-
On Polynomial Representations of Dual DP Color Functions
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Gabriel Sharbel
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an important notion in algebraic combinatorics that was introduced by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of chromatic polynomials have b…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an important notion in algebraic combinatorics that was introduced by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of chromatic polynomials have been introduced for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, list color functions (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, DP color functions (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, dual DP color functions (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. In 2022 (improving on older results) Dong and Zhang showed that for any graph $G$, $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq |E(G)|-1$. Consequently, the list color function of a graph is a polynomial for sufficiently large $m$. One of the most important and longstanding open questions on DP color functions asks: for every graph $G$ is there an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? We show that the answer to the analogue of this question for dual DP color functions is no. Our proof reveals a connection between a dual DP color function and the balanced chromatic polynomial of a signed graph introduced by Zaslavsky in 1982.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
-
On the Ohba Number and Generalized Ohba Numbers of Complete Bipartite Graphs
Authors:
Kennedy Cano,
Emily Gutknecht,
Gautham Kappaganthula,
George Miller,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Ezekiel Thornburgh
Abstract:
We say that a graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is equal to its chromatic number $χ(G)$. Chromatic-choosability is a well-studied topic, and in fact, some of the most famous results and conjectures related to list coloring involve chromatic-choosability. In 2002 Ohba showed that for any graph $G$ there is an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ a…
▽ More
We say that a graph $G$ is chromatic-choosable when its list chromatic number $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is equal to its chromatic number $χ(G)$. Chromatic-choosability is a well-studied topic, and in fact, some of the most famous results and conjectures related to list coloring involve chromatic-choosability. In 2002 Ohba showed that for any graph $G$ there is an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that the join of $G$ and a complete graph on at least $N$ vertices is chromatic-choosable. The Ohba number of $G$ is the smallest such $N$. In 2014, Noel suggested studying the Ohba number, $τ_{0}(a,b)$, of complete bipartite graphs with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$. In this paper we improve a 2009 result of Allagan by showing that $τ_{0}(2,b) = \lfloor \sqrt{b} \rfloor - 1$ for all $b \geq 2$, and we show that for $a \geq 2$, $τ_{0}(a,b) = Ω( \sqrt{b} )$ as $b \rightarrow \infty$. We also initiate the study of some relaxed versions of the Ohba number of a graph which we call generalized Ohba numbers. We present some upper and lower bounds of generalized Ohba numbers of complete bipartite graphs while also posing some questions.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Counting Packings of List-colorings of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
Given a list assignment for a graph, list packing asks for the existence of multiple pairwise disjoint list colorings of the graph. Several papers have recently appeared that study the existence of such a packing of list colorings. Formally, a proper $L$-packing of a graph $G$ of size $k$ is a set of $k$ pairwise disjoint proper $L$-colorings of $G$ where $L$ is a list assignment of colors to the…
▽ More
Given a list assignment for a graph, list packing asks for the existence of multiple pairwise disjoint list colorings of the graph. Several papers have recently appeared that study the existence of such a packing of list colorings. Formally, a proper $L$-packing of a graph $G$ of size $k$ is a set of $k$ pairwise disjoint proper $L$-colorings of $G$ where $L$ is a list assignment of colors to the vertices of $G$. In this paper, we initiate the study of counting such packings of list colorings of a graph. We define $P_\ell^\star(G,q,k)$ as the guaranteed number of proper $L$-packings of $G$ of size $k$ over all list assignments $L$ that assign $q$ colors to each vertex of $G$, and we let $P^\star(G,q,k)$ be its classical coloring counterpart. We let $P_\ell^\star(G,q)= P_\ell^\star(G,q,q)$ so that $P_\ell^\star(G,q)$ is the enumerative function for the previously studied list packing number $χ_\ell^\star(G)$. Note that the chromatic polynomial of $G$, $P(G,q)$, is $P^\star(G,q,1)$, and the list color function of $G$, $P_\ell(G,q)$, is $P_\ell^\star(G,q,1)$.
Inspired by the well-known behavior of the list color function and the chromatic polynomial, we make progress towards the question of whether $P_{\ell}^\star(G,q,k) = P^\star(G,q,k)$ when $q$ is large enough. Our result generalizes the recent theorem of Dong and Zhang (2023), which improved results going back to Donner (1992), about when the list color function equals the chromatic polynomial. Further, we use a polynomial method to generalize bounds on the list packing number, $χ_\ell^\star(G)$, of sparse graphs to exponential lower bounds (in the number of vertices of $G$) on the corresponding list packing functions, $P_\ell^\star(G,q)$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2024; v1 submitted 19 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
A Polynomial Method for Counting Colorings of $S$-labeled Graphs
Authors:
Samantha L. Dahlberg,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
The notion of $S$-labeling, where $S$ is a subset of the symmetric group, is a common generalization of signed $k$-coloring, signed $\mathbb{Z}_k$-coloring, DP-coloring, group coloring, and coloring of gained graphs that was introduced in 2019 by **, Wong, and Zhu. In this paper, we present a unified and simple polynomial method for giving exponential lower bounds on the number of colorings of an…
▽ More
