Scalable Algorithms for Individual Preference Stable Clustering
Authors:
Ron Mosenzon,
Ali Vakilian
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the individual preference (IP) stability, which is an notion capturing individual fairness and stability in clustering. Within this setting, a clustering is $α$-IP stable when each data point's average distance to its cluster is no more than $α$ times its average distance to any other cluster. In this paper, we study the natural local search algorithm for IP stable clusteri…
▽ More
In this paper, we study the individual preference (IP) stability, which is an notion capturing individual fairness and stability in clustering. Within this setting, a clustering is $α$-IP stable when each data point's average distance to its cluster is no more than $α$ times its average distance to any other cluster. In this paper, we study the natural local search algorithm for IP stable clustering. Our analysis confirms a $O(\log n)$-IP stability guarantee for this algorithm, where $n$ denotes the number of points in the input. Furthermore, by refining the local search approach, we show it runs in an almost linear time, $\tilde{O}(nk)$.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Exact Flow Sparsification Requires Unbounded Size
Authors:
Robert Krauthgamer,
Ron Mosenzon
Abstract:
Given a large edge-capacitated network $G$ and a subset of $k$ vertices called terminals, an (exact) flow sparsifier is a small network $G'$ that preserves (exactly) all multicommodity flows that can be routed between the terminals. Flow sparsifiers were introduced by Leighton and Moitra [STOC 2010], and have been studied and used in many algorithmic contexts.
A fundamental question that remaine…
▽ More
Given a large edge-capacitated network $G$ and a subset of $k$ vertices called terminals, an (exact) flow sparsifier is a small network $G'$ that preserves (exactly) all multicommodity flows that can be routed between the terminals. Flow sparsifiers were introduced by Leighton and Moitra [STOC 2010], and have been studied and used in many algorithmic contexts.
A fundamental question that remained open for over a decade, asks whether every $k$-terminal network admits an exact flow sparsifier whose size is bounded by some function $f(k)$ (regardless of the size of $G$ or its capacities). We resolve this question in the negative by proving that there exist $6$-terminal networks $G$ whose flow sparsifiers $G'$ must have arbitrarily large size. This unboundedness is perhaps surprising, since the analogous sparsification that preserves all terminal cuts (called exact cut sparsifier or mimicking network) admits sparsifiers of size $f_0(k)\leq 2^{2^k}$ [Hagerup, Katajainen, Nishimura, and Ragde, JCSS 1998].
We prove our results by analyzing the set of all feasible demands in the network, known as the demand polytope. We identify an invariant of this polytope, essentially the slope of certain facets, that can be made arbitrarily large even for $k=6$, and implies an explicit lower bound on the size of the network. We further use this technique to answer, again in the negative, an open question of Seymour [JCTB 2015] regarding flow-sparsification that uses only contractions and preserves the infeasibility of one demand vector.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2022; v1 submitted 15 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
