-
Designing an exploratory phase 2b platform trial in NASH with correlated, co-primary binary endpoints
Authors:
Elias Laurin Meyer,
Peter Mesenbrink,
Nicholas A. Di Prospero,
Juan M. Pericàs,
Ekkehard Glimm,
Vlad Ratziu,
Elena Sena,
Franz König
Abstract:
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and a disease with high unmet medical need. Platform trials provide great benefits for sponsors and trial participants in terms of accelerating drug development programs. In this article, we describe some of the activities of the EU-PEARL consortium (EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms)…
▽ More
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is the progressive form of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and a disease with high unmet medical need. Platform trials provide great benefits for sponsors and trial participants in terms of accelerating drug development programs. In this article, we describe some of the activities of the EU-PEARL consortium (EU Patient-cEntric clinicAl tRial pLatforms) regarding the use of platform trials in NASH, in particular the proposed trial design, decision rules and simulation results. For a set of assumptions, we present the results of a simulation study recently discussed with two health authorities and the learnings from these meetings from a trial design perspective. Since the proposed design uses co-primary binary endpoints, we furthermore discuss the different options and practical considerations for simulating correlated binary endpoints.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2023; v1 submitted 12 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
-
CohortPlat: Simulation of cohort platform trials investigating combination therapies
Authors:
Elias Laurin Meyer,
Peter Mesenbrink,
Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf,
Ekkehard Glimm,
Franz König
Abstract:
Platform trials have gained a lot of attention recently as a possible remedy for time-consuming classical two-arm randomized controlled trials, especially in early phase drug development. This short article illustrates how to use the CohortPlat R package to simulate a cohort platform trial, where each cohort consists of a combination treatment and the respective monotherapies and standard-of-care.…
▽ More
Platform trials have gained a lot of attention recently as a possible remedy for time-consuming classical two-arm randomized controlled trials, especially in early phase drug development. This short article illustrates how to use the CohortPlat R package to simulate a cohort platform trial, where each cohort consists of a combination treatment and the respective monotherapies and standard-of-care. The endpoint is always assumed to be binary. The package offers extensive flexibility with respect to both platform trial trajectories, as well as treatment effect scenarios and decision rules. As a special feature, the package provides a designated function for running multiple such simulations efficiently in parallel and saving the results in a concise manner. Many illustrations of code usage are provided.
△ Less
Submitted 4 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
On model-based time trend adjustments in platform trials with non-concurrent controls
Authors:
Marta Bofill Roig,
Pavla Krotka,
Carl-Fredrik Burman,
Ekkehard Glimm,
Stefan M. Gold,
Katharina Hees,
Peter Jacko,
Franz Koenig,
Dominic Magirr,
Peter Mesenbrink,
Kert Viele,
Martin Posch
Abstract:
Platform trials can evaluate the efficacy of several treatments compared to a control. The number of treatments is not fixed, as arms may be added or removed as the trial progresses. Platform trials are more efficient than independent parallel-group trials because of using shared control groups. For arms entering the trial later, not all patients in the control group are randomised concurrently. T…
▽ More
Platform trials can evaluate the efficacy of several treatments compared to a control. The number of treatments is not fixed, as arms may be added or removed as the trial progresses. Platform trials are more efficient than independent parallel-group trials because of using shared control groups. For arms entering the trial later, not all patients in the control group are randomised concurrently. The control group is then divided into concurrent and non-concurrent controls. Using non-concurrent controls (NCC) can improve the trial's efficiency, but can introduce bias due to time trends. We focus on a platform trial with two treatment arms and a common control arm. Assuming that the second treatment arm is added later, we assess the robustness of model-based approaches to adjust for time trends when using NCC. We consider approaches where time trends are modeled as linear or as a step function, with steps at times where arms enter or leave the trial. For trials with continuous or binary outcomes, we investigate the type 1 error (t1e) rate and power of testing the efficacy of the newly added arm under a range of scenarios. In addition to scenarios where time trends are equal across arms, we investigate settings with trends that are different or not additive in the model scale. A step function model fitted on data from all arms gives increased power while controlling the t1e, as long as the time trends are equal for the different arms and additive on the model scale. This holds even if the trend's shape deviates from a step function if block randomisation is used. But if trends differ between arms or are not additive on the model scale, t1e control may be lost. The efficiency gained by using step function models to incorporate NCC can outweigh potential biases. However, the specifics of the trial, plausibility of different time trends, and robustness of results should be considered
△ Less
Submitted 26 July, 2022; v1 submitted 13 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Pseudo-domains in imaging data improve prediction of future disease status in multi-center studies
Authors:
Matthias Perkonigg,
Peter Mesenbrink,
Alexander Goehler,
Miljen Martic,
Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah,
Georg Langs
Abstract:
In multi-center randomized clinical trials imaging data can be diverse due to acquisition technology or scanning protocols. Models predicting future outcome of patients are impaired by this data heterogeneity. Here, we propose a prediction method that can cope with a high number of different scanning sites and a low number of samples per site. We cluster sites into pseudo-domains based on visual a…
▽ More
In multi-center randomized clinical trials imaging data can be diverse due to acquisition technology or scanning protocols. Models predicting future outcome of patients are impaired by this data heterogeneity. Here, we propose a prediction method that can cope with a high number of different scanning sites and a low number of samples per site. We cluster sites into pseudo-domains based on visual appearance of scans, and train pseudo-domain specific models. Results show that they improve the prediction accuracy for steatosis after 48 weeks from imaging data acquired at an initial visit and 12-weeks follow-up in liver disease
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Decision rules for identifying combination therapies in open-entry, randomized controlled platform trials
Authors:
Elias Laurin Meyer,
Peter Mesenbrink,
Cornelia Dunger-Baldauf,
Ekkehard Glimm,
Yuhan Li,
Franz König
Abstract:
Platform trials have become increasingly popular for drug development programs, attracting interest from statisticians, clinicians and regulatory agencies. Many statistical questions related to designing platform trials - such as the impact of decision rules, sharing of information across cohorts, and allocation ratios on operating characteristics and error rates - remain unanswered. In many platf…
▽ More
Platform trials have become increasingly popular for drug development programs, attracting interest from statisticians, clinicians and regulatory agencies. Many statistical questions related to designing platform trials - such as the impact of decision rules, sharing of information across cohorts, and allocation ratios on operating characteristics and error rates - remain unanswered. In many platform trials, the definition of error rates is not straightforward as classical error rate concepts are not applicable. For an open-entry, exploratory platform trial design comparing combination therapies to the respective monotherapies and standard-of-care, we define a set of error rates and operating characteristics and then use these to compare a set of design parameters under a range of simulation assumptions. When setting up the simulations, we aimed for realistic trial trajectories, such that e.g. a priori we do not know the exact number of treatments that will be included over time in a specific simulation run as this follows a stochastic mechanism. Our results indicate that the method of data sharing, exact specification of decision rules and a priori assumptions regarding the treatment efficacy all strongly contribute to the operating characteristics of the platform trial. Furthermore, different operating characteristics might be of importance to different stakeholders. Together with the potential flexibility and complexity of a platform trial, which also impact the achieved operating characteristics via e.g. the degree of efficiency of data sharing, this implies that utmost care needs to be given to evaluation of different assumptions and design parameters at the design stage.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2021; v1 submitted 17 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
