-
Oralytics Reinforcement Learning Algorithm
Authors:
Anna L. Trella,
Kelly W. Zhang,
Stephanie M. Carpenter,
David Elashoff,
Zara M. Greer,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Dennis Ruenger,
Vivek Shetty,
Susan A. Murphy
Abstract:
Dental disease is still one of the most common chronic diseases in the United States. While dental disease is preventable through healthy oral self-care behaviors (OSCB), this basic behavior is not consistently practiced. We have developed Oralytics, an online, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that optimizes the delivery of personalized intervention prompts to improve OSCB. In this paper, we…
▽ More
Dental disease is still one of the most common chronic diseases in the United States. While dental disease is preventable through healthy oral self-care behaviors (OSCB), this basic behavior is not consistently practiced. We have developed Oralytics, an online, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that optimizes the delivery of personalized intervention prompts to improve OSCB. In this paper, we offer a full overview of algorithm design decisions made using prior data, domain expertise, and experiments in a simulation test bed. The finalized RL algorithm was deployed in the Oralytics clinical trial, conducted from fall 2023 to summer 2024.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
A Bayesian joint longitudinal-survival model with a latent stochastic process for intensive longitudinal data
Authors:
Madeline R. Abbott,
Walter H. Dempsey,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Lindsey N. Potter,
David W. Wetter,
Cho Y. Lam,
Jeremy M. G. Taylor
Abstract:
The availability of mobile health (mHealth) technology has enabled increased collection of intensive longitudinal data (ILD). ILD have potential to capture rapid fluctuations in outcomes that may be associated with changes in the risk of an event. However, existing methods for jointly modeling longitudinal and event-time outcomes are not well-equipped to handle ILD due to the high computational co…
▽ More
The availability of mobile health (mHealth) technology has enabled increased collection of intensive longitudinal data (ILD). ILD have potential to capture rapid fluctuations in outcomes that may be associated with changes in the risk of an event. However, existing methods for jointly modeling longitudinal and event-time outcomes are not well-equipped to handle ILD due to the high computational cost. We propose a joint longitudinal and time-to-event model suitable for analyzing ILD. In this model, we summarize a multivariate longitudinal outcome as a smaller number of time-varying latent factors. These latent factors, which are modeled using an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck stochastic process, capture the risk of a time-to-event outcome in a parametric hazard model. We take a Bayesian approach to fit our joint model and conduct simulations to assess its performance. We use it to analyze data from an mHealth study of smoking cessation. We summarize the longitudinal self-reported intensity of nine emotions as the psychological states of positive and negative affect. These time-varying latent states capture the risk of the first smoking lapse after attempted quit. Understanding factors associated with smoking lapse is of keen interest to smoking cessation researchers.
△ Less
Submitted 30 April, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Data integration methods for micro-randomized trials
Authors:
Easton Huch,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Lindsey Potter,
Cho Lam,
David W. Wetter,
Walter Dempsey
Abstract:
Existing statistical methods for the analysis of micro-randomized trials (MRTs) are designed to estimate causal excursion effects using data from a single MRT. In practice, however, researchers can often find previous MRTs that employ similar interventions. In this paper, we develop data integration methods that capitalize on this additional information, leading to statistical efficiency gains. To…
▽ More
Existing statistical methods for the analysis of micro-randomized trials (MRTs) are designed to estimate causal excursion effects using data from a single MRT. In practice, however, researchers can often find previous MRTs that employ similar interventions. In this paper, we develop data integration methods that capitalize on this additional information, leading to statistical efficiency gains. To further increase efficiency, we demonstrate how to combine these approaches according to a generalization of multivariate precision weighting that allows for correlation between estimates, and we show that the resulting meta-estimator possesses an asymptotic optimality property. We illustrate our methods in simulation and in a case study involving two MRTs in the area of smoking cessation.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
reBandit: Random Effects based Online RL algorithm for Reducing Cannabis Use
Authors:
Susobhan Ghosh,
Yongyi Guo,
Pei-Yao Hung,
Lara Coughlin,
Erin Bonar,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Maureen Walton,
Susan Murphy
Abstract:
