Designing Interpretable ML System to Enhance Trust in Healthcare: A Systematic Review to Proposed Responsible Clinician-AI-Collaboration Framework
Authors:
Elham Nasarian,
Roohallah Alizadehsani,
U. Rajendra Acharya,
Kwok-Leung Tsui
Abstract:
This paper explores the significant impact of AI-based medical devices, including wearables, telemedicine, large language models, and digital twins, on clinical decision support systems. It emphasizes the importance of producing outcomes that are not only accurate but also interpretable and understandable to clinicians, addressing the risk that lack of interpretability poses in terms of mistrust a…
▽ More
This paper explores the significant impact of AI-based medical devices, including wearables, telemedicine, large language models, and digital twins, on clinical decision support systems. It emphasizes the importance of producing outcomes that are not only accurate but also interpretable and understandable to clinicians, addressing the risk that lack of interpretability poses in terms of mistrust and reluctance to adopt these technologies in healthcare. The paper reviews interpretable AI processes, methods, applications, and the challenges of implementation in healthcare, focusing on quality control to facilitate responsible communication between AI systems and clinicians. It breaks down the interpretability process into data pre-processing, model selection, and post-processing, aiming to foster a comprehensive understanding of the crucial role of a robust interpretability approach in healthcare and to guide future research in this area. with insights for creating responsible clinician-AI tools for healthcare, as well as to offer a deeper understanding of the challenges they might face. Our research questions, eligibility criteria and primary goals were identified using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline and PICO method; PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched using sensitive and specific search strings. In the end, 52 publications were selected for data extraction which included 8 existing reviews and 44 related experimental studies. The paper offers general concepts of interpretable AI in healthcare and discuss three-levels interpretability process. Additionally, it provides a comprehensive discussion of evaluating robust interpretability AI in healthcare. Moreover, this survey introduces a step-by-step roadmap for implementing responsible AI in healthcare.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2024; v1 submitted 18 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
AI Framework for Early Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease: An Integration of Borderline SMOTE, Autoencoders and Convolutional Neural Networks Approach
Authors:
Elham Nasarian,
Danial Sharifrazi,
Saman Mohsenirad,
Kwok Tsui,
Roohallah Alizadehsani
Abstract:
The accuracy of coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis is dependent on a variety of factors, including demographic, symptom, and medical examination, ECG, and echocardiography data, among others. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) can help clinicians identify high-risk patients early in the diagnostic process, by synthesizing information from multiple factors. To this aim, Machine Lear…
▽ More
The accuracy of coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis is dependent on a variety of factors, including demographic, symptom, and medical examination, ECG, and echocardiography data, among others. In this context, artificial intelligence (AI) can help clinicians identify high-risk patients early in the diagnostic process, by synthesizing information from multiple factors. To this aim, Machine Learning algorithms are used to classify patients based on their CAD disease risk. In this study, we contribute to this research filed by develo** a methodology for balancing and augmenting data for more accurate prediction when the data is imbalanced and the sample size is small. The methodology can be used in a variety of other situations, particularly when data collection is expensive and the sample size is small. The experimental results revealed that the average accuracy of our proposed method for CAD prediction was 95.36, and was higher than random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and artificial neural network (ANN).
△ Less
Submitted 29 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