The notion of $S$-labeling, where $S$ is a subset of the symmetric group, is a common generalization of signed $k$-coloring, signed $\mathbb{Z}_k$-coloring, DP-coloring, group coloring, and coloring of gained graphs that was introduced in 2019 by **, Wong, and Zhu. In this paper, we present a unified and simple polynomial method for giving exponential lower bounds on the number of colorings of an $S$-labeled graph. This algebraic technique allows us to prove new lower bounds on the number of colorings of any $S$-labeling of graphs satisfying certain sparsity conditions. This gives new lower bounds on the DP color function, and consequently chromatic polynomial and list color function, of families of planar graphs, and the number of colorings of signed graphs. These bounds improve previously known results, or are the first such known results.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
DP-Coloring of Graphs from Random Covers
Authors:
Anton Bernshteyn,
Daniel Dominik,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) of graphs is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in $2015$. DP-coloring of a graph $G$ is equivalent to an independent transversal of a DP-cover of $G$. Intuitively, a $k$-fold DP-cover of a graph $G$ is an assignment of lists of size $k$ to the vertices of $G$ where the names o…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) of graphs is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in $2015$. DP-coloring of a graph $G$ is equivalent to an independent transversal of a DP-cover of $G$. Intuitively, a $k$-fold DP-cover of a graph $G$ is an assignment of lists of size $k$ to the vertices of $G$ where the names of colors vary from edge to edge. In this paper, we introduce the notion of random DP-covers and study the behavior of DP-coloring from such random covers. We prove a series of results about the probability that a graph is or is not DP-colorable from a random cover. These results support the following threshold behavior on random $k$-fold DP-covers as $ρ\to\infty$ where $ρ$ is the maximum density of a graph: graphs are non-DP-colorable with high probability when $k$ is sufficiently smaller than $ρ/\lnρ$, and graphs are DP-colorable with high probability when $k$ is sufficiently larger than $ρ/\lnρ$. Our results depend on $ρ$ growing fast enough and imply a sharp threshold for dense enough graphs. For sparser graphs, we analyze DP-colorability in terms of degeneracy. We also prove fractional DP-coloring analogs to these results.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
An Algebraic Approach for Counting DP-3-colorings of Sparse Graphs
Authors:
Samantha L. Dahlberg,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, and the list color function, $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold…
▽ More
DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied since its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, and the list color function, $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It follows that $P_{DP}(G,m) \le P_{\ell}(G,m) \le P(G,m)$. A function $f$ is chromatic-adherent if for every graph $G$, $f(G,a) = P(G,a)$ for some $a \geq χ(G)$ implies that $f(G,m) = P(G,m)$ for all $m \geq a$. It is known that the DP color function is not chromatic-adherent, but there are only two known graphs that demonstrate this. Suppose $G$ is an $n$-vertex graph and $\mathcal{H}$ is a 3-fold cover of $G$, in this paper we associate with $\mathcal{H}$ a polynomial $f_{G, \mathcal{H}} \in \mathbb{F}_3[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ so that the number of non-zeros of $f_{G, \mathcal{H}}$ equals the number of $\mathcal{H}$-colorings of $G$. We then use a well-known result of Alon and Füredi on the number of non-zeros of a polynomial to establish a non-trivial lower bound on $P_{DP}(G,3)$ when $2n > |E(G)|$. An easy consequence of this is that $P_{DP}(G, 3) \geq 3^{n/6}$ for every $n$-vertex planar graph $G$ of girth at least 5, improving the previously known bounds on both $P_{DP}(G, 3)$ and $P_{\ell}(G, 3)$. Finally, we use this bound to show that there are infinitely many graphs that demonstrate the non-chromatic-adherence of the DP color function.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2023; v1 submitted 23 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
Flexible list colorings: Maximizing the number of requests satisfied
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Rogers Mathew,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Michael J. Pelsmajer
Abstract:
Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019. Suppose $0 \leq ε\leq 1$, $G$ is a graph, $L$ is a list assignment for $G$, and $r$ is a function with non-empty domain $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that $r(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in D$ ($r$ is called a request of $L$). The triple $(G,L,r)$ is $ε$-satisfiable if there exists a proper $L$-coloring $f$ of $G$ such that…
▽ More
Flexible list coloring was introduced by Dvořák, Norin, and Postle in 2019. Suppose $0 \leq ε\leq 1$, $G$ is a graph, $L$ is a list assignment for $G$, and $r$ is a function with non-empty domain $D\subseteq V(G)$ such that $r(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in D$ ($r$ is called a request of $L$). The triple $(G,L,r)$ is $ε$-satisfiable if there exists a proper $L$-coloring $f$ of $G$ such that $f(v) = r(v)$ for at least $ε|D|$ vertices in $D$. We say $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible if $(G,L',r')$ is $ε$-satisfiable whenever $L'$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$ and $r'$ is a request of $L'$. It was shown by Dvořák et al. that if $d+1$ is prime, $G$ is a $d$-degenerate graph, and $r$ is a request for $G$ with domain of size $1$, then $(G,L,r)$ is $1$-satisfiable whenever $L$ is a $(d+1)$-assignment. In this paper, we extend this result to all $d$ for bipartite $d$-degenerate graphs.
The literature on flexible list coloring tends to focus on showing that for a fixed graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$ there exists an $ε> 0$ such that $G$ is $(k, ε)$-flexible, but it is natural to try to find the largest possible $ε$ for which $G$ is $(k,ε)$-flexible. In this vein, we improve a result of Dvořák et al., by showing $d$-degenerate graphs are $(d+2, 1/2^{d+1})$-flexible. In pursuit of the largest $ε$ for which a graph is $(k,ε)$-flexible, we observe that a graph $G$ is not $(k, ε)$-flexible for any $k$ if and only if $ε> 1/ ρ(G)$, where $ρ(G)$ is the Hall ratio of $G$, and we initiate the study of the list flexibility number of a graph $G$, which is the smallest $k$ such that $G$ is $(k,1/ ρ(G))$-flexible. We study relationships and connections between the list flexibility number, list chromatic number, list packing number, and degeneracy of a graph.