The escalating prevalence of cannabis use, and associated cannabis-use disorder (CUD), poses a significant public health challenge globally. With a notably wide treatment gap, especially among emerging adults (EAs; ages 18-25), addressing cannabis use and CUD remains a pivotal objective within the 2030 United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). In this work, we develop an onlin…
▽ More
The escalating prevalence of cannabis use, and associated cannabis-use disorder (CUD), poses a significant public health challenge globally. With a notably wide treatment gap, especially among emerging adults (EAs; ages 18-25), addressing cannabis use and CUD remains a pivotal objective within the 2030 United Nations Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). In this work, we develop an online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm called reBandit which will be utilized in a mobile health study to deliver personalized mobile health interventions aimed at reducing cannabis use among EAs. reBandit utilizes random effects and informative Bayesian priors to learn quickly and efficiently in noisy mobile health environments. Moreover, reBandit employs Empirical Bayes and optimization techniques to autonomously update its hyper-parameters online. To evaluate the performance of our algorithm, we construct a simulation testbed using data from a prior study, and compare against commonly used algorithms in mobile health studies. We show that reBandit performs equally well or better than all the baseline algorithms, and the performance gap widens as population heterogeneity increases in the simulation environment, proving its adeptness to adapt to diverse population of study participants.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2024; v1 submitted 27 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Monitoring Fidelity of Online Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Clinical Trials
Authors:
Anna L. Trella,
Kelly W. Zhang,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Vivek Shetty,
Iris Yan,
Finale Doshi-Velez,
Susan A. Murphy
Abstract:
Online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms offer great potential for personalizing treatment for participants in clinical trials. However, deploying an online, autonomous algorithm in the high-stakes healthcare setting makes quality control and data quality especially difficult to achieve. This paper proposes algorithm fidelity as a critical requirement for deploying online RL algorithms in cli…
▽ More
Online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms offer great potential for personalizing treatment for participants in clinical trials. However, deploying an online, autonomous algorithm in the high-stakes healthcare setting makes quality control and data quality especially difficult to achieve. This paper proposes algorithm fidelity as a critical requirement for deploying online RL algorithms in clinical trials. It emphasizes the responsibility of the algorithm to (1) safeguard participants and (2) preserve the scientific utility of the data for post-trial analyses. We also present a framework for pre-deployment planning and real-time monitoring to help algorithm developers and clinical researchers ensure algorithm fidelity. To illustrate our framework's practical application, we present real-world examples from the Oralytics clinical trial. Since Spring 2023, this trial successfully deployed an autonomous, online RL algorithm to personalize behavioral interventions for participants at risk for dental disease.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Optimal Adaptive SMART Designs with Binary Outcomes
Authors:
Rik Ghosh,
Bibhas Chakraborty,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Megan E. Patrick,
Palash Ghosh
Abstract:
In a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART), a sequence of treatments is given to a patient over multiple stages. In each stage, randomization may be done to allocate patients to different treatment groups. Even though SMART designs are getting popular among clinical researchers, the methodologies for adaptive randomization at different stages of a SMART are few and not sophistica…
▽ More
In a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART), a sequence of treatments is given to a patient over multiple stages. In each stage, randomization may be done to allocate patients to different treatment groups. Even though SMART designs are getting popular among clinical researchers, the methodologies for adaptive randomization at different stages of a SMART are few and not sophisticated enough to handle the complexity of optimal allocation of treatments at every stage of a trial. Lack of optimal allocation methodologies can raise serious concerns about SMART designs from an ethical point of view. In this work, we develop an optimal adaptive allocation procedure to minimize the expected number of treatment failures for a SMART with a binary primary outcome. Issues related to optimal adaptive allocations are explored theoretically with supporting simulations. The applicability of the proposed methodology is demonstrated using a recently conducted SMART study named M-Bridge for develo** universal and resource-efficient dynamic treatment regimes (DTRs) for incoming first-year college students as a bridge to desirable treatments to address alcohol-related risks.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2023;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Dyadic Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Shuangning Li,
