Showing 1–13 of 13 results for author: Melissourgos, T

On the Smoothed Complexity of Combinatorial Local Search

Authors: Yiannis Giannakopoulos, Alexander Grosz, Themistoklis Melissourgos

Abstract: We propose a unifying framework for smoothed analysis of combinatorial local optimization problems, and show how a diverse selection of problems within the complexity class PLS can be cast within this model. This abstraction allows us to identify key structural properties, and corresponding parameters, that determine the smoothed running time of local search dynamics. We formalize this via a black… ▽ More We propose a unifying framework for smoothed analysis of combinatorial local optimization problems, and show how a diverse selection of problems within the complexity class PLS can be cast within this model. This abstraction allows us to identify key structural properties, and corresponding parameters, that determine the smoothed running time of local search dynamics. We formalize this via a black-box tool that provides concrete bounds on the expected maximum number of steps needed until local search reaches an exact local optimum. This bound is particularly strong, in the sense that it holds for any starting feasible solution, any choice of pivoting rule, and does not rely on the choice of specific noise distributions that are applied on the input, but it is parameterized by just a global upper bound $φ$ on the probability density. The power of this tool can be demonstrated by instantiating it for various PLS-hard problems of interest to derive efficient smoothed running times (as a function of $φ$ and the input size). Most notably, we focus on the important local optimization problem of finding pure Nash equilibria in Congestion Games, that has not been studied before from a smoothed analysis perspective. Specifically, we propose novel smoothed analysis models for general and Network Congestion Games, under various representations, including explicit, step-function, and polynomial resource latencies. We study PLS-hard instances of these problems and show that their standard local search algorithms run in polynomial smoothed time. Finally, we present further applications of our framework to a wide range of additional combinatorial problems, including local Max-Cut in weighted graphs, the Travelling Salesman problem (TSP) under the $k$-opt local heuristic, and finding pure equilibria in Network Coordination Games. △ Less

Submitted 20 June, 2024; v1 submitted 14 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: An extended abstract of this paper was accepted to ICALP 2024

Multi-Agent Systems for Computational Economics and Finance

Authors: Michael Kampouridis, Panagiotis Kanellopoulos, Maria Kyropoulou, Themistoklis Melissourgos, Alexandros A. Voudouris

Abstract: In this article we survey the main research topics of our group at the University of Essex. Our research interests lie at the intersection of theoretical computer science, artificial intelligence, and economic theory. In particular, we focus on the design and analysis of mechanisms for systems involving multiple strategic agents, both from a theoretical and an applied perspective. We present an ov… ▽ More In this article we survey the main research topics of our group at the University of Essex. Our research interests lie at the intersection of theoretical computer science, artificial intelligence, and economic theory. In particular, we focus on the design and analysis of mechanisms for systems involving multiple strategic agents, both from a theoretical and an applied perspective. We present an overview of our group's activities, as well as its members, and then discuss in detail past, present, and future work in multi-agent systems. △ Less

Submitted 7 October, 2022; originally announced October 2022.

MSC Class: 91-XX

Tight Inapproximability for Graphical Games

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Alexandros Hollender, Themistoklis Melissourgos

Abstract: We provide a complete characterization for the computational complexity of finding approximate equilibria in two-action graphical games. We consider the two most well-studied approximation notions: $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibria ($\varepsilon$-NE) and $\varepsilon$-well-supported Nash equilibria ($\varepsilon$-WSNE), where $\varepsilon \in [0,1]$. We prove that computing an $\varepsilon$-NE is PPAD… ▽ More We provide a complete characterization for the computational complexity of finding approximate equilibria in two-action graphical games. We consider the two most well-studied approximation notions: $\varepsilon$-Nash equilibria ($\varepsilon$-NE) and $\varepsilon$-well-supported Nash equilibria ($\varepsilon$-WSNE), where $\varepsilon \in [0,1]$. We prove that computing an $\varepsilon$-NE is PPAD-complete for any constant $\varepsilon < 1/2$, while a very simple algorithm (namely, letting all players mix uniformly between their two actions) yields a $1/2$-NE. On the other hand, we show that computing an $\varepsilon$-WSNE is PPAD-complete for any constant $\varepsilon < 1$, while a $1$-WSNE is trivial to achieve, because any strategy profile is a $1$-WSNE. All of our lower bounds immediately also apply to graphical games with more than two actions per player. △ Less

