-
A Correspondence between Chord Diagrams and Families of 0-1 Young Diagrams
Authors:
Tomoki Nakamigawa
Abstract:
A chord diagram is a set of chords in which no pair of chords has a common endvertex. For a chord diagram $E$ having a crossing $S = \{ ac, bd \}$, by the chord expansion of $E$ with respect to $S$, we have two chord diagrams $E_1 = (E\setminus S) \cup \{ ab, cd \}$ and $E_2 = (E\setminus S) \cup \{ da, bc \}$. Starting from a chord diagram $E$, by iterating expansions, we have a binary tree $T$ s…
▽ More
A chord diagram is a set of chords in which no pair of chords has a common endvertex. For a chord diagram $E$ having a crossing $S = \{ ac, bd \}$, by the chord expansion of $E$ with respect to $S$, we have two chord diagrams $E_1 = (E\setminus S) \cup \{ ab, cd \}$ and $E_2 = (E\setminus S) \cup \{ da, bc \}$. Starting from a chord diagram $E$, by iterating expansions, we have a binary tree $T$ such that $E$ is a root of $T$ and a multiset of nonintersecting chord diagrams appear in the set of leaves of $T$. The number of leaves, which is not depending on the choice of expansions, is called the chord expansion number of $E$. A $0$-$1$ Young diagram is a Young diagram having a value of $0$ or $1$ for all boxes. This paper shows that the chord expansion number of some type counts the number of $0$-$1$ Young diagrams under some conditions. In particular, it is shown that the chord expansion number of an $n$-crossing, which corresponds to the Euler number, equals the number of $0$-$1$ Young diagrams of shape $(n,n-1,\ldots,1)$ such that each column has at most one $1$ and each row has an even number of $1$'s.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
On the average hitting times of the squares of cycles
Authors:
Yoshiaki Doi,
Norio Konno,
Tomoki Nakamigawa,
Tadashi Sakuma,
Etsuo Segawa,
Hidehiro Shinohara,
Shunya Tamura,
Yuuho Tanaka,
Kosuke Toyota
Abstract:
The exact formula for the average hitting time (HT, as an abbreviation) of simple random walks from one vertex to any other vertex on the square $C^2_N$ of an $N$-vertex cycle graph $C_N$ was given by N. Chair [\textit{Journal of Statistical Physics}, \textbf{154} (2014) 1177-1190]. In that paper, the author gives the expression for the even $N$ case and the expression for the odd $N$ case separat…
▽ More
The exact formula for the average hitting time (HT, as an abbreviation) of simple random walks from one vertex to any other vertex on the square $C^2_N$ of an $N$-vertex cycle graph $C_N$ was given by N. Chair [\textit{Journal of Statistical Physics}, \textbf{154} (2014) 1177-1190]. In that paper, the author gives the expression for the even $N$ case and the expression for the odd $N$ case separately. In this paper, by using an elementary method different from Chair (2014), we give a much simpler single formula for the HT's of simple random walks on $C^2_N$. Our proof is considerably short and fully combinatorial, in particular, has no-need of any spectral graph theoretical arguments. Not only the formula itself but also intermediate results through the process of our proof describe clear relations between the HT's of simple random walks on $C^2_N$ and the Fibonacci numbers.
△ Less
Submitted 24 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Pebble Exchange Group of Graphs
Authors:
Tatsuoki Kato,
Tomoki Nakamigawa,
Tadashi Sakuma
Abstract:
A graph puzzle ${\rm Puz}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is defined as follows. A configuration of ${\rm Puz}(G)$ is a bijection from the set of vertices of a board graph to the set of vertices of a pebble graph, both graphs being isomorphic to some input graph $G$. A move of pebbles is defined as exchanging two pebbles which are adjacent on both a board graph and a pebble graph. For a pair of configurations…
▽ More
A graph puzzle ${\rm Puz}(G)$ of a graph $G$ is defined as follows. A configuration of ${\rm Puz}(G)$ is a bijection from the set of vertices of a board graph to the set of vertices of a pebble graph, both graphs being isomorphic to some input graph $G$. A move of pebbles is defined as exchanging two pebbles which are adjacent on both a board graph and a pebble graph. For a pair of configurations $f$ and $g$, we say that $f$ is equivalent to $g$ if $f$ can be transformed into $g$ by a finite sequence of moves.
