Two-level Continuous Topology Optimization in Structural Mechanics
Authors:
Rafael Merli,
Antolín Martínez-Martínez,
Juan José Ródenas,
Marc Bosch-Galera,
Enrique Nadal
Abstract:
In the current industry, the development of optimized mechanical components able to satisfy the customer requirements evolves quickly. Therefore, companies are asked for efficient solutions to improve their products in terms of stiffness and strength. In this sense, Topology Optimization has been extensively used to determine the best topology of structural components from the mechanical point of…
▽ More
In the current industry, the development of optimized mechanical components able to satisfy the customer requirements evolves quickly. Therefore, companies are asked for efficient solutions to improve their products in terms of stiffness and strength. In this sense, Topology Optimization has been extensively used to determine the best topology of structural components from the mechanical point of view. Its main objective is to distribute a given amount of material into a predefined domain to reach the maximum overall stiffness of the component. Besides, high-resolution solutions are essential to define the final distribution of material. Standard Topological Optimization tools are able to propose an optimal topology for the whole component, but when small topological details are required (i.e. trabecular-type structures) the computational cost is prohibitive. In order to mitigate this issue, the present work proposes a two-level topology optimization method to solve high-resolution problems by using density-based methods. The proposed methodology includes three steps: The first one subdivides the whole component in cells and generates a coarse optimized low-definition material distribution assigning one different density to each cell. The second one uses an equilibrating technique that provides tractions continuity between adjacent cells, thus ensuring the material inter-cell continuity after the cells optimization process. Finally, each cell is optimized at fine scale taking as input data the densities and the equilibrated tractions obtained from the macro problem. The main goal of this work is to efficiently solve high-resolution topology optimization problems using density-based methods, which would be unaffordable with standard computing facilities and the current methodologies.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
Optimal Coupling of Jumpy Brownian Motion on the Circle
Authors:
Stephen B. Connor,
Roberta Merli
Abstract:
Consider a Brownian motion on the circumference of the unit circle, which jumps to the opposite point of the circumference at incident times of an independent Poisson process of rate $λ$. We examine the problem of coupling two copies of this `jumpy Brownian motion' started from different locations, so as to optimise certain functions of the coupling time. We describe two intuitive co-adapted coupl…
▽ More
Consider a Brownian motion on the circumference of the unit circle, which jumps to the opposite point of the circumference at incident times of an independent Poisson process of rate $λ$. We examine the problem of coupling two copies of this `jumpy Brownian motion' started from different locations, so as to optimise certain functions of the coupling time. We describe two intuitive co-adapted couplings (`Mirror' and `Synchronous') which differ only when the two processes are directly opposite one another, and show that the question of which strategy is best depends upon the jump rate $λ$ in a non-trivial way.
More precisely, we use the theory of stochastic control to show that there exists a critical value $λ^\star = 0.083\dots$ such that the Mirror coupling minimises the mean coupling time within the class of all co-adapted couplings when $λ<λ^\star$, but for $λ\ge λ^\star$ the Synchronous coupling uniquely maximises the Laplace transform $\mathbb{E}[e^{-γT}]$ of all coupling times $T$ within this class. We also provide an explicit description of a (non co-adapted) maximal coupling for any jump rate in the case that the two jumpy Brownian motions begin at antipodal points of the circle.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 28 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
