-
$H$-$φ$ formulation in Sparselizard combined with domain decomposition methods for modeling superconducting tapes, stacks, and twisted wires
Authors:
Nicolo Riva,
Alexandre Halbach,
Mika Lyly,
Christian Messe,
Janne Ruuskanen,
Valtteri Lahtinen
Abstract:
The growing interest in the modeling of superconductors has led to the development of effective numerical methods and software. One of the most utilized approaches for magnetoquasistatic simulations in applied superconductivity is the $H$ formulation. However, due to the large number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) present when modeling large and complex systems (e.g. large coils for fusion applicati…
▽ More
The growing interest in the modeling of superconductors has led to the development of effective numerical methods and software. One of the most utilized approaches for magnetoquasistatic simulations in applied superconductivity is the $H$ formulation. However, due to the large number of degrees of freedom (DOFs) present when modeling large and complex systems (e.g. large coils for fusion applications, electrical machines, and medical applications) using the standard $H$ formulation on a desktop machine becomes infeasible. The $H$ formulation solves the Faraday's law formulated in terms of the magnetic field intensity $\mathbf{H}$ using edge elements in the whole modeling domain. For this reason, a very high resistivity is assumed for the non-conducting domains, leading to an ill-conditioned system matrix and therefore long computation times. In contrast, the $H$-$φ$ formulation uses the $H$ formulation in the conducting region, and the $φ$ formulation (magnetic scalar potential) in the surrounding non-conducting domains, drastically reducing DOFs and computation time. In this work, we use the $H$-$φ$ formulation in 2D for the magnetothermal (AC losses and quench) analysis of stacks of REBCO tapes. The same approach is extended to a 3D case for the AC loss analysis of a twisted superconducting wire. All the results obtained by simulations in Sparselizard are compared with results obtained with COMSOL. Our custom tool allows us to distribute the simulations over hundreds of CPUs using domain decomposition methods, considerably reducing the simulation times without compromising accuracy.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2023; v1 submitted 3 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
-
A Strategic Approach to Advance Magnet Technology for Next Generation Colliders
Authors:
G. Ambrosio,
K. Amm,
M. Anerella,
G. Apollinari,
D. Arbelaez,
B. Auchmann,
S. Balachandran,
M. Baldini,
A. Ballarino,
S. Barua,
E. Barzi,
A. Baskys,
C. Bird,
J. Boerme,
E. Bosque,
L. Brouwer,
S. Caspi,
N. Cheggour,
G. Chlachidze,
L. Cooley,
D. Davis,
D. Dietderich,
J. DiMarco,
L. English,
L. Garcia Fajardo
, et al. (52 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Colliders are built on a foundation of superconducting magnet technology that provides strong dipole magnets to maintain the beam orbit and strong focusing magnets to enable the extraordinary luminosity required to probe physics at the energy frontier. The dipole magnet strength plays a critical role in dictating the energy reach of a collider, and the superconducting magnets are arguably the domi…
▽ More
Colliders are built on a foundation of superconducting magnet technology that provides strong dipole magnets to maintain the beam orbit and strong focusing magnets to enable the extraordinary luminosity required to probe physics at the energy frontier. The dipole magnet strength plays a critical role in dictating the energy reach of a collider, and the superconducting magnets are arguably the dominant cost driver for future collider facilities. As the community considers opportunities to explore new energy frontiers, the importance of advanced magnet technology - both in terms of magnet performance and in the magnet technology's potential for cost reduction - is evident, as the technology status is essential for informed decisions on targets for physics reach and facility feasibility.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Snowmass21 Accelerator Modeling Community White Paper
Authors:
S. Biedron,
L. Brouwer,
D. L. Bruhwiler,
N. M. Cook,
A. L. Edelen,
D. Filippetto,
C. -K. Huang,
A. Huebl,
T. Katsouleas,
N. Kuklev,
R. Lehe,
S. Lund,
C. Messe,
W. Mori,
C. -K. Ng,
D. Perez,
P. Piot,
J. Qiang,
R. Roussel,
D. Sagan,
A. Sahai,
A. Scheinker,
M. Thévenet,
F. Tsung,
J. -L. Vay
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
After a summary of relevant comments and recommendations from various reports over the last ten years, this paper examines the modeling needs in accelerator physics, from the modeling of single beams and individual accelerator elements, to the realization of virtual twins that replicate all the complexity to model a particle accelerator complex as accurately as possible. We then discuss cutting-ed…
▽ More