Lluis Salvat Niell,
Sung Won Choi,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Guy Shani,
Susan Murphy
Abstract:
Mobile health aims to enhance health outcomes by delivering interventions to individuals as they go about their daily life. The involvement of care partners and social support networks often proves crucial in hel** individuals managing burdensome medical conditions. This presents opportunities in mobile health to design interventions that target the dyadic relationship -- the relationship betwee…
▽ More
Mobile health aims to enhance health outcomes by delivering interventions to individuals as they go about their daily life. The involvement of care partners and social support networks often proves crucial in hel** individuals managing burdensome medical conditions. This presents opportunities in mobile health to design interventions that target the dyadic relationship -- the relationship between a target person and their care partner -- with the aim of enhancing social support. In this paper, we develop dyadic RL, an online reinforcement learning algorithm designed to personalize intervention delivery based on contextual factors and past responses of a target person and their care partner. Here, multiple sets of interventions impact the dyad across multiple time intervals. The developed dyadic RL is Bayesian and hierarchical. We formally introduce the problem setup, develop dyadic RL and establish a regret bound. We demonstrate dyadic RL's empirical performance through simulation studies on both toy scenarios and on a realistic test bed constructed from data collected in a mobile health study.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 15 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
A Continuous-Time Dynamic Factor Model for Intensive Longitudinal Data Arising from Mobile Health Studies
Authors:
Madeline R. Abbott,
Walter H. Dempsey,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Cho Y. Lam,
David W. Wetter,
Jeremy M. G. Taylor
Abstract:
Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collected in mobile health (mHealth) studies contain rich information on multiple outcomes measured frequently over time that have the potential to capture short-term and long-term dynamics. Motivated by an mHealth study of smoking cessation in which participants self-report the intensity of many emotions multiple times per day, we describe a dynamic factor model…
▽ More
Intensive longitudinal data (ILD) collected in mobile health (mHealth) studies contain rich information on multiple outcomes measured frequently over time that have the potential to capture short-term and long-term dynamics. Motivated by an mHealth study of smoking cessation in which participants self-report the intensity of many emotions multiple times per day, we describe a dynamic factor model that summarizes the ILD as a low-dimensional, interpretable latent process. This model consists of two submodels: (i) a measurement submodel--a factor model--that summarizes the multivariate longitudinal outcome as lower-dimensional latent variables and (ii) a structural submodel--an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) stochastic process--that captures the temporal dynamics of the multivariate latent process in continuous time. We derive a closed-form likelihood for the marginal distribution of the outcome and the computationally-simpler sparse precision matrix for the OU process. We propose a block coordinate descent algorithm for estimation. Finally, we apply our method to the mHealth data to summarize the dynamics of 18 different emotions as two latent processes. These latent processes are interpreted by behavioral scientists as the psychological constructs of positive and negative affect and are key in understanding vulnerability to lapsing back to tobacco use among smokers attempting to quit.
△ Less
Submitted 20 February, 2024; v1 submitted 28 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Design of Experiments with Sequential Randomizations on Multiple Timescales: The Hybrid Experimental Design
Authors:
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
John J. Dziak,
Hanna Venera,
Angela F. Pfammatter,
Bonnie Spring,
Walter Dempsey
Abstract:
Psychological interventions, especially those leveraging mobile and wireless technologies, often include multiple components that are delivered and adapted on multiple timescales (e.g., coaching sessions adapted monthly based on clinical progress, combined with motivational messages from a mobile device adapted daily based on the person's daily emotional state). The hybrid experimental design (HED…
▽ More