△ Less
Submitted 19 February, 2024; v1 submitted 16 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
A Short Proof that the List Packing Number of any Graph is Well Defined
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
List packing is a notion that was introduced in 2021 (by Cambie et al.). The list packing number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell}^*(G)$, is the least $k$ such that for any list assignment $L$ that assigns $k$ colors to each vertex of $G$, there is a set of $k$ proper $L$-colorings of $G$, $\{f_1, \ldots, f_k \}$, with the property $f_i(v) \neq f_j(v)$ whenever $1 \leq i < j \leq k$ and…
▽ More
List packing is a notion that was introduced in 2021 (by Cambie et al.). The list packing number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{\ell}^*(G)$, is the least $k$ such that for any list assignment $L$ that assigns $k$ colors to each vertex of $G$, there is a set of $k$ proper $L$-colorings of $G$, $\{f_1, \ldots, f_k \}$, with the property $f_i(v) \neq f_j(v)$ whenever $1 \leq i < j \leq k$ and $v \in V(G)$. We present a short proof that for any graph $G$, $χ_{\ell}^*(G) \leq |V(G)|$. Interestingly, our proof makes use of Galvin's celebrated result that the list chromatic number of the line graph of any bipartite multigraph equals its chromatic number.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2022; v1 submitted 24 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
Bounding the List Color Function Threshold from Above
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Akash Kumar,
Andrew Liu,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Patrick Rewers,
Paul Shin,
Michael Scott Tanahara,
Khue To
Abstract:
The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$ for each $m \in \mathbb{N}$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that…
▽ More
The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$ for each $m \in \mathbb{N}$. In 1990, Kostochka and Sidorenko introduced the list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, which is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. It is known that for every graph $G$, $τ(G)$ is finite, and in fact, $τ(G) \leq (|E(G)|-1)/\ln(1+ \sqrt{2}) + 1$. It is also known that when $G$ is a cycle or chordal graph, $G$ is enumeratively chromatic-choosable which means $τ(G) = χ(G)$. A recent paper of Kaul et al. suggests that understanding the list color function threshold of complete bipartite graphs is essential to the study of the extremal behavior of $τ$. In this paper we show that for any $n \geq 2$, $τ(K_{2,n}) \leq \lceil (n+2.05)/1.24 \rceil$ which gives an improvement on the general upper bound for $τ(G)$ when $G = K_{2,n}$. We also develop additional tools that allow us to show that $τ(K_{2,3}) = χ(K_{2,3})$ and $τ(K_{2,4}) = τ(K_{2,5}) = 3$.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2022; v1 submitted 11 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
On the List Color Function Threshold
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Akash Kumar,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Patrick Rewers,
Paul Shin,
Khue To
Abstract:
The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since the early 1990s, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a…
▽ More
The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since the early 1990s, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. It is known that for any graph $G$ there is a $k \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_\ell(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. The list color function threshold of $G$, denoted $τ(G)$, is the smallest $k \geq χ(G)$ such that $P_{\ell}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq k$. In 2009, Thomassen asked whether there is a universal constant $α$ such that for any graph $G$, $τ(G) \leq χ_{\ell}(G) + α$, where $χ_{\ell}(G)$ is the list chromatic number of $G$. We show that the answer to this question is no by proving that there exists a constant $C$ such that $τ(K_{2,l}) - χ_{\ell}(K_{2,l}) \ge C\sqrt{l}$ for $l \ge 16$.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2023; v1 submitted 6 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
The DP Color Function of Clique-Gluings of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Michael Maxfield,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Seth Thomason
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Formulas for…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of $G$, denoted by $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Formulas for chromatic polynomials of clique-gluings of graphs, a fundamental graph operation, are well-known, but the effect of such gluings on the DP color function is not well understood. In this paper we study the DP color function of $K_p$-gluings of graphs. Recently, Becker et. al. asked whether $P_{DP}(G,m) \leq (\prod_{i=1}^n P_{DP}(G_i,m))/\left( \prod_{i=0}^{p-1} (m-i) \right)^{n-1}$ whenever $m \geq p$, where the expression on the right is the DP-coloring analogue of the corresponding chromatic polynomial formula for a $K_p$-gluing, $G$, of $G_1, \ldots, G_n$. Becker et. al. showed this inequality holds when $p=1$. In this paper we show this inequality holds for edge-gluings ($p=2$). On the other hand, we show it does not hold for triangle-gluings ($p=3$), which also answers a question of Dong and Yang (2021). Finally, we show a relaxed version, based on a class of $m$-fold covers that we conjecture would yield the fewest DP-colorings for a given graph, of the inequality holds when $p \geq 3$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2023; v1 submitted 9 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
DP-Coloring Cartesian Products of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Gunjan Sharma,
Quinn Stratton
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Motivated by results related to list coloring Cartesian products of graphs, we initiate the study of the DP-chromatic number, $χ_{DP}$, of the same. We show that $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. Motivated by results related to list coloring Cartesian products of graphs, we initiate the study of the DP-chromatic number, $χ_{DP}$, of the same. We show that $χ_{DP}(G \square H) \leq \text{min}\{χ_{DP}(G) + \text{col}(H), χ_{DP}(H) + \text{col}(G) \} - 1$ where $\text{col}(H)$ is the coloring number of the graph $H$. We focus on building tools for lower bound arguments for $χ_{DP}(G \square H)$ and use them to show the sharpness of the bound above and its various forms. Our results illustrate that the DP color function of $G$, the DP analogue of the chromatic polynomial, is essential in the study of the DP-chromatic number of the Cartesian product of graphs, including the following question that extends the sharpness problem above and the classical result on gap between list chromatic number and chromatic number: given any graph $G$ and $k \in \mathbb{N}$, what is the smallest $t$ for which $χ_{DP}(G \square K_{k,t})= χ_{DP}(G) + k$?