Let ${\rm Aut}(G)$ be the automorphism group of $G$, and let ${\rm 1}_G$ be the unit element of ${\rm Aut}(G)$. The pebble exchange group of $G$, denoted by ${\rm Peb}(G)$, is defined as the set of all automorphisms $f$ of $G$ such that ${\rm 1}_G$ and $f$ are equivalent to each other.
In this paper, some basic properties of ${\rm Peb}(G)$ are studied. Among other results, it is shown that for any connected graph $G$, all automorphisms of $G$ are contained in ${\rm Peb}(G^2)$, where $G^2$ is a square graph of $G$.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2021; v1 submitted 31 March, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
Agent Arrangement Problem
Authors:
Tomoki Nakamigawa,
Tadashi Sakuma
Abstract:
An {\em arrangement} of an ordered pair $(G_A, G_M)$ of graphs is defined as a function $f$ from $V(G_A)$ to $V(G_M)$ such that, for each vertex $c$ of $G_M$, the vertex-set $f^{-1}(c)$ of $G_A$ either is $\emptyset$ (the case when $c \not\in f(V(G_A))$) or induces a connected subgraph of $G_A$ and that the family $\{f^{-1}(y) : y \in V(G_M), f^{-1}(y) \neq \emptyset\}$ is a partition of $V(G_A)$.…
▽ More
An {\em arrangement} of an ordered pair $(G_A, G_M)$ of graphs is defined as a function $f$ from $V(G_A)$ to $V(G_M)$ such that, for each vertex $c$ of $G_M$, the vertex-set $f^{-1}(c)$ of $G_A$ either is $\emptyset$ (the case when $c \not\in f(V(G_A))$) or induces a connected subgraph of $G_A$ and that the family $\{f^{-1}(y) : y \in V(G_M), f^{-1}(y) \neq \emptyset\}$ is a partition of $V(G_A)$. Let $f$ be an arrangement of $(G_A, G_M)$, let $pq$ be an edge of $G_M$ and let $U$ be a subset of $f^{-1}(p)$ such that each of the three graphs $G_A[U]$, $G_A[f^{-1}(p)\setminus U]$ and $G_A[f^{-1}(q)\cup U]$ is ether connected or $\emptyset$ and that $\big(f^{-1}(p)\cup f^{-1}(q) \big) \setminus U \neq \emptyset$. A {\em transfer} of $U$ from $p$ to $q$ is defined as the modification $f^{\prime}$ of $f$ such that $f^{\prime}(x):=f(x)$ for every $ x \notin U$ and $f^{\prime}(u):=q$ for every $u \in U$. Two arrangements $f$ and $g$ of $(G_A, G_M)$ are called {\em t-equivalent} if they can be transformed into each other by a finite sequence of transfers. An ordered pair $(G_A, G_M)$ of graphs is called {\em almighty} if every two arrangements of the pair $(G_A, G_M)$ are t-equivalent. In this study, we consider the following two decision problems. [{\bf (P1)}]{For a given pair of arrangements $f$ and $g$ of a given ordered pair $(G_A,G_M)$ of graphs, decide whether $f$ is t-equivalent to $g$ or not.} [{\bf (P2)}]{For a given ordered pair $(G_A,G_M)$ of graphs, decide whether the pair $(G_A,G_M)$ is almighty or not.} We show an $\Od(|E(G_A)|+(|V(G_M)|+|E(G_A)|)|V(G_A)|)$-time algorithm for {\bf (P1)}, and prove the $\co\np$-completeness of {\bf (P2)}.
△ Less
Submitted 20 December, 2012; v1 submitted 11 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