Psychological interventions, especially those leveraging mobile and wireless technologies, often include multiple components that are delivered and adapted on multiple timescales (e.g., coaching sessions adapted monthly based on clinical progress, combined with motivational messages from a mobile device adapted daily based on the person's daily emotional state). The hybrid experimental design (HED) is a new experimental approach that enables researchers to answer scientific questions about the construction of psychological interventions in which components are delivered and adapted on different timescales. These designs involve sequential randomizations of study participants to intervention components, each at an appropriate timescale (e.g., monthly randomization to different intensities of coaching sessions and daily randomization to different forms of motivational messages). The goal of the current manuscript is twofold. The first is to highlight the flexibility of the HED by conceptualizing this experimental approach as a special form of a factorial design in which different factors are introduced at multiple timescales. We also discuss how the structure of the HED can vary depending on the scientific question(s) motivating the study. The second goal is to explain how data from various types of HEDs can be analyzed to answer a variety of scientific questions about the development of multi-component psychological interventions. For illustration we use a completed HED to inform the development of a technology-based weight loss intervention that integrates components that are delivered and adapted on multiple timescales.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Reward Design For An Online Reinforcement Learning Algorithm Supporting Oral Self-Care
Authors:
Anna L. Trella,
Kelly W. Zhang,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Vivek Shetty,
Finale Doshi-Velez,
Susan A. Murphy
Abstract:
Dental disease is one of the most common chronic diseases despite being largely preventable. However, professional advice on optimal oral hygiene practices is often forgotten or abandoned by patients. Therefore patients may benefit from timely and personalized encouragement to engage in oral self-care behaviors. In this paper, we develop an online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for use in o…
▽ More
Dental disease is one of the most common chronic diseases despite being largely preventable. However, professional advice on optimal oral hygiene practices is often forgotten or abandoned by patients. Therefore patients may benefit from timely and personalized encouragement to engage in oral self-care behaviors. In this paper, we develop an online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm for use in optimizing the delivery of mobile-based prompts to encourage oral hygiene behaviors. One of the main challenges in develo** such an algorithm is ensuring that the algorithm considers the impact of the current action on the effectiveness of future actions (i.e., delayed effects), especially when the algorithm has been made simple in order to run stably and autonomously in a constrained, real-world setting (i.e., highly noisy, sparse data). We address this challenge by designing a quality reward which maximizes the desired health outcome (i.e., high-quality brushing) while minimizing user burden. We also highlight a procedure for optimizing the hyperparameters of the reward by building a simulation environment test bed and evaluating candidates using the test bed. The RL algorithm discussed in this paper will be deployed in Oralytics, an oral self-care app that provides behavioral strategies to boost patient engagement in oral hygiene practices.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2022; v1 submitted 15 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Designing Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for Digital Interventions: Pre-implementation Guidelines
Authors:
Anna L. Trella,
Kelly W. Zhang,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Vivek Shetty,
Finale Doshi-Velez,
Susan A. Murphy
Abstract:
Online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are increasingly used to personalize digital interventions in the fields of mobile health and online education. Common challenges in designing and testing an RL algorithm in these settings include ensuring the RL algorithm can learn and run stably under real-time constraints, and accounting for the complexity of the environment, e.g., a lack of accurat…
▽ More
Online reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms are increasingly used to personalize digital interventions in the fields of mobile health and online education. Common challenges in designing and testing an RL algorithm in these settings include ensuring the RL algorithm can learn and run stably under real-time constraints, and accounting for the complexity of the environment, e.g., a lack of accurate mechanistic models for the user dynamics. To guide how one can tackle these challenges, we extend the PCS (Predictability, Computability, Stability) framework, a data science framework that incorporates best practices from machine learning and statistics in supervised learning (Yu and Kumbier, 2020), to the design of RL algorithms for the digital interventions setting. Further, we provide guidelines on how to design simulation environments, a crucial tool for evaluating RL candidate algorithms using the PCS framework. We illustrate the use of the PCS framework for designing an RL algorithm for Oralytics, a mobile health study aiming to improve users' tooth-brushing behaviors through the personalized delivery of intervention messages. Oralytics will go into the field in late 2022.
