-
Machine Learning for Healthcare-IoT Security: A Review and Risk Mitigation
Authors:
Mirza Akhi Khatun,
Sanober Farheen Memon,
Ciarán Eising,
Lubna Luxmi Dhirani
Abstract:
The Healthcare Internet-of-Things (H-IoT), commonly known as Digital Healthcare, is a data-driven infrastructure that highly relies on smart sensing devices (i.e., blood pressure monitors, temperature sensors, etc.) for faster response time, treatments, and diagnosis. However, with the evolving cyber threat landscape, IoT devices have become more vulnerable to the broader risk surface (e.g., risks…
▽ More
The Healthcare Internet-of-Things (H-IoT), commonly known as Digital Healthcare, is a data-driven infrastructure that highly relies on smart sensing devices (i.e., blood pressure monitors, temperature sensors, etc.) for faster response time, treatments, and diagnosis. However, with the evolving cyber threat landscape, IoT devices have become more vulnerable to the broader risk surface (e.g., risks associated with generative AI, 5G-IoT, etc.), which, if exploited, may lead to data breaches, unauthorized access, and lack of command and control and potential harm. This paper reviews the fundamentals of healthcare IoT, its privacy, and data security challenges associated with machine learning and H-IoT devices. The paper further emphasizes the importance of monitoring healthcare IoT layers such as perception, network, cloud, and application. Detecting and responding to anomalies involves various cyber-attacks and protocols such as Wi-Fi 6, Narrowband Internet of Things (NB-IoT), Bluetooth, ZigBee, LoRa, and 5G New Radio (5G NR). A robust authentication mechanism based on machine learning and deep learning techniques is required to protect and mitigate H-IoT devices from increasing cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Hence, in this review paper, security and privacy challenges and risk mitigation strategies for building resilience in H-IoT are explored and reported.
△ Less
Submitted 17 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
The AIMI Initiative: AI-Generated Annotations for Imaging Data Commons Collections
Authors:
Gowtham Krishnan Murugesan,
Diana McCrumb,
Mariam Aboian,
Tej Verma,
Rahul Soni,
Fatima Memon,
Keyvan Farahani,
Linmin Pei,
Ulrike Wagner,
Andrey Y. Fedorov,
David Clunie,
Stephen Moore,
Jeff Van Oss
Abstract:
The Image Data Commons (IDC) contains publicly available cancer radiology datasets that could be pertinent to the research and development of advanced imaging tools and algorithms. However, the full extent of its research capabilities is limited by the fact that these datasets have few if any, annotations associated with them. Through this study with the Artificial Intelligence (AI) AI in Medical…
▽ More
The Image Data Commons (IDC) contains publicly available cancer radiology datasets that could be pertinent to the research and development of advanced imaging tools and algorithms. However, the full extent of its research capabilities is limited by the fact that these datasets have few if any, annotations associated with them. Through this study with the Artificial Intelligence (AI) AI in Medical Imaging (AIMI) initiative, we produced high-quality, AI-generated imaging annotations of tissues, organs, and/or cancers for 11 distinct medical imaging collections from the IDC. These collections have a variety of image modalities, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging modalities. Furthermore, the imaging collections cover various body parities, such as the chest, breast, kidneys, prostate, and liver. Both publicly available and novel AI algorithms were adopted and further developed using open-sourced data coupled with expert annotations to create the AI-generated annotations. A portion of the AI annotations were reviewed and corrected by a radiologist to assess the AI model's performance. Both the AI's and the radiologist's annotations conformed to DICOM standards for seamless integration into the IDC collections as third-party analyses. All the models and datasets (images and annotations) are publicly accessible.
