-
The Challenges and Opportunities in Creating an Early Warning System for Global Pandemics
Authors:
David C. Danko,
James Golden,
Charles Vorosmarty,
Anthony Cak,
Fabio Corsi,
Christopher E. Mason,
Rafael Maciel-de-Freitas,
Dorottya Nagy-Szakal,
Niamh B. OHara
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic revealed that global health, social systems, and economies can be surprisingly fragile in an increasingly interconnected and interdependent world. Yet, during the last half of 2022, and quite remarkably, we began dismantling essential infectious disease monitoring programs in several countries. Absent such programs, localized biological risks will transform into global shocks…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic revealed that global health, social systems, and economies can be surprisingly fragile in an increasingly interconnected and interdependent world. Yet, during the last half of 2022, and quite remarkably, we began dismantling essential infectious disease monitoring programs in several countries. Absent such programs, localized biological risks will transform into global shocks linked directly to our lack of foresight regarding emerging health risks. Additionally, recent studies indicate that more than half of all infectious diseases could be made worse by climate change, complicating pandemic containment. Despite this complexity, the factors leading to pandemics are largely predictable but can only be realized through a well-designed global early warning system. Such a system should integrate data from genomics, climate and environment, social dynamics, and healthcare infrastructure. The glue for such a system is community-driven modeling, a modern logistics of data, and democratization of AI tools. Using the example of dengue fever in Brazil, we can demonstrate how thoughtfully designed technology platforms can build global-scale precision disease detection and response systems that significantly reduce exposure to systemic shocks, accelerate science-informed public health policies, and deliver reliable healthcare and economic opportunities as an intrinsic part of the global sustainable development agenda.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Beyond Low Earth Orbit: Biological Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Self-Driving Labs
Authors:
Lauren M. Sanders,
Jason H. Yang,
Ryan T. Scott,
Amina Ann Qutub,
Hector Garcia Martin,
Daniel C. Berrios,
Jaden J. A. Hastings,
Jon Rask,
Graham Mackintosh,
Adrienne L. Hoarfrost,
Stuart Chalk,
John Kalantari,
Kia Khezeli,
Erik L. Antonsen,
Joel Babdor,
Richard Barker,
Sergio E. Baranzini,
Afshin Beheshti,
Guillermo M. Delgado-Aparicio,
Benjamin S. Glicksberg,
Casey S. Greene,
Melissa Haendel,
Arif A. Hamid,
Philip Heller,
Daniel Jamieson
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Space biology research aims to understand fundamental effects of spaceflight on organisms, develop foundational knowledge to support deep space exploration, and ultimately bioengineer spacecraft and habitats to stabilize the ecosystem of plants, crops, microbes, animals, and humans for sustained multi-planetary life. To advance these aims, the field leverages experiments, platforms, data, and mode…
▽ More
Space biology research aims to understand fundamental effects of spaceflight on organisms, develop foundational knowledge to support deep space exploration, and ultimately bioengineer spacecraft and habitats to stabilize the ecosystem of plants, crops, microbes, animals, and humans for sustained multi-planetary life. To advance these aims, the field leverages experiments, platforms, data, and model organisms from both spaceborne and ground-analog studies. As research is extended beyond low Earth orbit, experiments and platforms must be maximally autonomous, light, agile, and intelligent to expedite knowledge discovery. Here we present a summary of recommendations from a workshop organized by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration on artificial intelligence, machine learning, and modeling applications which offer key solutions toward these space biology challenges. In the next decade, the synthesis of artificial intelligence into the field of space biology will deepen the biological understanding of spaceflight effects, facilitate predictive modeling and analytics, support maximally autonomous and reproducible experiments, and efficiently manage spaceborne data and metadata, all with the goal to enable life to thrive in deep space.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Beyond Low Earth Orbit: Biomonitoring, Artificial Intelligence, and Precision Space Health
Authors:
Ryan T. Scott,
Erik L. Antonsen,
Lauren M. Sanders,
Jaden J. A. Hastings,
Seung-min Park,
Graham Mackintosh,
Robert J. Reynolds,
Adrienne L. Hoarfrost,
Aenor Sawyer,
Casey S. Greene,
Benjamin S. Glicksberg,
Corey A. Theriot,
Daniel C. Berrios,
Jack Miller,
Joel Babdor,
Richard Barker,
Sergio E. Baranzini,
Afshin Beheshti,
Stuart Chalk,
Guillermo M. Delgado-Aparicio,
Melissa Haendel,
Arif A. Hamid,
Philip Heller,
Daniel Jamieson,
Katelyn J. Jarvis
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Human space exploration beyond low Earth orbit will involve missions of significant distance and duration. To effectively mitigate myriad space health hazards, paradigm shifts in data and space health systems are necessary to enable Earth-independence, rather than Earth-reliance. Promising developments in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning for biology and health can address…
▽ More
