the identities of the nodes. These results are achieved by investigating the so-called local hierarchy of complexity classes in which the certificates do not exploit the node identities. Indeed, we give a characterization of such a hierarchy, which is of its own interest △ Less

Submitted 12 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

A Big Data Analyzer for Large Trace Logs

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Dennis Olivetti, Ozalp Babaoglu, Moreno Marzolla, Alina Sîrbu

Abstract: Current generation of Internet-based services are typically hosted on large data centers that take the form of warehouse-size structures housing tens of thousands of servers. Continued availability of a modern data center is the result of a complex orchestration among many internal and external actors including computing hardware, multiple layers of intricate software, networking and storage devic… ▽ More Current generation of Internet-based services are typically hosted on large data centers that take the form of warehouse-size structures housing tens of thousands of servers. Continued availability of a modern data center is the result of a complex orchestration among many internal and external actors including computing hardware, multiple layers of intricate software, networking and storage devices, electrical power and cooling plants. During the course of their operation, many of these components produce large amounts of data in the form of event and error logs that are essential not only for identifying and resolving problems but also for improving data center efficiency and management. Most of these activities would benefit significantly from data analytics techniques to exploit hidden statistical patterns and correlations that may be present in the data. The sheer volume of data to be analyzed makes uncovering these correlations and patterns a challenging task. This paper presents BiDAl, a prototype Java tool for log-data analysis that incorporates several Big Data technologies in order to simplify the task of extracting information from data traces produced by large clusters and server farms. BiDAl provides the user with several analysis languages (SQL, R and Hadoop MapReduce) and storage backends (HDFS and SQLite) that can be freely mixed and matched so that a custom tool for a specific task can be easily constructed. BiDAl has a modular architecture so that it can be extended with other backends and analysis languages in the future. In this paper we present the design of BiDAl and describe our experience using it to analyze publicly-available traces from Google data clusters, with the goal of building a realistic model of a complex data center. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2015; originally announced September 2015.

Comments: 26 pages, 10 figures

Journal ref: Computing, 98(12), Dec 2016, pp. 1225-1249

BiDAl: Big Data Analyzer for Cluster Traces

Authors: Alkida Balliu, Dennis Olivetti, Ozalp Babaoglu, Moreno Marzolla, Alina Sîrbu

Abstract: Modern data centers that provide Internet-scale services are stadium-size structures housing tens of thousands of heterogeneous devices (server clusters, networking equipment, power and cooling infrastructures) that must operate continuously and reliably. As part of their operation, these devices produce large amounts of data in the form of event and error logs that are essential not only for iden… ▽ More Modern data centers that provide Internet-scale services are stadium-size structures housing tens of thousands of heterogeneous devices (server clusters, networking equipment, power and cooling infrastructures) that must operate continuously and reliably. As part of their operation, these devices produce large amounts of data in the form of event and error logs that are essential not only for identifying problems but also for improving data center efficiency and management. These activities employ data analytics and often exploit hidden statistical patterns and correlations among different factors present in the data. Uncovering these patterns and correlations is challenging due to the sheer volume of data to be analyzed. This paper presents BiDAl, a prototype "log-data analysis framework" that incorporates various Big Data technologies to simplify the analysis of data traces from large clusters. BiDAl is written in Java with a modular and extensible architecture so that different storage backends (currently, HDFS and SQLite are supported), as well as different analysis languages (current implementation supports SQL, R and Hadoop MapReduce) can be easily selected as appropriate. We present the design of BiDAl and describe our experience using it to analyze several public traces of Google data clusters for building a simulation model capable of reproducing observed behavior. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2014; originally announced October 2014.

Comments: published in E. Plödereder, L. Grunske, E. Schneider, D. Ull (editors), proc. INFORMATIK 2014 Workshop on System Software Support for Big Data (BigSys 2014), September 25--26 2014, Stuttgart, Germany, Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI) Proceedings, Series of the Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI), Volume P-232, pp. 1781--1795, ISBN 978-3-88579-626-8, ISSN 1617-5468

Journal ref: proc. INFORMATIK 2014 Workshop on System Software Support for Big Data (BigSys 2014), Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Volume P-232, pp. 1781-1795, ISBN 78-3-88579-626-8, ISSN 1617-5468