Submitted 29 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Pure-Circuit: Strong Inapproximability for PPAD

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Alexandros Hollender, Themistoklis Melissourgos

Abstract: The current state-of-the-art methods for showing inapproximability in PPAD arise from the $\varepsilon$-Generalized-Circuit ($\varepsilon$-GCircuit) problem. Rubinstein (2018) showed that there exists a small unknown constant $\varepsilon$ for which $\varepsilon$-GCircuit is PPAD-hard, and subsequent work has shown hardness results for other problems in PPAD by using $\varepsilon$-GCircuit as an i… ▽ More The current state-of-the-art methods for showing inapproximability in PPAD arise from the $\varepsilon$-Generalized-Circuit ($\varepsilon$-GCircuit) problem. Rubinstein (2018) showed that there exists a small unknown constant $\varepsilon$ for which $\varepsilon$-GCircuit is PPAD-hard, and subsequent work has shown hardness results for other problems in PPAD by using $\varepsilon$-GCircuit as an intermediate problem. We introduce Pure-Circuit, a new intermediate problem for PPAD, which can be thought of as $\varepsilon$-GCircuit pushed to the limit as $\varepsilon \rightarrow 1$, and we show that the problem is PPAD-complete. We then prove that $\varepsilon$-GCircuit is PPAD-hard for all $\varepsilon < 0.1$ by a reduction from Pure-Circuit, and thus strengthen all prior work that has used GCircuit as an intermediate problem from the existential-constant regime to the large-constant regime. We show that stronger inapproximability results can be derived by reducing directly from Pure-Circuit. In particular, we prove tight inapproximability results for computing $\varepsilon$-well-supported Nash equilibria in two-action polymatrix games, as well as for finding approximate equilibria in threshold games. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2023; v1 submitted 29 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: Improved inapproximability result for approximate NE in polymatrix games

Constant Inapproximability for PPA

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Alexandros Hollender, Themistoklis Melissourgos

Abstract: In the $\varepsilon$-Consensus-Halving problem, we are given $n$ probability measures $v_1, \dots, v_n$ on the interval $R = [0,1]$, and the goal is to partition $R$ into two parts $R^+$ and $R^-$ using at most $n$ cuts, so that $|v_i(R^+) - v_i(R^-)| \leq \varepsilon$ for all $i$. This fundamental fair division problem was the first natural problem shown to be complete for the class PPA, and all… ▽ More In the $\varepsilon$-Consensus-Halving problem, we are given $n$ probability measures $v_1, \dots, v_n$ on the interval $R = [0,1]$, and the goal is to partition $R$ into two parts $R^+$ and $R^-$ using at most $n$ cuts, so that $|v_i(R^+) - v_i(R^-)| \leq \varepsilon$ for all $i$. This fundamental fair division problem was the first natural problem shown to be complete for the class PPA, and all subsequent PPA-completeness results for other natural problems have been obtained by reducing from it. We show that $\varepsilon$-Consensus-Halving is PPA-complete even when the parameter $\varepsilon$ is a constant. In fact, we prove that this holds for any constant $\varepsilon < 1/5$. As a result, we obtain constant inapproximability results for all known natural PPA-complete problems, including Necklace-Splitting, the Discrete-Ham-Sandwich problem, two variants of the pizza sharing problem, and for finding fair independent sets in cycles and paths. △ Less

Submitted 24 January, 2022; originally announced January 2022.