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2022; v1 submitted 10 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Non-chromatic-adherence of the DP Color Function via Generalized Theta Graphs
Authors:
Manh Vu Bui,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Michael Maxfield,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Paul Shin,
Seth Thomason
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an extensively studied notion in combinatorics since its introduction by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is an extensively studied notion in combinatorics since its introduction by Birkhoff in 1912; denoted $P(G,m)$, it equals the number of proper $m$-colorings of graph $G$. Counting function analogues of the chromatic polynomial have been introduced and studied for list colorings: $P_{\ell}$, the list color function (1990); DP colorings: $P_{DP}$, the DP color function (2019), and $P^*_{DP}$, the dual DP color function (2021). For any graph $G$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, $P_{DP}(G, m) \leq P_\ell(G,m) \leq P(G,m) \leq P_{DP}^*(G,m)$. A function $f$ is chromatic-adherent if for every graph $G$, $f(G,a) = P(G,a)$ for some $a \geq χ(G)$ implies that $f(G,m) = P(G,m)$ for all $m \geq a$. It is not known if the list color function and the DP color function are chromatic-adherent. We show that the DP color function is not chromatic-adherent by studying the DP color function of Generalized Theta graphs. The tools we develop along with the Rearrangement Inequality give a new method for determining the DP color function of all Theta graphs and the dual DP color function of all Generalized Theta graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 6 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
A Deletion-Contraction Relation for the DP Color Function
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. A well-known tool for computing the chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is the deletion-contraction formula which relates $P(G,m)$ to the chromatic polynomials of two smaller graphs. The DP…
▽ More
DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. A well-known tool for computing the chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is the deletion-contraction formula which relates $P(G,m)$ to the chromatic polynomials of two smaller graphs. The DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, is a DP-coloring analogue of the chromatic polynomial, and $P_{DP}(G,m)$ is the minimum number of DP-colorings of $G$ over all possible $m$-fold covers. In this paper we present a deletion-contraction relation for the DP color function. To make this possible, we extend the definition of the DP color function to multigraphs. We also introduce the dual DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P^*_{DP}(G,m)$, which counts the maximum number of DP-colorings of $G$ over certain $m$-fold covers. We show how the dual DP color function along with our deletion-contraction relation yields a new general lower bound on the DP color function of a graph.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
The DP Color Function of Joins and Vertex-Gluings of Graphs
Authors:
Jack Becker,
Jade Hewitt,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Michael Maxfield,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
David Spivey,
Seth Thomason,
Tim Wagstrom
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Chromatic polynomials f…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. Chromatic polynomials for joins and vertex-gluings of graphs are well understood, but the effect of these graph operations on the DP color function is not known. In this paper we make progress on understanding the DP color function of the join of a graph with a complete graph and vertex-gluings of certain graphs. We also develop tools to study the DP color function under these graph operations, and we study the threshold (smallest $m$) beyond which the DP color function of a graph constructed with these operations equals its chromatic polynomial.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2022; v1 submitted 25 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
On Polynomial Representations of the DP Color Function: Theta Graphs and Their Generalizations
Authors:
Charlie Halberg,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Andrew Liu,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Paul Shin,
Seth Thomason
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It is known that, unlik…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring that has been widely studied in recent years after its introduction by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. As the analogue of the chromatic polynomial $P(G,m)$, the DP color function of a graph $G$, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, counts the minimum number of DP-colorings over all possible $m$-fold covers. It is known that, unlike the list color function $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph $G$ with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. Thus, two fundamental open questions regarding the DP color function are: (i) for which $G$ does there exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = P(G,m)$ whenever $m \geq N$, (ii) Given a graph $G$ does there always exist an $N \in \mathbb{N}$ and a polynomial $p(m)$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) = p(m)$ whenever $m \geq N$?
In this paper we give exact formulas for the DP color function of a Theta graph based on the parity of its path lengths. This gives an explicit answer, including the formulas for the polynomials that are not the chromatic polynomial, to both the questions above for Theta graphs. We extend this result to Generalized Theta graphs by characterizing the exact parity condition that ensures the DP color function eventually equals the chromatic polynomial. To answer the second question for Generalized Theta graphs, we confirm it for the larger class of graphs with a feedback vertex set of size one.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2023; v1 submitted 22 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Answers to Two Questions on the DP Color Function
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Seth Thomason
Abstract:
DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is a notion that has been extensively studied since the early 20th century. The chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is denoted $P(G,m)$, and it is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. In 2019, Kaul and Mudrock introduced an analogue of the chromatic po…
▽ More
DP-coloring is a generalization of list coloring that was introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle. The chromatic polynomial of a graph is a notion that has been extensively studied since the early 20th century. The chromatic polynomial of graph $G$ is denoted $P(G,m)$, and it is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. In 2019, Kaul and Mudrock introduced an analogue of the chromatic polynomial for DP-coloring; specifically, the DP color function of graph $G$ is denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$. Two fundamental questions posed by Kaul and Mudrock are: (1) For any graph $G$ with $n$ vertices, is it the case that $P(G,m)-P_{DP}(G,m) = O(m^{n-3})$ as $m \rightarrow \infty$? and (2) For every graph $G$, does there exist $p,N \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $P_{DP}(K_p \vee G, m) = P(K_p \vee G, m)$ whenever $m \geq N$? We show that the answer to both these questions is yes. In fact, we show the answer to (2) is yes even if we require $p=1$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
On Equitable List Arboricity of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Michael J. Pelsmajer
Abstract:
Equitable list arboricity, introduced by Zhang in 2016, generalizes the notion of equitable list coloring by requiring the subgraph induced by each color class to be acyclic (instead of edgeless) in addition to the usual upper bound on the size of each color class. Graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable if an equitable, arborable list coloring of $G$ exists for every list assignment for $G$ tha…
▽ More
Equitable list arboricity, introduced by Zhang in 2016, generalizes the notion of equitable list coloring by requiring the subgraph induced by each color class to be acyclic (instead of edgeless) in addition to the usual upper bound on the size of each color class. Graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable if an equitable, arborable list coloring of $G$ exists for every list assignment for $G$ that associates with each vertex in $G$ a list of $k$ available colors. Zhang conjectured that any graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable for each $k$ satisfying $k \geq \lceil (1+Δ(G))/2 \rceil$. We verify this conjecture for powers of cycles by applying a new lemma which is a general tool for extending partial equitable, arborable list colorings. We also propose a stronger version of Zhang's Conjecture for certain connected graphs: any connected graph $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable for each $k$ satisfying $k \geq \lceil Δ(G)/2 \rceil$ provided $G$ is neither a cycle nor a complete graph of odd order. We verify this stronger version of Zhang's Conjecture for powers of paths, 2-degenerate graphs, and certain other graphs. We also show that if $G$ is equitably $k$-list arborable it does not necessarily follow that $G$ is equitably $(k+1)$-list arborable which addresses a question of Drgas-Burchardt, Furmanczyk, and Sidorowicz (2018).
