Leveraging convergence behavior to balance conflicting tasks in multi-task learning
Authors:
Angelica Tiemi Mizuno Nakamura,
Denis Fernando Wolf,
Valdir Grassi Jr
Abstract:
Multi-Task Learning is a learning paradigm that uses correlated tasks to improve performance generalization. A common way to learn multiple tasks is through the hard parameter sharing approach, in which a single architecture is used to share the same subset of parameters, creating an inductive bias between them during the training process. Due to its simplicity, potential to improve generalization…
▽ More
Multi-Task Learning is a learning paradigm that uses correlated tasks to improve performance generalization. A common way to learn multiple tasks is through the hard parameter sharing approach, in which a single architecture is used to share the same subset of parameters, creating an inductive bias between them during the training process. Due to its simplicity, potential to improve generalization, and reduce computational cost, it has gained the attention of the scientific and industrial communities. However, tasks often conflict with each other, which makes it challenging to define how the gradients of multiple tasks should be combined to allow simultaneous learning. To address this problem, we use the idea of multi-objective optimization to propose a method that takes into account temporal behaviour of the gradients to create a dynamic bias that adjust the importance of each task during the backpropagation. The result of this method is to give more attention to the tasks that are diverging or that are not being benefited during the last iterations, allowing to ensure that the simultaneous learning is heading to the performance maximization of all tasks. As a result, we empirically show that the proposed method outperforms the state-of-art approaches on learning conflicting tasks. Unlike the adopted baselines, our method ensures that all tasks reach good generalization performances.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
A Software Architecture for Autonomous Vehicles: Team LRM-B Entry in the First CARLA Autonomous Driving Challenge
Authors:
Luis Alberto Rosero,
Iago Pacheco Gomes,
Júnior Anderson Rodrigues da Silva,
Tiago Cesar dos Santos,
Angelica Tiemi Mizuno Nakamura,
Jean Amaro,
Denis Fernando Wolf,
Fernando Santos Osório
Abstract:
The objective of the first CARLA autonomous driving challenge was to deploy autonomous driving systems to lead with complex traffic scenarios where all participants faced the same challenging traffic situations. According to the organizers, this competition emerges as a way to democratize and to accelerate the research and development of autonomous vehicles around the world using the CARLA simulat…
▽ More
The objective of the first CARLA autonomous driving challenge was to deploy autonomous driving systems to lead with complex traffic scenarios where all participants faced the same challenging traffic situations. According to the organizers, this competition emerges as a way to democratize and to accelerate the research and development of autonomous vehicles around the world using the CARLA simulator contributing to the development of the autonomous vehicle area. Therefore, this paper presents the architecture design for the navigation of an autonomous vehicle in a simulated urban environment that attempts to commit the least number of traffic infractions, which used as the baseline the original architecture of the platform for autonomous navigation CaRINA 2. Our agent traveled in simulated scenarios for several hours, demonstrating his capabilities, winning three out of the four tracks of the challenge, and being ranked second in the remaining track.
Our architecture was made towards meeting the requirements of CARLA Autonomous Driving Challenge and has components for obstacle detection using 3D point clouds, traffic signs detection and classification which employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and depth information, risk assessment with collision detection using short-term motion prediction, decision-making with Markov Decision Process (MDP), and control using Model Predictive Control (MPC).
△ Less
Submitted 23 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