△ Less
Submitted 18 August, 2022; v1 submitted 8 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
Transformers for prompt-level EMA non-response prediction
Authors:
Supriya Nagesh,
Alexander Moreno,
Stephanie M. Carpenter,
Jamie Yap,
Soujanya Chatterjee,
Steven Lloyd Lizotte,
Neng Wan,
Santosh Kumar,
Cho Lam,
David W. Wetter,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
James M. Rehg
Abstract:
Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs) are an important psychological data source for measuring current cognitive states, affect, behavior, and environmental factors from participants in mobile health (mHealth) studies and treatment programs. Non-response, in which participants fail to respond to EMA prompts, is an endemic problem. The ability to accurately predict non-response could be utilized…
▽ More
Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs) are an important psychological data source for measuring current cognitive states, affect, behavior, and environmental factors from participants in mobile health (mHealth) studies and treatment programs. Non-response, in which participants fail to respond to EMA prompts, is an endemic problem. The ability to accurately predict non-response could be utilized to improve EMA delivery and develop compliance interventions. Prior work has explored classical machine learning models for predicting non-response. However, as increasingly large EMA datasets become available, there is the potential to leverage deep learning models that have been effective in other fields. Recently, transformer models have shown state-of-the-art performance in NLP and other domains. This work is the first to explore the use of transformers for EMA data analysis. We address three key questions in applying transformers to EMA data: 1. Input representation, 2. encoding temporal information, 3. utility of pre-training on improving downstream prediction task performance. The transformer model achieves a non-response prediction AUC of 0.77 and is significantly better than classical ML and LSTM-based deep learning models. We will make our a predictive model trained on a corpus of 40K EMA samples freely-available to the research community, in order to facilitate the development of future transformer-based EMA analysis works.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
SMART Binary: Sample Size Calculation for Comparing Adaptive Interventions in SMART studies with Longitudinal Binary Outcomes
Authors:
John J. Dziak,
Daniel Almirall,
Walter Dempsey,
Catherine Stanger,
Inbal Nahum-Shani
Abstract:
Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research. This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of individuals. A variety of sample size planning resources for SMART studies have been developed in re…
▽ More
Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trials (SMARTs) play an increasingly important role in psychological and behavioral health research. This experimental approach enables researchers to answer scientific questions about how to sequence and match interventions to the unique, changing needs of individuals. A variety of sample size planning resources for SMART studies have been developed in recent years; these enable researchers to plan SMARTs for addressing different types of scientific questions. However, relatively limited attention has been given to planning SMARTs with binary (dichotomous) outcomes, which often require higher sample sizes relative to continuous outcomes. Existing resources for estimating sample size requirements for SMARTs with binary outcomes do not consider the potential to improve power by including a baseline measurement and/or multiple repeated outcome measurements. The current paper addresses this issue by providing sample size simulation code and approximate formulas for two-wave repeated measures binary outcomes (i.e., two measurement times for the outcome variable, before and after receiving the intervention). The simulation results agree well with the formulas. We also discuss how to use simulations to calculate power for studies with more than two outcome measurement occasions. The results show that having at least one repeated measurement of the outcome can substantially improve power under certain conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2023; v1 submitted 11 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The Micro-Randomized Trial for Develo** Digital Interventions: Experimental Design and Data Analysis Considerations
Authors:
Tianchen Qian,
Ashley E. Walton,
Linda M. Collins,
Predrag Klasnja,
Stephanie T. Lanza,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Mashifiqui Rabbi,
Michael A. Russell,
Maureen A. Walton,
Hyesun Yoo,
Susan A. Murphy
Abstract:
Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are time-varying adaptive interventions that use frequent opportunities for the intervention to be adapted--weekly, daily, or even many times a day. The micro-randomized trial (MRT) has emerged for use in informing the construction of JITAIs. MRTs can be used to address research questions about whether and under what circumstances JITAI components are e…
▽ More
Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are time-varying adaptive interventions that use frequent opportunities for the intervention to be adapted--weekly, daily, or even many times a day. The micro-randomized trial (MRT) has emerged for use in informing the construction of JITAIs. MRTs can be used to address research questions about whether and under what circumstances JITAI components are effective, with the ultimate objective of develo** effective and efficient JITAI. The purpose of this article is to clarify why, when, and how to use MRTs; to highlight elements that must be considered when designing and implementing an MRT; and to review primary and secondary analyses methods for MRTs. We briefly review key elements of JITAIs and discuss a variety of considerations that go into planning and designing an MRT. We provide a definition of causal excursion effects suitable for use in primary and secondary analyses of MRT data to inform JITAI development. We review the weighted and centered least-squares (WCLS) estimator which provides consistent causal excursion effect estimators from MRT data. We describe how the WCLS estimator along with associated test statistics can be obtained using standard statistical software such as R (R Core Team, 2019). Throughout we illustrate the MRT design and analyses using the HeartSteps MRT, for develo** a JITAI to increase physical activity among sedentary individuals. We supplement the HeartSteps MRT with two other MRTs, SARA and BariFit, each of which highlights different research questions that can be addressed using the MRT and experimental design considerations that might arise.