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2021; v1 submitted 19 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
On the Equitable Choosability of the Disjoint Union of Stars
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Tim Wagstrom
Abstract:
Equitable $k$-choosability is a list analogue of equitable $k$-coloring that was introduced by Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West in 2003. It is known that if vertex disjoint graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ are equitably $k$-choosable, the disjoint union of $G_1$ and $G_2$ may not be equitably $k$-choosable. Given any $m \in \mathbb{N}$ the values of $k$ for which $K_{1,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable are known…
▽ More
Equitable $k$-choosability is a list analogue of equitable $k$-coloring that was introduced by Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West in 2003. It is known that if vertex disjoint graphs $G_1$ and $G_2$ are equitably $k$-choosable, the disjoint union of $G_1$ and $G_2$ may not be equitably $k$-choosable. Given any $m \in \mathbb{N}$ the values of $k$ for which $K_{1,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable are known. Also, a complete characterization of equitably $2$-choosable graphs is not known. With these facts in mind, we study the equitable choosability of $\sum_{i=1}^n K_{1,m_i}$, the disjoint union of $n$ stars. We show that determining whether $\sum_{i=1}^n K_{1,m_i}$ is equitably choosable is NP-complete when the same list of two colors is assigned to every vertex. We completely determine when the disjoint union of two stars (or $n \geq 2$ identical stars) is equitably 2-choosable, and we present results on the equitable $k$-choosability of the disjoint union of two stars for arbitrary $k$.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2021; v1 submitted 12 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Proportional Choosability of Complete Bipartite Graphs
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Jade Hewitt,
Paul Shin,
Collin Smith
Abstract:
Proportional choosability is a list analogue of equitable coloring that was introduced in 2019. The smallest $k$ for which a graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable is the proportional choice number of $G$, and it is denoted $χ_{pc}(G)$. In the first ever paper on proportional choosability, it was shown that when $2 \leq n \leq m$,…
▽ More
Proportional choosability is a list analogue of equitable coloring that was introduced in 2019. The smallest $k$ for which a graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable is the proportional choice number of $G$, and it is denoted $χ_{pc}(G)$. In the first ever paper on proportional choosability, it was shown that when $2 \leq n \leq m$, $ \max\{ n + 1, 1 + \lceil m / 2 \rceil\} \leq χ_{pc}(K_{n,m}) \leq n + m - 1$. In this note we improve on this result by showing that $ \max\{ n + 1, \lceil n / 2 \rceil + \lceil m / 2 \rceil\} \leq χ_{pc}(K_{n,m}) \leq n + m -1- \lfloor m/3 \rfloor$. In the process, we prove some new lower bounds on the proportional choice number of complete multipartite graphs. We also present several interesting open questions.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Partial DP-Coloring
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Michael J. Pelsmajer
Abstract:
In 1980, Albertson and Berman introduced partial coloring. In 2000, Albertson, Grossman, and Haas introduced partial list coloring. Here, we initiate the study of partial coloring for an insightful generalization of list coloring introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle, DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring). We consider the DP-coloring analogue of the Partial List Coloring Conjecture, which gen…
▽ More
In 1980, Albertson and Berman introduced partial coloring. In 2000, Albertson, Grossman, and Haas introduced partial list coloring. Here, we initiate the study of partial coloring for an insightful generalization of list coloring introduced in 2015 by Dvořák and Postle, DP-coloring (or correspondence coloring). We consider the DP-coloring analogue of the Partial List Coloring Conjecture, which generalizes a natural bound for partial coloring. We show that while this partial DP-coloring conjecture does not hold, several results on partial list coloring can be extended to partial DP-coloring. We also study partial DP-coloring of the join of a graph with a complete graph, and we present several interesting open questions.
△ Less
Submitted 9 January, 2021; v1 submitted 4 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Combinatorial Nullstellensatz and DP-coloring of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
We initiate the study of applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to the DP-coloring of graphs even though, as is well-known, the Alon-Tarsi theorem does not apply to DP-coloring. We define the notion of good covers of prime order which allows us to apply the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to DP-coloring. We apply these tools to DP-coloring of the cones of certain bipartite graphs and uniquely 3-…
▽ More
We initiate the study of applying the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to the DP-coloring of graphs even though, as is well-known, the Alon-Tarsi theorem does not apply to DP-coloring. We define the notion of good covers of prime order which allows us to apply the Combinatorial Nullstellensatz to DP-coloring. We apply these tools to DP-coloring of the cones of certain bipartite graphs and uniquely 3-colorable graphs. We also extend a result of Akbari, Mirrokni, and Sadjad (2006) on unique list colorability to the context of DP-coloring. We establish a sufficient algebraic condition for a graph $G$ to satisfy $χ_{DP}(G) \leq 3$, and we completely determine the DP-chromatic number of squares of all cycles.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2020; v1 submitted 1 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Proportional 2-Choosability with a Bounded Palette
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Robert Piechota,
Paul Shin,
Tim Wagstrom
Abstract:
Proportional choosability is a list coloring analogue of equitable coloring. Specifically, a $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ from its list $L(v)$. A proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper $L$-coloring in which each color $c \in \bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)$ is used…
▽ More
