CompartOS: CHERI Compartmentalization for Embedded Systems
Authors:
Hesham Almatary,
Michael Dodson,
Jessica Clarke,
Peter Rugg,
Ivan Gomes,
Michal Podhradsky,
Peter G. Neumann,
Simon W. Moore,
Robert N. M. Watson
Abstract:
Existing high-end embedded systems face frequent security attacks. Software compartmentalization is one technique to limit the attacks' effects to the compromised compartment and not the entire system. Unfortunately, the existing state-of-the-art embedded hardware-software solutions do not work well to enforce software compartmentalization for high-end embedded systems. MPUs are not fine-grained a…
▽ More
Existing high-end embedded systems face frequent security attacks. Software compartmentalization is one technique to limit the attacks' effects to the compromised compartment and not the entire system. Unfortunately, the existing state-of-the-art embedded hardware-software solutions do not work well to enforce software compartmentalization for high-end embedded systems. MPUs are not fine-grained and suffer from significant scalability limitations as they can only protect a small and fixed number of memory regions. On the other hand, MMUs suffer from non-determinism and coarse-grained protection. This paper introduces CompartOS as a lightweight linkage-based compartmentalization model for high-end, complex, mainstream embedded systems. CompartOS builds on CHERI, a capability-based hardware architecture, to meet scalability, availability, compatibility, and fine-grained security goals. Microbenchmarks show that CompartOS' protection-domain crossing is 95% faster than MPU-based IPC. We applied the CompartOS model, with low effort, to complex existing systems, including TCP servers and a safety-critical automotive demo. CompartOS not only catches 10 out of 13 FreeRTOS-TCP published vulnerabilities that MPU-based protection (e.g., uVisor) cannot catch but can also recover from them. Further, our TCP throughput evaluations show that our CompartOS prototype is 52% faster than relevant MPU-based compartmentalization models (e.g., ACES), with a 15% overhead compared to an unprotected system. This comes at an FPGA's LUTs overhead of 10.4% to support CHERI for an unprotected baseline RISC-V processor, compared to 7.6% to support MPU, while CHERI only incurs 1.3% of the registers area overhead compared to 2% for MPU.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2022; v1 submitted 6 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
Bugs in our Pockets: The Risks of Client-Side Scanning
Authors:
Hal Abelson,
Ross Anderson,
Steven M. Bellovin,
Josh Benaloh,
Matt Blaze,
Jon Callas,
Whitfield Diffie,
Susan Landau,
Peter G. Neumann,
Ronald L. Rivest,
Jeffrey I. Schiller,
Bruce Schneier,
Vanessa Teague,
Carmela Troncoso
Abstract:
Our increasing reliance on digital technology for personal, economic, and government affairs has made it essential to secure the communications and devices of private citizens, businesses, and governments. This has led to pervasive use of cryptography across society. Despite its evident advantages, law enforcement and national security agencies have argued that the spread of cryptography has hinde…
▽ More
Our increasing reliance on digital technology for personal, economic, and government affairs has made it essential to secure the communications and devices of private citizens, businesses, and governments. This has led to pervasive use of cryptography across society. Despite its evident advantages, law enforcement and national security agencies have argued that the spread of cryptography has hindered access to evidence and intelligence. Some in industry and government now advocate a new technology to access targeted data: client-side scanning (CSS). Instead of weakening encryption or providing law enforcement with backdoor keys to decrypt communications, CSS would enable on-device analysis of data in the clear. If targeted information were detected, its existence and, potentially, its source, would be revealed to the agencies; otherwise, little or no information would leave the client device. Its proponents claim that CSS is a solution to the encryption versus public safety debate: it offers privacy -- in the sense of unimpeded end-to-end encryption -- and the ability to successfully investigate serious crime. In this report, we argue that CSS neither guarantees efficacious crime prevention nor prevents surveillance. Indeed, the effect is the opposite. CSS by its nature creates serious security and privacy risks for all society while the assistance it can provide for law enforcement is at best problematic. There are multiple ways in which client-side scanning can fail, can be evaded, and can be abused.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
