A partition-based similarity for classification distributions
Authors:
Hayden S. Helm,
Ronak D. Mehta,
Brandon Duderstadt,
Weiwei Yang,
Christoper M. White,
Ali Geisa,
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Carey E. Priebe
Abstract:
Herein we define a measure of similarity between classification distributions that is both principled from the perspective of statistical pattern recognition and useful from the perspective of machine learning practitioners. In particular, we propose a novel similarity on classification distributions, dubbed task similarity, that quantifies how an optimally-transformed optimal representation for a…
▽ More
Herein we define a measure of similarity between classification distributions that is both principled from the perspective of statistical pattern recognition and useful from the perspective of machine learning practitioners. In particular, we propose a novel similarity on classification distributions, dubbed task similarity, that quantifies how an optimally-transformed optimal representation for a source distribution performs when applied to inference related to a target distribution. The definition of task similarity allows for natural definitions of adversarial and orthogonal distributions. We highlight limiting properties of representations induced by (universally) consistent decision rules and demonstrate in simulation that an empirical estimate of task similarity is a function of the decision rule deployed for inference. We demonstrate that for a given target distribution, both transfer efficiency and semantic similarity of candidate source distributions correlate with empirical task similarity.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
A Simple Lifelong Learning Approach
Authors:
Joshua T. Vogelstein,
Jayanta Dey,
Hayden S. Helm,
Will LeVine,
Ronak D. Mehta,
Tyler M. Tomita,
Haoyin Xu,
Ali Geisa,
Qingyang Wang,
Gido M. van de Ven,
Chenyu Gao,
Weiwei Yang,
Bryan Tower,
Jonathan Larson,
Christopher M. White,
Carey E. Priebe
Abstract:
In lifelong learning, data are used to improve performance not only on the present task, but also on past and future (unencountered) tasks. While typical transfer learning algorithms can improve performance on future tasks, their performance on prior tasks degrades upon learning new tasks (called forgetting). Many recent approaches for continual or lifelong learning have attempted to maintain perf…
▽ More
In lifelong learning, data are used to improve performance not only on the present task, but also on past and future (unencountered) tasks. While typical transfer learning algorithms can improve performance on future tasks, their performance on prior tasks degrades upon learning new tasks (called forgetting). Many recent approaches for continual or lifelong learning have attempted to maintain performance on old tasks given new tasks. But striving to avoid forgetting sets the goal unnecessarily low. The goal of lifelong learning should be to use data to improve performance on both future tasks (forward transfer) and past tasks (backward transfer). In this paper, we show that a simple approach -- representation ensembling -- demonstrates both forward and backward transfer in a variety of simulated and benchmark data scenarios, including tabular, vision (CIFAR-100, 5-dataset, Split Mini-Imagenet, and Food1k), and speech (spoken digit), in contrast to various reference algorithms, which typically failed to transfer either forward or backward, or both. Moreover, our proposed approach can flexibly operate with or without a computational budget.
△ Less
Submitted 11 June, 2024; v1 submitted 27 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