Proportional choosability is a list coloring analogue of equitable coloring. Specifically, a $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ from its list $L(v)$. A proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper $L$-coloring in which each color $c \in \bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)$ is used $\lfloor η(c)/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil η(c)/k \rceil$ times where $η(c)=\left\lvert{\{v \in V(G) : c \in L(v) \}}\right\rvert$. A graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. Motivated by earlier work, we initiate the study of proportional choosability with a bounded palette by studying proportional 2-choosability with a bounded palette. In particular, when $\ell \geq 2$, a graph $G$ is said to be proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $2$-assignment for $G$ satisfying $|\bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)| \leq \ell$. We observe that a graph is proportionally $(2,2)$-choosable if and only if it is equitably 2-colorable. As $\ell$ gets larger, the set of proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable graphs gets smaller. We show that whenever $\ell \geq 5$ a graph is proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable if and only if it is proportionally 2-choosable. We also completely characterize the connected proportionally $(2, \ell)$-choosable graphs when $\ell = 3,4$.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2020; v1 submitted 5 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
A Note on Fractional DP-Coloring of Graphs
Authors:
Daniel Dominik,
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. In 2019, Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu introduced a fractional version of DP-coloring. They showed that unlike the fractional list chromatic number, the fractional DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{_{DP}}^*(G)$, can be arbitrarily larger than $χ^*(G)$, the…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring introduced by Dvořák and Postle in 2015. In 2019, Bernshteyn, Kostochka, and Zhu introduced a fractional version of DP-coloring. They showed that unlike the fractional list chromatic number, the fractional DP-chromatic number of a graph $G$, denoted $χ_{_{DP}}^*(G)$, can be arbitrarily larger than $χ^*(G)$, the graph's fractional chromatic number. We generalize a result of Alon, Tuza, and Voigt (1997) on the fractional list chromatic number of odd cycles, and, in the process, show that for each $k \in \mathbb{N}$, $χ_{_{DP}}^*(C_{2k+1}) = χ^*(C_{2k+1})$. We also show that for any $n \geq 2$ and $m \in \mathbb{N}$, if $p^*$ is the solution in $(0,1)$ to $p=(1-p)^n$ then $χ_{_{DP}}^*(K_{n,m})\leq1/p^*$, and we prove a generalization of this result for multipartite graphs. Finally, we determine a lower bound on $χ_{_{DP}}^*(K_{2,m})$ for any $m \geq 3$.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2024; v1 submitted 4 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
On List Equitable Total Colorings of the Generalized Theta Graph
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Max Marsh,
Tim Wagstrom
Abstract:
In 2003 Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. A $k$-assignment, $L$, for a graph $G$ assigns a list, $L(v)$, of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$, and an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring, $f$, of $G$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and each color class of $f$ has size at most…
▽ More
In 2003 Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. A $k$-assignment, $L$, for a graph $G$ assigns a list, $L(v)$, of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$, and an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring, $f$, of $G$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and each color class of $f$ has size at most $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$. In 2018, Kaul, Mudrock, and Pelsmajer subsequently introduced the List Equitable Total Coloring Conjecture which states that if $T$ is a total graph of some simple graph, then $T$ is equitably $k$-choosable for each $k \geq \max \{χ_\ell(T), Δ(T)/2 + 2 \}$ where $Δ(T)$ is the maximum degree of a vertex in $T$ and $χ_\ell(T)$ is the list chromatic number of $T$. In this paper we verify the List Equitable Total Coloring Conjecture for subdivisions of stars and the generalized theta graph.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
On the Chromatic Polynomial and Counting DP-Colorings
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since 1992, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalizati…
▽ More
The chromatic polynomial of a graph $G$, denoted $P(G,m)$, is equal to the number of proper $m$-colorings of $G$. The list color function of graph $G$, denoted $P_{\ell}(G,m)$, is a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial that has been studied since 1992, primarily through comparisons with the corresponding chromatic polynomial. DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring recently introduced by Dvořák and Postle. In this paper, we introduce a DP-coloring analogue of the chromatic polynomial called the DP color function, denoted $P_{DP}(G,m)$, and ask several fundamental open questions about it, making progress on some of them. Motivated by known results related to the list color function, we show that while the DP color function behaves similar to the list color function for some graphs, there are also some surprising differences. For example, Wang, Qian, and Yan recently showed that if $G$ is a connected graph with $l$ edges, then $P_{\ell}(G,m)=P(G,m)$ whenever $m > \frac{l-1}{\ln(1+ \sqrt{2})}$, but we will show that for any $g \geq 3$ there exists a graph, $G$, with girth $g$ such that $P_{DP}(G,m) < P(G,m)$ when $m$ is sufficiently large. We also study the asymptotics of $P(G,m) - P_{DP}(G,m)$ for a fixed graph $G$. We develop techniques to compute $P_{DP}(G,m)$ exactly and apply them to certain classes of graphs such as chordal graphs, unicyclic graphs, and cycles with a chord. Finally, we make progress towards showing that for any graph $G$, there is a $p$ such that $P_{DP}(G \vee K_p, m) = P(G \vee K_p , m)$ for large enough $m$.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2020; v1 submitted 16 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
-
List Coloring a Cartesian Product with a Complete Bipartite Factor
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of any graph $G$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$. We have two motivations. A classic result on the gap between list chromatic number and the chromatic number tells us $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) = 1 + a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$. Since $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) \leq 1 + a$ for any…
▽ More