Pizza Sharing is PPA-hard

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Themistoklis Melissourgos

Abstract: We study the computational complexity of finding a solution for the straight-cut and square-cut pizza sharing problems. We show that computing an $\varepsilon$-approximate solution is PPA-complete for both problems, while finding an exact solution for the square-cut problem is FIXP-hard and in BU. Our PPA-hardness results apply for any $\varepsilon < 1/5$, even when all mass distributions consist… ▽ More We study the computational complexity of finding a solution for the straight-cut and square-cut pizza sharing problems. We show that computing an $\varepsilon$-approximate solution is PPA-complete for both problems, while finding an exact solution for the square-cut problem is FIXP-hard and in BU. Our PPA-hardness results apply for any $\varepsilon < 1/5$, even when all mass distributions consist of non-overlap** axis-aligned rectangles or when they are point sets, and our FIXP-hardness result applies even when all mass distributions are unions of squares and right-angled triangles. We also prove that the decision variants of both approximate problems are NP-complete, while it is ETR-complete for the exact version of square-cut pizza sharing. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2023; v1 submitted 28 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

MSC Class: 91B32

Walrasian Equilibria in Markets with Small Demands

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, Themistoklis Melissourgos, Paul G. Spirakis

Abstract: We study the complexity of finding a Walrasian equilibrium in markets where the agents have $k$-demand valuations. These valuations are an extension of unit-demand valuations where a bundle's value is the maximum of its $k$-subsets' values. For unit-demand agents, where the existence of a Walrasian equilibrium is guaranteed, we show that the problem is in quasi-NC. For $k=2$, we show that it is NP… ▽ More We study the complexity of finding a Walrasian equilibrium in markets where the agents have $k$-demand valuations. These valuations are an extension of unit-demand valuations where a bundle's value is the maximum of its $k$-subsets' values. For unit-demand agents, where the existence of a Walrasian equilibrium is guaranteed, we show that the problem is in quasi-NC. For $k=2$, we show that it is NP-hard to decide if a Walrasian equilibrium exists even if the valuations are fractionally subadditive (XOS), while for $k=3$ the hardness carries over to budget-additive valuations. In addition, we give a polynomial-time algorithm for markets with 2-demand single-minded valuations, or unit-demand valuations. △ Less

Submitted 3 May, 2021; v1 submitted 24 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Connected Subgraph Defense Games

Authors: Eleni C. Akrida, Argyrios Deligkas, Themistoklis Melissourgos, Paul G. Spirakis

Abstract: We study a security game over a network played between a $defender$ and $k$ $attackers$. Every attacker chooses, probabilistically, a node of the network to damage. The defender chooses, probabilistically as well, a connected induced subgraph of the network of $λ$ nodes to scan and clean.Each attacker wishes to maximize the probability of esca** her cleaning by the defender. On the other hand, t… ▽ More We study a security game over a network played between a $defender$ and $k$ $attackers$. Every attacker chooses, probabilistically, a node of the network to damage. The defender chooses, probabilistically as well, a connected induced subgraph of the network of $λ$ nodes to scan and clean.Each attacker wishes to maximize the probability of esca** her cleaning by the defender. On the other hand, the goal of the defender is to maximize the expected number of attackers that she catches. This game is a generalization of the model from the seminal paper of Mavronicolas et al. "The price of defense" (MFCS'06). We are interested in Nash equilibria (NE) of this game, as well as in characterizing $defense$-$optimal$ networks which allow for the best $equilibrium$ $defense$ $ratio$, termed Price of Defense; this is the ratio of $k$ over the expected number of attackers that the defender catches in a NE. We provide characterizations of the NEs of this game and defense-optimal networks. This allows us to show that the NEs of the game coincide independently from the coordination or not of the attackers. In addition, we give an algorithm for computing NEs. Our algorithm requires exponential time in the worst case, but it is polynomial-time for $λ$ constantly close to 1 or $n$. For the special case of tree-networks, we refine our characterization which allows us to derive a polynomial-time algorithm for deciding whether a tree is defense-optimal and if this is the case it computes a defense-optimal NE. On the other hand, we prove that it is NP-hard to find a best-defense strategy if the tree is not defense-optimal. We complement this negative result with a polynomial-time constant-approximation algorithm that computes solutions that are close to optimal ones for general graphs. Finally, we provide asymptotically (almost) tight bounds for the Price of Defense for any $λ$. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2019; originally announced June 2019.

