A Synthetic Prediction Market for Estimating Confidence in Published Work
Authors:
Sarah Rajtmajer,
Christopher Griffin,
Jian Wu,
Robert Fraleigh,
Laxmaan Balaji,
Anna Squicciarini,
Anthony Kwasnica,
David Pennock,
Michael McLaughlin,
Timothy Fritton,
Nishanth Nakshatri,
Arjun Menon,
Sai Ajay Modukuri,
Rajal Nivargi,
Xin Wei,
C. Lee Giles
Abstract:
Explainably estimating confidence in published scholarly work offers opportunity for faster and more robust scientific progress. We develop a synthetic prediction market to assess the credibility of published claims in the social and behavioral sciences literature. We demonstrate our system and detail our findings using a collection of known replication projects. We suggest that this work lays the…
▽ More
Explainably estimating confidence in published scholarly work offers opportunity for faster and more robust scientific progress. We develop a synthetic prediction market to assess the credibility of published claims in the social and behavioral sciences literature. We demonstrate our system and detail our findings using a collection of known replication projects. We suggest that this work lays the foundation for a research agenda that creatively uses AI for peer review.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2021;
originally announced January 2022.
Predicting the Reproducibility of Social and Behavioral Science Papers Using Supervised Learning Models
Authors:
Jian Wu,
Rajal Nivargi,
Sree Sai Teja Lanka,
Arjun Manoj Menon,
Sai Ajay Modukuri,
Nishanth Nakshatri,
Xin Wei,
Zhuoer Wang,
James Caverlee,
Sarah M. Rajtmajer,
C. Lee Giles
Abstract:
In recent years, significant effort has been invested verifying the reproducibility and robustness of research claims in social and behavioral sciences (SBS), much of which has involved resource-intensive replication projects. In this paper, we investigate prediction of the reproducibility of SBS papers using machine learning methods based on a set of features. We propose a framework that extracts…
▽ More
In recent years, significant effort has been invested verifying the reproducibility and robustness of research claims in social and behavioral sciences (SBS), much of which has involved resource-intensive replication projects. In this paper, we investigate prediction of the reproducibility of SBS papers using machine learning methods based on a set of features. We propose a framework that extracts five types of features from scholarly work that can be used to support assessments of reproducibility of published research claims. Bibliometric features, venue features, and author features are collected from public APIs or extracted using open source machine learning libraries with customized parsers. Statistical features, such as p-values, are extracted by recognizing patterns in the body text. Semantic features, such as funding information, are obtained from public APIs or are extracted using natural language processing models. We analyze pairwise correlations between individual features and their importance for predicting a set of human-assessed ground truth labels. In doing so, we identify a subset of 9 top features that play relatively more important roles in predicting the reproducibility of SBS papers in our corpus. Results are verified by comparing performances of 10 supervised predictive classifiers trained on different sets of features.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 7 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