We study the list chromatic number of the Cartesian product of any graph $G$ and a complete bipartite graph with partite sets of size $a$ and $b$, denoted $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$. We have two motivations. A classic result on the gap between list chromatic number and the chromatic number tells us $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) = 1 + a$ if and only if $b \geq a^a$. Since $χ_\ell(K_{a,b}) \leq 1 + a$ for any $b \in \mathbb{N}$, this result tells us the values of $b$ for which $χ_\ell(K_{a,b})$ is as large as possible and far from $χ(K_{a,b})=2$. In this paper we seek to understand when $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b})$ is far from $χ(G \square K_{a,b}) = \max \{χ(G), 2 \}$. It is easy to show $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) \leq χ_\ell (G) + a$. In 2006, Borowiecki, Jendrol, Král, and Miskuf showed that this bound is attainable if $b$ is sufficiently large; specifically, $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) = χ_\ell (G) + a$ whenever $b \geq (χ_\ell(G) + a - 1)^{a|V(G)|}$. Given any graph $G$ and $a \in \mathbb{N}$, we wish to determine the smallest $b$ such that $χ_\ell(G \square K_{a,b}) = χ_\ell (G) + a$. In this paper we show that the list color function, a list analogue of the chromatic polynomial, provides the right concept and tool for making progress on this problem. Using the list color function, we prove a general improvement on Borowiecki et al.'s 2006 result, and we compute the smallest such $b$ exactly for some large families of chromatic-choosable graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
A Note on the Equitable Choosability of Complete Bipartite Graphs
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Madelynn Chase,
Isaac Kadera,
Ezekiel Thornburgh,
Tim Wagstrom
Abstract:
In 2003 Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. A $k$-assignment, $L$, for a graph $G$ assigns a list, $L(v)$, of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$, and an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring, $f$, of $G$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and each color class of $f$ has size at most…
▽ More
In 2003 Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. A $k$-assignment, $L$, for a graph $G$ assigns a list, $L(v)$, of $k$ available colors to each $v \in V(G)$, and an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper coloring, $f$, of $G$ such that $f(v) \in L(v)$ for each $v \in V(G)$ and each color class of $f$ has size at most $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$. Graph $G$ is said to be equitably $k$-choosable if an equitable $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. In this note we study the equitable choosability of complete bipartite graphs. A result of Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West implies $K_{n,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable if $k \geq \max \{n,m\}$ provided $K_{n,m} \neq K_{2l+1, 2l+1}$. We prove $K_{n,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable if $m \leq \left\lceil (m+n)/k \right \rceil(k-n)$ which gives $K_{n,m}$ is equitably $k$-choosable for certain $k$ satisfying $k < \max \{n,m\}$. We also give a complete characterization of the equitable choosability of complete bipartite graphs that have a partite set of size at most 2.
△ Less
Submitted 10 January, 2019; v1 submitted 4 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
A Simple Characterization of Proportionally 2-choosable Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Michael J. Pelsmajer,
Benjamin Reiniger
Abstract:
We recently introduced proportional choosability, a new list analogue of equitable coloring. Like equitable coloring, and unlike list equitable coloring (a.k.a. equitable choosability), proportional choosability bounds sizes of color classes both from above and from below. In this note, we show that a graph is proportionally 2-choosable if and only if it is a linear forest such that its largest co…
▽ More
We recently introduced proportional choosability, a new list analogue of equitable coloring. Like equitable coloring, and unlike list equitable coloring (a.k.a. equitable choosability), proportional choosability bounds sizes of color classes both from above and from below. In this note, we show that a graph is proportionally 2-choosable if and only if it is a linear forest such that its largest component has at most 5 vertices and all of its other components have two or fewer vertices. We also construct examples that show that characterizing equitably 2-choosable graphs is still open.
△ Less
Submitted 29 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Proportional Choosability: A New List Analogue of Equitable Coloring
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Michael J. Pelsmajer,
Benjamin Reiniger
Abstract:
In 2003, Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. In this paper, we motivate and define a new list analogue of equitable coloring called proportional choosability. A $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors for each vertex $v$ of $G$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ fr…
▽ More
In 2003, Kostochka, Pelsmajer, and West introduced a list analogue of equitable coloring called equitable choosability. In this paper, we motivate and define a new list analogue of equitable coloring called proportional choosability. A $k$-assignment $L$ for a graph $G$ specifies a list $L(v)$ of $k$ available colors for each vertex $v$ of $G$. An $L$-coloring assigns a color to each vertex $v$ from its list $L(v)$. For each color $c$, let $η(c)$ be the number of vertices $v$ whose list $L(v)$ contains $c$. A proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ is a proper $L$-coloring in which each color $c \in \bigcup_{v \in V(G)} L(v)$ is used $\lfloor η(c)/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil η(c)/k \rceil$ times. A graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable if a proportional $L$-coloring of $G$ exists whenever $L$ is a $k$-assignment for $G$. We show that if a graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable, then every subgraph of $G$ is also proportionally $k$-choosable and also $G$ is proportionally $(k+1)$-choosable, unlike equitable choosability for which analogous claims would be false. We also show that any graph $G$ is proportionally $k$-choosable whenever $k \geq Δ(G) + \lceil |V(G)|/2 \rceil$, and we use matching theory to completely characterize the proportional choosability of stars and the disjoint union of cliques.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Criticality, The List Color Function, and List Coloring the Cartesian Product of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
We introduce a notion of color-criticality in the context of chromatic-choosability. We define a graph $G$ to be strong $k$-chromatic-choosable if $χ(G) = k$ and every $(k-1)$-assignment for which $G$ is not list-colorable has the property that the lists are the same for all vertices. That is the usual coloring is, in some sense, the obstacle to list-coloring. We prove basic properties of strongly…
▽ More
