-
On the Scalability and Message Count of Trickle-based Broadcasting Schemes
Authors:
Thomas M. M. Meyfroyt,
Sem C. Borst,
Onno J. Boxma,
Dee Denteneer
Abstract:
As the use of wireless sensor networks increases, the need for efficient and reliable broadcasting algorithms grows. Ideally, a broadcasting algorithm should have the ability to quickly disseminate data, while kee** the number of transmissions low. In this paper, we analyze the popular Trickle algorithm, which has been proposed as a suitable communication protocol for code maintenance and propag…
▽ More
As the use of wireless sensor networks increases, the need for efficient and reliable broadcasting algorithms grows. Ideally, a broadcasting algorithm should have the ability to quickly disseminate data, while kee** the number of transmissions low. In this paper, we analyze the popular Trickle algorithm, which has been proposed as a suitable communication protocol for code maintenance and propagation in wireless sensor networks. We show that the broadcasting process of a network using Trickle can be modeled by a Markov chain and that this chain falls under a class of Markov chains, closely related to residual lifetime distributions. It is then shown that this class of Markov chains admits a stationary distribution of a special form. These results are used to analyze the Trickle algorithm and its message count. Our results prove conjectures made in the literature concerning the effect of a listen-only period. Besides providing a mathematical analysis of the algorithm, we propose a generalized version of Trickle, with an additional parameter defining the length of a listen-only period.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
Adaptive Broadcast Suppression for Trickle-Based Protocols
Authors:
Thomas M. M. Meyfroyt,
Milosh Stolikj,
Johan J. Lukkien
Abstract:
Low-power wireless networks play an important role in the Internet of Things. Typically, these networks consist of a very large number of lossy and low-capacity devices, challenging the current state of the art in protocol design. In this context the Trickle algorithm plays an important role, serving as the basic mechanism for message dissemination in notable protocols such as RPL and MPL. While T…
▽ More
Low-power wireless networks play an important role in the Internet of Things. Typically, these networks consist of a very large number of lossy and low-capacity devices, challenging the current state of the art in protocol design. In this context the Trickle algorithm plays an important role, serving as the basic mechanism for message dissemination in notable protocols such as RPL and MPL. While Trickle's broadcast suppression mechanism has been proven to be efficient, recent work has shown that it is intrinsically unfair in terms of load distribution and that its performance relies strongly on network topology. This can lead to increased end-to-end delays (MPL), or creation of sub-optimal routes (RPL). Furthermore, as highlighted in this work, there is no clear consensus within the research community about what the proper parameter settings of the suppression mechanism should be. We propose an extension to the Trickle algorithm, called adaptive-k, which allows nodes to individually adapt their suppression mechanism to local node density. Supported by analysis and a case study with RPL, we show that this extension allows for an easier configuration of Trickle, making it more robust to network topology.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
Improving the Performance of Trickle-Based Data Dissemination in Low-Power Networks
Authors:
Milosh Stolikj,
Thomas M. M. Meyfroyt,
Pieter J. L. Cuijpers,
Johan J. Lukkien
Abstract:
Trickle is a polite gossip algorithm for managing communication traffic. It is of particular interest in low-power wireless networks for reducing the amount of control traffic, as in routing protocols (RPL), or reducing network congestion, as in multicast protocols (MPL). Trickle is used at the network or application level, and relies on up-to-date information on the activity of neighbors. This ma…
▽ More
Trickle is a polite gossip algorithm for managing communication traffic. It is of particular interest in low-power wireless networks for reducing the amount of control traffic, as in routing protocols (RPL), or reducing network congestion, as in multicast protocols (MPL). Trickle is used at the network or application level, and relies on up-to-date information on the activity of neighbors. This makes it vulnerable to interference from the media access control layer, which we explore in this paper. We present several scenarios how the MAC layer in low-power radios violates Trickle timing. As a case study, we analyze the impact of CSMA/CA with ContikiMAC on Trickle's performance. Additionally, we propose a solution called Cleansing that resolves these issues.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
A Data Propagation Model for Wireless Gossi**
Authors:
Thomas M. M. Meyfroyt,
Sem C. Borst,
Onno J. Boxma,
Dee Denteneer
Abstract:
Wireless sensor networks require communication protocols for efficiently propagating data in a distributed fashion. The Trickle algorithm is a popular protocol serving as the basis for many of the current standard communication protocols. In this paper we develop a mathematical model describing how Trickle propagates new data across a network consisting of nodes placed on a line. The model is anal…
▽ More
Wireless sensor networks require communication protocols for efficiently propagating data in a distributed fashion. The Trickle algorithm is a popular protocol serving as the basis for many of the current standard communication protocols. In this paper we develop a mathematical model describing how Trickle propagates new data across a network consisting of nodes placed on a line. The model is analyzed and asymptotic results on the hop count and end-to-end delay distributions in terms of the Trickle parameters and network density are given. Additionally, we show that by only a small modification of the Trickle algorithm the expected end-to-end delay can be greatly decreased. Lastly, we demonstrate how one can derive the exact hop count and end-to-end delay distributions for small network sizes.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2014; v1 submitted 23 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
-
Data Dissemination Performance in Large-Scale Sensor Networks
Authors:
Thomas M. M. Meyfroyt,
Sem C. Borst,
Onno J. Boxma,
Dee Denteneer
Abstract:
As the use of wireless sensor networks increases, the need for (energy-)efficient and reliable broadcasting algorithms grows. Ideally, a broadcasting algorithm should have the ability to quickly disseminate data, while kee** the number of transmissions low. In this paper we develop a model describing the message count in large-scale wireless sensor networks. We focus our attention on the popular…
▽ More
As the use of wireless sensor networks increases, the need for (energy-)efficient and reliable broadcasting algorithms grows. Ideally, a broadcasting algorithm should have the ability to quickly disseminate data, while kee** the number of transmissions low. In this paper we develop a model describing the message count in large-scale wireless sensor networks. We focus our attention on the popular Trickle algorithm, which has been proposed as a suitable communication protocol for code maintenance and propagation in wireless sensor networks. Besides providing a mathematical analysis of the algorithm, we propose a generalized version of Trickle, with an additional parameter defining the length of a listen-only period. This generalization proves to be useful for optimizing the design and usage of the algorithm. For single-cell networks we show how the message count increases with the size of the network and how this depends on the Trickle parameters. Furthermore, we derive distributions of inter-broadcasting times and investigate their asymptotic behavior. Our results prove conjectures made in the literature concerning the effect of a listen-only period. Additionally, we develop an approximation for the expected number of transmissions in multi-cell networks. All results are validated by simulations.
△ Less
Submitted 22 July, 2014;
originally announced July 2014.