△ Less
Submitted 25 November, 2021; v1 submitted 7 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Sample size estimation for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a SMART: a Monte Carlo-based approach and case study with longitudinal overdispersed count outcomes
Authors:
Jamie Yap,
John J. Dziak,
Raju Maiti,
Kevin G. Lynch,
James R. McKay,
Bibhas Chakraborty,
Inbal Nahum-Shani
Abstract:
Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs), also known as treatment algorithms or adaptive interventions, play an increasingly important role in many health domains. DTRs are motivated to address the unique and changing needs of individuals by delivering the type of treatment needed, when needed, while minimizing unnecessary treatment. Practically, a DTR is a sequence of decision rules that specify, for ea…
▽ More
Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs), also known as treatment algorithms or adaptive interventions, play an increasingly important role in many health domains. DTRs are motivated to address the unique and changing needs of individuals by delivering the type of treatment needed, when needed, while minimizing unnecessary treatment. Practically, a DTR is a sequence of decision rules that specify, for each of several points in time, how available information about the individual's status and progress should be used in practice to decide which treatment (e.g., type or intensity) to deliver. The sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART) is an experimental design widely used to empirically inform the development of DTRs. Sample size planning resources for SMARTs have been developed for continuous, binary, and survival outcomes. However, an important gap exists in sample size estimation methodology for SMARTs with longitudinal count outcomes. Further, in many health domains, count data are overdispersed - having variance greater than their mean. We propose a Monte Carlo-based approach to sample size estimation applicable to many types of longitudinal outcomes and provide a case study with longitudinal overdispersed count outcomes. A SMART for engaging alcohol and cocaine-dependent patients in treatment is used as motivation.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2023; v1 submitted 31 March, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
The Micro-Randomized Trial for Develo** Digital Interventions: Experimental Design Considerations
Authors:
Ashley E. Walton,
Linda M. Collins,
Predrag Klasnja,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Mashfiqui Rabbi,
Maureen A. Walton,
Susan A. Murphy
Abstract:
Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are time-varying adaptive interventions that use frequent opportunities for the intervention to be adapted such as weekly, daily, or even many times a day. This high intensity of adaptation is facilitated by the ability of digital technology to continuously collect information about an individual's current context and deliver treatments adapted to this…
▽ More
Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) are time-varying adaptive interventions that use frequent opportunities for the intervention to be adapted such as weekly, daily, or even many times a day. This high intensity of adaptation is facilitated by the ability of digital technology to continuously collect information about an individual's current context and deliver treatments adapted to this information. The micro-randomized trial (MRT) has emerged for use in informing the construction of JITAIs. MRTs operate in, and take advantage of, the rapidly time-varying digital intervention environment. MRTs can be used to address research questions about whether and under what circumstances particular components of a JITAI are effective, with the ultimate objective of develo** effective and efficient components. The purpose of this article is to clarify why, when, and how to use MRTs; to highlight elements that must be considered when designing and implementing an MRT; and to discuss the possibilities this emerging optimization trial design offers for future research in the behavioral sciences, education, and other fields. We briefly review key elements of JITAIs, and then describe three case studies of MRTs, each of which highlights research questions that can be addressed using the MRT and experimental design considerations that might arise. We also discuss a variety of considerations that go into planning and designing an MRT, using the case studies as examples.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Translating Behavioral Theory into Technological Interventions: Case Study of an mHealth App to Increase Self-reporting of Substance-Use Related Data
Authors:
Mashfiqui Rabbi,
Meredith Philyaw-Kotov,
**seok Li,
Katherine Li,
Bess Rothman,
Lexa Giragosian,
Maya Reyes,
Hannah Gadway,
Rebecca Cunningham,
Erin Bonar,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Maureen Walton,
Susan Murphy,
Predrag Klasnja
Abstract:
Mobile health (mHealth) applications are a powerful medium for providing behavioral interventions, and systematic reviews suggest that theory-based interventions are more effective. However, how exactly theoretical concepts should be translated into features of technological interventions is often not clear. There is a gulf between the abstract nature of psychological theory and the concreteness o…
▽ More
