Machine learning potentials with Iterative Boltzmann Inversion: training to experiment
Authors:
Sakib Matin,
Alice Allen,
Justin S. Smith,
Nicholas Lubbers,
Ryan B. Jadrich,
Richard A. Messerly,
Benjamin T. Nebgen,
Ying Wai Li,
Sergei Tretiak,
Kipton Barros
Abstract:
Methodologies for training machine learning potentials (MLPs) to quantum-mechanical simulation data have recently seen tremendous progress. Experimental data has a very different character than simulated data, and most MLP training procedures cannot be easily adapted to incorporate both types of data into the training process. We investigate a training procedure based on Iterative Boltzmann Invers…
▽ More
Methodologies for training machine learning potentials (MLPs) to quantum-mechanical simulation data have recently seen tremendous progress. Experimental data has a very different character than simulated data, and most MLP training procedures cannot be easily adapted to incorporate both types of data into the training process. We investigate a training procedure based on Iterative Boltzmann Inversion that produces a pair potential correction to an existing MLP, using equilibrium radial distribution function data. By applying these corrections to a MLP for pure aluminum based on Density Functional Theory, we observe that the resulting model largely addresses previous overstructuring in the melt phase. Interestingly, the corrected MLP also exhibits improved performance in predicting experimental diffusion constants, which are not included in the training procedure. The presented method does not require auto-differentiating through a molecular dynamics solver, and does not make assumptions about the MLP architecture. The results suggest a practical framework of incorporating experimental data into machine learning models to improve accuracy of molecular dynamics simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
A Neural Network for Determination of Latent Dimensionality in Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
Authors:
Benjamin T. Nebgen,
Raviteja Vangara,
Miguel A. Hombrados-Herrera,
Svetlana Kuksova,
Boian S. Alexandrov
Abstract:
Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) has proven to be a powerful unsupervised learning method for uncovering hidden features in complex and noisy data sets with applications in data mining, text recognition, dimension reduction, face recognition, anomaly detection, blind source separation, and many other fields. An important input for NMF is the latent dimensionality of the data, that is, the n…
▽ More
Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) has proven to be a powerful unsupervised learning method for uncovering hidden features in complex and noisy data sets with applications in data mining, text recognition, dimension reduction, face recognition, anomaly detection, blind source separation, and many other fields. An important input for NMF is the latent dimensionality of the data, that is, the number of hidden features, K, present in the explored data set. Unfortunately, this quantity is rarely known a priori. We utilize a supervised machine learning approach in combination with a recent method for model determination, called NMFk, to determine the number of hidden features automatically. NMFk performs a set of NMF simulations on an ensemble of matrices, obtained by bootstrap** the initial data set, and determines which K produces stable groups of latent features that reconstruct the initial data set well. We then train a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) classifier network to determine the correct number of latent features utilizing the statistics and characteristics of the NMF solutions, obtained from NMFk. In order to train the MLP classifier, a training set of 58,660 matrices with predetermined latent features were factorized with NMFk. The MLP classifier in conjunction with NMFk maintains a greater than 95% success rate when applied to a held out test set. Additionally, when applied to two well-known benchmark data sets, the swimmer and MIT face data, NMFk/MLP correctly recovered the established number of hidden features. Finally, we compared the accuracy of our method to the ARD, AIC and Stability-based methods.
△ Less
Submitted 22 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