Computing Exact Solutions of Consensus Halving and the Borsuk-Ulam Theorem

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Themistoklis Melissourgos, Paul G. Spirakis

Abstract: We study the problem of finding an exact solution to the consensus halving problem. While recent work has shown that the approximate version of this problem is PPA-complete, we show that the exact version is much harder. Specifically, finding a solution with $n$ cuts is FIXP-hard, and deciding whether there exists a solution with fewer than $n$ cuts is ETR-complete. We also give a QPTAS for the ca… ▽ More We study the problem of finding an exact solution to the consensus halving problem. While recent work has shown that the approximate version of this problem is PPA-complete, we show that the exact version is much harder. Specifically, finding a solution with $n$ cuts is FIXP-hard, and deciding whether there exists a solution with fewer than $n$ cuts is ETR-complete. We also give a QPTAS for the case where each agent's valuation is a polynomial. Along the way, we define a new complexity class BU, which captures all problems that can be reduced to solving an instance of the Borsuk-Ulam problem exactly. We show that FIXP $\subseteq$ BU $\subseteq$ TFETR and that LinearBU $=$ PPA, where LinearBU is the subclass of BU in which the Borsuk-Ulam instance is specified by a linear arithmetic circuit. △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2021; v1 submitted 7 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

Strategic Contention Resolution in Multiple Channels

Authors: George Christodoulou, Themistoklis Melissourgos, Paul G. Spirakis

Abstract: We consider the problem of resolving contention in communication networks with selfish users. In a \textit{contention game} each of $n \geq 2$ identical players has a single information packet that she wants to transmit using one of $k \geq 1$ multiple-access channels. To do that, a player chooses a slotted-time protocol that prescribes the probabilities with which at a given time-step she will at… ▽ More We consider the problem of resolving contention in communication networks with selfish users. In a \textit{contention game} each of $n \geq 2$ identical players has a single information packet that she wants to transmit using one of $k \geq 1$ multiple-access channels. To do that, a player chooses a slotted-time protocol that prescribes the probabilities with which at a given time-step she will attempt transmission at each channel. If more than one players try to transmit over the same channel (collision) then no transmission happens on that channel. Each player tries to minimize her own expected \textit{latency}, i.e. her expected time until successful transmission, by choosing her protocol. The natural problem that arises in such a setting is, given $n$ and $k$, to provide the players with a common, anonymous protocol (if it exists) such that no one would unilaterally deviate from it (equilibrium protocol). All previous theoretical results on strategic contention resolution examine only the case of a single channel and show that the equilibrium protocols depend on the feedback that the communication system gives to the players. Here we present multi-channel equilibrium protocols in two main feedback classes, namely \textit{acknowledgement-based} and \textit{ternary}. In particular, we provide equilibrium characterizations for more than one channels, and give specific anonymous, equilibrium protocols with finite and infinite expected latency. In the equilibrium protocols with infinite expected latency, all players transmit successfully in optimal time, i.e. $Θ(n/k)$, with probability tending to 1 as $n/k \to \infty$. △ Less

Submitted 10 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: The results of this work are included in the 11th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT 2018) and the 16th Workshop on Approximation and Online Algorithms (WAOA 2018)

Approximating the Existential Theory of the Reals

Authors: Argyrios Deligkas, John Fearnley, Themistoklis Melissourgos, Paul G. Spirakis

Abstract: The Existential Theory of the Reals (ETR) consists of existentially quantified Boolean formulas over equalities and inequalities of polynomial functions of variables in $\mathbb{R}$. In this paper we propose and study the approximate existential theory of the reals ($ε$-ETR), in which the constraints only need to be satisfied approximately. We first show that when the domain of the variables is… ▽ More The Existential Theory of the Reals (ETR) consists of existentially quantified Boolean formulas over equalities and inequalities of polynomial functions of variables in $\mathbb{R}$. In this paper we propose and study the approximate existential theory of the reals ($ε$-ETR), in which the constraints only need to be satisfied approximately. We first show that when the domain of the variables is $\mathbb{R}$ then $ε$-ETR = ETR under polynomial time reductions, and then study the constrained $ε$-ETR problem when the variables are constrained to lie in a given bounded convex set. Our main theorem is a sampling theorem, similar to those that have been proved for approximate equilibria in normal form games. It discretizes the domain in a grid-like manner whose density depends on various properties of the formula. A consequence of our theorem is that we obtain a quasi-polynomial time approximation scheme (QPTAS) for a fragment of constrained $ε$-ETR. We use our theorem to create several new PTAS and QPTAS algorithms for problems from a variety of fields. △ Less

Submitted 19 March, 2020; v1 submitted 2 October, 2018; originally announced October 2018.