Mobile health (mHealth) applications are a powerful medium for providing behavioral interventions, and systematic reviews suggest that theory-based interventions are more effective. However, how exactly theoretical concepts should be translated into features of technological interventions is often not clear. There is a gulf between the abstract nature of psychological theory and the concreteness of the designs needed to build health technologies. In this paper, we use SARA, a mobile app we developed to support substance-use research among adolescents and young adults, as a case study of a process of translating behavioral theory into mHealth intervention design. SARA was designed to increase adherence to daily self-report in longitudinal epidemiological studies. To achieve this goal, we implemented a number of constructs from the operant conditioning theory. We describe our design process and discuss how we operationalized theoretical constructs in the light of design constraints, user feedback, and empirical data from four formative studies.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
A Robust Functional EM Algorithm for Incomplete Panel Count Data
Authors:
Alexander Moreno,
Zhenke Wu,
Jamie Yap,
David Wetter,
Cho Lam,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Walter Dempsey,
James M. Rehg
Abstract:
Panel count data describes aggregated counts of recurrent events observed at discrete time points. To understand dynamics of health behaviors, the field of quantitative behavioral research has evolved to increasingly rely upon panel count data collected via multiple self reports, for example, about frequencies of smoking using in-the-moment surveys on mobile devices. However, missing reports are c…
▽ More
Panel count data describes aggregated counts of recurrent events observed at discrete time points. To understand dynamics of health behaviors, the field of quantitative behavioral research has evolved to increasingly rely upon panel count data collected via multiple self reports, for example, about frequencies of smoking using in-the-moment surveys on mobile devices. However, missing reports are common and present a major barrier to downstream statistical learning. As a first step, under a missing completely at random assumption (MCAR), we propose a simple yet widely applicable functional EM algorithm to estimate the counting process mean function, which is of central interest to behavioral scientists. The proposed approach wraps several popular panel count inference methods, seamlessly deals with incomplete counts and is robust to misspecification of the Poisson process assumption. Theoretical analysis of the proposed algorithm provides finite-sample guarantees by expanding parametric EM theory to our general non-parametric setting. We illustrate the utility of the proposed algorithm through numerical experiments and an analysis of smoking cessation data. We also discuss useful extensions to address deviations from the MCAR assumption and covariate effects.
△ Less
Submitted 19 June, 2020; v1 submitted 2 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Linear Mixed Models for Comparing Dynamic Treatment Regimens on a Longitudinal Outcome in Sequentially Randomized Trials
Authors:
Brook Luers,
Min Qian,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Connie Kasari,
Daniel Almirall
Abstract:
A dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) is a pre-specified sequence of decision rules which maps baseline or time-varying measurements on an individual to a recommended intervention or set of interventions. Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) represent an important data collection tool for informing the construction of effective DTRs. A common primary aim in a SMART is the marginal…
▽ More
A dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) is a pre-specified sequence of decision rules which maps baseline or time-varying measurements on an individual to a recommended intervention or set of interventions. Sequential multiple assignment randomized trials (SMARTs) represent an important data collection tool for informing the construction of effective DTRs. A common primary aim in a SMART is the marginal mean comparison between two or more of the DTRs embedded in the trial. This manuscript develops a mixed effects modeling and estimation approach for these primary aim comparisons based on a continuous, longitudinal outcome. The method is illustrated using data from a SMART in autism research.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Sample size considerations for comparing dynamic treatment regimens in a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial with a continuous longitudinal outcome
Authors:
Nicholas J. Seewald,
Kelley M. Kidwell,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Tianshuang Wu,
James R. McKay,
Daniel Almirall
Abstract:
Clinicians and researchers alike are increasingly interested in how best to personalize interventions. A dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) is a sequence of pre-specified decision rules which can be used to guide the delivery of a sequence of treatments or interventions that are tailored to the changing needs of the individual. The sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) is a research…
▽ More