△ Less
Submitted 21 November, 2023; v1 submitted 23 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
A Large Open Access Dataset of Brain Metastasis 3D Segmentations with Clinical and Imaging Feature Information
Authors:
Divya Ramakrishnan,
Leon Jekel,
Saahil Chadha,
Anastasia Janas,
Harrison Moy,
Nazanin Maleki,
Matthew Sala,
Manpreet Kaur,
Gabriel Cassinelli Petersen,
Sara Merkaj,
Marc von Reppert,
Ujjwal Baid,
Spyridon Bakas,
Claudia Kirsch,
Melissa Davis,
Khaled Bousabarah,
Wolfgang Holler,
MingDe Lin,
Malte Westerhoff,
Sanjay Aneja,
Fatima Memon,
Mariam S. Aboian
Abstract:
Resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) are the standards of care for the treatment of patients with brain metastases (BM) but are often associated with cognitive side effects. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves a more targeted treatment approach and has been shown to avoid the side effects associated with WBRT. However, SRS requires precise identification and delineation of BM. While…
▽ More
Resection and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) are the standards of care for the treatment of patients with brain metastases (BM) but are often associated with cognitive side effects. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves a more targeted treatment approach and has been shown to avoid the side effects associated with WBRT. However, SRS requires precise identification and delineation of BM. While many AI algorithms have been developed for this purpose, their clinical adoption has been limited due to poor model performance in the clinical setting. Major reasons for non-generalizable algorithms are the limitations in the datasets used for training the AI network. The purpose of this study was to create a large, heterogenous, annotated BM dataset for training and validation of AI models to improve generalizability. We present a BM dataset of 200 patients with pretreatment T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and FLAIR MR images. The dataset includes contrast-enhancing and necrotic 3D segmentations on T1 post-contrast and whole tumor (including peritumoral edema) 3D segmentations on FLAIR. Our dataset contains 975 contrast-enhancing lesions, many of which are sub centimeter, along with clinical and imaging feature information. We used a streamlined approach to database-building leveraging a PACS-integrated segmentation workflow.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2023; v1 submitted 10 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI
Authors:
Ahmed W. Moawad,
Anastasia Janas,
Ujjwal Baid,
Divya Ramakrishnan,
Rachit Saluja,
Nader Ashraf,
Leon Jekel,
Raisa Amiruddin,
Maruf Adewole,
Jake Albrecht,
Udunna Anazodo,
Sanjay Aneja,
Syed Muhammad Anwar,
Timothy Bergquist,
Evan Calabrese,
Veronica Chiang,
Verena Chung,
Gian Marco Marco Conte,
Farouk Dako,
James Eddy,
Ivan Ezhov,
Ariana Familiar,
Keyvan Farahani,
Juan Eugenio Iglesias,
Zhifan Jiang
, et al. (206 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and chara…
▽ More
The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space.The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well-annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied clinical environments and providing personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.
△ Less
Submitted 17 June, 2024; v1 submitted 1 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
DNA Electromagnetic Properties and Interactions
Authors:
M. H. S. Bukhari,
Y. Raza,
S. Batool,
T. Razzaki,
A. Bukhari,
F. Memon,
M. A. Rauf,
A. Rizvi,
O. Bagasra
Abstract:
DNA is an essential molecule central to the survival and propagation of life, it was imperative to investigate possible electromagnetic properties inherent to it, such as the existence of any non-trivial interactions of this molecule with electromagnetic fields (beyond the usual dielectric response and damage by ionizing gamma radiations). Extensive investigations were carried out with both prokar…
▽ More
DNA is an essential molecule central to the survival and propagation of life, it was imperative to investigate possible electromagnetic properties inherent to it, such as the existence of any non-trivial interactions of this molecule with electromagnetic fields (beyond the usual dielectric response and damage by ionizing gamma radiations). Extensive investigations were carried out with both prokaryotic and eukaryotic purified DNA samples utilizing some of the most sensitive and precision instrumentation and methods available, while scanning the whole spectral region from 1Hz to 100KHz (in the low frequencies) and all the way to the high-frequency region of 100MHz (including investigations on the effects of 100MHz high-frequency fields as well as 2.4GHz microwave fields on the DNA). We were unable to detect any electromagnetism of any kind intrinsic to the DNA or its coupling to external noise sources, whether concentrated or diluted in water, as compared to control samples (H2O or empty chambers), neither existence of any possible spontaneous or stimulated/induced electromagnetic fields or waves emanated from both the eukaryotic and prokaryotic genetic material. Based on our measurements, we conclude that either there is no intrinsic electromagnetic activity or fields present in the DNA material, in both concentrated or diluted form, or any such activity is extremely weak in its intensity and beyond the measurement limits of current scientific methods.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
Image Quality Assessment for Performance Evaluation of Focus Measure Operators
Authors:
Farida Memon,
Mukhtiar Ali Unar,
Sheeraz Memon
Abstract:
This paper presents the performance evaluation of eight focus measure operators namely Image CURV (Curvature), GRAE (Gradient Energy), HISE (Histogram Entropy), LAPM (Modified Laplacian), LAPV (Variance of Laplacian), LAPD (Diagonal Laplacian), LAP3 (Laplacian in 3D Window) and WAVS (Sum of Wavelet Coefficients). Statistical matrics such as MSE (Mean Squared Error), PNSR (Peak Signal to Noise Rati…
▽ More
This paper presents the performance evaluation of eight focus measure operators namely Image CURV (Curvature), GRAE (Gradient Energy), HISE (Histogram Entropy), LAPM (Modified Laplacian), LAPV (Variance of Laplacian), LAPD (Diagonal Laplacian), LAP3 (Laplacian in 3D Window) and WAVS (Sum of Wavelet Coefficients). Statistical matrics such as MSE (Mean Squared Error), PNSR (Peak Signal to Noise Ratio), SC (Structural Content), NCC (Normalized Cross Correlation), MD (Maximum Difference) and NAE (Normalized Absolute Error) are used to evaluate stated focus measures in this research. . FR (Full Reference) method of the image quality assessment is utilized in this paper. Results indicate that LAPD method is comparatively better than other seven focus operators at typical imaging conditions.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