Human space exploration beyond low Earth orbit will involve missions of significant distance and duration. To effectively mitigate myriad space health hazards, paradigm shifts in data and space health systems are necessary to enable Earth-independence, rather than Earth-reliance. Promising developments in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning for biology and health can address these needs. We propose an appropriately autonomous and intelligent Precision Space Health system that will monitor, aggregate, and assess biomedical statuses; analyze and predict personalized adverse health outcomes; adapt and respond to newly accumulated data; and provide preventive, actionable, and timely insights to individual deep space crew members and iterative decision support to their crew medical officer. Here we present a summary of recommendations from a workshop organized by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, on future applications of artificial intelligence in space biology and health. In the next decade, biomonitoring technology, biomarker science, spacecraft hardware, intelligent software, and streamlined data management must mature and be woven together into a Precision Space Health system to enable humanity to thrive in deep space.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Metagenomics for clinical diagnostics: technologies and informatics
Authors:
Caitlin Loeffler,
Keylie M. Gibson,
Lana Martin,
Liz Chang,
Jeremy Rotman,
Ian V. Toma,
Christopher E. Mason,
Eleazar Eskin,
Joseph P. Zackular,
Keith A. Crandall,
David Koslicki,
Serghei Mangul
Abstract:
The human-associated microbiome is closely tied to human health and is of substantial clinical interest. Metagenomics-based tools are emerging for clinical diagnostics, tracking the spread of diseases, and surveillance of potential pathogens. In some cases, these tools are overcoming limitations of traditional clinical approaches. Metagenomics has limitations barring the tools from clinical valida…
▽ More
The human-associated microbiome is closely tied to human health and is of substantial clinical interest. Metagenomics-based tools are emerging for clinical diagnostics, tracking the spread of diseases, and surveillance of potential pathogens. In some cases, these tools are overcoming limitations of traditional clinical approaches. Metagenomics has limitations barring the tools from clinical validation. Once these hurdles are overcome, clinical metagenomics will inform doctors of the best, targeted treatment for their patients and provide early detection of disease. Here we present an overview of metagenomics methods with a discussion of computational challenges and limitations.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2020; v1 submitted 25 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Assessing Technical Performance in Differential Gene Expression Experiments with External Spike-in RNA Control Ratio Mixtures
Authors:
Sarah A. Munro,
Steve P. Lund,
P. Scott Pine,
Hans Binder,
Djork-Arné Clevert,
Ana Conesa,
Joaquin Dopazo,
Mario Fasold,
Sepp Hochreiter,
Huixiao Hong,
Nederah Jafari,
David P. Kreil,
Paweł P. Łabaj,
Sheng Li,
Yang Liao,
Simon Lin,
Joseph Meehan,
Christopher E. Mason,
Javier Santoyo,
Robert A. Setterquist,
Leming Shi,
Wei Shi,
Gordon K. Smyth,
Nancy Stralis-Pavese,
Zhenqiang Su
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
There is a critical need for standard approaches to assess, report, and compare the technical performance of genome-scale differential gene expression experiments. We assess technical performance with a proposed "standard" dashboard of metrics derived from analysis of external spike-in RNA control ratio mixtures. These control ratio mixtures with defined abundance ratios enable assessment of diagn…
▽ More
There is a critical need for standard approaches to assess, report, and compare the technical performance of genome-scale differential gene expression experiments. We assess technical performance with a proposed "standard" dashboard of metrics derived from analysis of external spike-in RNA control ratio mixtures. These control ratio mixtures with defined abundance ratios enable assessment of diagnostic performance of differentially expressed transcript lists, limit of detection of ratio (LODR) estimates, and expression ratio variability and measurement bias. The performance metrics suite is applicable to analysis of a typical experiment, and here we also apply these metrics to evaluate technical performance among laboratories. An interlaboratory study using identical samples shared amongst 12 laboratories with three different measurement processes demonstrated generally consistent diagnostic power across 11 laboratories. Ratio measurement variability and bias were also comparable amongst laboratories for the same measurement process. Different biases were observed for measurement processes using different mRNA enrichment protocols.
△ Less
Submitted 18 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
Comprehensive evaluation of differential expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data
Authors:
Franck Rapaport,
Raya Khanin,
Yupu Liang,
Azra Krek,
Paul Zumbo,
Christopher E. Mason,
Nicholas D. Socci,
Doron Betel
Abstract:
High-throughput sequencing of RNA transcripts (RNA-seq) has become the method of choice for detection of differential expression (DE). Concurrent with the growing popularity of this technology there has been a significant research effort devoted towards understanding the statistical properties of this data and the development of analysis methods. We report on a comprehensive evaluation of the comm…
▽ More
High-throughput sequencing of RNA transcripts (RNA-seq) has become the method of choice for detection of differential expression (DE). Concurrent with the growing popularity of this technology there has been a significant research effort devoted towards understanding the statistical properties of this data and the development of analysis methods. We report on a comprehensive evaluation of the commonly used DE methods using the SEQC benchmark data set. We evaluate a number of key features including: assessment of normalization, accuracy of DE detection, modeling of genes expressed in only one condition, and the impact of sequencing depth and number of replications on identifying DE genes. We find significant differences among the methods with no single method consistently outperforming the others. Furthermore, the performance of array-based approach is comparable to methods customized for RNA-seq data. Perhaps most importantly, our results demonstrate that increasing the number of replicate samples provides significantly more detection power than increased sequencing depth.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2013; v1 submitted 22 January, 2013;
originally announced January 2013.
