MLP-SRGAN: A Single-Dimension Super Resolution GAN using MLP-Mixer
Authors:
Samir Mitha,
Seungho Choe,
Pejman Jahbedar Maralani,
Alan R. Moody,
April Khademi
Abstract:
We propose a novel architecture called MLP-SRGAN, which is a single-dimension Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (SRGAN) that utilizes Multi-Layer Perceptron Mixers (MLP-Mixers) along with convolutional layers to upsample in the slice direction. MLP-SRGAN is trained and validated using high resolution (HR) FLAIR MRI from the MSSEG2 challenge dataset. The method was applied to three mu…
▽ More
We propose a novel architecture called MLP-SRGAN, which is a single-dimension Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (SRGAN) that utilizes Multi-Layer Perceptron Mixers (MLP-Mixers) along with convolutional layers to upsample in the slice direction. MLP-SRGAN is trained and validated using high resolution (HR) FLAIR MRI from the MSSEG2 challenge dataset. The method was applied to three multicentre FLAIR datasets (CAIN, ADNI, CCNA) of images with low spatial resolution in the slice dimension to examine performance on held-out (unseen) clinical data. Upsampled results are compared to several state-of-the-art SR networks. For images with high resolution (HR) ground truths, peak-signal-to-noise-ratio (PSNR) and structural similarity index (SSIM) are used to measure upsampling performance. Several new structural, no-reference image quality metrics were proposed to quantify sharpness (edge strength), noise (entropy), and blurriness (low frequency information) in the absence of ground truths. Results show MLP-SRGAN results in sharper edges, less blurring, preserves more texture and fine-anatomical detail, with fewer parameters, faster training/evaluation time, and smaller model size than existing methods. Code for MLP-SRGAN training and inference, data generators, models and no-reference image quality metrics will be available at https://github.com/IAMLAB-Ryerson/MLP-SRGAN.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
Biomedical image analysis competitions: The state of current participation practice
Authors:
Matthias Eisenmann,
Annika Reinke,
Vivienn Weru,
Minu Dietlinde Tizabi,
Fabian Isensee,
Tim J. Adler,
Patrick Godau,
Veronika Cheplygina,
Michal Kozubek,
Sharib Ali,
Anubha Gupta,
Jan Kybic,
Alison Noble,
Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano,
Samiksha Pachade,
Caroline Petitjean,
Daniel Sage,
Donglai Wei,
Elizabeth Wilden,
Deepak Alapatt,
Vincent Andrearczyk,
Ujjwal Baid,
Spyridon Bakas,
Niranjan Balu,
Sophia Bano
, et al. (331 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis,…
▽ More
The number of international benchmarking competitions is steadily increasing in various fields of machine learning (ML) research and practice. So far, however, little is known about the common practice as well as bottlenecks faced by the community in tackling the research questions posed. To shed light on the status quo of algorithm development in the specific field of biomedical imaging analysis, we designed an international survey that was issued to all participants of challenges conducted in conjunction with the IEEE ISBI 2021 and MICCAI 2021 conferences (80 competitions in total). The survey covered participants' expertise and working environments, their chosen strategies, as well as algorithm characteristics. A median of 72% challenge participants took part in the survey. According to our results, knowledge exchange was the primary incentive (70%) for participation, while the reception of prize money played only a minor role (16%). While a median of 80 working hours was spent on method development, a large portion of participants stated that they did not have enough time for method development (32%). 25% perceived the infrastructure to be a bottleneck. Overall, 94% of all solutions were deep learning-based. Of these, 84% were based on standard architectures. 43% of the respondents reported that the data samples (e.g., images) were too large to be processed at once. This was most commonly addressed by patch-based training (69%), downsampling (37%), and solving 3D analysis tasks as a series of 2D tasks. K-fold cross-validation on the training set was performed by only 37% of the participants and only 50% of the participants performed ensembling based on multiple identical models (61%) or heterogeneous models (39%). 48% of the respondents applied postprocessing steps.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2023; v1 submitted 16 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
Mitosis Detection for Breast Cancer Pathology Images Using UV-Net
Authors:
Seyed H. Mirjahanmardi,
Samir Mitha,
Salar Razavi,
Susan Done,
April Khademi
Abstract:
The difficulty of detecting mitosis and its similarity to non-mitosis objects has remained a challenge in computational pathology. The lack of publicly available data has added more complexity. Deep learning algorithms have shown potentials in mitosis detection tasks. However, they face challenges when applied to pathology images with dense medium and diverse dataset. This paper introduces an opti…
▽ More
The difficulty of detecting mitosis and its similarity to non-mitosis objects has remained a challenge in computational pathology. The lack of publicly available data has added more complexity. Deep learning algorithms have shown potentials in mitosis detection tasks. However, they face challenges when applied to pathology images with dense medium and diverse dataset. This paper introduces an optimized UV-Net architecture, developed to focus on mitosis details with high-resolution through feature preservation. Stain normalization methods are used to generalize the trained network. An F1 score of 0.6721 is achieved using this network.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2021; v1 submitted 2 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
