Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Minasyan, E

Online Control of Unknown Time-Varying Dynamical Systems

Authors: Edgar Minasyan, Paula Gradu, Max Simchowitz, Elad Hazan

Abstract: We study online control of time-varying linear systems with unknown dynamics in the nonstochastic control model. At a high level, we demonstrate that this setting is \emph{qualitatively harder} than that of either unknown time-invariant or known time-varying dynamics, and complement our negative results with algorithmic upper bounds in regimes where sublinear regret is possible. More specifically,… ▽ More We study online control of time-varying linear systems with unknown dynamics in the nonstochastic control model. At a high level, we demonstrate that this setting is \emph{qualitatively harder} than that of either unknown time-invariant or known time-varying dynamics, and complement our negative results with algorithmic upper bounds in regimes where sublinear regret is possible. More specifically, we study regret bounds with respect to common classes of policies: Disturbance Action (SLS), Disturbance Response (Youla), and linear feedback policies. While these three classes are essentially equivalent for LTI systems, we demonstrate that these equivalences break down for time-varying systems. We prove a lower bound that no algorithm can obtain sublinear regret with respect to the first two classes unless a certain measure of system variability also scales sublinearly in the horizon. Furthermore, we show that offline planning over the state linear feedback policies is NP-hard, suggesting hardness of the online learning problem. On the positive side, we give an efficient algorithm that attains a sublinear regret bound against the class of Disturbance Response policies up to the aforementioned system variability term. In fact, our algorithm enjoys sublinear \emph{adaptive} regret bounds, which is a strictly stronger metric than standard regret and is more appropriate for time-varying systems. We sketch extensions to Disturbance Action policies and partial observation, and propose an inefficient algorithm for regret against linear state feedback policies. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Machine Learning for Mechanical Ventilation Control (Extended Abstract)

Authors: Daniel Suo, Naman Agarwal, Wenhan Xia, Xinyi Chen, Udaya Ghai, Alexander Yu, Paula Gradu, Karan Singh, Cyril Zhang, Edgar Minasyan, Julienne LaChance, Tom Zajdel, Manuel Schottdorf, Daniel Cohen, Elad Hazan

Abstract: Mechanical ventilation is one of the most widely used therapies in the ICU. However, despite broad application from anaesthesia to COVID-related life support, many injurious challenges remain. We frame these as a control problem: ventilators must let air in and out of the patient's lungs according to a prescribed trajectory of airway pressure. Industry-standard controllers, based on the PID method… ▽ More Mechanical ventilation is one of the most widely used therapies in the ICU. However, despite broad application from anaesthesia to COVID-related life support, many injurious challenges remain. We frame these as a control problem: ventilators must let air in and out of the patient's lungs according to a prescribed trajectory of airway pressure. Industry-standard controllers, based on the PID method, are neither optimal nor robust. Our data-driven approach learns to control an invasive ventilator by training on a simulator itself trained on data collected from the ventilator. This method outperforms popular reinforcement learning algorithms and even controls the physical ventilator more accurately and robustly than PID. These results underscore how effective data-driven methodologies can be for invasive ventilation and suggest that more general forms of ventilation (e.g., non-invasive, adaptive) may also be amenable. △ Less

Submitted 23 December, 2021; v1 submitted 19 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: Machine Learning for Health (ML4H) at NeurIPS 2021 - Extended Abstract. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2102.06779

Provable Regret Bounds for Deep Online Learning and Control

Authors: Xinyi Chen, Edgar Minasyan, Jason D. Lee, Elad Hazan

Abstract: The theory of deep learning focuses almost exclusively on supervised learning, non-convex optimization using stochastic gradient descent, and overparametrized neural networks. It is common belief that the optimizer dynamics, network architecture, initialization procedure, and other factors tie together and are all components of its success. This presents theoretical challenges for analyzing state-… ▽ More The theory of deep learning focuses almost exclusively on supervised learning, non-convex optimization using stochastic gradient descent, and overparametrized neural networks. It is common belief that the optimizer dynamics, network architecture, initialization procedure, and other factors tie together and are all components of its success. This presents theoretical challenges for analyzing state-based and/or online deep learning. Motivated by applications in control, we give a general black-box reduction from deep learning to online convex optimization. This allows us to decouple optimization, regret, expressiveness, and derive agnostic online learning guarantees for fully-connected deep neural networks with ReLU activations. We quantify convergence and regret guarantees for any range of parameters and allow any optimization procedure, such as adaptive gradient methods and second order methods. As an application, we derive provable algorithms for deep control in the online episodic setting. △ Less