Comments: In the proceedings of the 14th Conference on Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2018)

An extension of the Moran process using type-specific connection graphs

Authors: Themistoklis Melissourgos, Sotiris Nikoletseas, Christoforos Raptopoulos, Paul Spirakis

Abstract: The Moran process, as studied by [Lieberman, E., Hauert, C. and Nowak, M. Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 433, pp. 312-316 (2005)], is a stochastic process modeling the spread of genetic mutations in populations. In this process, agents of a two-type population (i.e. mutants and residents) are associated with the vertices of a graph. Initially, only one vertex chosen uniformly at random is… ▽ More The Moran process, as studied by [Lieberman, E., Hauert, C. and Nowak, M. Evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Nature 433, pp. 312-316 (2005)], is a stochastic process modeling the spread of genetic mutations in populations. In this process, agents of a two-type population (i.e. mutants and residents) are associated with the vertices of a graph. Initially, only one vertex chosen uniformly at random is a mutant, with fitness $r > 0$, while all other individuals are residents, with fitness $1$. In every step, an individual is chosen with probability proportional to its fitness, and its state (mutant or resident) is passed on to a neighbor which is chosen uniformly at random. In this paper, we introduce and study a generalization of the model of Lieberman et al. by assuming that different types of individuals perceive the population through different graphs, namely $G_R(V,E_R)$ for residents and $G_M(V,E_M)$ for mutants. In this model, we study the fixation probability, i.e. the probability that eventually only mutants remain in the population, for various pairs of graphs. First, we transfer known results from the original single-graph model of Lieberman et al. to our 2-graph model. Among them, we provide a generalization of the Isothermal Theorem of Lieberman et al., that gives sufficient conditions for a pair of graphs to have the same fixation probability as a pair of cliques. Next, we give a 2-player strategic game view of the process where player payoffs correspond to fixation and/or extinction probabilities. In this setting, we attempt to identify best responses for each player and give evidence that the clique is the most beneficial graph for both players. Finally, we examine the possibility of efficient approximation of the fixation probability and provide a FPRAS for the special case where the mutant graph is complete. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2021; v1 submitted 19 October, 2017; originally announced October 2017.

Existence of Evolutionarily Stable Strategies Remains Hard to Decide for a Wide Range of Payoff Values

Authors: Themistoklis Melissourgos, Paul Spirakis

Abstract: The concept of an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), introduced by Smith and Price, is a refinement of Nash equilibrium in 2-player symmetric games in order to explain counter-intuitive natural phenomena, whose existence is not guaranteed in every game. The problem of deciding whether a game possesses an ESS has been shown to be $Σ_{2}^{P}$-complete by Conitzer using the preceding important wor… ▽ More The concept of an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), introduced by Smith and Price, is a refinement of Nash equilibrium in 2-player symmetric games in order to explain counter-intuitive natural phenomena, whose existence is not guaranteed in every game. The problem of deciding whether a game possesses an ESS has been shown to be $Σ_{2}^{P}$-complete by Conitzer using the preceding important work by Etessami and Lochbihler. The latter, among other results, proved that deciding the existence of ESS is both NP-hard and coNP-hard. In this paper we introduce a "reduction robustness" notion and we show that deciding the existence of an ESS remains coNP-hard for a wide range of games even if we arbitrarily perturb within some intervals the payoff values of the game under consideration. In contrast, ESS exist almost surely for large games with random and independent payoffs chosen from the same distribution. △ Less

Submitted 27 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

Comments: 24 pages, 4 figures

MSC Class: 68Q01