Clinicians and researchers alike are increasingly interested in how best to personalize interventions. A dynamic treatment regimen (DTR) is a sequence of pre-specified decision rules which can be used to guide the delivery of a sequence of treatments or interventions that are tailored to the changing needs of the individual. The sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial (SMART) is a research tool which allows for the construction of effective DTRs. We derive easy-to-use formulae for computing the total sample size for three common two-stage SMART designs in which the primary aim is to compare mean end-of-study outcomes for two embedded DTRs which recommend different first-stage treatments. The formulae are derived in the context of a regression model which leverages information from a longitudinal outcome collected over the entire study. We show that the sample size formula for a SMART can be written as the product of the sample size formula for a standard two-arm randomized trial, a deflation factor that accounts for the increased statistical efficiency resulting from a longitudinal analysis, and an inflation factor that accounts for the design of a SMART. The SMART design inflation factor is typically a function of the anticipated probability of response to first-stage treatment. We review modeling and estimation for DTR effect analyses using a longitudinal outcome from a SMART, as well as the estimation of standard errors. We also present estimators for the covariance matrix for a variety of common working correlation structures. Methods are motivated using the ENGAGE study, a SMART aimed at develo** a DTR for increasing motivation to attend treatments among alcohol- and cocaine-dependent patients.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2020; v1 submitted 30 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Power Analysis in a SMART Design: Sample Size Estimation for Determining the Best Dynamic Treatment Regime
Authors:
William J. Artman,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Tianshuang Wu,
James R. McKay,
Ashkan Ertefaie
Abstract:
Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designs have become increasingly popular in the field of precision medicine by providing a means for comparing sequences of treatments tailored to the individual patient, i.e., dynamic treatment regime (DTR). The construction of evidence-based DTRs promises a replacement to adhoc one-size-fits-all decisions pervasive in patient care. Howeve…
▽ More
Sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designs have become increasingly popular in the field of precision medicine by providing a means for comparing sequences of treatments tailored to the individual patient, i.e., dynamic treatment regime (DTR). The construction of evidence-based DTRs promises a replacement to adhoc one-size-fits-all decisions pervasive in patient care. However, there are substantial statistical challenges in sizing SMART designs due to the complex correlation structure between the DTRs embedded in the design. Since the primary goal of SMARTs is the construction of an optimal DTR, investigators are interested in sizing SMARTs based on the ability to screen out DTRs inferior to the optimal DTR by a given amount which cannot be done using existing methods. In this paper, we fill this gap by develo** a rigorous power analysis framework that leverages multiple comparisons with the best methodology. Our method employs Monte Carlo simulation in order to compute the minimum number of individuals to enroll in an arbitrary SMART. We will evaluate our method through extensive simulation studies. We will illustrate our method by retrospectively computing the power in the Extending Treatment Effectiveness of Naltrexone SMART study.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Non-Inferiority and Equivalence Tests in A Sequential Multiple-Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART)
Authors:
Palash Ghosh,
Inbal Nahum-Shani,
Bonnie Spring,
Bibhas Chakraborty
Abstract:
Adaptive interventions (AIs) are increasingly becoming popular in medical and behavioral sciences. An AI is a sequence of individualized intervention options that specify for whom and under what conditions different intervention options should be offered, in order to address the changing needs of individuals as they progress over time. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART)…
▽ More
Adaptive interventions (AIs) are increasingly becoming popular in medical and behavioral sciences. An AI is a sequence of individualized intervention options that specify for whom and under what conditions different intervention options should be offered, in order to address the changing needs of individuals as they progress over time. The sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) is a novel trial design that was developed to aid in empirically constructing effective AIs. The sequential randomizations in a SMART often yield multiple AIs that are embedded in the trial by design. Many SMARTs are motivated by scientific questions pertaining to the comparison of such embedded AIs. Existing data analytic methods and sample size planning resources for SMARTs are suitable for superiority testing, namely for testing whether one embedded AI yields better primary outcomes on average than another. This represents a major scientific gap since AIs are often motivated by the need to deliver support/care in a less costly or less burdensome manner, while still yielding benefits that are equivalent or non-inferior to those produced by a more costly/burdensome standard of care. Here, we develop data analytic methods and sample size formulas for SMART studies aiming to test the non-inferiority or equivalence of one AI over another. Sample size and power considerations are discussed with supporting simulations, and online sample size planning resources are provided. For illustration, we use an example from a SMART study aiming to develop an AI for promoting weight loss among overweight/obese adults.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2018; v1 submitted 4 May, 2017;
originally announced May 2017.