Towards Refactoring of DMARF and GIPSY Case Studies -- a Team 8 SOEN6471-S14 Project Report
Authors:
Nitish Agrawal,
Rachit Naidu,
Sadhana Viswanathan,
Vikram Wankhede,
Zakaria Nasereldine,
Zohaib S. Kiyani
Abstract:
Of the factors that determines the quality of a software system is its design and architecture. Having a good and clear design and architecture allows the system to evolve (plan and add new features), be easier to comprehend, easier to develop, easier to maintain; and in conclusion increase the life time of the, and being more competitive in its market. In the following paper we study the architec…
▽ More
Of the factors that determines the quality of a software system is its design and architecture. Having a good and clear design and architecture allows the system to evolve (plan and add new features), be easier to comprehend, easier to develop, easier to maintain; and in conclusion increase the life time of the, and being more competitive in its market. In the following paper we study the architecture of two different systems: GIPSY and DMARF. This paper provides a general overview of these two systems. What are these two systems, purpose, architecture, and their design patterns? Classes with week architecture and design, and code smells were also identified and some refactorings were suggested and implemented. Several tools were used throughout the paper for several purpose. LOGICSCOPE, JDeodoant, McCabe were used to identify classes with weak designs and code smells. Other tools and plugins were also used to identify class designs and relationships between classes such as ObjectAid (Eclipse plugin).
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
Toward Software Measurement and Quality Analysis of MARF and GIPSY Case Studies a Team 13 SOEN6611-S14 Project Report
Authors:
Abdulrhman Albeladi,
Rabe Abdalkareem,
Farhat Agwaeten,
Khalid Altoum,
Youssef Bennis,
Zakaria Nasereldine
Abstract:
It is no longer a debate that quality is an essential requirement in any software product, especially in a highly competitive market and a context of mission critical product. To obtain better product quality, software metrics are the only reliable indicators provided to assess and measure this attribute of a software product. Several metrics have been elaborated but none of them were really conve…
▽ More
It is no longer a debate that quality is an essential requirement in any software product, especially in a highly competitive market and a context of mission critical product. To obtain better product quality, software metrics are the only reliable indicators provided to assess and measure this attribute of a software product. Several metrics have been elaborated but none of them were really convenient in an object oriented ecosystem. However, the MOOD metrics have proven their efficiency in gauging the software quality at system level, while CK Metrics measure the quality of software at class level . These metrics, well suited for Object-Oriented design, allow measuring object oriented design properties such as coupling, cohesion, encapsulation, Inheritance and polymorphism. The goal of the present study is using the mentioned metrics to assess the quality of two different case studies, MARF and GIPSY. For this purpose, different tools such as McCabe, Logiscope and, JDeodorant have been used to measure the quality of these projects by implementing in different manners the metrics composing the CK and MOOD suite metrics, whilst MARFCAT has been used to detect vulnerable code files in both case studies. The present study puts the light on the strengths of these tools to measure the quality of proven and largely researched software products.
△ Less
Submitted 2 July, 2014; v1 submitted 30 June, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