We introduce a notion of color-criticality in the context of chromatic-choosability. We define a graph $G$ to be strong $k$-chromatic-choosable if $χ(G) = k$ and every $(k-1)$-assignment for which $G$ is not list-colorable has the property that the lists are the same for all vertices. That is the usual coloring is, in some sense, the obstacle to list-coloring. We prove basic properties of strongly chromatic-choosable graphs such as chromatic-choosability and vertex-criticality, and we construct infinite families of strongly chromatic-choosable graphs. We derive a sufficient condition for the existence of at least two list colorings of strongly chromatic-choosable graphs and use it to show that: if $M$ is a strong $k$-chromatic-choosable graph with $|E(M)| \leq |V(M)|(k-2)$ and $H$ is a graph that contains a Hamilton path, $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_m$, such that $w_i$ has at most $ρ\geq 1$ neighbors among $w_1, \ldots, w_{i-1}$, then $χ_{\ell}(M \square H) \le k+ ρ- 1$. We show that this bound is sharp for all $ρ\ge 1$ by generalizing the theorem to apply to $H$ that are $(M,ρ)$-Cartesian accommodating which is a notion we define with the help of the list color function, $ P_{\ell}(G,k)$, the list analogue of the chromatic polynomial. We also use the list color function to determine the list chromatic number of certain star-like graphs: $χ_{\ell}(M \square K_{1,s}) =$ $k \; \text{if } s < P_{\ell}(M,k)$, or $k+1 \; \text{if } s \geq P_{\ell}(M,k)$, where $M$ is a strong $k$-chromatic-choosable graph. We show that $ P_{\ell}(M,k)$ equals $P(M,k)$, the chromatic polynomial, when $M$ is an odd cycle, complete graph, or the join of an odd cycle with a complete graph.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2018; v1 submitted 6 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
A Note on the DP-Chromatic Number of Complete Bipartite Graphs
Authors:
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring recently introduced by Dvořák and Postle. Several known bounds for the list chromatic number of a graph $G$, $χ_\ell(G)$, also hold for the DP-chromatic number of $G$, $χ_{DP}(G)$. On the other hand, there are several properties of the DP-chromatic number that shows that it differs with the list chromatic number…
▽ More
DP-coloring (also called correspondence coloring) is a generalization of list coloring recently introduced by Dvořák and Postle. Several known bounds for the list chromatic number of a graph $G$, $χ_\ell(G)$, also hold for the DP-chromatic number of $G$, $χ_{DP}(G)$. On the other hand, there are several properties of the DP-chromatic number that shows that it differs with the list chromatic number. In this note we show one such property. It is well known that $χ_\ell (K_{k,t}) = k+1$ if and only if $t \geq k^k$. We show that $χ_{DP} (K_{k,t}) = k+1$ if $t \geq 1 + (k^k/k!)(\log(k!)+1)$, and we show that $χ_{DP} (K_{k,t}) < k+1$ if $t < k^k/k!$.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
On the Alon-Tarsi Number and Chromatic-choosability of Cartesian Products of Graphs
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock
Abstract:
We study the list chromatic number of Cartesian products of graphs through the Alon-Tarsi number as defined by Jensen and Toft (1995) in their seminal book on graph coloring problems. The Alon-Tarsi number of $G$, $AT(G)$, is the smallest $k$ for which there is an orientation, $D$, of $G$ with max indegree $k\!-\!1$ such that the number of even and odd circulations contained in $D$ are different.…
▽ More
We study the list chromatic number of Cartesian products of graphs through the Alon-Tarsi number as defined by Jensen and Toft (1995) in their seminal book on graph coloring problems. The Alon-Tarsi number of $G$, $AT(G)$, is the smallest $k$ for which there is an orientation, $D$, of $G$ with max indegree $k\!-\!1$ such that the number of even and odd circulations contained in $D$ are different. It is known that $χ(G) \leq χ_\ell(G) \leq χ_p(G) \leq AT(G)$, where $χ(G)$ is the chromatic number, $χ_\ell(G)$ is the list chromatic number, and $χ_p(G)$ is the paint number of $G$. In this paper we find families of graphs $G$ and $H$ such that $χ(G \square H) = AT(G \square H)$, reducing this sequence of inequalities to equality. We show that the Alon-Tarsi number of the Cartesian product of an odd cycle and a path is always equal to 3. This result is then extended to show that if $G$ is an odd cycle or a complete graph and $H$ is a graph on at least two vertices containing the Hamilton path $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_n$ such that for each $i$, $w_i$ has a most $k$ neighbors among $w_1, w_2, \ldots, w_{i-1}$, then $AT(G \square H) \leq Δ(G)+k$ where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. We discuss other extensions for $G \square H$, where $G$ is such that $V(G)$ can be partitioned into odd cycles and complete graphs, and $H$ is a graph containing a Hamiltonian path. We apply these bounds to get chromatic-choosable Cartesian products, in fact we show that these families of graphs have $χ(G) = AT(G)$, improving previously known bounds.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Total Equitable List Coloring
Authors:
Hemanshu Kaul,
Jeffrey A. Mudrock,
Michael J. Pelsmajer
Abstract:
An equitable coloring is a proper coloring of a graph such that the sizes of the color classes differ by at most one. A graph $G$ is equitably $k$-colorable if there exists an equitable coloring of $G$ which uses $k$ colors, each one appearing on either $\lfloor |V(G)|/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$ vertices of $G$. In 1994, Fu conjectured that for any simple graph $G$, the total graph of…
▽ More
An equitable coloring is a proper coloring of a graph such that the sizes of the color classes differ by at most one. A graph $G$ is equitably $k$-colorable if there exists an equitable coloring of $G$ which uses $k$ colors, each one appearing on either $\lfloor |V(G)|/k \rfloor$ or $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$ vertices of $G$. In 1994, Fu conjectured that for any simple graph $G$, the total graph of $G$, $T(G)$, is equitably $k$-colorable whenever $k \geq \max\{χ(T(G)), Δ(G)+2\}$ where $χ(T(G))$ is the chromatic number of the total graph of $G$ and $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. We investigate the list coloring analogue. List coloring requires each vertex $v$ to be colored from a specified list $L(v)$ of colors. A graph is $k$-choosable if it has a proper list coloring whenever vertices have lists of size $k$. A graph is equitably $k$-choosable if it has a proper list coloring whenever vertices have lists of size $k$, where each color is used on at most $\lceil |V(G)|/k \rceil$ vertices. In the spirit of Fu's conjecture, we conjecture that for any simple graph $G$, $T(G)$ is equitably $k$-choosable whenever $k \geq \max\{χ_l(T(G)), Δ(G)+2\}$ where $χ_l(T(G))$ is the list chromatic number of $T(G)$. We prove this conjecture for all graphs satisfying $Δ(G) \leq 2$ while also studying the related question of the equitable choosability of powers of paths and cycles.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