After a summary of relevant comments and recommendations from various reports over the last ten years, this paper examines the modeling needs in accelerator physics, from the modeling of single beams and individual accelerator elements, to the realization of virtual twins that replicate all the complexity to model a particle accelerator complex as accurately as possible. We then discuss cutting-edge and emerging computing opportunities, such as advanced algorithms, AI/ML and quantum computing, computational needs in hardware, software performance, portability and scalability, and needs for scalable I/O and in-situ analysis. Considerations of reliability, long-term sustainability, user support and training are considered next, before discussing the benefits of ecosystems with integrated workflows based on standardized input and output, and with integrated frameworks and data repositories developed as a community. Last, we highlight how the community can work more collaboratively and efficiently through the development of consortia and centers, and via collaboration with industry.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2022; v1 submitted 15 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Adaptive level set topology optimization using hierarchical B-splines
Authors:
L. Noel,
M. Schmidt,
C. Messe,
J. A. Evans,
K. Maute
Abstract:
This paper presents an adaptive discretization strategy for level set topology optimization of structures based on hierarchical B-splines. This work focuses on the influence of the discretization approach and the adaptation strategy on the optimization results and computational cost. The geometry of the design is represented implicitly by the iso-contour of a level set function. An immersed bounda…
▽ More
This paper presents an adaptive discretization strategy for level set topology optimization of structures based on hierarchical B-splines. This work focuses on the influence of the discretization approach and the adaptation strategy on the optimization results and computational cost. The geometry of the design is represented implicitly by the iso-contour of a level set function. An immersed boundary technique, here the extended finite element method, is used to predict the structural response. Both the level set function and the state variable fields are discretized by hierarchical B-splines. While only first-order B-splines are used for the state variable fields, up to third order B-splines are considered for discretizing the level set function. The discretizations of the level set function and the state variable fields are locally refined along the material interfaces and selectively coarsened within the bulk phases. For locally refined/coarsened meshes, truncated B-splines are considered. The properties of the proposed mesh adaptation strategy are studied for level set topology optimization where either the initial design is comprised of a uniform array of inclusions or inclusions are generated during the optimization process. Numerical studies employing static linear elastic material/void problems in 2D and 3D demonstrate the ability of the proposed method to start from a coarse mesh and converge to designs with complex geometries and fine features, reducing the overall computational cost. Comparing optimization results for different B-spline orders suggests that higher order basis functions promote the development of smooth designs and suppress the emergence of small features, without providing an explicit feature size control. A distinct advantage of cubic over quadratic B-splines is not observed.
△ Less
Submitted 23 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Scalable multigrid methods for immersed finite element methods and immersed isogeometric analysis
Authors:
F. de Prenter,
C. V. Verhoosel,
E. H. van Brummelen,
J. A. Evans,
C. Messe,
J. Benzaken,
K. Maute
Abstract:
Ill-conditioning of the system matrix is a well-known complication in immersed finite element methods and trimmed isogeometric analysis. Elements with small intersections with the physical domain yield problematic eigenvalues in the system matrix, which generally degrades efficiency and robustness of iterative solvers. In this contribution we investigate the spectral properties of immersed finite…
▽ More
Ill-conditioning of the system matrix is a well-known complication in immersed finite element methods and trimmed isogeometric analysis. Elements with small intersections with the physical domain yield problematic eigenvalues in the system matrix, which generally degrades efficiency and robustness of iterative solvers. In this contribution we investigate the spectral properties of immersed finite element systems treated by Schwarz-type methods, to establish the suitability of these as smoothers in a multigrid method. Based on this investigation we develop a geometric multigrid preconditioner for immersed finite element methods, which provides mesh-independent and cut-element-independent convergence rates. This preconditioning technique is applicable to higher-order discretizations, and enables solving large-scale immersed systems in parallel, at a computational cost that scales linearly with the number of degrees of freedom. The performance of the preconditioner is demonstrated for conventional Lagrange basis functions and for isogeometric discretizations with both uniform B-splines and locally refined approximations based on truncated hierarchical B-splines.
△ Less
Submitted 26 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.