-
IFC models for (semi)automating common planning checks for building permits
Authors:
Francesca Noardo,
Teng Wu,
Ken Arroyo Ohori,
Thomas Krijnen,
Jantien Stoter
Abstract:
To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data…
▽ More
To support building permit issuing with automatic digital tools, the reuse of models produced by designers would make the process quicker and more objective. However, current studies and pilots often leave a gap with respect to the models as actually provided by architects, having varying quality and content. In this study, rather than taking a top down approach, we started from the available data and made the necessary inferences, which gave the opportunity to tackle basic and common issues often preventing smooth automatic processing. Specific characteristics of the IFC models were outlined and a tool was developed to extract the necessary information from them to check representative regulations. While the case study is specific in location, regulations and input models, the type of issues encountered are a generally applicable example for automated code compliance checking. This represents a solid base for future works towards the automation of building permits issuing.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2021; v1 submitted 3 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Reference study of IFC software support: the GeoBIM benchmark 2019 -- Part I
Authors:
Francesca Noardo,
Thomas Krijnen,
Ken Arroyo Ohori,
Filip Biljecki,
Claire Ellul,
Lars Harrie,
Helen Eriksson,
Lorenzo Polia,
Nebras Salheb,
Helga Tauscher,
Jordi van Liempt,
Hendrik Goerne,
Dean Hintz,
Tim Kaiser,
Cristina Leoni,
Artur Warchol,
Jantien Stoter
Abstract:
IFC, buildingSMART open standard for Building Information Models, is underused with respect to its promising potential, since, according to the experience of practitioners and researchers working with BIM, issues in the standard's implementation and use prevent its effective use. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been performed, and there is thus insufficient evide…
▽ More
IFC, buildingSMART open standard for Building Information Models, is underused with respect to its promising potential, since, according to the experience of practitioners and researchers working with BIM, issues in the standard's implementation and use prevent its effective use. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been performed, and there is thus insufficient evidence for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on tools behaviour about relevant aspects (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analysed and described in this paper. Interestingly, few patterns are detectable about the behaviour of different software with standardised data, and significant issues are found in their support of the standards, probably due to the very high complexity of the standard data model. This paper is in tandem with Part II, describing the results of the benchmark related to CityGML, counterpart of IFC within geoinformation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2021; v1 submitted 21 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
Reference study of CityGML software support: the GeoBIM benchmark 2019 -- Part II
Authors:
Francesca Noardo,
Ken Arroyo Ohori,
Filip Biljecki,
Claire Ellul,
Lars Harrie,
Thomas Krijnen,
Helen Eriksson,
Jordi van Liempt,
Maria Pla,
Antonio Ruiz,
Dean Hintz,
Nina Krueger,
Cristina Leoni,
Leire Leoz,
Diana Moraru,
Stelios Vitalis,
Philipp Willkomm,
Jantien Stoter
Abstract:
OGC CityGML is an open standard for 3D city models intended to foster interoperability and support various applications. However, through our practical experience and discussions with practitioners, we have noticed several problems related to the implementation of the standard and the use of standardized data. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been performed, and t…
▽ More
OGC CityGML is an open standard for 3D city models intended to foster interoperability and support various applications. However, through our practical experience and discussions with practitioners, we have noticed several problems related to the implementation of the standard and the use of standardized data. Nevertheless, a systematic investigation of these issues has never been performed, and there is thus insufficient evidence that can be used for tackling the problems. The GeoBIM benchmark project is aimed at finding such evidence by involving external volunteers, reporting on tools behaviour about relevant aspects (geometry, semantics, georeferencing, functionalities), analysed and described in this paper. This study explicitly pointed out the critical points embedded in the format as an evidence base for future development. This paper is in tandem with Part I, describing the results of the benchmark related to IFC, counterpart of CityGML within building information modelling.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2021; v1 submitted 21 July, 2020;
originally announced July 2020.
-
CityJSON: a compact and easy-to-use encoding of the CityGML data model
Authors:
Hugo Ledoux,
Ken Arroyo Ohori,
Kavisha Kumar,
Balázs Dukai,
Anna Labetski,
Stelios Vitalis
Abstract:
The international standard CityGML is both a data model and an exchange format to store digital 3D models of cities. While the data model is used by several cities, companies, and governments, in this paper we argue that its XML-based exchange format has several drawbacks. These drawbacks mean that it is difficult for developers to implement parsers for CityGML, and that practitioners have, as a c…
▽ More
The international standard CityGML is both a data model and an exchange format to store digital 3D models of cities. While the data model is used by several cities, companies, and governments, in this paper we argue that its XML-based exchange format has several drawbacks. These drawbacks mean that it is difficult for developers to implement parsers for CityGML, and that practitioners have, as a consequence, to convert their data to other formats if they want to exchange them with others. We present CityJSON, a new JSON-based exchange format for the CityGML data model (version 2.0.0). CityJSON was designed with programmers in mind, so that software and APIs supporting it can be quickly built. It was also designed to be compact (a compression factor of around six with real-world datasets), and to be friendly for web and mobile development. We argue that it is considerably easier to use than the CityGML format, both for reading and for creating datasets. We discuss in this paper the main features of CityJSON, briefly present the different software packages to parse/view/edit/create files (including one to automatically convert between the JSON and GML encodings), analyse how real-world datasets compare to those of CityGML, and we also introduce \emph{Extensions}, which allow us to extend the core data model in a documented manner.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2020; v1 submitted 25 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
