Ethical considerations when planning, implementing and releasing health economic model software: a new proposal
Authors:
Matthew P Hamilton,
Caroline Gao,
Jonathan Karnon,
Luis Salvador-Carulla,
Sue M Cotton,
Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Abstract:
Most health economic analyses are undertaken with the aid of computers. However, the research ethics of implementing health economic models as software (or computational health economic models (CHEMs)) are poorly understood. We propose that developers and funders of CHEMs should adhere to research ethics principles and pursue the goals of: (i) socially acceptable user requirements and design speci…
▽ More
Most health economic analyses are undertaken with the aid of computers. However, the research ethics of implementing health economic models as software (or computational health economic models (CHEMs)) are poorly understood. We propose that developers and funders of CHEMs should adhere to research ethics principles and pursue the goals of: (i) socially acceptable user requirements and design specifications; (ii) fit for purpose implementations; and (iii) socially beneficial post-release use. We further propose that a transparent (T), reusable (R) and updatable (U) CHEM is suggestive of a project team that has largely met these goals. We propose six criteria for assessing TRU CHEMs: (T1) software files are publicly available; (T2) developer contributions and judgments on appropriate use are easily identified; (R1) programming practices facilitate independent reuse of model components; (R2) licenses permit reuse and derivative works; (U1) maintenance infrastructure is in place; and (U2) releases are systematically retested and deprecated. Few existing CHEMs would meet all TRU criteria. Addressing these limitations will require the development of new and updated good practice guidelines and investments by governments and other research funders in enabling infrastructure and human capital.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
A prototype software framework for transferable computational health economic models and its early application in youth mental health
Authors:
Matthew P Hamilton,
Caroline X Gao,
Glen Wiesner,
Kate M Filia,
Jana M Menssink,
Petra Plencnerova,
David G Baker,
Patrick D McGorry,
Alexandra Parker,
Jonathan Karnon,
Sue M Cotton,
Cathrine Mihalopoulos
Abstract:
We are develo** an economic model to explore multiple topics in Australian youth mental health policy. We want that model to be readily transferable to other jurisdictions. We developed a software framework for authoring transparent, reusable and updatable Computational Health Economic Models (CHEMs) (the software files that implement health economic models). We specified framework user requirem…
▽ More
We are develo** an economic model to explore multiple topics in Australian youth mental health policy. We want that model to be readily transferable to other jurisdictions. We developed a software framework for authoring transparent, reusable and updatable Computational Health Economic Models (CHEMs) (the software files that implement health economic models). We specified framework user requirements of a template CHEM module that facilitates modular model implementations, a simple programming syntax and tools for authoring new CHEM modules, supplying CHEMs with data, reporting reproducible CHEM analyses, searching for CHEM modules and maintaining a CHEM project website. We implemented the framework as six development version code libraries in the programming language R that integrate with online services for software development and research data archiving. We used the framework to author five development version R libraries of CHEM modules focused on utility map** in youth mental health. These modules provide tools for variable validation, dataset description, multi-attribute instrument scoring, construction of map** models, reporting of map** studies and making out of sample predictions. We assessed these CHEM module libraries as mostly meeting transparency, reusability and updatability criteria that we have previously developed, but requiring more detailed documentation and unit testing of individual modules. Our software framework has potential value as a prototype for future tools to support the development of transferable CHEMs.
△ Less
Submitted 25 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