Submitted 16 February, 2022; v1 submitted 14 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Machine Learning for Mechanical Ventilation Control

Authors: Daniel Suo, Naman Agarwal, Wenhan Xia, Xinyi Chen, Udaya Ghai, Alexander Yu, Paula Gradu, Karan Singh, Cyril Zhang, Edgar Minasyan, Julienne LaChance, Tom Zajdel, Manuel Schottdorf, Daniel Cohen, Elad Hazan

Abstract: We consider the problem of controlling an invasive mechanical ventilator for pressure-controlled ventilation: a controller must let air in and out of a sedated patient's lungs according to a trajectory of airway pressures specified by a clinician. Hand-tuned PID controllers and similar variants have comprised the industry standard for decades, yet can behave poorly by over- or under-shooting their… ▽ More We consider the problem of controlling an invasive mechanical ventilator for pressure-controlled ventilation: a controller must let air in and out of a sedated patient's lungs according to a trajectory of airway pressures specified by a clinician. Hand-tuned PID controllers and similar variants have comprised the industry standard for decades, yet can behave poorly by over- or under-shooting their target or oscillating rapidly. We consider a data-driven machine learning approach: First, we train a simulator based on data we collect from an artificial lung. Then, we train deep neural network controllers on these simulators.We show that our controllers are able to track target pressure waveforms significantly better than PID controllers. We further show that a learned controller generalizes across lungs with varying characteristics much more readily than PID controllers do. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2022; v1 submitted 12 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Adaptive Regret for Control of Time-Varying Dynamics

Authors: Paula Gradu, Elad Hazan, Edgar Minasyan

Abstract: We consider the problem of online control of systems with time-varying linear dynamics. This is a general formulation that is motivated by the use of local linearization in control of nonlinear dynamical systems. To state meaningful guarantees over changing environments, we introduce the metric of {\it adaptive regret} to the field of control. This metric, originally studied in online learning, me… ▽ More We consider the problem of online control of systems with time-varying linear dynamics. This is a general formulation that is motivated by the use of local linearization in control of nonlinear dynamical systems. To state meaningful guarantees over changing environments, we introduce the metric of {\it adaptive regret} to the field of control. This metric, originally studied in online learning, measures performance in terms of regret against the best policy in hindsight on {\it any interval in time}, and thus captures the adaptation of the controller to changing dynamics. Our main contribution is a novel efficient meta-algorithm: it converts a controller with sublinear regret bounds into one with sublinear {\it adaptive regret} bounds in the setting of time-varying linear dynamical systems. The main technical innovation is the first adaptive regret bound for the more general framework of online convex optimization with memory. Furthermore, we give a lower bound showing that our attained adaptive regret bound is nearly tight for this general framework. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2022; v1 submitted 8 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Faster Projection-free Online Learning

Authors: Elad Hazan, Edgar Minasyan

Abstract: In many online learning problems the computational bottleneck for gradient-based methods is the projection operation. For this reason, in many problems the most efficient algorithms are based on the Frank-Wolfe method, which replaces projections by linear optimization. In the general case, however, online projection-free methods require more iterations than projection-based methods: the best known… ▽ More In many online learning problems the computational bottleneck for gradient-based methods is the projection operation. For this reason, in many problems the most efficient algorithms are based on the Frank-Wolfe method, which replaces projections by linear optimization. In the general case, however, online projection-free methods require more iterations than projection-based methods: the best known regret bound scales as $T^{3/4}$. Despite significant work on various variants of the Frank-Wolfe method, this bound has remained unchanged for a decade. In this paper we give an efficient projection-free algorithm that guarantees $T^{2/3}$ regret for general online convex optimization with smooth cost functions and one linear optimization computation per iteration. As opposed to previous Frank-Wolfe approaches, our algorithm is derived using the Follow-the-Perturbed-Leader method and is analyzed using an online primal-dual framework. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2020; v1 submitted 30 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.